IT.COM

poll Would you take the Covid Vaccine when it becomes available

NameSilo
Watch
Status
Not open for further replies.

Are you willing to get vaccinated for Covid

  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.
  • Yes but only if required by my employer

    votes
    0.0%
  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.

oldtimer

SaveThyWorld.com Let's not leave anyone behindTop Member
Impact
6,497
The only way to end this Pandemic is if the majority of the people around the World get vaccinated.

It's amazing that several vaccines have already been developed in record time and thus far they all show very good results as far as creating some level of immunity against Covid19 without causing any major side effects and supposedly even if those who have been vaccinated come down with the disease it won't be at the more severe levels that require hospitalization.

There are many companies that are working on the vaccine although the top contenders currently are Moderna, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...d-vaccine-heres-what-we-know-them/6308571002/


I personally would be first in line to get the vaccine as I am in the older category with some history of heart problems and although I believe that everyone should be free to make their own choices, but this will only be effective in stopping the Pandemic if the majority of the people (like over 80% or so) get vaccinated.

Please do your own research about the vaccines and indicate your choice in the poll (visible to all) and post any justification for your decision as to whether you are going to get the vaccine or not below.

IMO

Thread rules: everyone is invited to participate as long as things are kept on topic and are on the constructive, professional, and respectful side.

If you provide a link to anything make sure that it pertains to the subject of this thread and give a brief description as to what it is about, and if you are just expressing your own personal opinion make sure to put IMO an the end of your comment (In My Opinion).
 
Last edited:
6
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
1
•••
Last edited:
0
•••
Fauci’s incompetence led to many deaths in HIV AIDS outbreak. Look up the AZT deaths.

AZT was the first anti-HIV drug.
I dont think he gets asked this question ever, one of worst on “The Good Doctor’s” resume.

Fauci is enjoying his time in the media & news.
It behooves me, the pedestal people place him

You dont have to look hard ;)
That said,take vaccine folks... What i’d do (did)

Fauci and Gates are some sick men.

 
1
•••
Fauci’s incompetence led to many deaths in HIV AIDS outbreak. Look up the AZT deaths.

AZT was the first anti-HIV drug.
I dont think he gets asked this question ever, one of worst on “The Good Doctor’s” resume.

Fauci is enjoying his time in the media & news.
It behooves me, the pedestal people place him

Ahh ye ol fake news narrative pusher of the radical right @Samer .... Do you ever research anything before posting it, or do you just blindly repeat anything coming from any devil of the RADICAL right? And folks wonder how the QAnon echo chamber grew into lies and chaos? smh :banghead:

Do you still wonder why I have you, and other radicals, set to ignore on namePros? The echo chamber needs to stop somewhere.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2020/05/20/fauci-aids-nih-coronavirus/

“Act Up, Fight Back, Fight AIDS!” The angry chanting grew louder as hundreds of protesters wove through the usually placid campus of the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda on May 21, 1990

As confused NIH scientists and administrators looked out of their windows, the 1,000-strong demonstration then marched to Building 31, which housed the offices of the protests’ target: Anthony S. Fauci, then and now the chief of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).

For months, ACT UP had been formally urging Fauci to include their members in the government’s development process for AIDS drugs. Fauci, now under attack by some Trump supporters for his response to the coronavirus pandemic, was in favor of the group’s participation.

“I was trying to get them into all the planning meetings for the clinical trials,” Fauci said last week, taking time out from the coronavirus fight to look back at another deadly disease he managed 30 years ago. But he met increasing resistance from the scientific community, who were put off by ACT UP’s tactics.

“We were putting Tony in a tough spot,” acknowledged Peter Staley, the ACT UP leader who spearheaded the protest.

ACT UP had formed in New York City in 1987 as an angry response to government inaction on finding drugs and treatments for AIDS patients. The group was motivated by rage, helplessness and grief, Harrington said, as they stood by and watched thousands of friends and lovers die of the human immunodeficiency virus that led to AIDS — what was then called a “gay plague.”

As more and more gay men died in the mid-1980s, and homophobia flourished, ACT UP staged theatrical protests at the Food and Drug Administration, on Wall Street and at New York’s City Hall. The most famous was a 1989 die-in at St. Patrick’s Cathedral in New York to protest then-Cardinal John O’Connor’s opposition to teaching safe sex and distributing condoms.

