Dynadot
Spaceship Spaceship
Watch

DOMAIN ILLUMINATI

THTMVATMEDNOATTop Member
Impact
11,605
🚩

A few days ago, FACEBOOK's Mark Zuckerberg joins (AMAZON's Jeff Bezos and MICROSOFT's Bill Gates) in the ultra exclusive, three - person (August 2020) centibillionaire club after his net worth passes $ 100 billion USD (according to news reports from bloomberg and many other major news companies) but neither he nor one of the other two mentioned centibillionaires do own the ...

... the domain name centibillionaire.club which was registered also a few days ago.

Most probably you can't join the centibillionaire club but you can join this discussion - so feel free to share your thoughts and opinions about the surprising fact that none of them own this domain name - although all three are super famous for being the (co -) founders of three of the largest internet / software / web companies in the world (wide web) and for being the only (officially known) three centibillionaires (August 2020) in the world at the time when this post was created.
 
1
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
I am not suggesting we need to behead Rothschilds and Rockafellers.

I am not suggesting we need to fire a nuclear warhead on Geneva.

We only need to change rules.
 
0
•••
I am not suggesting we need to behead Rothschilds and Rockafellers.

I am not suggesting we need to fire a nuclear warhead on Geneva.

We only need to change rules.
No human is allowed to take another ones life (unless some psychopath surprisingly intends to kill you (may this never happen of course) and there is no other way to defend yourself) - neither through beheading nor through bombings - nor through other ways.

And nevertheless unfortunately there were / are (past / current) individuals (and their helpers) that were / are ignoring this (holy) rule ...

... financing wars, for example, is one of the main roots of evil - especially if it was / is an ongoing, parallel financing of both sides (which is absolutely cruel).

It is GOD (the one and only being / creator that has the power to combine all elements / atoms / particles in the way that life can exist) alone, who decides what HE will forgive those of HIS creation who regret their cruel actions.

So there is actually no need to change the (holy) rules (which is anyhow not possible), the change is primarily needed in the behave of those individuals who don't follow the (holy) rules.

However, I understand your point - but, symbolically spoken, unless you are in the centibillionaire club, changing global circumstances (primarily economical justice) is just not easy - and even then it is certainly a very complex matter (as one can see).
 
Last edited:
0
•••
How are you suggesting to change the behavior of killuminati?
 
0
•••
How are you suggesting to change the behavior of killuminati?
I assume you mean illuminati since killuminati is the term which was created (and which is meant) for being a statement against them (illuminati) as I explained earlier.

It is important that there is consistency in the distinction between these two words.

If you agree to this distinction (in form of a reply), I will answer your question in terms of content.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
killuminati is the accurate word.
 
0
•••
killuminati is the accurate word.
Only in terms of "being against the illuminati" the term killuminati is the right term (but not the other way around), one can compare it with "anti illuminati".
 
0
•••
for or against, killuminati is killuminati
 
0
•••
for or against, killuminati is killuminati
The (made up) word killuminati is the (made up) word killuminati, sure - but it is important that there is consensus in the interpretation of a word because otherwise a conversation does not make much sense.

The correct (established) interpretation of the word killuminati is "(being) against (the) illuminati".

Do you agree with this correct (established) interpretation?
 
Last edited:
0
•••
1
•••
killuminati is killuminati
Well, I can confirm that the (made up) term killuminati is the (made up) term killuminati, yes.
 
0
•••
killuminati is the actual word
 
0
•••
Last edited:
0
•••
The better question is how are you proposing to change the behavior of killuminati?
 
0
•••
0
•••
Now Iran is enriching uranium.

So, where are fake "ill uminati" led the planet?
 
0
•••
Now Iran is enriching uranium.

So, where are fake "ill uminati" led the planet?
The illuminati are real, they exist (in secret).

They are "fake" only in the sense that they think they are "enlightened", because they (mistakenly) believe that the devil ((may he be cursed) who they call "lucifer" but there are many other names for him (may he be cursed) in other langauges too) is GOD, thus they are ultimately misguided - they are blind through their occult deals with the devil (may he be cursed), in exchange for (earthly) power they help him (may he be cursed) on his permanent plan to get worshipped as GOD.

They rule the world through deception of the masses, they control all presidents and state leaders in the world (those who won't act as the illuminati tell them, will get exchanged (they call it "election") for others who will do so), they control the mainstream media and thus they permanently broadcast the illusion that there are (other) enemies (than the devil (may he be cursed)) and unfortunately many (no matter which country, culture, religion) fall for it (and turning themselve into bad people) as they forget that it is in fact the devil (may he be cursed)) who is the real enemy ...

