Top-Download.net completely new version

SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch
Status
Not open for further replies.

lajkonik86

Established Member
Impact
0
A while ago it used to avarage above 3500 uniques per day. Lately mainly because of a lack of time on my behalf it dropped to 500 uniques.

So i decided it was time to revitalize top-download.net with a new look new content and new promotion.

But before i get into the promotion part i would like your opinion about the website and make some final adjustments.


Regards,
Thierry http://www.top-download.net
 
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
GoDaddyGoDaddy
Its ok. I don't like the font used, use arial or tahoma maybe. I also feel its maybe a bit too on the simple side, and the gray bar on the side awkwardly distracts from the main site content. Also the header seems to be beveled, this should be taken off immediately! :lol: I hate that bevel effect! :)

Apart from that, its ok really! :)
 
0
•••
not bad....
 
0
•••
to be honest i really dont like the design at all, to dark, bad use of fonts and colours, and the header doesnt really fit in with the rest of the site.
 
0
•••
Change the font :)..
 
0
•••
I don't like the whole design itself, just nothing fits in my eyes. Best of luck with the revap and advertising.
 
0
•••
Hi

Your site has a good header that makes good use of fades and colours. The photography is quite nice. Perhaps the text in the header could be a little different and not repeated below. Make it a little larger with perhaps an outline.

The navigation looks nice with the orange on the left taken from the header. Try and make the font consistent - the navigation has a different font to the links "Login - Register".

The box on the left has space at the top - which seems unnecessary try aligning that to the top.

Perhaps you could have a welcome paragraph at the top on the main page. For search engine optimisation you could add some more in your META... like a description. You are not using valid html: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.top-download.net/ and you have lots of CSS errors http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/check/referer

The word "tops" in your navigation has an ambiguous meaning - try to be quite blatant as to what link is for. In this case - the word "tops" seems to mean "demos"
 
0
•••
thanks for the advice
P.S. i'm also looking for button exchanges
 
0
•••
lajkonik86 said:
P.S. i'm also looking for button exchanges
how much traffic are you getting now?
 
0
•••
Umm, firstly, try and improve a bit on the English.
Secondly, change the font and header so it fits in with the rest of the site.
Thirdly, put a little bit of an introduction on the homepage to explain what the site is about :)

Other than that, there's a lot of potential for a brilliant site.
 
0
•••
doesnt look bad, but why dont you try a clean layout? get more downloads and not only demos most people will download the demos on the official website.
 
0
•••
Try and get more news items... add more content.
I've seen some of the ugliest layouts with huge amount of visitors, so I guess you should concentrate on the content.
 
0
•••
Changed the fonts, articles are in my opinion a lot easier to read now.
Thanks for advice.

Please critique some more
 
0
•••
I don't really like it. The banner is too advanced for the rest of the site.
 
0
•••
Good job! The flame effects on the logo look particularly neat.
 
0
•••
Hey,

Doesn't look that bad. I like the image in the header, looks really neat an also the image in the right content area. However the choice of colors are not so good, color scheme is a little too dark, menu needs some improvement.

SW
 
0
•••
PoorDoggie said:
how much traffic are you getting now?
Currently 650 uniques per day and rising
 
0
•••
Status
Not open for further replies.
Dynadot — .com TransferDynadot — .com Transfer
CatchedCatched

We're social

Escrow.com
Spaceship
Rexus Domain
CryptoExchange.com
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
DomainEasy — Live Options
DomDB
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back