NameSilo

Are there legal issues with not-so-recently deceased people?

SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

Fixhotep

Established Member
Impact
1
I've done some searching and could not find any answers. I'm looking to see if there are any trademark/legal issues with not-so-recently deceased people. As in the last 100 years or so. for example:

WilliamTaft.com
BuddyHolly.com
GeorgeOrwell.com
SinclairLewis.com
ShoelessJoeJackson.com
JamesDean.com
BillieHoliday.com
JohnPershing.com
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
GoDaddyGoDaddy
There could be if the trademark rights are owned by someone... say a recording label for instance...or passed on to a relative or some such. Not too sure about others tho...
 
0
•••
WilliamTaft.com
BuddyHolly.com
GeorgeOrwell.com
SinclairLewis.com
ShoelessJoeJackson.com
JamesDean.com
BillieHoliday.com
JohnPershing.com

That's a great list to kick around, for a couple of reasons.

Public figures and entertainers have different standing with respect to right of publicity claims which, yes, can be passed on. Some celebrities have earned much more dead than alive. That's particularly true of, say, Buddy Holly, but also true of such merchandising powerhouses as Elvis and Marilyn Monroe.

Come to think of it, there are still quite a few more tour dates for Zappa Plays Zappa (http://www.zappaplayszappa.com/tourdates.html), and if anyone is in the Wilmington, Delaware area on the 30th, you can have my wife's ticket, since I can't persuade her to go with me. I wouldn't miss it for the world, though.

But, anyway, there was a pertinent lawsuit a while back brought by Arnold Schwarzenegger against people selling bobble head dolls. To the extent the dolls were trading on his image as governor of California, that's fine - as a politician, he does not have a claim to a right of publicity in it. However, to the extent the dolls were trading on his image as the Terminator, then that is an impermissible use of his reputation in connection with his goods and services as an entertainer.

So, right there, William Taft and John Pershing are historical public figures which you can fairly use for a variety of things.

On the other end of the scale would be Shoeless Joe Jackson, James Dean, Billie Holiday. James Dean is still probably worth a fortune in ongoing revenue in particular.

Scientific and literary figures are a crapshoot. The Tolkein estate is positively rabid:

http://domains.adrforum.com/domains/decisions/204083.htm

It turns out that for most run-of-the-mill dead celebrities, there is one licensing agency which seems to be their favorite. Compare the outcome in:

humphreybogart.com
http://domains.adrforum.com/domains/decisions/144631.htm
(complaint denied)

and

humphreybogart.com
http://domains.adrforum.com/domains/decisions/162770.htm
(Transfer)

That's right - same domain, same respondent, two different outcomes.

Same thing happened with the two AlbertEinstein.com cases at WIPO.

Here are some more NAF cases, since CMG Worldwide is something of a frequent flier there:

94187 jamesdean.net
CMG Worldwide, Inc. v James Dean Internet Club
Transferred

94661 chuckberry.com
CMG Worldwide, Inc. v Alessandro Bottai
Transferred

94909 leestrasberg.com
CMG Worldwide, Inc. v Eric Dluhos
Transferred

95641 princessdi.com princessdiana.com
CMG Worldwide, Inc. v Naughtya Page
Transferred

95645 dianaspencer.com
CMG Worldwide, Inc. v Steve Gregory
Transferred

95966 vincelombardi.com
CMG Worldwide, Inc. v Lombardi
Transferred

97061 EnglandsRose.com, Englands-Rose.com, DianasLegacy.com, DianasRoses.com, DazzlingDiRose.com, CandleInTheWindRose.com, DianasLegacyInRoses.com, ToMummyRose.com, ARoyalBrideRose.com, PrincessCharmingRose.com, ThePeoplesPrincessRose.com, LadyDianaRose.com, PrincessOfWalesRose.com, ShyDiRose.com, HerBoysRose.com
CMG Worldwide, Inc. v Bonnie Masterson
Claim Denied

You'll also notice in these, that CMG Worldwide wasn't the complainant, but the attorney was Lawrence Molnar, who, I swear, attracts dead clients like no lawyer I know. If you are famous, and dead, then he's the man you want to talk to:

96671 johnunitas.com
Unitas Management Corp. v Noreserve Inc.
Transferred


220007 annanicolesmith.com
Anna Nicole Smith v DNS Research, Inc.
Claim Denied

621110 kendrawilkinson.com
Kendra Wilkinson v Kendra Wilkinson
Transferred

702606 dorothydandridge.com
The Estate of Dorothy Dandridge v Dick Lobin
Transferred

Check out this guy's client list:

http://www.cmgww.com/clients.html

Now, interestingly, he includes General George S. Patton. IMHO, Pershing was a better general and the movie version of "Patton" was accurate insofar as, yes the man was a nutcase but, no, it did not make him a better military leader or strategist. If you're willing to tolerate unacceptably high losses for the sake of being a prima donna against a less well-equipped enemy then, yes, you too can be a "hero".
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Excellent info jb... so a good rule of thumb would be, historical, usually ok, entertainers, best left alone?
 
0
•••
so a good rule of thumb would be, historical, usually ok, entertainers, best left alone?

As a starting point, yes. But someone will come along and say, "But, wait, isn't Walt Disney a 'historical figure'?" In one sense, we are all destined to be merely historical figures...
 
0
•••
jberryhill said:
As a starting point, yes. But someone will come along and say, "But, wait, isn't Walt Disney a 'historical figure'?" In one sense, we are all destined to be merely historical figures...

True... but many people don't become "famous" until after they pass away, sometimes long after, and I personally would define historical and famous differently.

"Famous" people are well known before they die, such as Walt Disney (although not always - some people become famous after passing and leave no rights to anyone), but he also left a company with his name on it, and they have full rights to it, whereas someone like, say Martin Luther, is a Historical figure as he has long been ... dusted... and no entity (that I'm aware of at least) can claim rights to his name.

It would be interesting to see where a court would draw the line, but I think that is a pretty reasonable place to draw it.
 
0
•••
Appreciate the insight and loads of references jberryhill. Thanks!
 
0
•••
If you ever need a load of anything, I'm your guy.
 
0
•••
Dynadot — .com TransferDynadot — .com Transfer
Appraise.net

We're social

Escrow.com
Spaceship
Rexus Domain
CryptoExchange.com
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
DomainEasy — Payment Flexibility
DomDB
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back