IT.COM

discuss .NET has been underperforming for me lately. I figured out why.

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch

twiki

Top Member
Impact
30,419
I've been thinking what makes .NET so less desirable today. And, most importantly, is this downward trend going to continue?

I've determined that the answer is yes, .NET will likely continue to decline. Here's why.

First off, let's look at what .NET tld historically was and is.

It was, in most cases, the next level replacement for .com.

In the old times when .com / .net / .org was the standard, the choice was clear. If you were a business, you wanted to get the .com. If you couldn't (expensive or unavailable) you probably had to settle for a .net in order to get a shorter name and more memorable. Or, if you were an organization / nonprofit etc, you opted for a .org.

.NET has always been the awkward little brother of .com. Side note in the past, the terms "internet" and "network" were really hot. So .net had some promotional factor out there. Today, "Cloud" and similar terms are the new hot thing. And for some reason, they don't opt for .net anymore.

Why? Because there are new folks in town.

Most companies don't want to limit themselves to "network". They want a generic name and memorable, firstly .com. This is also why .co is on the rise lately = it seems as the next choice, generic name, most similar to .com (despite its disadvantages such as email issues).

This is also why .xyz for example is on the rise lately; it appears to be, for the users, a very nice generic name. XYZ = the end of alphabet, the end of everything. Nice one (@DNGear would agree). But XYZ still has a lot to grow, at least on 2-words which are not yet mature (my experience). Time will tell.

There's also IO. IO has been eating a lot from .net.

Everyone in tech seems to go for .IO because any developer knows what IO is (note, acronym for input/output). IO is on the rise and expensive purchases are being made. So it basically kicked out .net from the table and gorging a ton of domains right now.

So what is .NET today?

Basically the same awkward little brother of .com, but now old and being kicked out by almost any new tld out there (.co, .io, .xyz, .tech, .cloud or whatever your fancy is). This is an established trend already, and I don't see it changing anytime soon.

The question is: Is it worth investing in .NET anymore? The answer is, I'm afraid - maybe. It depends.

Very short .net names are still in demand. Certain very well researched .nets will sell for a lot. Names taken in 150 TLDs etc will definitely sell. Great single words, will probably sell.

But the larger mass of average 2-words and more, not so much.

There is a ton of replacement available out there, sometimes for very cheap and all tlds above seem, in many cases, a great alternative for .net. (Edit: and of course there are a lot of others.)

This is why I've decided to unload most of my .nets and keep only the very short ones and some single words I have. Everything else is going out on the door. My .net sales have been really scarce, and I cannot even tell which is going to sell or not. Even the number of tlds and comparable .com sales didn't provide a match for me. It was always a c***p shoot if I might use this term here.

So should you also discard your .nets or keep them?

I can't tell. Maybe (either). It's your decision - but at least read the above.

Oh, and you're invited to let us know what you think in comments below. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
25
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
I've been thinking what makes .NET so less desirable today. And, most importantly, is this downward trend going to continue?

I've determined that the answer is yes, .NET will likely continue to decline. Here's why.

First off, let's look at what .NET tld historically was and is.

It was, in most cases, the next level replacement for .com.

In the old times when .com / .net / .org was the standard, the choice was clear. If you were a business, you wanted to get the .com. If you couldn't (expensive or unavailable) you probably had to settle for a .net in order to get a shorter name and more memorable. Or, if you were an organization / nonprofit etc, you opted for a .org.

.NET has always been the awkward little brother of .com. Side note in the past, the terms "internet" and "network" were really hot. So .net had some promotional factor out there. Today, "Cloud" and similar terms are the new hot thing. And for some reason, they don't opt for .net anymore.

Why? Because there are new folks in town.

Most companies don't want to limit themselves to "network". They want a generic name and memorable, firstly .com. This is also why .co is on the rise lately = it seems as the next choice, generic name, most similar to .com (despite its disadvantages such as email issues).

This is also why .xyz for example is on the rise lately; it appears to be, for the users, a very nice generic name. XYZ = the end of alphabet, the end of everything. Nice one (@DNGear would agree). But XYZ still has a lot to grow, at least on 2-words which are not yet mature (my experience). Time will tell.

There's also IO. IO has been eating a lot from .net.

Everyone in tech seems to go for .IO because any developer knows what IO is (note, acronym for input/output). IO is on the rise and expensive purchases are being made. So it basically kicked out .net from the table and gorging a ton of domains right now.

So what is .NET today?

Basically the same awkward little brother of .com, but now old and being kicked out by almost any new tld out there (.co, .io, .xyz, .tech, .cloud or whatever your fancy is). This is an established trend already, and I don't see it changing anytime soon.

