negotiable OMNIVERSE-STANDARDS.ORG - Note the registration of metaverse-standards.org.

[WNC HOLDINGS]

Greetings! We're accepting reasonable offers for:

omniverse-standards.org

Registrar: Namecheap
Expiration: June 23, 2024

Payment: Escrow / Paypal / Dan

Note: metaverse-standards.org has been registered; and links to the Metaverse Standards Forum website.

PM Offers

Best Regards,

WNC HOLDINGS

 

[markfromslo]

What about all the numerous trademarks for Omniverse, including the two by Virtuix Holdings which are in the area that we're all excited about?

 

[WNC HOLDINGS]

What about all the numerous trademarks for Omniverse, including the two by Virtuix Holdings which are in the area that we're all excited about?

@markfromslo,

We hope all is well. Thank you for your inquiry. The domain listed here is relative to “Omniverse Standards”; and not the term “Omniverse” itself. There aren’t any pending or existing trademarks for Omniverse Standards at the moment. Even if there were, registration class would be a distinguishing factor as well.

As strong advocates for trademark rights and so forth, we’re committed to factoring relevant variables into choosing which domains we acquire, sell, broker and/or build-out. Rest assured, our goal is to offer domains that can be paired with use-cases that won’t present any potential liability for a client/buyer. Thank you again!

Chris
WNC HOLDINGS

 

[markfromslo]

So, honestly curious here, if I were to for example have Microsoft-standards.com, it's not a problem with Microsoft? No sure about that. Thanks.

 

[hawkeye]

Note the registration of metaverse-standards.org​

Ok, it was registered last month, 50 days before you regging omniverse-standards.org last week! So...what are we to be 'noting' about it??

Also you passed on regging the .com and .net, both of which are still available. As most experienced and not so experienced know, the .com is more desirable and sellable, so why did you pass on them??

And there are only 127 returned Google results for this term, some 4 years or more old. Not a popular term.

Are you sure you grasp the concept of domain investing? Or just 'think' you do? (Asking for a friend of course.)

Would be nice (interesting) to see what names you have regged so far, if you don't mind sharing.

 

[markfromslo]

Ok, it was registered last month, 50 days before you regging omniverse-standards.org last week! So...what are we to be 'noting' about it??

Also you passed on regging the .com and .net, both of which are still available. As most experienced and not so experienced know, the .com is more desirable and sellable, so why did you pass on them??

And there are only 127 returned Google results for this term, some 4 years or more old. Not a popular term.

Are you sure you grasp the concept of domain investing? Or just 'think' you do? (Asking for a friend of course.)

Would be nice (interesting) to see what names you have regged so far, if you don't mind sharing.

Not to mention that you can freely register the name without the dash. : omniversestandards.org

On top of that, you can also register the .com without the dash: omniversestandards.com

Pretty crazy. Seller must be new at this, as you said.

 

[WNC HOLDINGS]

Ok, it was registered last month, 50 days before you regging omniverse-standards.org last week! So...what are we to be 'noting' about it??

Also you passed on regging the .com and .net, both of which are still available. As most experienced and not so experienced know, the .com is more desirable and sellable, so why did you pass on them??

And there are only 127 returned Google results for this term, some 4 years or more old. Not a popular term.

Are you sure you grasp the concept of domain investing? Or just 'think' you do? (Asking for a friend of course.)

Would be nice (interesting) to see what names you have regged so far, if you don't mind sharing.

@hawkeye,

We hope all is well. Thank you for taking the time to express your viewpoint. It’s apparent your assessment is driven by your endorsement of "the status-quo approach to domain investing". It’s worth noting that we acquire domains for specific use-cases and projects. Our acquisitions aren’t driven by the current domain investing culture. We acquire “assets we deem appropriate”; and “not whatever’s available for registration”.

With regard to “Note the registration of metaverse-standards.org”, we were merely highlighting the use of a hyphenated domain, with a .org extension, for an initiative involving many of the biggest names in the metaverse space. We’re aware of the allegiance some investors have to short .coms. However, we factor language, readability and future use-case in concert with what’s fitting. “Trends” don’t drive our strategy.

