Dynadot

alert Epik Had A Major Breach

NameSilo
Watch

Silentptnr

Domains88.comTop Member
Impact
47,106
Last edited:
33
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Is that you? When you joined NamePros and this thread a day ago, you said you were an "uninvolved outlooker".
Turns out most people effected by the hack don't use any particular forum. You on the other hand insist on becoming involved not only as a non-customer, but as someone with a very long vendetta as a...
..

..
..

Wikipedia admin

This thread is directed toward and for those effected by the epik breach as domain owners, so I joined as someone who fits that description.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Turns out most people effected by the hack don't use any particular forum. You on the other hand insist on becoming involved not only as a non-customer, but as someone with a very long vendetta as a...
..

..
..

Wikipedia admin
I'm not the one trying to gatekeep who can post in this thread, though, am I?

This thread is directed toward and for those effected by the epik breach as domain owners, so I joined as someone who fits that description.
As for your edit, I own a domain too 🤷‍♀️

Gatekeeping is dumb, and I think a lot of "outsiders" or whoever that have posted here (including yourself) have valuable perspective. If the mods think my posts are offtopic or want to more narrowly dictate the scope of this thread, I have no objections to that and will happily abide any instructions. But I'm not interested in backseat-forum-modding (either participating in it myself by trying to define the types of people who can or can't post here, or trying to abide by all the various and contradictory ways different posters here think this thread ought to be run).
 
Last edited:
2
•••
This thread should only be for those effected by the hack as customers or potential buyers.

I'm not sure if this thread can accommodate 15MM people that were affected by the breach.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
I'm not sure if this thread can accomodate 15MM people that were affected by the breach.
Most have no idea it happened. Partially because most outlets found it unethical to make noise on behalf of trolls who wanted it, ie these hackers.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
the "crime syndicate" exposer has logged on.
 
5
•••
the "crime syndicate" exposer has logged on.

Considering over 26 people directly associating with the name Anonymous have been arrested around the globe for hacking related crimes, yea I'd call it a crime syndicate. If it's people's opinion it's too amorphous to be a group, no one should be claiming to be a founder of it.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Most have no idea it happened. Partially because most outlets found it unethical to make noise about trolls, ie these hackers.

When was the last time you spoke with Rob Monster or any rep at Epik? (Your answer may be used in future litigation).
 
0
•••
When was the last time you spoke with Rob Monster or any rep at Epik? (Your answer may be used in future litigation).
Cute

If you go back you can see me grilling him over password hashing.
 
0
•••
0
•••
I said it once and I'll say it again. Over 26 people directly associating with the name Anonymous have been arrested, yes arrested, around the globe for hacking related crimes.

If you were effected by the Epik hack, I'd watch these people (Anonymous people associating with the Epik hack) on Twitter closely. There's not many of them right now directly associating with the Epik drama, but they are out there.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
My goodness -- this thread has really become a dumpster fire. Derek is persistently not just off-topic, but off-base and off his rocker.

I think I will return to this thread after Derek has been removed from it. I have run out of cheeks to turn here, but you guys are welcome to entertain this nonsense if you like.

In the meantime, I leave you with some very timely wisdom from an unexpected place. It transcends all things that divide and polarize.


Have a great start to the week.
 
5
•••
I think I will return to this thread after Derek has been removed from it.

I would appreciate if you stay here. You provide us with beautiful graphics.
 
1
•••

That's not a Dave Chappelle quote. It would be a bit rich if Chappelle was preaching about being compassionate these days (the recent fiasco with his Netflix special will come up on your search engine of choice if you have missed it in the news). As it is that you are, when you have excused Mr. Camp's actions because you feel he is justified in victimizing "dishonorable people", and when you still have not acted upon the doxing and harassing content that Mr. Camp is still hosting on an Epik server after you've repeatedly claimed to have put an end to it.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
I'm not the one trying to gatekeep who can post
As for your edit, I own a domain too 🤷‍♀️
You don't own a domain at Epik is my educated guess.

You are already asking Rob these questions, very loudly, on Twitter, I dunno daily? I don't see the point of this thread being revolved around that and the 'cancel epik' people rather than customers. But I also can't stop you or them from using this thread.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
My goodness -- this thread has really become a dumpster fire. Derek is persistently not just off-topic, but off-base and off his rocker.

I think I will return to this thread after Derek has been removed from it. I have run out of cheeks to turn here, but you guys are welcome to entertain this nonsense if you like.

In the meantime, I leave you with some very timely wisdom from an unexpected place. It transcends all things that divide and polarize.


Have a great start to the week.

@Rob Monster, I am beginning to wonder if you are using proxies to try to derail this thread rather than address the issues raised here.
 
7
•••
Shoulda, are you going to answer my question?
When was the last time you spoke with Rob Monster or any rep at Epik? (Your answer may be used in future litigation).

I'll really will give you $500 USD if you share your text messages with monster discussing your shilling services. Crypto, paypal, whatever you want. DM me.
I first came here critical of Rob and you've made it very hard for me to continue doing that with this nonsense conspiracy theorizing.

The hackers are the ones who did something illegal with respect to the thread title so that's where my focus is at least.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
You don't own a domain at Epik is my educated guess.
I do not. Do you?

