LOL. DotComAgency.com Profit for Year=$31,797 (GBP 19,873)

SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

Aggro

Established Member
Impact
42
1/ Straight from their accounts y/e 31 Jan 2012

Shareholders funds are ~ $1.63M (GBP 1.019M) so respectable, better than 99.9% of domainers in existence
But don't forget it's been in operation for over 11 years, since 28 Dec 2001,

Fat Ian might have paid himself & his wife over the years a small Salary or dividends to utilize the tax free allowance - but that's about the size of it, folks

Almost certain this is typically what many of the lower tier volume merchants (30,000+ domains) are actually making subsistence money similar to a low paid unskilled job :lol:
This includes all the wannabe volume merchants who bulked up quick with 1000's of crap hand regs (long tailed GEOs, mobis etc) such as RK Bhanots etc who once bragged about having the 'best Spanish .mobis in existence' :lol:

Did I mention that BREAK-EVEN on 30,000 domains is ~ $260,000 pa reg fees ($21,675/mth)?:o
That's before making a single penny in Profit


2/ Let me remind how I schooled Snoopy back in 2006 who thought they were "making millions":
http://www.namepros.com/domain-name-discussion/167191-is-dotcomagency-making-millions.html

In fact, back in 2004, the operation was actually technically insolvent (Shareholder funds < 0)


3/ Contrary to all the industry hype (the picture many bloggers would like their accolytes to believe)

Net of reg fees & any salaries, most are making jack :'(

Many like to talk just about Revenue (that's the bigger number before deduction reg fees :lol:)
But conveniently ignore that pesky recurring annual rent (aka reg fees) across the whole portfolio, warts & all

Funny - like a gambler who only talks up the fewer winners - how domainers talk about making eg 9567% return on that single reg fee name that sold BUT conveniently ignore the sales price across the WHOLE PORTFOLIO (including all the vast majority loser domains that did not sell, incurring reg fees every year)


4/ Yeah yeah, yada yada I've heard all the usual domainer soundbite memes across the blogosphere repeated ad infinitum until it turns into gospel:

- how all those "domaining for a living" types were doing so well (:lol:)
- how many were all doing millions :lol:

In fact, most of these middle-aged FULL-TIME domainer types (you know who you are) are making subsistence money (c $20,000-$30,000 profit if that after reg fees/expenses)
AND only by living like a hermit in some cheap place in Ohio/Oklahoma etc) :lol::bah:


5/ This coming year

I expect more & more *full-time domaining for a living* types to be POUNDED OUT & back to their cubicles (if they can still land a job in this economy & with their mediocre skills!)

You can't expect to be doing this 'full time for a living' for much longer on 3000-5000 domains & mediocre Tier 3 domains, at that

Of course, everyone likes to draw the line of demarcation below THEIR OWN heels, thinking they are luckier, more skilled, work harder, smarter, better negotiation technique etc than the rest

But given the overall quality of their 'portfolio' is similar to the rest of the marginal domainers (Marginal=a few $1000-2000 sales a mth, the odd $5000 sale), the 'law of averages' would dictate it will soon revert to the mean.
In other words, you will soon be pounded out from full time back to being a part timer

Most of these types are, at best, 1 or 2 (lost) sales away from having to pawn their assets or domains for quick cash :lol:
The equivalent of the jobber living paycheck 2 paycheck

Well news bud, coming soon your luck's gonna run out :bingo:


6/ Every year more & more domainers with a few yrs experience quietly slip away from domaining 'full time' or the 'scene'

These are replaced with more idiots with no money or sense but vigour & big dreams (Uzomas, Jeff Schneiders, blog comments whores etc etc)

The same could be said of the domain speculation cycle what Buffett said about progress:
"First come the innovators, then come the imitators, then come the idiots." :hehe:

And on the cycle goes

Take that to the bank! :bah:_\|/_
 
2
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
AfternicAfternic
Well $31,797 profit is still a profit if renewals are paid for.

