discuss Best Crypto Markets and Domains

[toughdomains]

had a few members sign up with some nice crypto names wanted to know what the best names are by our members.
Bitcoin
Crypto
Ether
Sia
Coin
Wallet
Blockchain
Sidechain
etc

 

[PAVAN]

I think Its a term used by developer's and sounds good too

https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc223897.aspx

https://bitcointalk.to/index.php?topic=56250.0

 

[newshunter]

(dawtcoms)

DLTWork

DLTLine

(DLT- Distributed Ledger Technology- the 'umbrella term' for blockchain, HashGraph etc)

 

[subjot]

 

[subjot]

 

[Ace3coiner]

Reported Snapped up

Domain Price Date Venue
coinuncle.com 850 USD 2018-04-08 GoDaddy
wintoken.com 601 USD 2018-04-08 GoDaddy
cryptorabbit.com 579 USD 2018-04-08 GoDaddy
cryptotask.com 219 USD 2018-04-08 NameJet
blockchaintransaction.com 185 USD 2018-04-08 NameJet
nevacoin.com 1,564 USD 2018-04-07 DropCatch
sigmablockchain.com 168 USD 2018-04-07 GoDaddy
spaceblockchain.com 128 USD 2018-04-07 GoDaddy
cryptoticketing.com 114 USD 2018-04-07 DropCatch

 

[Ace3coiner]

Bitcoin-Buying.com




$5.60 CPC​

 

[Ace3coiner]

AltCryptoBank.com​

 

[Natto]

CryptoEnabler (KING)
CryptoEnablers (KING)

 

[Bayan]

 

[Haykay2005]

Cryptolabs.com just sold at Sedo for $10k
Not my sale

 

[mrcurly]

Cryptolabs.com just sold at Sedo for $10k
Not my sale

Love that name

 

[BRANDERX]

Cryptolabs.com just sold at Sedo for $10k
Not my sale

& plural. Great.. thanks for reporting.

 

[Keith]

& plural. Great.. thanks for reporting.

And plural...exactly. Feels like someone overpaid imo.

 

[Haris]

how much do random LL+coin .com domains sell for?

 

[Mary Muse]

And plural...exactly. Feels like someone overpaid imo.

Unless it was an end-user, then it was priced perfectly. Who's to say that's not their exact-match? The price could've been much higher, depending on how badly they wanted it.

Sure the singular should go for much more, but let's not discount sales in a market that's hardly established. I can only imagine end-user pricing for the singular would be in the mid-to-upper $xx,xxx range, so to simply say someone overpayed is a bit of a stretch imo.

 

[mrcurly]

I think its a great name! $10k good price for buyer imo. I think the plural works. Tm probs tho?

 

[EZPZYO]

And plural...exactly. Feels like someone overpaid imo.

Unless it was an end-user, then it was priced perfectly. Who's to say that's not their exact-match? The price could've been much higher, depending on how badly they wanted it.

Sure the singular should go for much more, but let's not discount sales in a market that's hardly established. I can only imagine end-user pricing for the singular would be in the mid-to-upper $xx,xxx range, so to simply say someone overpayed is a bit of a stretch imo.

The singular version is Trademarked https://www.trademarkia.com/trademarks-search.aspx?tn=Crypto+Lab

 

[Mary Muse]

The singular version is Trademarked https://www.trademarkia.com/trademarks-search.aspx?tn=Crypto+Lab

Great looking out -- just one of many variables that could've played into the final sale price..

 

[Keith]

The singular version is Trademarked https://www.trademarkia.com/trademarks-search.aspx?tn=Crypto+Lab

Even worse for the buyer, unless they’re the TM holder. If they’re not the holder then $10k just got flushed.

 

[lambo.com]

Even worse for the buyer, unless they’re the TM holder. If they’re not the holder then $10k just got flushed.

Most guys here are clueless about these matters, including you

 

[Keith]

Most guys here are clueless about these matters, including you

Yeah, clueless. They could use it different blah blah blah. Good luck with that...

 

[EZPZYO]

Most guys here are clueless about these matters, including you

That's harsh bro

 

[lambo.com]

Yeah, clueless. They could use it different blah blah blah. Good luck with that...

A trademark does not represent totalitarian authority over it for the holder, esp when TM contains common language/ terms. That's how multiple TMs can coexist for same term with different registrants.

 

[BRANDERX]

The singular version is Trademarked https://www.trademarkia.com/trademarks-search.aspx?tn=Crypto+Lab

The domain is for sale too.. hmmm

 

[Keith]

A trademark does not represent totalitarian authority over it for the holder, esp when TM contains common language/ terms. That's how multiple TMs can coexist for same term with different registrants.

Sure, TMs can coexist for something like “apple” where you can brand that into anything. Something like cryptolab is completely different. But whatever works for you...