You inquired about domains we own. You’re welcome to visit proofofmint.com to get a gist of how we offer concepts and IP in tandem with domains. It’s simply a lander page that provides information about a scalable blockchain app concept that we’re brokering the sale of. It just so happens to come with centralized domains. What’s even better is the buyer receives the .proofofmint blockchain TLD which they actually own forever.

In closing, it’s important to reiterate that we respect whatever domain investing strategy an investor employs. However, many of the domains we acquire are simply meant to accent a broader IP-related objective or initiative. In laymen terms, our business objectives extend beyond just buying and selling domains. Domains are simply a tool we leverage.

We acquire what we prefer. Not what investor sentiment implies we should have.

Hopefully this has provided some clarity.

Chris
WNC HOLDINGS

 

[WNC HOLDINGS]

So, honestly curious here, if I were to for example have Microsoft-standards.com, it's not a problem with Microsoft? No sure about that. Thanks.

@markfromslo,

We hope all is well. When you say “a problem with Microsoft”, we’ll respectfully assume you’re referencing “Microsoft claiming infringement on their trademark”. It’s worth noting that a trademark holder can claim infringement on whatever grounds they deem appropriate; but the courts ultimately determine whether an infringement claim has merit etc. Registration class and the infringing use-case are among the factors weighed.

With regard to whether microsoft-standards.com would prompt an infringement claim, it comes down to how the domain would be utilized. If it’s being marketed as affiliated with the Microsoft Corporation, then it could be deemed a vehicle for misrepresentation and misleading the general public. Trademark laws are valuable; but they don't blanket-protect every word, phrase or image across the use-spectrum by default. Hence, there being "trademark classes".

Chris
WNC HOLDINGS

 

[WNC HOLDINGS]

Not to mention that you can freely register the name without the dash. : omniversestandards.org

On top of that, you can also register the .com without the dash: omniversestandards.com

Pretty crazy. Seller must be new at this, as you said.

@markfromslo,

We hope all is well. Your perspective has been noted. It’s important to reiterate that our investing strategy doesn’t involve registering everything that’s available. Having a preference isn’t relative to being new in the domain investment space. We simply know exactly what we’re aiming for.

We’re fortunate to be an entity whose investment progress isn’t contingent on how many variations of a domain we opt to register. We have the privilege of being able to register what we deem a perfect fit. Ex: We might opt for vibrant.skin instead of vibrantskin.com. It’s a choice.

Hopefully we were able to provide more clarity about our approach to operating in the domain investment space. We definitely realize there’s a culture that implies "1-5 character domains", ".com" and "using static-metrics to determine domain value" are the “ONLY” ways to invest.

It’s fair to say we take “an alternative approach”. Even if some believe this somehow translates to being “new” in the domain investment space.

Chris
WNC HOLDINGS

 

[hawkeye]

It’s worth noting that we acquire domains for specific use-cases and projects. Our acquisitions aren’t driven by the current domain investing culture.

Yet your post starts out as this -

Greetings! We're accepting reasonable offers for:

omniverse-standards.org

Registrar: Namecheap
Expiration: June 23, 2024

Payment: Escrow / Paypal / Dan

So I guess your post here is considered to be a 'specific use-case or project' which in this case is to sell this domain name you 'invested' in last week, right??

 

[WNC HOLDINGS]

Yet your post starts out as this -

So I guess your post here is considered to be a 'specific use-case or project' which in this case is to sell this domain name you 'invested' in last week, right??

@hawkeye,

The domain comes with extras. It includes logo, brief-paper and more. All of which were not advertised in the post to avoid any issues with violating forum posting guidelines. We’ve had matters arise in the past with “advertising” in the Namepros forum; so we’re left to detail the basics. The same basics you’re attempting to leverage here. We’re posting within the confines of what this forum allows. If it were our call, it would be a greater tolerance for creative posting on this platform. We guess there’s a time and place for everything.

Chris
WNC HOLDINGS