showcase Metaverse ~ Showcase your names and Discussion Thread~

[DomainBarracksRob]

Hey all figured with the recent .io 6 figure sale and the nice .xyz sale by a follow NP member. We should open a showcase and discussion thread here.

Metaverse is a fast growing keyword, term and niche! Let's share and discuss our name and news.

I've only got One to start with but its a GOOD one my favorite ending keyword on most names.


MetaverseHub.com



Welcome!

 

[gilescoley]

Show attachment 220858

I see Nvidia filed a trademark for "Omniverse" back in 2019.

 

[Igor Gabrielan]

I see Nvidia filed a trademark for "Omniverse" back in 2019.

If you open the website omniverse.com , you can see

OmniVerse™

Since June 2002

OmniVerse™ and Omniverse.com™ are the

intellectual property of Nexcorp LLC.

 

[gilescoley]

If you open the website omniverse.com , you can see

Yeah I saw that, but Nvidia have the Omniverse TM on USPTO

 

[HandmadeLife]

..

 

[DNIRick]

Verse List

HarpyVerse.com​

StagVerse.com​

CopperheadVerse.com​

https://domainurge.com/?s=verse

 

[redemo]

metastore24.com

Short, rhymes, very sexy metaverse domain name. Not interested in buying though.

 

[Andreas B.]

Short, rhymes, very sexy metaverse domain name. Not interested in buying though.

thank you, store and 24 makes a good rhyme, true

I may keep it for a while, if I don't get a decent price.

Selling the names as collection to a web 3 retail investor makes more sense than trying to sell each name seperately, I think.

Edit: If anyone knows a good source (buyer), I offer a commission of 15% on the sales price.

 

[TSL]

SafeMetaverse.com
GuildMetaverse.com
WagmiMetaverse.com
MetaverseMoon.com

 

[honestbobby]

Falcon metaverse in king

 

[justlife]

If you open the website omniverse.com , you can see

So we should avoid all omniverse names?

 

[Igor Gabrielan]

So we should avoid all omniverse names?

I have the opposite conclusion, if Nvidia is not afraid to develop Omniverse, then we should not be afraid either. There are many protection classes, registration of a brand in one class does not prohibit use in other directions.

 

[gilescoley]

So we should avoid all omniverse names?

I think that is advisable. Nvidia can develop as they own the TM for Omniverse.

 

[DomainNature]

So we should avoid all omniverse names?

We are free to reg prefix Omni+anything or vice versa which is less attractive, however omniverse can be just like metaverse so that one corporation is not the only who can use this term.

 

[Aznagui]

I have 4meta.xyz

 

[Aznagui]

CosmicVerse.com
PlayMetaverse.xyz
ErisVerse.Com
AZverse.com
DespositVerse.com
OrcusVerse
FundamentalVerse.com
ObviousVerse.com
StyxVerse.Com

 

[Centauri]

Have seen this great ranking of all metaverse projects, by now.
And wanted to share.

Sandbox is at rank 1, by no surprise.

 

[Centauri]

[sorry for this stupid thumbnail; I know its an act to have zucks face so close]

 

[Elad n]

Most likely people will renew until they drop.

I wouldnt buy a name for one specific buyer especially if it's not .com

 

[Centauri]

Most likely people will renew until they drop.

I wouldnt buy a name for one specific buyer especially if it's not .com

well,
are there any examples of successfully running meta( ).com / or ( )meta.com websites?!

just as example:
https://www.metapay.com/
https://www.metagaming.com/
https://metanews.com/

 

[Centauri]

Will Facebook come again for metapay. , metapayments. , metabank. and meta. !!!!!


Or we will renew and renew and renew and renew and ren,,,,,,,

No need to come back for:

metapay.com > fully functional website >> has nothing to do with Meta Platforms Inc.
metabank.com > fully functional website >> has nothing to do with Meta Platforms Inc.
metapayments.com > not resolving

both websites seem to have no legal problems with running their sites using these domains,
& naming themself alike.
Just like many other, who run a legal business using 'meta' in their domain.


So, my question:
I posted earlier 3 running sites, which seem to have no legal problems.
@Elad n and @HandmadeLife claim that if required, only Meta Platforms Inc. would be interested in (any) meta( ).com domain.

So you could impossible earn any money trading / or developing meta( ).com domains, as no one would be interested in it...


However, reality shows clearly that this is NOT the case.

Otherwise, please elaborate me in a different view with real arguments.


Thanks

 

[NYJimbo]

I think for the Metaverse to work, the equipment is going to have to be very cheap and you charge for the content. Right now the equipment (very little exists) is very expensive and there is little content.

While we are seeing a huge commitment by Meta/Facebook and a few dozen large companies, 99% of businesses out there are just sitting on the sidelines waiting for it to blow up.

Expect to renew all of your good "meta" names for another year or two before this thing really gets rolling.

 

[Centauri]

I think for the Metaverse to work, the equipment is going to have to be very cheap and you charge for the content. Right now the equipment (very little exists) is very expensive and there is little content.

While we are seeing a huge commitment by Meta/Facebook and a few dozen large companies, 99% of businesses out there are just sitting on the sidelines waiting for it to blow up.

Expect to renew all of your good "meta" names for another year or two before this thing really gets rolling.

yep - for most names & likelihood, you might be totally right.

Most companies are waiting for big great news, just like many domainers...


this is however different than to say:
no one will be interested /
if meta inc. does not come along, you won't get any chances to sell your name.

 

[Elad n]

I never said that, good luck I have no time for that.

 

[meanieme]

No need to come back for:

metapay.com > fully functional website >> has nothing to do with Meta Platforms Inc.
metabank.com > fully functional website >> has nothing to do with Meta Platforms Inc.

both websites seem to have no legal problems with running their sites using these domains,
& naming themself alike.
Just like many other, who run a legal business using 'meta' in their domain.

Not sure what you mean but these two ARE what Meta Platforms paid $60M to acquire. You will notice their front page indicates their new names are Pathward, because Meta Platforms now owns both names.

https://www.argusleader.com/story/n...thward-after-facebook-meta-buyout/7247271001/

 

[meanieme]

https://www.metagaming.com/
https://metanews.com/

If anyone owns/runs these two websites please let me know!
They seem to be news aggregators.