information Brent Oxley Loses Access to Create.com, Plus Millions of Dollars Worth of His Domains

The Rover said:

Ding Ding!

Honestly, part of me is glad this is happening. It's time for people to be called out. Leave ideology OUT of business.

Click to expand...

You guys are delusional morons if you think this is some kind of conspiracy with GoDaddy's CEO who is paid $15 million per year and is a turban-wearing Sikh guy (seems kind of religious), in combination with the scam artist Agarwal, who apparently has very little money, and calls himself a devil-worshipper and uses prostitutes (stuff that is the opposite of what a religious Sikh would want a connection with... also not something a left-ish guy [seems like you complain about Bhutani being one] would associate with). It's like thinking some CEO in Vancouver has a connection to a hillbilly in Tennessee, just because they're both of German origin.

India has more people than North America and South America combined. Just because GoDaddy's CEO is of Indian origin doesn't mean he has anything to do with Agarwal.

And that NY Times article has lots of quotes directly from Oxley's staff, and lay outs their descriptions about how they operate the ranch and why... their reasons are stupid, but it is what they think and say, and consistent with what Oxley says on his blog. So what's the complaint about the article? That they publicized what the ranch does? The ranch and its staff seemed to enjoy talking about it anyway... if they didn't want to, they didn't have to be part of the article.

And then drawing the connection between GoDaddy's CEO being on the NY Times board is another level of crazy conspiracy thinking, like this:



As I wrote above, it's an obvious case of incompetence by GoDaddy's legal department + them being overly cautious, since Oxley did have some business relationship with Agarwal.

And like I said, I myself have a domain locked by GoDaddy for a legal reason (and they keep renewing it).

barybadrinath said:

Yes i was indeed cheated and very badly cheated.

Click to expand...

Perhaps you both could ask each other for forgiveness and you could both move forward with a clear understanding.

Start said:

You guys are total morons if you think this is some kind of conspiracy with GoDaddy's CEO who is paid $15 million per year and is a turban-wearing Sikh guy, in combination with the scam artist Agarwal, who calls himself a devil-worshipper and uses prostitutes, and apparently has very little money. It's like thinking some CEO in Vancouver has a connection to a hillbilly in Tennessee, just because they're both of German origin.

India has more people than North America and South America combined. Just because GoDaddy's CEO is of Indian origin doesn't mean he has anything to do with Agarwal.

And that NY Times article has lots of quotes directly from Oxley's staff, and lay outs their descriptions about how they operate the ranch and why... their reasons is stupid, but it is what they think and say, and consistent with what Oxley says on his blog. So what's the complaint about the article? That they publicized what the ranch does? They ranch and its staff seemed to enjoy talking about it anyway... if they didn't want to, they didn't have to be part of the article.

And then drawing the connection between GoDaddy's CEO being on the NY Times board is another level of idiotic conspiracy thinking, like this:



As I wrote above, it's an obvious case of incompetence by GoDaddy's legal department + them being overly cautious, since Oxley did have some business relationship with Agarwal.

And like I said, I myself have a domain locked by GoDaddy for a legal reason (and they keep renewing it).

Click to expand...

Truth!

@barybadrinath

I am grateful for this incident. It made me finally take action to do what I have known for some time needed to be done. I moved my domains from GD to another registrar.

Start said:

You guys are total morons if you think this is some kind of conspiracy with GoDaddy's CEO who is paid $15 million per year and is a turban-wearing Sikh guy, in combination with the scam artist Agarwal, who calls himself a devil-worshipper and uses prostitutes, and apparently has very little money. It's like thinking some CEO in Vancouver has a connection to a hillbilly in Tennessee, just because they're both of German origin.

India has more people than North America and South America combined. Just because GoDaddy's CEO is of Indian origin doesn't mean he has anything to do with Agarwal.

And that NY Times article has lots of quotes directly from Oxley's staff, and lay outs their descriptions about how they operate the ranch and why... their reasons is stupid, but it is what they think and say, and consistent with what Oxley says on his blog. So what's the complaint about the article? That they publicized what the ranch does? The ranch and its staff seemed to enjoy talking about it anyway... if they didn't want to, they didn't have to be part of the article.

And then drawing the connection between GoDaddy's CEO being on the NY Times board is another level of idiotic conspiracy thinking, like this:

As I wrote above, it's an obvious case of incompetence by GoDaddy's legal department + them being overly cautious, since Oxley did have some business relationship with Agarwal.

And like I said, I myself have a domain locked by GoDaddy for a legal reason (and they keep renewing it).

Click to expand...

This drugs + indian prime minister + mafia don + prostitute + scammer are all planted fake arguments.

Ok

barybadrinath said:

This drugs + indian prime minister + mafia don + prostitute + scammer are all planted fake arguments.

Click to expand...

It seems clear to me that you felt you had no other option. You felt cheated and stuck. Maybe Mr. Oxley feels bad over your relationship also. In either case, it seems that there is room for making this right.

