Dynadot

discuss 10N and up .com discussion and showcase

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch

decades80

Account Closed (Requested)
Impact
2,261
Hi all,

I personally think 12N is the highest limit if you have good sequence or palindromes. Palindromes are for the long ones the best and the reason is you memorize just a half of the domain name. I see many of good ones in 10N and 11N area are taken, mostly of October, BUT there are 12Ns which seem to be rather empty. So if anyone would like to take a risk, go ahead. I have bought yesterday this 11N : 88882828888.com
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
To be really honest, I find 11Ns more cute than 10Ns. You can build triples in them (begins with triple, ends with triple and has a triple in the body. They are palindromes too 888X888X888 and they are very easy to remember. But all those unfortunately are already taken.
 
0
•••
I've been away for a few weeks... I have some catching up to do.. Here a a few of my 10n and up....


10N
8888888 799
888 99 888 99

12N
888 999 888 999
88 99 88 99 88 99
99 88 99 88 99 88
 
0
•••
888 99 888 99
888 999 888 999
Good
The rest is too long
 
0
•••
i can't find consistent information about why 4 is bad, i see many domains on here and on 4.cn with four in it ...??
 
0
•••
0
•••
I posted this in another thread but thought it should go here as well
~
Ok for some "homework" i have regged a domain that could be tied into a phone identity, 1088810888
The 10 at the beginning is the area code for Beiing, the remaining eight digits incorporate two lots of 888 and repeat the area code. So we end up with 1088810888 which is a handy name regardless. It all depends on how far you wish to go. Here is the link to Chinese area codes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_numbers_in_China
 
1
•••
88222888.com.
59998888.com
868666888.com
888868880.com
8686666888.com
8686668888.com
8686868888.com
8888686868.com
 
0
•••
I reg these:

88808880888.com
88818881888.com
88828882888.com
88838883888.com
88848884888.com
88858885888.com
88868886888.com
88878887888.com
88898889888.com
 
5
•••
Too complicated pattern...Not easy to memorize..

8686666888.com
8686668888.com
8686868888.com
8888686868.com
 
0
•••
0
•••
Phone Carriers limit the phone number to 10 digits and first few are common to carrier. I think more than 10 digits is not good as its away from the ability to remember. Unless it has lots of repeating numbers
 
0
•••
Area codes and the like make it a little hard to nail a phone based name
 
0
•••
AA BBB CC DDD
XX XXX XX XXX
 
0
•••
Phone Carriers limit the phone number to 10 digits and first few are common to carrier. I think more than 10 digits is not good as its away from the ability to remember. Unless it has lots of repeating numbers

Ok i went with 1088810888 Beijing and 2188821888 Shanghai ..... regardless of phone aspect these are handy 10N's
 
0
•••
Has anybody noticed that Fibonacci up to 21 is registered? its 10N.
 
1
•••
Fibonacci ,,,, Say What?
~
google has answered for me
~
Too lonnnng
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Has anybody noticed that Fibonacci up to 21 is registered? its 10N.

Apparently well past 21. The first available is ...

1123581321345589144233.com

You can have it, though. I don't want it. :)
 
1
•••
Actually "modern" fib (starting with 0) is reg'd further...
01123581321345589144233.com is taken...
01123581321345589144233377.com is not. !!
 
0
•••
I'm going back to shorty's
 
0
•••
I actually checked just till 21, didnt know that its taken up to 20N+, but shorter name would be nice for some sort of institute for Maths Science, or Mathematics enthusiasts, you can still find them :)
 
0
•••
Has anybody noticed that Fibonacci up to 21 is registered? its 10N.

I doubt it's worth much due to the extension but I grabbed this one a while back:
011235813 (Net)

Couldn't resist.
 
1
•••
0
•••
1
•••
0
•••

Im a nerd and domaining is a "Hobby" of mine. I don't take this too seriously.

As a self proclaimed nerd there is no way I'm not registering this!
 
0
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back