But I hope the owners have a day job, then it is a nice side revenue.

They are doing better than that other entity, I can't remember which one. Was it Giantdomains ? The company was in dormant status - obvious not doing a lot of business.

Anyway, I give them credit for being incorporated, that means they had a business plan of some sort. 99.9% of domainers will never take the process that far :)

There is money to be made in domains, but very very few people can make it a full-time job.
I think domainers vastly overestimate the potential of the market. Domains are not commodities or household products.
People buy a new mobile phone every two years or so but won't be buying a domain name every two years if ever. No wonder the lottery mindset is so prevalent in domaining ;)
 
3
•••
Why in gods name would you even *want* it to be a full time job?

Excluding the tiny handful like Schilling for whom managing a colossal portfolio is a full time business that's rewarding in and of itself, sitting around waiting for emails, sending out spam and scanning lists doesn't sound like a rewarding working life to me. The argument can be made that all the free time can be put to good use, but sure as the sun occasionally shines on a dogs ass, you're ultimately left with the Retiree's Dilemma at an early age- working to have free time but then wanting something to do- usually WITHOUT the reliable enough income stream to support a rewarding and stable life with all that open calendar space.

When online poker blew up, a lot of 19, 22, 25 year old "pros" made some pretty serious lamentations about what they'd done with their lives, how they wish they'd taken a more conventional path, sought out more rewarding endeavors, etc.

Different strokes for different folks, all I know is if my life were ever reduced to 'domaining', I'd consider that a completely failed life no matter how much money I did or didn't make.
 
3
•••
Aggro do you deal in domains? could you share your results for 2012, does not matter good or bad
 
0
•••
Why in gods name would you even *want* it to be a full time job?
Right, it doesn't have to.

It's a scary thought that people regarded as the most successful in this industry aren't marking a comfortable living at all.
On top of that, the business model is shaky because sales are unpredictable - the revenue is variable but the expenses (renewal fees) will always be there.

Aggro do you deal in domains? could you share your results for 2012, does not matter good or bad
I wish I could share mine but you know, it's between me, my accountant and the IRS, oh and the sales are always under NDA haha :P
 
1
•••
Examining the numbers in more details...
He ain't got sh t :bah::zzz:

1/ And this guy would be considered one of the more successful domainers in domainerdom
He's been in the game for over 11 Years.
So he's not some Johnny-cum-lately we're talking about.

2/ Note that Shareholders Funds $1.63M (GBP 1.019M), might look somewhat impressive
But is it?

It's not actually all liquid cash

It's represented by the following assets:
- Stocks (Inventory)= $1.142M (GBP 714,000) - being domains stated at historical cost
- Cash = $410,000 (GBP 256,000)
- with remainder being debtors & creditors


So in fact, actual Cash ($410,000=GBP 256,000) is only ~25% of Shareholders Funds
($1.63M)
(I'll spell it out. That's less than a $Million for the get-rich-quick wannabes that domaining invariably attracts, like flies to sh t :bingo:)
The balance in 'Stocks' is, in essence, domain 'funny money's' worth. :lol:

3/ Needless to say, if you can't realize it into cash quickly & easily, you can't get a loan based on domain 'collateral' (no, I don't consider domain pawning viable. Latona already mined the better quality domains yrs ago before quitting), & you can't spend it, it's 'funny money'

Cash flow is often, at best, slightly positive.
When the economy gets worse this guy just about breaks even


4/ This is after over 11 yrs of trading!!!
So we're looking at average net cash of $41,000 pa (=GBP 25,600 pa)

These are the cold, hard facts! :kickass:

5/ As for the Historical Cost accounting policy ramifications, no doubt there will be stuff in 'Stocks' (Inventory) vastly underpriced (at cost compared to retail price) which can be realized relatively easily into cash, far exceeding the stated acquisition cost

But it works both ways.
The majority will be stuff acquired years ago for too high a price, or for which no end user will ever come forward in their lifetime.