Fauci was one of the younger scientists working on AIDS research at NIAID at the time, and Staley said ACT UP members began to get to know him. “All the older scientists thought we were crazy,” he said. “But Fauci wanted to hear what we had to say.”
“We liked Tony personally. He’s a brilliant scientist, a brilliant fighter of epidemics,” Staley said.
“I was becoming friends with some of them, like Peter Staley and Mark Harrington,” Fauci agreed. “I felt very strongly that we needed to get them into the planning process because they weren’t always right, but they had very, very good input.”

Fauci attended an ACT UP meeting in October 1989. After that, some of the group’s leaders on its Treatment and Data Committee would meet the NIAID chief and his deputy, Jim Hill, for dinner at Hill’s townhouse on Capitol Hill.

Fauci said he urged the scientific community and his own staff to include ACT UP members in the drug trial process. “I was pushing and pulling these people and screaming, ‘Hey, we have to deal with them,’ ” he said. “I was in a difficult position because I was trying to convince the establishment that ACT UP had something to offer.”

Fauci promised NIAID would become more inclusive, but after months with no action, ACT UP decided the only choice they had was a protest, Harrington said.

At a dinner with Fauci in March, Staley said, “Tony, we’ve got some bad news for you. We know you’ve been advocating for us on this. But we’ve decided to do a gigantic demonstration at the NIH, and it will be in front of your building.”

Fauci tried to talk them out of it, but Staley vowed not just to demonstrate, but to get arrested, too, according to Fauci.

Between March and May, ACT UP spread the word about “Storm the NIH” to its chapters across the country. The group took out full-page ads in The Washington Post.

ACT UP was renowned for creating what Staley called a six-ring circus at its demonstrations, and the NIH protest was no different. Gathering at the NIH gates that Monday morning in May, chapters were divided into “affinity groups,” each of which organized its own presentation, skit or protest focus.

“One guy even had Fauci’s head on a stick,” Staley said.

It might have seemed otherwise, “but this was not a protest against research,” Ruta said. “It was a protest on behalf of research.”

Staley and his crew lit the smoke bombs and ran through the parting crowd. A roar went up from protesters as billows of red, yellow, blue, purple and green smoke filled the air. An Associated Press photo of screaming activists under a cloud of rainbow smoke eventually made it onto the cover of newspapers across the country.

Meanwhile, Fauci, looking out his office window, grew frustrated. “I didn’t like that degree of disruption on campus,” he said, concerned the rowdy action would further alienate scientists from including ACT UP in the drug development process.

Then Fauci noticed a protester climbing onto the building’s front overhang. It was Peter Staley. Police officers pulled Staley off the roof, lowering him into a band of officers who immediately handcuffed him. Fauci said he raced down to the first floor to make sure Peter was okay.

“I didn’t want him to get hurt because there were mounted police and that could be dangerous,” he said.
“A big, burly African American cop dragged me through the first floor of the building, and who should I run into, but Tony Fauci,” Staley said.

The next month, however, ACT UP could definitively declare victory. At the International Conference on AIDS in San Francisco, Fauci gave Harrington the good news: Activists, journalists and people with AIDS would be let into the AIDS Clinical Trials Group, Harrington said, and the trials would expand to include women of color, drug users and children.

It was a turning point — for both ACT UP and biomedical research, Harrington said.
All drug testing committees at NIH now have patient advocates, he noted, including NIH’s trial to test hydroxychloroquine and azythromicin.

Staley points out that community activists are now involved in coordinating efforts to combat covid-19, an outgrowth of ACT UP. Activists “are now in lockstep with scientists,” he said.

“Ever since the 1990 demonstration, we’ve been partners in fighting illnesses and diseases, and our enemies now are hesitant politicians and anti-science radio hosts,” he said. “We are now Fauci’s great defenders against the anti-science. And the world is better for it.”