I sincerely hope that both you and Mr. Oxley are able to repair your damage and move forward.

barybadrinath said:

Ok

Click to expand...

I edited my comment as @barybadrinath removed the comment I was responding to.

Brad

barybadrinath said:

This drugs + indian prime minister + mafia don + prostitute + scammer are all planted fake arguments.

Click to expand...

Are you saying the evidence filed in the suit is falsified/fake?

barybadrinath said:

This drugs + indian prime minister + mafia don + prostitute + scammer are all planted fake arguments.

Click to expand...

Is the chat transcript in the court evidence not true? Seems legit though.

barybadrinath said:

Ok

Click to expand...

Are you able to drop your case under the right circumstances? I don't know how indian courts work.

barybadrinath said:

This drugs + indian prime minister + mafia don + prostitute + scammer are all planted fake arguments.

Click to expand...

Can we just focus on the issue at hand, instead of all this superfluous bullshit?

Brad

barybadrinath said:

Yes i was indeed cheated and very badly cheated.

Click to expand...

How <please answer EXACTLY how you were cheated>...

Was it by Mr. Oxley saying you were not authorize to charge $30,000, and reversing that transaction?

... are you saying you were authorized to charge $30,000 to his card?

... are you saying you have some ownership stake in the domains locked?

I think part of the issue here, is nobody has a clue, specifically, to how you were cheated? You keep hinting at not wanting to expose shady business or unethical practices, almost in an effort to extort Mr. Oxley due to some knowledge you possess. So were you really cheated, or is this an elaborately concocted retaliatory extortion scheme?

Simply put, you made a lot of allegations in the email(s) you sent to the Texas court. References attached.

Silentptnr said:

Are you able to drop your case under the right circumstances? I don't know how indian courts work.

Click to expand...

Impossible says i m possible

Grilled said:

How <please answer EXACTLY how you were cheated>...

Was it by Mr. Oxley saying you were not authorize to charge $30,000, and reversing that transaction?

... are you saying you were authorized to charge $30,000 to his card?

... are you saying you have some ownership stake in the domains locked?

I think part of the issue here, is nobody has a clue, specifically, to how you were cheated? You keep hinting at not wanting to expose shady business or unethical practices, almost in an effort to extort Mr. Oxley due to some knowledge you possess.

Simply put, you made a lot of allegations in the email you sent to the Texas court. References attached.

Click to expand...

Please wear a lawyer coat and "grill" me in the court room. I will respond to each and every question or clarification sought by you legally

barybadrinath said:

Impossible says i m possible

Click to expand...

Perhaps you should speak directly. Maybe there is a solution now.

barybadrinath said:

Please wear a lawyer coat and "grill" me in the court room. I will respond to each and every question or clarification sought by you legally

Click to expand...

Extortion sir?

Maybe cows will be sacrificed because of your actions. Have you thought about this?

barybadrinath said:

Please wear a lawyer coat and "grill" me in the court room. I will respond to each and every question or clarification sought by you legally

Click to expand...

Are you ever planning on actually serving Brent, or are you going to just sit on the lawsuit and GoDaddy lock as long as possible for leverage? Any competent court has a limit of how far they will allow a lawsuit to drag on without service of process.

If you have a case actually make it, in court. Just having some open ended lawsuit is nonsense.

Brad

barybadrinath said:

Please wear a lawyer coat and "grill" me in the court room. I will respond to each and every question or clarification sought by you legally

Click to expand...

You can message me if you like. Perhaps there can be a resolution soon.

I do not have pacer access. One of the domainer told me today from usa that might be all of my responses and evidences, chat transcripts are not uploaded on pacer. I sent everything to Hon' Court via emails ,not by pacer.
If you will read all those chat transcripts , all email threads sent to court , all of your questions will be automatically answered and then you will be asking questions from brent sir

bmugford said:

Are you ever planning on actually serving Brent, or are you going to just sit on the lawsuit and GoDaddy lock as long as possible for leverage? Any component court has a limit of how far they will allow a lawsuit to drag on without service of process.

If you have a case actually make it, in court. Just having some open ended lawsuit is nonsense.

Brad

Click to expand...

May I ask do you have proper knowledge about this case and its summons served or not. That is why I am asking again and again to first have full knowledge , get facts right and then ask questions. Your FACTS are not correct.

.

barybadrinath said:

May I ask do you have proper knowledge about this case and its summons served or not. That is why I am asking again and again to first have full knowledge , get facts right and then ask questions. Your FACTS are not correct.

Click to expand...

The online records show that he was not served.

Was Brent served? YES or NO.

This is a simple question.

If it is not a straight "Yes" answer, we know what the actual answer it.

Brad

barybadrinath said:

May I ask do you have proper knowledge about this case and its summons served or not. That is why I am asking again and again to first have full knowledge , get facts right and then ask questions. Your FACTS are not correct.

Click to expand...

@barybadrinath I hope both parties issues are resolved. I can see you two are the only people that fully understand the relationship you had.

Of course, this is separate from my feelings about the actions of GD.