IT.COM

poll Who is the greatest domain investor of all time? 2021 edition

NameSilo
Watch

Who is the greatest domain investor of all time? 2021 edition

  • 1st

    Rick Schwartz

    92 
    votes
    32.7%
  • 2nd

    Frank Schilling

    35 
    votes
    12.5%
  • 3rd

    Other (leave a comment)

    32 
    votes
    11.4%
  • 4th

    Andrew Rosener

    18 
    votes
    6.4%
  • 5th

    Mike Mann

    15 
    votes
    5.3%
  • 6th

    Yun Ye

    12 
    votes
    4.3%
  • 7th

    Brent Oxley

    votes
    3.2%
  • 8th (tie)

    Hiren Patel

    votes
    2.8%
  • 8th (tie)

    Kevin Ham

    votes
    2.8%
  • 9th (tie)

    Adam Dicker

    votes
    2.1%
  • 9th (tie)

    James Booth

    votes
    2.1%
  • 9th (tie)

    Bob Parsons

    votes
    2.1%
  • 9th (tie)

    Reberry Brothers (Andrew Reberry & Jeff Reberry)

    votes
    2.1%
  • 10th (tie)

    Mike Carson

    votes
    1.8%
  • 10th (tie)

    Braden Pollock

    votes
    1.8%
  • 11th

    Thunayan Al-Ghanim (FMA)

    votes
    1.4%
  • 12th

    Anything.com

    votes
    1.1%
  • 13th (tie)

    Mike Berkens

    votes
    0.7%
  • 13th (tie)

    Nat Cohen

    votes
    0.7%
  • 13th (tie)

    George Kirikos

    votes
    0.7%
  • 13th (tie)

    Igal Lichtman (Mrs.Jello)

    votes
    0.7%
  • 14th (tie)

    Mike Zapolin

    vote
    0.4%
  • 14th (tie)

    Scott Day

    vote
    0.4%
  • 14th (tie)

    Jay Chapman

    vote
    0.4%
  • 15th (tie)

    Garry Chernoff

    votes
    0.0%
  • 15th (tie)

    Marc Ostrofsky

    votes
    0.0%
  • 15th (tie)

    David and Michael Castello

    votes
    0.0%
  • 15th (tie)

    Chris Chena

    votes
    0.0%
  • 15th (tie)

    Andy Booth

    votes
    0.0%
  • 15th (tie)

    Greg McLemore (Web Magic)

    votes
    0.0%

equity78

Top Member
TheDomains Staff
TLDInvestors.com
Impact
28,597
It’s been 7 years since we did a poll on the greatest domain name investor of all time on TheDomains.com. Frank Schilling won back in 2014. Over the last 7 years many new investors have come into the business.

Some investors might be perceived differently today than during the last poll, so here is the 2021 poll.

Sometimes people ask what is meant? Like so and so might not have made as much money but they lifted people up or they were a nicer human being.

This is who is the greatest domain investor of all time, the selling, sales attained, marketing and name selection skills should be what is considered.

Results of last poll

  • Frank Schilling (31%, 77 Votes)
  • Yun Ye (17%, 43 Votes)
  • Rick Schwartz (11%, 27 Votes)
  • Mike Mann (6%, 14 Votes)
  • Anything.com (5%, 13 Votes)
  • Michael Berkens (5%, 12 Votes)
  • Castello Brothers (4%, 11 Votes)
  • George Kirikos (4%, 9 Votes)
  • Adam Dicker (4%, 9 Votes)
  • Igal Lichtman (Mrs.Jello) (3%, 8 Votes)
  • Chris Chena (3%, 7 Votes)
  • Thunayan Al-Ghanim (FMA) (3%, 7 Votes)
  • Scott Day (2%, 6 Votes)
  • Marc Ostrofsky (2%, 4 Votes)
  • Mike Zapolin (1%, 3 Votes)
  • Nat Cohen/Telepathy (0%, 2 Votes)
 
16
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
I see the conversation between @johnn and @DOMAIN ILLUMINATI . I think the topic is about a question if great investors must be .com owners and supporters, or no? No one can give an answer, because NGTlds are promising, but it still needs time to see the performances. The question is, if some one owns 1 millions premium NGTlds, is he the greatest investor or the greatest looser? Every one has an opinion, but there is no actual answer about that. And I agree with @johnn, it needs another threads to talk about this sensitive question. As I know, Frank Schilling has support NGtlds, while Ricks Schwartz doesn't like NGtlds... So we have to vote the best investor, without arguing about Ngtlds/CCTlds vs .com..