You are already asking Rob these questions, very loudly, on Twitter, I dunno daily? I don't see the point of this thread being revolved around that and the 'cancel epik' people rather than customers. But I also can't stop you or them from using this thread.

You seem very familiar with my Twitter activity, so it's odd that you are getting things like this wrong. I haven't really tried much to engage with Mr. Monster directly on Twitter because he isn't very active there (particularly since the hack), and primarily uses it for fairly superficial interactions. I gave it a shot back in September, since he had a brief period of Twitter activity after the hack, but that's about it (you can easily confirm). I think you are perhaps mistaking my tweets where I have reposted discussions at this forum for the benefit of the many people who are not active here but who are interested in the Epik hack and its aftermath, or in various related in/actions by Rob Monster (such as those pertaining to Joey Camp, who has targeted many people besides myself).

Again, I'm not really interested in sparring with you over who's allowed to post in this thread, but it does really irk me when people get things wrong that would be very easy to double-check.
 
Last edited:
4
•••
I do not. Do you?

Yes I have domains at Epik. That's what I thought this thread was mostly for. Current or prospective customers, or those effected by the breach.

a lot of words

You are the only person talking about the hack on twitter for sometimes 6-7 sequential hours at a time. That shows up on Twitter latest. Interjecting yourself into this, more than possibly anyone, (you transcribed hours worth of Rob's comments) then claiming it's weird when people notice is dishonest at best.[/QUOTE]
 
Last edited:
3
•••
That's not a Dave Chappelle quote. It would be a bit rich if Chappelle was preaching about being compassionate these days (the recent fiasco with his Netflix special will come up on your search engine of choice if you have missed it in the news). As it is that you are, when you have excused Mr. Camp's actions because you feel he is justified in victimizing "dishonorable people", and when you still have not acted upon the doxing and harassing content that Mr. Camp is still hosting on an Epik server after you've repeatedly claimed to have put an end to it.

Have you criticized anonymous for publishing the private information of thousands of people?
 
Last edited:
2
•••
You are the only person talking about the hack on twitter for sometimes 6-7 sequential hours at a time. That shows up on Twitter latest. Interjecting yourself into this, more than possibly anyone, (you transcribed hours worth of Rob's comments) then claiming it's weird when people notice is dishonest at best.

I have not "claimed it's weird that people notice" I've talked about the hack on Twitter. Read my post again. The thing I said was odd is that you are so familiar with my Twitter activity yet fundamentally mischaracterize it as "asking Rob these questions, very loudly, on Twitter". But given you are now completely mischaracterizing something I said just posts earlier, perhaps it's not that unusual for you?

Since you're so up to speed with my Twitter posts, I hope you didn't miss the aardvark with the pumpkin. Very weird/cute.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
When was the last time you spoke with Rob Monster or any rep at Epik? (Your answer may be used in future litigation).

I understand why you keep asking this question. Frankly, it is a waste of time. Some of these accounts appear to be proxy accounts for Epik/RM. You will not get a response. Surrogates of Epik will not let you know they are such.
 
2
•••
@Rob Monster, I am beginning to wonder if you are using proxies to try to derail this thread rather than address the issues raised here.

He most certainly is. He is afraid to lie through his alts when I ask him b/c he knows it will look very bad for him in court. I am sick of all the notifications. I wish people would stop interacting with them and just report. he is just trying to make a couple pages of junk content between recent and last damning discussions to bury evidence.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
I have not "claimed it's weird that people notice" I've talked about the hack on Twitter. Read my post again. The thing I said was odd is that you are so familiar with my Twitter activity yet fundamentally mischaracterize it as "asking Rob these questions, very loudly, on Twitter". But given you are now completely mischaracterizing something I said just posts earlier, perhaps it's not that unusual for you?

Since you're so up to speed with my Twitter posts, I hope you didn't miss the aardvark with the pumpkin. Very weird/cute.


Have you criticized anonymous for publishing the private information of thousands of people?
 
0
•••
Have you criticized anonymous for publishing the private information of thousands of people?

I heard you the first time you asked. I was going back through my posts here to verify that it was indeed here where I said what I thought I had, because, like I just said, I hate it when people get easily verifiable things wrong. Anyway, yes, earlier in this thread I referred to Anonymous being to blame for the leaked data. Before that I said that I feel for the people whose data was leaked, and I still do. Despite the misconceptions some people here seem to have, I was not behind the hack or otherwise involved in it—had I been, I would not have been comfortable publishing all that data.

Elsewhere in my posts here I have mentioned how much I dislike "whataboutism" too, by the way.
 
Last edited:
6
•••
I understand why you keep asking this question. Frankly, it is a waste of time. Some of these accounts appear to be proxy accounts for Epik/RM. You will not get a response. Surrogates of Epik will not let you know they are such.

All the accounts I asked that question of are Monster alts or paid shills. I am screenshotting all. I know what I am doing. Many times it isn't the crime itself but the attempted cover up that dooms people. As much as I like the evidence I don't like the work of taking screenshots and I already have plenty to prove the point so would prefer he grew up and acted like somewhat of a man.
 
1
•••
Back