legal Oops! Afternic gets a UDRP while not the actual registrant

like Add.com is listed @Sedo for 50K, yet sold for $800k at most recent NamesCon auction?

Why is “seller’s asking price $50k?” lies sedo..

Samer

Samer said:

like Add.com is listed @Sedo for 50K, yet sold for $800k at most recent NamesCon auction?

Why is “seller’s asking price $50k?” lies sedo..

Samer

Click to expand...

Are you having trouble focusing on the subject of this post?

Sedo is not a part of this. And it's not a listing issue, is a WHOIS issue.

Acroplex said:

Are you having trouble focusing on the subject of this post?

Sedo is not a part of this. And it's not a listing issue, is a WHOIS issue.

Click to expand...

It reminds me of forgetting to update listing, since Whois outdated... semantics aside,

i consider it an industry problem, thankfully this one with afternic outdated whois resolved. let’s focus on improving, who knows if list may lead big problems down the line... Let’s solve fixed, much like outdated Whois 5 yrs ago, so no one pays price. Didnt mean to hijack thread.., anything “out dated” is all the same

buyers don't care about whois contact email etc stupid rich ppl

Samer said:

like Add.com is listed @Sedo for 50K, yet sold for $800k at most recent NamesCon auction?

Why is “seller’s asking price $50k?” lies sedo..

Samer

Click to expand...

The difference is in "Seller's asking price" (Make offer / Negotiation start above $50k) vs "Buy Now Price".

Regards

No worries, Samer. But this case is interesting because the domain was sold on Afternic, but retained the WHOIS info after the transfer to the buyer's GoDaddy account. So when the UDRP arrived, GoDaddy pointed at...Afternic.

Lox said:

The difference is in "Seller's asking price" (Make offer / Negotiation start above $50k) vs "Buy Now Price".

Regards

Click to expand...

Ahh, misleading but OK
so it’s not really “asking price”