You need to collect more information about the Investors and their portfolios. You're right; n/gTLD or else is not important.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
I agree with that comment. I responded to it saying the same, but the post is in moderation for some reason.

The people on the list are legends. Even people with 0 or a few votes. People like Nat Cohen, Garry Chernoff, George Kirikos, Scott Day, and many others.

It is pretty hard to put all these people in the same group. Many had completely different contributions.

How do you compare Rick Schwartz to Bob Parsons to Andrew Rosener? They all did different things at different times.

Someone like Brent Oxley has an incredible portfolio, but that is because he built an incredibly successful business in Host Gator which is a more impressive achievement IMO.

Brad

It went to spam Brad, I approved it.
 
2
•••
I agree with that comment. I responded to it saying the same, but the post is in moderation for some reason.

The people on the list are legends. Even people with 0 or a few votes. People like Nat Cohen, Garry Chernoff, George Kirikos, Scott Day, and many others.

It is pretty hard to put all these people in the same group. Many had completely different contributions.

How do you compare Rick Schwartz to Bob Parsons to Andrew Rosener? They all did different things at different times.

Someone like Brent Oxley has an incredible portfolio, but that is because he built an incredibly successful business in Host Gator which is a more impressive achievement IMO.

Brad

I believe that this thread was based on flawed logic to begin with and should have been created to acknowledge the major achievements and contributions made across the board in the domain Industry instead of trying to choose just one person.

That's why in the Olympics they give medals to so many people that are best in their own category or that they don't give a medal to just one person in the Army.

There needs to be more medals and trophies given in the domain Industry too.

IMO

On my trophy it should say:

"The longest lasting Newbie in the history of the domain Industry" ©

:xf.smile::xf.wink::angelic:
 
Last edited:
2
•••
1
•••
Time to unwatch this thread
Apart from the fact that you could have just clicked on "Unwatch Thread" (instead of informing us about it (which is not a problem though)) you are giving a good example of what to do if you don't want to continue participating in a discussion.

It's appreciated that you go your way peacefully.

All the best from me, the
(currently) greatest (domain name investor /) domainer of all time.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Good moment to close this thread @equity78

Thanks for all good comments.
 
3
•••
Just for the record, I do not agree with this poll's official outcome - I am rejecting it as the result of an uninformed electorate.

Rick Schwartz (or others from the poll's list) isn't (aren't) the greatest
(domain name investor /) domainer of all time.

Because he (or others from the poll's list) does (do) not own the domain name that it necessary for it.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
All the best from me, the (currently) greatest (domain name investor /) domainer of all time.
keep.png
 
1
•••
It's not the length of "Pinoccio's" "nose" that is decisive to be the greatest (domain name investor /) domainer of all time, it's the length of a certain domain name that is decisive in regards to this question.

So this picture makes no sense as a reply to my quoted post because I am indeed the greatest (domain name investor /) domainer of all time and I have already explained why.

And I can prove it.


+++

To give the community (and ultimately all readers) the whole picture of this matter, I suggest nP to reinstate all deleted posts (except a blatantly disrespectful one) of this thread, in their own interest - simply to give their members a voice and as said (written), all readers the whole picture.
All these deleted posts (except a blatantly disrespectful one) were in fact indeed nothing other than a natural reaction to other ontopic posts and they all were written in no other regards than to this thread
(s poll) - in other words, they all were a part of this thread(s question) and therefore they were undeniably a part of this matter.
I don't know why
nP prefers to delete decisive parts of a thread - it's like tearing out pages of a book in my eyes, it makes not much sense to delete posts as long as they are not insulting etc. and it destroys the whole picture - but that's not in my power, all I can do is to give nP my view and it's up to them to take it into consideration or not, I am just a member here (although I am the greatest (domain name investor /) domainer of all time)).
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Time to close this thread? We need more fetus pics, so gross. As for your suggestion kingof.top haha. Stay on topic, gotta do that around here, no one will TOP Frank or Rick
 
0
•••
Time to close this thread? We need more fetus pics, so gross. As for your suggestion kingof.top haha. Stay on topic, gotta do that around here, no one will TOP Frank or Rick
Closing a nP discussion thread is like closing a door to nP in general, there is no value in closing a discussion.
Members can participate or not.
Simple as that.


Aside that, I already reported this (blatantly offtopic) post (with the gross pic).

+++

MasterOfYourDomains, hahaha, reread my posts to find out that I absolutely stay on topic.