Anyways, @Samer, I doubt you read the full article. Or anything besides radical right propaganda. You seem more like a headline reader, quick to spout anything that would push for a radical right fake news narrative. I just hope you read a little more before you up and decide to go storm the Capitol or the NIH.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
0
•••
.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Ahh ye ol fake news narrative pusher of the radical right @Samer .... Do you ever research anything before posting it, or do you just blindly repeat anything coming from any devil of the RADICAL right? And folks wonder how the QAnon echo chamber grew into lies and chaos? smh :banghead:

Do you still wonder why I have you, and other radicals, set to ignore on namePros? The echo chamber needs to stop somewhere.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2020/05/20/fauci-aids-nih-coronavirus/





























Anyways, @Samer, I doubt you read the full article. Or anything besides radical right propaganda. You seem more like a headline reader, quick to spout anything that would push for a radical right fake news narrative. I just hope you read a little more before you up and decide to go storm the Capitol or the NIH.

Radical Right? Lol, found your Boogey man.

i prioritize sources, above all else.

Fauci isnt liked. I didnt quote Breitbart.

I cited 247Sports.com a forum piece write-up.
“Q-Anon” is not relevant, but nice try.
Maybe confusing their Shaman with Dr. Fauci,
I can see why you’d make that mistake.

Grilled, “Radical Left” is Vox, HuffPost “ThinkProgress” WashPost, most of the media youre fed.really analyze the world broad scope
Instead of thinking of things along “left” v “right”
Only right should be thinking “right vs wrong”

Long as you have that “us vs. them” mentality,
you will never prosper, and live a life of hate. Surround yourself with supportive people — Not an echo chamber. Positive people.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
I may let you have this one, since Fauci is married to a New Jersey gal ❤️

You may let me have this one? I'm glad citing fake news is a game to you. Is citing fake news online all day more fun than living real life? Or is this what we do when we avoid real life?

Radical Right?

Well the right sure isn't united, nor does it appear they want things united. Especially when the head of the radical right likes to further divide, and always cite radical left. If folks want to constantly shout radical left, don't be surprised if the left starts calling the wronngright radical as well.

It seems as if the radicals had their way, states won't be united, and the south would rise again. But the south will not rise again, or not atleast in the way some radical right wants the south to rise. The confederate flag is a thing of the past. Sorry, @radicalright. I prefer a United States, so until folks stop citing the radical left, I won't stop citing the radical right.

Anywho back to ignoring the radical right.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Mental health should be the priority and a “vaccine” doesn’t heal that
 
Last edited:
1
•••
You may let me have this one? I'm glad citing fake news is a game to you. Is citing fake news online all day more fun than living real life? Or is this what we do when we avoid real life?



Well the right sure isn't united, nor does it appear they want things united. Especially when the head of the right likes to furrther divide, and always cite radical left. If folks want to constantly shout radical left, don't be surprised if the left starts calling the right radical as well.

It seems as if the radicals had their way, states won't be united, and the south would rise again. But the south will not rise again, or not atleast in the way some radical right wants the south to rise. The confederate flag is a thing of the past. Sorry, @radicalright. I prefer a United States, so until folks stop citing the radical left, I won't stop citing the radical right.

Anywho back to ignore the radical right goes.
What’s a “game”?

Discourse? Discussion. Kno you prefer censor.

Also note: i took the vaccine.

dont “Radical right” dont believe Gates’ vacc? narratives are falling apart- house of cards 😉
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Last edited:
1
•••
0
•••
https://mtonews.com/dmx-received-co...e-heart-attack-family-says-no-drugs-exclusive

Screenshot_20210410-205822.png
 
1
•••
0
•••
0
•••
1
•••
A press release from Pfizer, that sure is credible..
 
1
•••
0
•••
1
•••
https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/03/2...vid-vaccine-increases-by-483-in-just-7-weeks/
Number of Pregnant Women suffering Miscarriage after having Covid Vaccine increases by 483% in just 7 weeks

This was the Governments own advice upon emergency approval of the Pfizer / BioNTech vaccine –

Pregnancy’
There are no or limited amount of data from the use of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2.
Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine
BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy.

For women of childbearing age, pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination. In addition, women
of childbearing age should be advised to avoid pregnancy for at least 2 months after their second dose.


We told you about this back in December, as the Governments own advice also included comments on breast-feeding and fertility which were as follows –

Breast-feeding
It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is excreted in human milk. A risk to
the newborns/infants cannot be excluded. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 should not be used
during breast-feeding.
Fertility

It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 has an impact on fertility.

