IT.COM

status-duplicate Who prefers this old design?

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch
Status
Not open for further replies.

Do you like the NamePros 20.0.4 theme?

  • 1st

    I prefer the previous one.

    134 
    votes
    54.3%
  • 2nd

    I love it!

    59 
    votes
    23.9%
  • 3rd

    It's whatever...

    30 
    votes
    12.1%
  • 4th

    I like it.

    24 
    votes
    9.7%

King

Investor & CreatorTop Member
Impact
3,858
I don't, the previous logo was also way better IMO, this one feels like a library, by the way SVG > PNG

How do I go back to the previous version, can you guys add it to the style chooser?

Nothing against those who like this design better, I like simple & modern. I thought the previous design felt a bit outdated, this one is even more 💔




Update:
 
Last edited:
2
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
I don't care for the theme very much and am hoping it's an April Fools Day prank, no need to go back to the Golden Days of the internet. This design sets us back 21+ years and an example of the 1990's.
 
8
•••
1
•••
I don't care for the theme very much and am hoping it's an April Fools Day prank, no need to go back to the Golden Days of the internet. This design sets us back 21+ years and an example of the 1990's.
Exactly :ROFL:
 
1
•••
Yay. I love the old throwback to 2004 colors. Not my favorite logo though, I miss the NamePros light bulb! :)
 
2
•••
I miss the NamePros light bulb!
This version?

newlogo.gif
 
7
•••
The theme design is okay but the logo looks like it's for a library or a book publishing company.
 
3
•••
4
•••
I forgot that Twitter didn't start until 2006. I may have just broke the internet when I tweeted this.

NameProsRollback.png
 
3
•••
1
•••
0
•••
Well according to the creator:

I'm just saying I wouldn't try to tell you that your pronouncing your name wrong.

Bah, you ruined it. The joke was supposed to be that "GIF" is ambiguous. :P
 
1
•••
1
•••
Everyone's complaining that we don't have dark mode, so I've added it. Just click here to enable it. Disclaimer: Only works in cool browsers.
 
4
•••
Make the dark mode stop....I am freaking out!

ADD: got it back...now I need to step outside for a.....beer!?!?! :xf.wink:
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Everyone's complaining that we don't have dark mode, so I've added it. Just click here to enable it. Disclaimer: Only works in cool browsers.

Congrats, you found something that looks even worse. Who knew that was possible. 😂
 
1
•••
Congrats, you found something that looks even worse. Who knew that was possible. 😂

I'm just getting started. Wait until you see the red + cyan variant.
 
1
•••
0
•••
1
•••
Hmm, the psychedelic flamingo scheme isn't actually as bad as I was expecting.

Also, I voted 'It's whatever...' but in a "it's a nice place to visit but I wouldn't want to live to here" reasoning.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
White looks cleaner and more professional, not to mention easier to read.
 
0
•••
For me , its new and good design , still relevant on 2020 , cause I join Namepros on 2019. Congrat's for back to old design...
 
0
•••
I prefer the previous one...
 
5
•••
I was hoping it would go back to the other day, where there wasnt 1/2 my screen real estate wasted, more scrolling, etc but seems we're still stuck with this. Dont like it. Yuck!

At least give us a choice like we had prior to this change. No matter which style is chosen on the bottom left, it defaults to this one. Thats not cool.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
This is way to white don't like it back in 2004 it was ok :ROFL:
 
0
•••
Everyone's complaining that we don't have dark mode, so I've added it. Just click here to enable it. Disclaimer: Only works in cool browsers.

neat ... :)
so how do we save its there when we open close np window?
i hate darkmode but anthing is better than this new design.

also, the new design really is harder on the eyes.. the borders and especially the fact that you can now barely tell difference between watched threads with new posts vs those without... it is so much harder than before. any chance you can do something about that... or maybe like your darkmode, just offer an option for people to go back to old design?

just curious to ask... i wasn't here in 2004... but what is the logic behind bringing back an ancient design that was to begin with modified once or more since 2004, by the thinkiing process of improving on the previous one(s)... isn't it logical to assume that if you once had a 2004 design... then modified it in following years, then you did so as part of an imrpovement process? if so, then why go back now to something which by logic and default is necessarily just inferior? in this case its inferior not only by logic but also not improvement by general public opinion.

i mean why not just consult people before. or is this still all negotiable? or will you just force it on people who clearly vote against it? if this is here to stay, then who here takes decision to force on people designs that most do not like?

ty
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back