+++

Neither Rick Schwartz nor Frank Schilling is the greatest
(domain name investor /) domainer of all time (I have explained the reasons).

They both got topped by a domain name that (even) they can't top.

As long as one do not own this domain name, one can not be the greatest (domain name investor /) domainer of all time.
There is no higher achievement possible in domaining than to own this domain name.
In other words, this is the only criteria for being it.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Yeh, indicators on who is not the greatest investor of all time:

1) They spam threads endlessly with imbecilic bullshit;

2) inject off-topic topics such as celebrity gossip and distasteful photos;

3) keep running in circles like the village idiot. Someone will always notice you, but never take you seriously.

**

I think every person on poll list at the very least has some sort of social awareness. They can take cues from like-minded individuals in the gatherings they participate in. The true greats find a way to connect, even if indirectly.
 
6
•••
Greatest of all time could also mean who would perform the best if starting from zero.

If everyone started with nothing in their portfolio today and we all had only $1,000 to invest, who would be the most successful?

I think the results would be different if we looked at the question this way.
 
Last edited:
5
•••
Greatest of all time could also mean who would perform the best if starting from zero.

If everyone started with nothing in their portfolio today and we all had only $1,000 to invest, who would be the most successful?

I think the results would be different if we looked at the question this way.

I would reduce the $1000 to just $50

Who could start with $50 and make 10k in just six months by buying (or hand registering) domains and trading them up.

IMO
 
3
•••
Yeh, indicators on who is not the greatest investor of all time:

1) They spam threads endlessly with imbecilic bullshit;

2) inject off-topic topics such as celebrity gossip and distasteful photos;

3) keep running in circles like the village idiot. Someone will always notice you, but never take you seriously.

**

I think every person on poll list at the very least has some sort of social awareness. They can take cues from like-minded individuals in the gatherings they participate in. The true greats find a way to connect, even if indirectly.
1.)
Who is "they"? If you claim such, you should tell names - otherwise it's your claim that is the "imbecilic bullsh*t", it's easy to say anything without being specific and aside that, it looks like you are another one who do not understand what "spam" is.
In case you mean me with your words, you are wrong - technically and as well in terms of content. If you don't understand why, I can help.


2.)
Here I agree, this post (already deleted) and its bizarre content had indeed zero to do with this thread's topic.


3.)
The whole life is a circle (just think of what is called "breathing", probably the ultime "circle") and the term "village idiot" is a very rude term which is actually just hate speech. If you are convinced from yourself and your work, believe me, you absolutely don't care if others "take you seriously" or not, this low level way of thinking
("Will others take me or my work seriously?") doesn't affect you any longer then, your mind is free of such thoughts then.

+++

Your last sentences are well written - however, and aside all qualities the persons listed in the poll have, the point is not social awareness - the point is that none of them is the greatest (domain name investor /) domainer of all time because I am the greatest (domain name investor /) domainer of all time.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Any proof to this? It sounds cool in this new conspiracy UFO era, but if you make a list of the best 500 for sale domains you will find that you could trace almost all to a known domainer.

What you wrote here is complete nonsense. In real estate this is true, not in domaining. All portfolio holders of valuable names are known in 2021.

"i think there are many high profile people/companies who will no doubt operate under the radar/own some fantastic domains (plus made great sales) but keep their business to themselves"

I think @Kingslayer made a fair point.

eg: do you know who purchased fashion.com in late 2019?

It would have to be one of the most valuable unused domains.

Who purchased it and for how much?
 
3
•••
I think @Kingslayer made a fair point.

eg: do you know who purchased fashion.com in late 2019?

It would have to be one of the most valuable unused domains.

Who purchased it and for how much?


No I dont know
 
1
•••
Greatest of all time could also mean who would perform the best if starting from zero.

If everyone started with nothing in their portfolio today and we all had only $1,000 to invest, who would be the most successful?

I think the results would be different if we looked at the question this way.

Sure if we started today things might look a lot different.
 
3
•••
^^Advantages are built-in with who you are, where you are, and so on. "Everyone starting with nothing" is not possible in an English dominated name game. Just as starting a portfolio today has social networking and other platform advantages not available to early domainers.

Best practice in Greatest of All Time biz polls is stick with the standard Universal Criteria for Determining the Greatest [Domain] Investor. ('Domain' in the categorical tense, be it real estate, rockets, etc.).

