- Impact
- 21
Most appraisals done here, or to be correct, in the appraisal section, are usually based upon price-to-reseller estimation.
I think there could be an appraisal section for people who are more serious and concerned about getting paid better, shouldn´t most domainers be that?
An example, among my domains, most of them are end user targeted. Like one I have, ElectroMechanicalComponents.com. Even the (too often wrong) Estibot rated $2100 . Over 400.000 results at Google with "quotations".
So, I should contact the end users, the electromechanical manufacturers directly. Doing big money talk directly? "If you don´t buy, one of your competitors may do it." !
I think this site would gain if there would be a section for that, providing better advice to really get the most out of end user domains especially.
Besides, almost any fairly good name can be potential too, so appraisals should, according to my view, reflect the overall potential, not strictly the reviewer´s personal taste.
Many domains shown here by people may reflect their individual preferences and in case of developing a domain with a web site and so on that is needed. Good websites are unique and some of them even have bad or boring names but that do well anyway.
I think that many are a bit overly concerned about the .com-thing. The com-is-king will decrease somewhat more and more, so shouldn´t we have that in mind?
Wikipedia is .org. My mom´s husband had a company with a .net-site (the first letter of the name was B). It was a success (as other companies he developed prior to that). He sold the company for millions.
I think net sounds better than com! Why com has become the big market king is simply because of phono semantic rules. Names with C, (g), m, d, b, p and s in particular just do better in the big markets (maybe in the smaler too). Coca cola, Canon, Kodak, MacDonalds, Godaddy, Google, Big Mac, Burger King, Business, Money, Market, MiCrosoft, Cash, Coin. And what else did you see.. a lot of o-s!
Last presidents? Nixon (a like 2nd camera name on the market, Nikon !), Gerald Ford, Carter, Ronald (alike donalds) Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush. Not just o but on.
(Who wins next time? Will phono semantics decide?!)
When thinking about big market, it´s not always right to try to compete with the big market. It might be better to aim at the medium market.
Think of AmericanIdol! Nearly all of them try to sing as the biggest artists and there is not room for many in that top. But if they tried to get just a little lower they find less competiton.
I think there could be an appraisal section for people who are more serious and concerned about getting paid better, shouldn´t most domainers be that?
An example, among my domains, most of them are end user targeted. Like one I have, ElectroMechanicalComponents.com. Even the (too often wrong) Estibot rated $2100 . Over 400.000 results at Google with "quotations".
So, I should contact the end users, the electromechanical manufacturers directly. Doing big money talk directly? "If you don´t buy, one of your competitors may do it." !
I think this site would gain if there would be a section for that, providing better advice to really get the most out of end user domains especially.
Besides, almost any fairly good name can be potential too, so appraisals should, according to my view, reflect the overall potential, not strictly the reviewer´s personal taste.
Many domains shown here by people may reflect their individual preferences and in case of developing a domain with a web site and so on that is needed. Good websites are unique and some of them even have bad or boring names but that do well anyway.
I think that many are a bit overly concerned about the .com-thing. The com-is-king will decrease somewhat more and more, so shouldn´t we have that in mind?
Wikipedia is .org. My mom´s husband had a company with a .net-site (the first letter of the name was B). It was a success (as other companies he developed prior to that). He sold the company for millions.
I think net sounds better than com! Why com has become the big market king is simply because of phono semantic rules. Names with C, (g), m, d, b, p and s in particular just do better in the big markets (maybe in the smaler too). Coca cola, Canon, Kodak, MacDonalds, Godaddy, Google, Big Mac, Burger King, Business, Money, Market, MiCrosoft, Cash, Coin. And what else did you see.. a lot of o-s!
Last presidents? Nixon (a like 2nd camera name on the market, Nikon !), Gerald Ford, Carter, Ronald (alike donalds) Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush. Not just o but on.
(Who wins next time? Will phono semantics decide?!)
When thinking about big market, it´s not always right to try to compete with the big market. It might be better to aim at the medium market.
Think of AmericanIdol! Nearly all of them try to sing as the biggest artists and there is not room for many in that top. But if they tried to get just a little lower they find less competiton.
Last edited:














