discuss Joe Biden - NOW USA President

Samer said:

Yes Brad, a suit to guarantee transparent integrity of the election. 70M people voted other way;
Put our minds at ease, instea dof just "brushing us off" ya know?

They wont take it; if it means absolute transparensy and audit of results.

Theyre too scared to look at it; I expect 5-4 win; since Roberts the snake grandstanding virtue-signaling to his leftist followers (as usual)

Click to expand...

You don't get to just fucking scream fraud, then provide no evidence nor even claim it in court.
Sorry, that is not how the legal system works.

We are on day 20 now since the election.

Where is the evidence of anything other than conspiracy bullshit that was so extreme it got Sidney Powell booted off the Trump legal team.

Imagine being too extreme for that group of clowns.

Brad

bmugford said:

You don't get to just fucking scream fraud, then provide no evidence nor even claim in court.
Sorry, that is not how the legal system works.

We are on day 20 now since the election.
Where is the evidence of anything other than conspiracy bullshit that was so extreme it got Sidney Powell booted off the Trump legal team.

Imagine being too extreme for that group of clowns.

Brad

Click to expand...

Well, that's the thing;
He's run out the clock to the absolute end;
To the point where the MSM media just reports the "certifications" and assume "Done"
Maybe. You'd think that's the likely outcome based on what's happened to this point, right?

Soon the new news will trickle in (or so i hope)
It will prove JusttheNews; and theEpochTimes credibility
(u guys always take shots at) They reported it before all else;
They will reverse; (Or so i hope) a Hawaiin Judge halted the "racist" "Travel Ban" for cryin loud

Samer said:

Yes Brad, a suit to guarantee transparent integrity of the election. 70M people voted other way;
Put our minds at ease, instead just "brushing us off" know?

They wont take it; if it means absolute transparensy and audit of results.

Theyre too scared to look at it; I expect 5-4 win; since Roberts the snake grandstanding virtue-signaling to his leftist followers (as usual)

Click to expand...

Trump didn’t put Amy Coney Barrett in the Supreme Court for nothing ... Trump doesn’t appear to excited about anything .. he is golfing and other shit .. that is what makes me feel he does indeed have an end game card for them

.X. said:

Trump didn’t put Amy Coney Barrett in the Supreme Court for nothing ... Trump doesn’t appear to excited about anything .. he is golfing and other shit .. that is what makes me feel he does indeed have an end game card for them

Click to expand...

Ain't going to Supreme Court guys. They have nothing if you haven't figured that out yet. Cleanest election ever.

bmugford said:

You don't get to just fucking scream fraud, then provide no evidence nor even claim it in court.
Sorry, that is not how the legal system works.

We are on day 20 now since the election.

Where is the evidence of anything other than conspiracy bullshit that was so extreme it got Sidney Powell booted off the Trump legal team.

Imagine being too extreme for that group of clowns.

Brad

Click to expand...

Al Gore did it for 36 days

JB Lions said:

Ain't going to Supreme Court guys. They have nothing if you haven't figured that out yet. Cleanest election ever.

Click to expand...

our Supreme Court is to us what your mail in ballots were to you

.X. said:

Trump didn’t put Amy Coney Barrett in the Supreme Court for nothing ... Trump doesn’t appear to excited about anything .. he is golfing and other shit .. that is what makes me feel he does indeed have an end game card for them

Click to expand...

So basically the goal then is without any real evidence, to overturn democracy in the Supreme Court based on nothing? If that is the end game, it is a pathetic stance.

Anyone who supports that scheme is not American, does not support the Constitution, does not support democracy, and is not a patriot.

Brad

Be mad at all the sites lying to you, giving you false hope for clicks, advertising $$$, trying to milk every last dollar out of this Trump Error. Be mad at yourself for constantly falling for it. We'll have a show until Jan. 20, Biden still gets sworn in after thrashing Trump in the election.

bmugford said:

So basically the goal then is without any real evidence, to overturn democracy in the Supreme Court based on nothing? If that is the end game, it is a pathetic stance.

Anyone who supports that scheme is not American, does not support the Constitution, does not support democracy, and is not a patriot.

Brad

Click to expand...

no no.... it would be tit for tat ... mail in ballot fraud vs our partial Supreme Court ... fair enough

.X. said:

Al Gore did it for 36 days

Click to expand...

Yes, because one single state, that decided the winner, separated by 500 votes, with a legit question over what ballots to count (hanging chads) is totally the same as getting electorally blown out and claiming widespread fraud with no actual evidence of it.

Brad

.X. said:

no no.... it would be tit for tat ... mail in ballot fraud vs our partial Supreme Court ... fair enough

Click to expand...

Biden won the total vote. Biden won the electoral vote.

The ball is in Trump's court to prove that isn't true.
I am waiting for Trump's dream team of lawyers to prove it.

At some point you need to provide actual evidence, not just conspiracy theories.
Again they are not even making these fraud claims in actual court filings.

Brad

bmugford said:

Yes, because one single state, that decided the winner, with a legit question over what ballots to count (hanging chads) is totally the same as getting electorally blown out and claiming widespread fraud with no actual evidence of it.

Brad

Click to expand...

It was very planned out and excellent work ... when done like that their should be no sustainable evidence left behind .. so yes .. it is allegations ... you would do the same thing if the election were overturned .... but the Dems wouldn’t be able to prove anything as well ...

.X. said:

no no.... it would be tit for tat ... mail in ballot fraud vs our partial Supreme Court ... fair enough

Click to expand...

If the supreme court would decide in Bidens favour would you get behind it?

- Georgia: We have identified over a thousand early/abs votes cast by individuals whose registered addresses are in fact at post offices, UPS, and FedEx locations, wilfully disguising the box numbers as "Apt," "Unit," etc.

.X. said:

It was very planned out and excellent work ... when done like that their should be no sustainable evidence left behind .. so yes .. it is allegations ... you would do the same thing if the election were overturned .... but the Dems wouldn’t be able to prove anything as well ...

Click to expand...

So the argument then is the fraud was so good there is no evidence.
So by that logic....No evidence of fraud = Fraud.

Brad

NameDeck said:

If the supreme court would decide in Bidens favour would you get behind it?

Click to expand...

they wouldn’t though ... none of the Republicans sitting on that court want to hear anything that the progressive Dems say ... they wouldn’t rule for Biden if hell was freezing over

mr-x said:

- Georgia: We have identified over a thousand early/abs votes cast by individuals whose registered addresses are in fact at post offices, UPS, and FedEx locations, wilfully disguising the box numbers as "Apt," "Unit," etc.

Click to expand...

They better forward that proof to trump

mr-x said:

- Georgia: We have identified over a thousand early/abs votes cast by individuals whose registered addresses are in fact at post offices, UPS, and FedEx locations, wilfully disguising the box numbers as "Apt," "Unit," etc.

Click to expand...

And? Where does it say you can't use that as a mailing address?

Brad

.X. said:

they wouldn’t though ... none of the Republicans sitting on that court want to hear anything that the progressive Dems say ... they wouldn’t rule for Biden if hell was freezing over

Click to expand...

So you're saying they wouldn't follow facts and law? Do you really think so little of SCOTUS?

bmugford said:

So the argument then is the fraud was so good there is no evidence.
So by that logic....No evidence of fraud = Fraud.

Brad

Click to expand...

pretty much .... no evidence means job very well done ... the events leading to Biden’s victory are the obvious ... although circumstantial ... there is enough there to connect the dots and over turn it

.X. said:

pretty much .... no evidence means job very well done ... the events leading to Biden’s victory are the obvious ... although circumstantial ... there is enough there to connect the dots and over turn it

Click to expand...

If your evidence in court of voter fraud is that there is no evidence, that is honestly the most absurd thing I have ever heard.

You have to just be trolling...

Brad

NameDeck said:

So you're saying they wouldn't follow facts and law? Do you really think to little of SCOTUS?

Click to expand...

the facts of law do allow circumstantial evidence and eye witnesses in a court of law .... if they didn’t we would have unsolved crimes all over the place ... so I do believe SCOTUS will hear the case ..

bmugford said:

If your evidence in court of voter fraud is that there is no evidence, that is honestly the most absurd thing I have ever heard.

You have to just be trolling...

Brad

Click to expand...

eye witnesses ...

.X. said:

eye witnesses ...

Click to expand...

Hey, let me know when lawyers actually make claims of fraud in their court cases.

At some point anecdotal "evidence" has to match empirical data to have a case.

Soliciting affidavits, then submitting ones you can't disprove is not "evidence" as the judge in Arizona said as he admonished Trump's lawyers.

Brad

There are over 150 eye witnesses that have signed to testify ... sworn in testimony and the events of Nov 4 going forward