Domain was previously registered and expired on 2006 02 04.
It was register again by you on 16-aug-2006.
Isn't this a STOP warning?
IMO the ovt score of the typo was "created" by scripts searching for ovt domains from expired lists...
In fact, the original domain have a great alexa and ovt score with and without tld but the typo just have with TLD, a decent typo should have without tld too.
In the future, before you buy an ovt w/ext you should check it first, remember that ovt its only an indicator.
Anyway... we're talking about typos...it only depends of the number of people that misspells the name.
Even high OVT does not guarantee high traffic.
If you don't get traffic see if you can dump the name after tasting it, your registrar may extend the 5-day grace period to you...
first of all greatestjournal.com dont even have what i consedair a good ovt score 2K is not enaugh to go get typos for that domain (but this is my openion and that is how i work ) , but i agree about what callmoney said there you should do some home work like VOT W/Ex and ovt Wo/Ex , plus seach for the domain without Ex in google and see how many time ppl did that typo in websites exemple google Disneyyworld , etc... you got to do some home work befor registreing typos , BUT now with the system of REGISTER wait 4 days no traffic DELETE domain option at some registrars is reduceing the risk of stuck with the typo for all the year ,
FYI TV, "report" is typo'd in your sig...not sure if you meant to do that to show how easy it is to typo or what.
Anyways, to answer the original poster, that's not a particularly good typo IMO, and that's an awfully high percentage of the real site's OVT w/ ext for even a really good typo. "greatest" and "journal" are not all that hard to spell or type...there is a bit of room for misspellings for journal, but even those I would say there would likely not be OVT w/ ext for. There are no typos that stand out for that name although plurals are always good (greatestjournals.com). Still, I wouldn't put any of that name's typos as being good enough to have OVT w/ ext.
I have some of the best typos of an online casino that has over 2K OVT w/ext and none of the have any OVT w/ extension. As much as I would say use OVT to guide you through typos, you also have to watch out for something that looks too good to be true.