1). Establish ones ownership and control of [xDomain] assets.
2). ROI: compare one [xDomain] owner's business model and ROI against other [xDomain] owners.
3). Impact: Determine whose [Domain] assets and biz model has had the greatest impact on the world.

As mentioned, and by these standards, I think Bryon Allen's .TV portfolio and biz model -which grew a billion dollar media empire from scratch, and whose domains: Pets.TV, Comedy.TV, Recipe.TV, Cars.TV, ES.TV, MyDestination.TV and JusticeCentral.TV now have 80 million subscribers, wins. But his name is not even on the list. Why is that?

The subscription metric alone makes Bryon The Greatest Domain Investor because he milks his domains like cash cows for tens of million$ year after year instead of selling a cow once.. (Note: Byron's TV.com holdings, like ThisTV.com, are ad based and also generate millions annually).

Rick Swartz, uses 3rd parties to build-out over 750 domains that are considerably less successful deploying the same development model. His 35 domain sales, since 1995, are great, but are less than 1/10th of what Bryon pulls-in, with much less overhead.

Not that any of this matters here, as even if Bryon was on the list, he would lose Big. Like the "English name game advantage", NamePros is WhiteBros, so the winner here need only preach to that choir.

But, take this poll question, add Bryon Allen's name to the list, and make it a national, or global media poll on the web, radio, TV, and newspaper sites to reach as many people as freely possible, and I think we all know Bryon Allen would win in a landslide... because the work of The Greatest Domain Investor would actually be known by The People on the web.
 
4
•••
Jeff had the most posts per day on .mobi mobility


210955_bb0fc8d1c2e25f662b8cac586b8ad7d5.png



All the best
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20210624-013026.png
    Screenshot_20210624-013026.png
    356 KB · Views: 146
Last edited:
1
•••
^^Advantages are built-in with who you are, where you are, and so on. "Everyone starting with nothing" is not possible in an English dominated name game. Just as starting a portfolio today has social networking and other platform advantages not available to early domainers.

Best practice in Greatest of All Time biz polls is stick with the standard Universal Criteria for Determining the Greatest [Domain] Investor. ('Domain' in the categorical tense, be it real estate, rockets, etc.).

1). Establish ones ownership and control of [xDomain] assets.
2). ROI: compare one [xDomain] owner's business model and ROI against other [xDomain] owners.
3). Impact: Determine whose [Domain] assets and biz model has had the greatest impact on the world.

As mentioned, and by these standards, I think Bryon Allen's .TV portfolio and biz model -which grew a billion dollar media empire from scratch, and whose domains: Pets.TV, Comedy.TV, Recipe.TV, Cars.TV, ES.TV, MyDestination.TV and JusticeCentral.TV now have 80 million subscribers, wins. But his name is not even on the list. Why is that?

The subscription metric alone makes Bryon The Greatest Domain Investor because he milks his domains like cash cows for tens of million$ year after year instead of selling a cow once.. (Note: Byron's TV.com holdings, like ThisTV.com, are ad based and also generate millions annually).

Rick Swartz, uses 3rd parties to build-out over 750 domains that are considerably less successful deploying the same development model. His 35 domain sales, since 1995, are great, but are less than 1/10th of what Bryon pulls-in, with much less overhead.

Not that any of this matters here, as even if Bryon was on the list, he would lose Big. Like the "English name game advantage", NamePros is WhiteBros, so the winner here need only preach to that choir.

But, take this poll question, add Bryon Allen's name to the list, and make it a national, or global media poll on the web, radio, TV, and newspaper sites to reach as many people as freely possible, and I think we all know Bryon Allen would win in a landslide... because the work of The Greatest Domain Investor would actually be known by The People on the web.
Yeps benown is Jessica Alba who is hiding around here.. the point of domaining for some people is to be set trying to land that big one whether aftermarket (honest.com) or hand-reg (us10y.com) then any need to even be here? Exception for peeps like DO who give to others on webchat I mean 1 billion is ALOT cash Warren.. I like the fact Rick Schwartz came back to uplift domaining on Twitter after his domainking handle was available.. he even is a bit more positive to hand-reggers like me (us30y.com) , btw whom got that 4 character .com gold derivatives on chat I gifted now :)
 
Last edited:
1
•••
If ass.com sale is legitimate, than I would say Richard Schwartz.
I think no one, or almost no one, can get that amount of money for that domain.
 
1
•••
1
•••
cant we nominate ourself?
in 1999 january WHOIS there was one Chinese registrant most generics used contact "No Name" when was looking em up personally, anyone??
 
Last edited:
1
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back