Dynadot

$4.00 .COM registration and transfer at IONOS (Promo expired)

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch

aelko

.COM promos at tldes.comTop Member
Impact
6,110
upload_2021-3-19_3-6-32.png
 
10
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
I successfully disabled this timer and unlocked my domain before 60 days after previous transfer.

u can unlock successfully b4 60 days all u like..and make whois status show ok...but when u start transfer they will block u.

people just dont get it that its an icann rule.. independent of registrar.. meaning it cannot work on some but not others
 
0
•••
0
•••
u can unlock successfully b4 60 days all u like..and make whois status show ok...but when u start transfer they will block u.

people just dont get it that its an icann rule.. independent of registrar.. meaning it cannot work on some but not others

it actually appears to be a registry rule in the case of .CO. they state on the go.co website that transfers are not permitted within 60 days of registration, 60 days within a preceding transfer, and one other thing i cannot remember now
 
0
•••
it actually appears to be a registry rule in the case of .CO. they state on the go.co website that transfers are not permitted within 60 days of registration, 60 days within a preceding transfer, and one other thing i cannot remember now

and what makes u think they are not saying it cause it's an icann rule?

which it is. cheers
 
0
•••
and what makes u think they are not saying it cause it's an icann rule?

which it is. cheers

i looked at the ICANN rules. its only an explicit requirement within 60 days of registration and it is optional for registrys to implement it under different circumstances. it is all on the ICANN website
 
Last edited:
0
•••
i looked at the ICANN rules. its only an explicit requirement within 60 days of registration and it is optional for registrys to implement it under different circumstances. it is all on the ICANN website

nah..if it was not icann rule everyone would not be doing it
 
0
•••
nah..if it was not icann rule everyone would not be doing it

of course they would still be doing it. they dont want people jumping around from registrar to registrar every single time a registrar offers a deal...
 
0
•••
of course they would still be doing it. they dont want people jumping around from registrar to registrar every single time a registrar offers a deal...

yea right and they all follow same details..all 60 days etc

yea right.. that's pure chance.

I tell u its icann rule ...go read up on it.
 
0
•••
yea right and they all follow same details..all 60 days etc

yea right.. that's pure chance.

I tell u its icann rule ...go read up on it.

i did read about it, today in fact lol
 
0
•••
i did read about it, today in fact lol

lol then we got a problem.. cause just a day ago by accident i tried trnasfer a .co from stablehost to ionos..aftr 45 days from transferring it to stable host ... and ionos gave me msg that icann prevents transfers b4 days

should have saved screen shot for ya hahah
 
0
•••
lol then we got a problem.. cause just a day ago by accident i tried trnasfer a .co from stablehost to ionos..aftr 45 days from transferring it to stable host ... and ionos gave me msg that icann prevents transfers b4 days

should have saved screen shot for ya hahah


:ROFL: i dont care what the registrars say about ICANN policy. i care about what ICANN says ICANN policy. of course registrars are going to blame ICANN when the registrars greedily choose to hold your domains hostage
 
0
•••
well they sent me this info by email too..

so end result is same as if icann rule... cause no registrars can allow it cause it's a registry rule...

so .. it's as if icann rule..same end result ...well that ends my offtopic chat on this..case closed..u cant transfr on any registrars b4 60 days up..

Screenshot_20210503-102320_Gmail.jpg
 
0
•••
@alcy
LOL notice how it says "a provision of the respective registry"
 
Last edited:
0
•••
@alcy
LOL notice how it says "a provision of the respective registry"

anyway the original dilemma was if we can transfer out b4 60 days..the answer is no ...no matter who blocks it.
 
0
•••
anyway the original dilemma was if we can transfer out b4 60 days..the answer is no ...no matter who blocks it.

no, the point is the registrars are preventing it out of greed, even though it is not required of them
 
0
•••
no, the point is the registrars are preventing it out of greed, even though it is not required of them

no the point is that they are preventing it period.

the question was if we can transfer out b4 60 days.

not who blocks it why.

yer just asking and answering yer own questions now.
 
0
•••
no the point is that they are preventing it period.

the question was if we can transfer out b4 60 days.

not who blocks it why.

yer just asking and answering yer own questions now.

i meant in our side discussion... anyways, im done discussing this
 
1
•••
people just dont get it that its an icann rule.
It is NOT a rule since Dec'2016, when ICANN IRTP was updated.
Nowadays it is just OPTION. Registrars MAY use it or not. They are NOT obliged anymore.

p.s. And IRTP is applicable only for gTLDs.
NOT for ccTLDs.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
It is NOT a rule since Dec'2016, when ICANN IRTP was updated.
Nowadays it is just OPTION. Registrars MAY use it or not. They are NOT obliged anymore.

p.s. And IRTP is applicable only for gTLDs.
NOT for ccTLDs.

it sure applies to co and io..

anyway bottom line ..we cant trnasfer out b4 60 days..org com co io net info... and prolly many others that most dont care for

end of story.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
.io is Afilias.
All Afilias TLDs are locked for 60 days since registration or transfer, this is their retro policy.

.co/.in under Neustar.
Another story at all.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
.io is Afilias.
All Afilias TLDs are locked for 60 days since registration or transfer, this is their retro policy.

.co/.in under Neustar.
Another story at all.

no matter what story. the bottom line...all locked.

which was our talk here to begin with...locked or not. ty
 
0
•••
Regarding Verisign TLDs...
Even here on NamePros was thread that .COM was succesfully transferred to Dynadot and then after ~2 weeks to Uni.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
no matter what story. the bottom line...all locked.
Then how I sold and transferred away from 1and1 .LIFE domain ~40 days old???

p.s. Both mentioned examples happened after December'2016 (NEW IRTP).
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Regarding Verisign TLDs...
Even here on NamePros was thread that .COM was succesfully transferred to Dynadot and then after ~2 weeks to Uni.
And even Dynadot confirmed, they don't prevent the transfer-outs regardless of when initiated.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Then how I sold and transferred away from 1and1 .LIFE domain ~40 days old???

p.s. Both mentioned examples happened after December'2016 (NEW IRTP).

well some exotic new tlds may be exempt... but as u know most domainers dont care about those
 
0
•••
Back