I'm sure many domainers would love to state in their 'balance sheet', domains bought for crazy extravagant sums in bidding wars at NJ/Snapnames/Pool during the bubble years.
Well, chances are no one's ever going to pay anything close to that at all, if it gets inquiries at all.

I'm sure many many idiots & losers would LOVE to get back what they paid for some domains overpaid during the bubble years!
Doesn't necessarily mean they can ever sell at those prices, ever again, though.
Eg PlaceBets.com bought for $65,000, anyone??:bingo:
Just 1 of many, many examples flicking thru past DNJ reports


6/ Like I say: tons of domainers in this business play a game called 'creating the illusion that they are hugely successful', they hope to 'fake it 'til they make it' or sumpting. :bah::lol:

Let me ask you: if some of these long time vets were making $$$Millions, would they still be flogging their ass as a middle-aged 'Logo Designer' :'((no names needed. :loveyou:),
Does Warren Buffett still shake the sofa for loose change...! :lol:

Then you check out some of the others' home address...yup some hole in Ohio/Oklahoma, dirt cheap...
They certainly aren't living the highlife :lol:

(As for the fantasy they are living like a hermit but salting away all their $$$millions in offshore banks or making savvy investments...no, i don't believe that sh t)

Folks, there's a massive incongruency in what they try to publically portray, the stories they tell & the REALITY


Conclusion:
REALITY is: MOST ain't making sh t :wave::zzz:
 
2
•••
sounds like aggro failed and now gains happiness when he sees others fall. people like him are sad.
 
2
•••
And - why are u here?
 
0
•••
I don't know and don't care about this story, but if someone survived 11 years in this biz, hats off, thats good enough, and it must have worked one way or another. Most people give up after the first few months and either dissapear or end up as embittered haters who put their nose in other people's business and get a boner whenever they see someone else failed with something, because they don't have any kind of own business.

Anyway, most of us have a "regular" job anyway and domaining is just a hobby with an occasional side income (if any). So no need to educate us about the impossibility to make millions and live solely from domains.
I think most of us know that.

Sometimes i read some blogs if there is some interesting and detailed information about technical subjects, news, etc. which i did't know yet. I don't care how much money others are or aren't making. I am happy if people share their success and excitement with sales they make and report though.
Other than that, I only mind my own business.
 
Last edited:
3
•••
I seem to be making a living full time with domaining.
My wife works a full time job and I make more money then her.

The key is to keep your overhead low and buy quality domains at low prices.

As they say, it takes money to make money.

B-)
 
3
•••
Although I agree with the thrust of what Aggro is saying, I think he misrepresents the state of DotComAgency.com.

I think valuing domains at cost, could be a conservative valuation if they are indeed old domains. Clearly it's a valuation which has been accepted by their auditors. Stocks of $1,142,000 / 30,000 is only a value of $38/domain. That doesn't sound widely overpriced, imho. Sure, there will be a whole lot of dross domains which will never sell, but to counter that there are probably domains which are undervalued.

Cash at 1/4 of Shareholders Funds is also healthy, imho. Enough for about 1.5 years renewals. So it's a risky business. But we know that already.

But for me, it's Aggro's tone which is disturbing. Belittling a hard working individual with modest profits to show for his efforts. If he's paying $260,000/yr for renewals and still is able to make a modest profit, I take my hat off to him.

I took a look at his domains. They are not great. But if he can turn that much profit each year. It's ok by me. I wouldn't go around belittling his efforts.

I agree with Aggro's conclusion that domaining isn't a very profitable business for most domainers, as is evidenced by DotComAgency.com's Accounts. It requires a different approach than just stockpiling domains for sale.

I'd like to see Aggro's assessment of HugeDomains.com operations.
 
Last edited:
5
•••
Your example of a guy with $1.63M in shareholder funds ($410,000 cash) who's making a profit... to somehow show that domainers don't make money... is strange. Maybe he's buying bargains to flip when the economy improves, maybe he's got a few aces that are waiting for the right offer. Who knows.