The question is: Is it worth investing in .NET anymore? The answer is, I'm afraid - maybe. It depends.

Very short .net names are still in demand. Certain very well researched .nets will sell for a lot. Names taken in 150 TLDs etc will definitely sell. Great single words, will probably sell.

But the larger mass of average 2-words and more, not so much.

There is a ton of replacement available out there, sometimes for very cheap and all tlds above seem, in many cases, a great alternative for .net. (Edit: and of course there are a lot of others.)

This is why I've decided to unload most of my .nets and keep only the very short ones and some single words I have. Everything else is going out on the door. My .net sales have been really scarce, and I cannot even tell which is going to sell or not. Even the number of tlds and comparable .com sales didn't provide a match for me. It was always a c***p shoot if I might use this term here.

So should you also discard your .nets or keep them?

I can't tell. Maybe (either). It's your decision - but at least read the above.

Oh, and you're invited to let us know what you think in comments below. Thanks!


thank you
that makes it a lot clearer

and, yes, I fully agree
 
1
•••
I don't see any value in .net unless it's a good domain hack. For names I love, I try to get .com and .co at the same time as I think .co MIGHT reach parity with .com in the future. Who knows
 
0
•••
Just my opinion but I think the two word .net still has value if it's a premium keyword. Just debatable if it's worth it beyond that.
 
1
•••
I also had no much success on .net and reduced to couple of .net. One my son's name as I could not get .com and the other UKImmigration.net as I was helping people with UK Immigration documentation many years back. I think I should hold it further.
 
0
•••
i turned down five figures for Faiths net years back.. and im just wanting to unload it at this point...been tough year for me in general...domains bring me a good 10k yearly...but nada in 2021 lol...
 
1
•••
For anyone saying .net is dead, is that your opinion in terms of reselling, using, or both? I registered a two word .com a couple years ago that's a good, brandable fit for something I want to build. I also own the matching .net, .org, .xyz, .co, .io, and a handful of others. I don't resell domains, but I follow some of these forums to get a better understanding of how "usable" some of those TLDs are in terms of being recognized and building a product on them.

I've been planning on using the .net as a dedicated domain for user created profiles. Several tech companies use .io for the same thing. For example, GitHub uses github.io for their GitHub Pages product. The thing that I don't understand is why someone like GitHub would use github.io when they also own and don't use github.net. GitLab looks like they do the same. Why would anyone choose .io over .net when they own both?

When I was trying to decide which TLDs to register it was obvious that, as the registrant, I get better guarantees from the gTLDs than from the ccTLDs. In fact I'll probably keep the .co and .io for brand protection, but I'll never use them. I hate paying for the renewals on those two because they're expensive (in relative terms).

So I guess the thing I'm wondering is if you need a generic, non-thematic domain (ie: not .tech or .media) and could pick the exact same domain in any TLD that's not .com, which TLD would you pick? To me, .net seems like the obvious choice. I'd probably pick .xyz second. What would you pick and why?
 
1
•••
I am still investing and still believe in .net because having names like expireddomains .net is always a great source of encouragement.
 
1
•••
I tend to partly agree with @twiki . As someone with a portfolio that consists mainly of .com and .net, about half of my sales have come from .net's, with the rest being .com and .org . I agree that longer .net domains (3 or even 4 words) are becoming more and more difficult to sell but whoever is bought in big with 4 word .net domains will be in trouble sooner or later anyway. As long as there are businesses using .net, there is no reason for me to stop trying my luck with 'em. Personally, I think that single word and good two-word domains will continue to sell well.
 
0
•••
I picked up Scalpels.net and Emyd.net ( a type of turtle) and Broths.net myself I still think shorter dictionary. Net will have value or I've had a psychiatric break.
 
0
•••
I picked up Scalpels.net and Emyd.net ( a type of turtle) and Broths.net myself I still think shorter dictionary. Net will have value or I've had a psychiatric break.

More of the latter.

4-letters might work though.
 
0
•••
I'm dropping 99% of my .NET's in preparation for the 2025 .ORG revolution
 
0
•••
Watch they make a comeback in years time, like vinyl. Become a prized legacy holding.
 
0
•••
This is also a primary reason I scan what forum members have to say about usability of domains (ryan 29); as I also am not a large reseller, but end user.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Agreed .net getting stiff competition from .io
 
0
•••
I have been domaining 5 years and net hasn’t been performing since before that. This is not new. Sure there is an occasional break through good sale but I do agree it is not currently nor has it been “2nd choice” for some time.

In most scenarios on average names, you are lucky to flip the net to the dot com owner for XXX.

I would not even bother with net unless its single dictionary word or some highly trending term and even then no sure thing (though you can ask for more for sure) in spite of better quality.
 
0
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back