 
Last edited:
2
•••
Joint CDC and FDA Statement on Johnson & Johnson Covid-19 Vaccine

Released Tuesday, April 13, 2021

"As of April 12, more than 6.8 million doses of the Johnson & Johnson (Janssen ) vaccine have been administered in the U.S. CDC and FDA are reviewing data involving six reported U.S. cases of a rare and severe type of blood clot in individuals after receiving the J&J vaccine. In these cases, a type of blood clot called cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) was seen in combination with low levels of blood platelets (thrombocytopenia). All six cases occurred among women between the ages of 18 and 48, and symptoms occurred 6 to 13 days after vaccination. Treatment of this specific type of blood clot is different from the treatment that might typically be administered. Usually, an anticoagulant drug called heparin is used to treat blood clots. In this setting, administration of heparin may be dangerous, and alternative treatments need to be given.

CDC will convene a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) on Wednesday to further review these cases and assess their potential significance. FDA will review that analysis as it also investigates these cases. Until that process is complete, we are recommending a pause in the use of this vaccine out of an abundance of caution. This is important, in part, to ensure that the health care provider community is aware of the potential for these adverse events and can plan for proper recognition and management due to the unique treatment required with this type of blood clot.

Right now, these adverse events appear to be extremely rare. COVID-19 vaccine safety is a top priority for the federal government, and we take all reports of health problems following COVID-19 vaccination very seriously. People who have received the J&J vaccine who develop severe headache, abdominal pain, leg pain, or shortness of breath within three weeks after vaccination should contact their health care provider."


https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2021/s0413-JJ-vaccine.html
 
2
•••
Joint CDC and FDA Statement on Johnson & Johnson Covid-19 Vaccine

Released Tuesday, April 13, 2021

"As of April 12, more than 6.8 million doses of the Johnson & Johnson (Janssen ) vaccine have been administered in the U.S. CDC and FDA are reviewing data involving six reported U.S. cases of a rare and severe type of blood clot in individuals after receiving the J&J vaccine. In these cases, a type of blood clot called cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) was seen in combination with low levels of blood platelets (thrombocytopenia). All six cases occurred among women between the ages of 18 and 48, and symptoms occurred 6 to 13 days after vaccination. Treatment of this specific type of blood clot is different from the treatment that might typically be administered. Usually, an anticoagulant drug called heparin is used to treat blood clots. In this setting, administration of heparin may be dangerous, and alternative treatments need to be given.

CDC will convene a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) on Wednesday to further review these cases and assess their potential significance. FDA will review that analysis as it also investigates these cases. Until that process is complete, we are recommending a pause in the use of this vaccine out of an abundance of caution. This is important, in part, to ensure that the health care provider community is aware of the potential for these adverse events and can plan for proper recognition and management due to the unique treatment required with this type of blood clot.

Right now, these adverse events appear to be extremely rare. COVID-19 vaccine safety is a top priority for the federal government, and we take all reports of health problems following COVID-19 vaccination very seriously. People who have received the J&J vaccine who develop severe headache, abdominal pain, leg pain, or shortness of breath within three weeks after vaccination should contact their health care provider."


https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2021/s0413-JJ-vaccine.html
Johnson and Johnson was never the best vaccine. It was like 60%ish good. One shot.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Johnson and Johnson was never the best vaccine. It was like 60%ish good. One shot.

Johnson & Johnson vaccine was the one that I got about two weeks ago,

Although at around 65% effectiveness against getting Covid you can still get the virus, but it's supposed to prevent the more severe cases that require people to get hospitalized.

But then I have been on blood thinner and have been taking daily Aspirin ever since I had a heart attack a few years back so hopefully I won't get any blood clots.

Best for people to consult with their doctor about this or any other vaccine. Although sometimes there are no clear cut answers so you might have to take a chance with certain meds and procedures depending on your personal conditions and circumstances and what your doctor says.

IMO
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Joint CDC and FDA Statement on Johnson & Johnson Covid-19 Vaccine

Released Tuesday, April 13, 2021


Even this is released by the numbers....

 
0
•••
0
•••
Status
Not open for further replies.
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back