Why do you even care? Why aren't you concentrating on your own money instead of worrying about how much other people make? You're either bitter, or a troll.
 
2
•••
Sure. The risk and work effort required for a small return is lousy.
 
0
•••
Aggro what you fail to realize is that $40,000 can go a long, long way in most of the world.

I say in Thailand you could live like a king on $40,000 a year. Plus tax free if you are lucky enough to be a citizen of a country that doesn't tax out of country income.

Not everyone aspires to be a "domainer millionare".
 
0
•••
But it works both ways.
The majority will be stuff acquired years ago for too high a price, or for which no end user will ever come forward in their lifetime.

I'm sure many domainers would love to state in their 'balance sheet', domains bought for crazy extravagant sums in bidding wars at NJ/Snapnames/Pool during the bubble years.
Well, chances are no one's ever going to pay anything close to that at all, if it gets inquiries at all.

I'm sure many many idiots & losers would LOVE to get back what they paid for some domains overpaid during the bubble years!

Most of what you said is totally true, but this is PARTICULARLY true and goesn't go spoken about much, these days.

There are a lot of people who spent a shitload on aftermarket domains 2004-2007 who , realistically, are operating that name at an enormous loss and unless they're willing to cut and take what they can, will be operating at a TOTAL loss since they'll hold that name forever, until their heirs sell it off for whatever it brings.

Since so much of the domain game relies on 'hope' and 'tomorrow', they hold on but with ever increasing regularity, you're beginning to see some of them demand/need liquidity and in many cases, selling for a loss, or at a 'reserve auction' that completely fails to come within 1/4 of what they originally paid.

This is what the smouldering remnants of a bubble look like, all those guys holding their stacks upon stacks of the same mint condition #1 issue comic books, oblivious to the fact that when time comes to make hay, the liquidity profile is tragically ugly.

---------- Post added at 12:15 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:14 AM ----------

Aggro what you fail to realize is that $40,000 can go a long, long way in most of the world.

I say in Thailand you could live like a king on $40,000 a year. Plus tax free if you are lucky enough to be a citizen of a country that doesn't tax out of country income.

Not everyone aspires to be a "domainer millionare".

This is also true.
I don't think Aggro is begrudging people who make a nice side income, or a modest primary income from domaining.

He's simply pointing out all the fantasists and bullshitters who strut around like they're rolling in domain-dough when in reality, they're not.

There's a TON of those types in domaining, although they're not nearly as common as they were a few years back. Most of them got pounded out. A couple renewal cycles will have that effect.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
I also agree with one of the above posters that if he survived for 11 years, he has to be doing something right.. And as for the 40k profit, do you know if he didn't buy any assets (other then domains) to bring the profit down? Why pay the IRS if you can buy assets that make you money and bring your profit margin down, which means you got less tax to pay and another possible income stream for the new year :)
 
0
•••
@Fonzie - But at an average value of only $38/domain I don't think the proprietor of DotComAgency is one of those people that Aggro and you are talking about. He looks in pretty good shape, actually. Apart from the risk of holding 30K of Domains ;) Which up to the date of his last accounts, he's managed quite well. Of course past performance is not any indication of future performance ;) But we all know that in this industry. He's managed his risk quite well over the boom and bust cycles he's been operating in. At least according to his last published accounts. We could all ask him if he thinks his risks & efforts have been worth the return. It would be interesting to hear his reply :)
 
Last edited:
0
•••
What I don't understand is aggro celebrating the "supposed fall". Laughing and happily waiting for others to fail. What a great human being posting that in a domain forum. Celebrate your own failures is that is what makes you happy! Also, what industry isn't falling? They all are!
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Dynadot — .com TransferDynadot — .com Transfer
Appraise.net

We're social

Escrow.com
Spaceship
Rexus Domain
CryptoExchange.com
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
DomainEasy — Zero Commission
DomDB
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back