Dynadot

Showcase and Discuss your Token Domains

NameSilo
Watch

Woke Monkey

Account Closed (Requested)
Impact
489
The world is being Tokenized!

Everything ranging from Art (NFT’s, Collectibles), Money (Cryptoassets, e-money Tokens, Stable Tokens), Finance (DeFi Tokens), Advertising to Gaming, everything is being tokenized on a Blockchain platform somewhere, even your Time/Attention.

If it exists right now then it’s probably going to get tokenized.

Do you currently hold any Token Domains?
 
Last edited:
6
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
1
•••
Imagine spending 69 million only to find out you don’t own the copyright! :xf.eek:

This is the very important thing 'I think people don't understand' about buying NFTs

"I think that people don't understand that when you buy, you have the token [or NFT]. You can display the token and show you own the token, but, you don't own the copyright" to the art that is represented by the token, Winkelmann, 37, says.

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/26/digital-artist-beeple-common-misunderstanding-about-nfts.html
 
3
•••
*removed*
 
Last edited:
1
•••
OneTokens.com、,DAN,Make Offer(y)
 
1
•••
Source: Diem Association.

597FC4D5-8A11-49C8-B4E0-7EFFF8B97BE5.jpeg


All Hand Regs

MarketplaceTokens.com
LogisticsTokens.com
StoreOfValueTokens.com
ServicesTokens.com
BorrowingTokens.com
 
3
•••
Just closed a deal on 2 Keyword+ Tokens.com domains. Mid x,xxx each.

Will share when completed.
 
14
•••
What the actual!

So the seller has changed the price of 1 of the domains and wants me to up my offer.

That’s NOT how it works!

We agreed a deal. I’m not going to name and shame but I am out. End of!
 
1
•••
What the actual!

So the seller has changed the price of 1 of the domains and wants me to up my offer.

That’s NOT how it works!

We agreed a deal. I’m not going to name and shame but I am out. End of!

That's why it's advised to mention them only once the deal is really closed.
 
3
•••
I have TimechainToken and TimechainTokens both dotcoms.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
2
•••
1
•••
1
•••
Closed for me is when the money is in the bank...but that's just me.

Sorry to read the deal fell through. Pick yourself up, and on to the next...imo
 
7
•••
..
(dawtcom)


PictureTokens

.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Closed for me is when the money is in the bank...but that's just me.

Sorry to read the deal fell through. Pick yourself up, and on to the next...imo

Thanks mate,

Gonna take a breather from the Forum for a while.

The ground work’s been done and it’s starting to pay off. Would of been nice to secure those last couple but learned a valuable lesson there.
 
2
•••
Thanks mate,

Gonna take a breather from the Forum for a while.

The ground work’s been done and it’s starting to pay off. Would of been nice to secure those last couple but learned a valuable lesson there.

You have some great names. Hope you make a mint...cheers!
 
2
•••
@Levi_charlz Glad to see you are doing some aftermarket work, StableTokens, PaymentTokens...

These can work.

Keep grinding behind the scenes!
 
Last edited:
3
•••
0
•••
StockExchangeTokens.com

Still available.
 
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
added : stockcoinx.com and stockcoin.exchange
 
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
UK regulatory approach to cryptoassets and stablecoins: consultation and call for evidence

A random dip of +50 Responses I’ve found:

The Investment Association - theia.org


“With regard to the proposed new regulated category of ‘stable tokens’, we broadly agree that the ‘stable’ nature of these tokens makes them similar to traditional assets, and as a proxy for exposure to these assets directly, there is an argument for them to be regulated. We are supportive of HMT’s technology agnostic approach, where the focus is on regulating the activity rather than whether it relies on distributed ledger technology (DLT) or not. This is sensible given the technology’s rapidly evolving nature and also the different forms stable tokens may take in the future.”

https://www.theia.org/sites/default... to cryptoassets and stablecoins Mar21_0.pdf



Etrading Software - etradingsoftware.com

“The scope of DTI issuance is all fungible digital assets which use distributed ledger technology for their issuance, storage, exchange, record of ownership, or transaction validation, excluding central bank digital currencies. This scope includes all the digital tokens discussed in the consultation paper, such as stable tokens, exchange tokens, utility tokens as well as security tokens.”

https://www.etradingsoftware.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/ETS_Response_to_HMT_CP-20210321.pdf


Eden Block & RW Blears - Blears.com


“Rather, we recommend that we largely rely on the existing regulatory perimeter in relation to security tokens and e-money tokens, save for the changes to be made to include fiat-backed and commodity-backed stable tokens so that they are ‘in-scope’.”

https://www.blears.com/wp-content/u...-Cryptoassets-EB-RWB-Joint-Response-Paper.pdf


Global Digital Finance ‘GDF’ - gdf.io

“On the whole, GDF welcomes the proposed creation of a new regulated category of ‘stable tokens’. As mentioned in the response to question 1 of this Consultation Paper, stablecoins often do not fall within the current regulatory perimeter and therefore the creation of this new category will be useful.”

https://www.gdf.io/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/GDF-HMT-Consultation-Response.pdf


Association for Financial Markets in Europe - afme.ey

We welcome UK authorities in:

• Bringing stable tokens in scope of new, and proportionate, risk-based requirements; and

https://www.afme.eu/Portals/0/Dispa...1 AFME response HMT Crypto-assets (FINAL).pdf


Financial Markets Law Committee response - fmlc.org

“HM Treasury therefore proposes to introduce a regulatory regime for what it calls "stable tokens", which can be used as a means of payment, including stable tokens backed by single-fiat and those backed by other linked assets. The new regime would cover both firms issuing stable tokens and firms providing services facilitating the use of stable tokens, based upon a specified list of activities that the government considers should be regulated (including issuing, creating or destroying asset-linked and fiat-linked tokens, transmission of funds, and providing custody and administration of a stable token for a third party). Key participants likely to be caught include issuers, system operators, cryptoasset exchanges and wallet providers.

Stable tokens will interact with any specified investments under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities) Order 2001 (the “RAO”).”

http://fmlc.org/wp-content/uploads/...-Approach-to-Cryptoassets-and-Stablecoins.pdf


UK Finance response - ukfinance.org.uk

We are supportive of the definition by HMT of single fiat stabletokens and an approach that is based on payments regulation and note its similarity to the GFMA definition of Tokenised Commercial Bank Money.

https://www.ukfinance.org.uk/system/files/HMT Stablecoin UKF Response v1.0.pdf

Electronic Money Association - e-ma.org

“We concur with HMT’s position that “given the rapidly evolving market and hybrid nature of many tokens it is ... important that any classification is future-proof and sufficiently flexible”. From this perspective we do welcome the proposed regulated category of ‘stable tokens’. We consider that, as defined in the CP, it refers to a reality of crypto asset-based products, related actors, activities, services and emerging ecosystems that despite the ongoing market and technological developments are sufficiently well defined and indeed stable to allow for UK regulation to be shaped and passed in the near future.”

https://www.e-ma.org/emaweb/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/EMA-response-to-HMT-CP-on-Cryptoassets.pdf

 
0
•••
Back