... this is why the term "killuminati" arrived - as a name for those who are against the "illuminati".

Regards my domaining activity, I use the term "ILLUMINATI" in context of creating awareness for the term "KILLUMINATI" and its meaning and finally for the topic at all.

One should consider the possibility that in reality there may be no nuclear weapons at all (but only in our imagination as a result of media brainwashing over the decades) as they could just be a virtual fear tool that is part of the manipulation, it has continued (only the level has changed) since man was banished from heaven ...

... but the good news is that if we pass the test known as earthly life, we will have a chance to return to heaven as the devil (may he be cursed) has no chance of deceiving us as long as we banish him (may he be cursed) in the name of GOD.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
The do evil but people are developping nuclear weapons to kill them for the evil they do. Killuminati they are.
 
0
•••
They do evil ...
Yes.

... but people are developping nuclear weapons to kill them for the evil they do. Killuminati they are.
No.

It's not the
killuminati who develop nuclear weapons - it's the illuminati (or those on their behalf) themselve who may (have) develop(ed) nuclear weapons (if nuclear weapons can (or do) exist at all - in other words, if they are not just a media hoax to create fear as I implied in my last post) as part of their devil (may he be cursed) worship.

The weapons of the killuminati are not from violence nature, they are form spiritual nature.
It's spiritual energy which is the highest form of energy.

So the
"kill..." in "killuminati" is meant in a spiritual way, it's the power of mind and wisdom (which GOD gives those who ask HIM for it) that will kill the illuminati without any physical weapon.

We just have to use our potential in the right way and the illuminati will lose their war against humanity.

In my case, my weapon is a certain domain name that kills them due the fact that (even) they can't top it.

That's why it is known as killuminati domain name developed by domain name killuminati and it has more power than any (fake or real) nuclear weapon.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
killuminati murder people through manipulating people into hot and cold wars.

normal people develop nuclear weapons to defend themselves, killuminati will all be beheaded.
 
0
•••
killuminati murder people through manipulating people into hot and cold wars.
Wrong.

It's the
(so called) illuminati who you mean in fact, you are still confusing the two ...

... in case you are not "trolling".

normal people develop nuclear weapons to defend themselves, killuminati will all be beheaded.
Also wrong.

And besides, normal people would not make such statements ...

... so either you are not normal (at least in regards to this topic) or you are indeed "trolling" (which is a kind of "not normal").

upload_2021-1-6_19-37-15.png
CLICK FOR FULL VIEW

It is no coincidence that you are restricted (50 % - 70 %).
 
Last edited:
0
•••
This post is a friendly reminder that the actual topic of this thread is (not about "k/illuminati" but) about the domain name

centibillionaire.club

and about the surprising fact that (still) not one of the officially known centibillionaires (according to certain lists from FORBES / BLOOMBERG / ...) owns it.

Another fact (but not a surprising one) is, that, in meanwhile, this domain name(s URL) is now displayed each at the top of the first page (at least at the time when I made this post) when you search for it via ...

... Google
https://www.google.com/search?&q=centibillionaire.club

... Bing
https://www.bing.com/search?&q=centibillionaire.club

... which is not a bad result when considered that there are tons of (other) websites (not "tons of top" (which is another story)) referring to the centibillionaire club and its members.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Another word for killuminati is mafia
 
0
•••
Another word for killuminati is mafia
It seems important to you to strengthen your image of an ignorant "troll".

On the other hand, you would just have to remove the "k" (from "killuminati") - then your statement would even make sense.
In this case it would also be advisable to use only one red - tone / font size in future as this would let people take your statements more serious.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
I can only tell you one thing with absolute confidence...

Not one centibillionaire gives a rats ass that you own centibillionaire.club

It is an absolutely silly move to register it because your target audience is what ?

3 people (n)
 
1
•••
I can only tell you one thing with absolute confidence...

Not one centibillionaire gives a rats ass that you own centibillionaire.club

It is an absolutely silly move to register it because your target audience is what ?

3 people (n)
No, it's actually (also) you (in example) who is (part of) my target audience - and not only centibillionaires, the reason why I registered it, is another one than the one you seem to have in mind.

In other words, the picture is bigger than the one you created in / with your (absolute silly) comment, a sale of centibillionaire.club would only be an unplanned side effect.

That being said, I am absolutely sure that at least one centibillionaire already visited my domain name(s website) and you can be sure I will renew it.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Back