Dynadot
Spaceship Spaceship
Watch

Who is to Blame for the Troubled US Economy?

  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.
  • Both Parties

    268 
    votes
    44.7%
  • Neither Party

    57 
    votes
    9.5%
  • Democrats

    133 
    votes
    22.2%
  • Republicans

    141 
    votes
    23.5%
  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.

Impact
8,557
Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun :)

:wave:
 
8
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
1
•••
Obama closes escrow on $11,000,000 beach front home. Liberals rebrand "climate change" as "climate hysterics catastrophe".
 
1
•••
Scathing Report!
aka: 500 legal "scholars" liberals, 99% of all "scientist" paid liberals, transcript of Trump having a laugh.

@Patriot_Musket
The tactic here is tried and true.
"Respected legal scholars all agree that Trump committed impeachable offenses."
"92% of scientists agree that climate change is real."
"Members of America's national intelligence agencies are unassailable.".

mr-x basically saying:

educated folk = liberals, or
scientists and legal scholars = liberals

in defense he comes up with a tweet from Patriot_Musket :xf.rolleyes::xf.rolleyes:

------------------------
North Korea's U.N. envoy says denuclearization off negotiating table with United States

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/worl...able-with-united-states/ar-BBXU3hq?li=BBnb7Kz
 
0
•••
mr-x basically saying:

educated folk = liberals, or
scientists and legal scholars = liberals

in defense he comes up with a tweet from Patriot_Musket :xf.rolleyes::xf.rolleyes:

mr-x IS saying no one is surprised 500 liberal professors / lawyers / criminals would impeach trump for having large salt and pepper shakers. Liberals are hypocrites and willing to believe any outlandish prediction with the words "climate change".

------------------------
North Korea's U.N. envoy says denuclearization off negotiating table with United States

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/worl...able-with-united-states/ar-BBXU3hq?li=BBnb7Kz

LOL.
 
1
•••
mr-x IS saying no one is surprised 500 liberal professors / lawyers / criminals would impeach trump for having large salt and pepper shakers. Liberals are hypocrites and willing to believe any outlandish prediction with the words "climate change".



LOL.

Why do you waste your time, continually making yourself look silly with stuff like that? Legal scholars. Again, you associate scholars with being liberal, you're giving liberals a compliment. You come back with some tweet from somebody. You don't know their political leaning at all, didn't take apart the arguments they made. Why don't you do that with your next post, actually go thru the article and take it apart.

The tactic here is tried and true.

Folded. Dodged it.

Legal scholar who testified in congress had to "cross the street" to avoid waking in front of a building with Trump's name on it. The other thought Trump should be impeached for mean tweets.

Get out of here.

Continually posting stupid stuff. Mentioning 1 scholar crossing the street, isn't an argument against the article and 500 legal scholars. It's just you running away again posting up dumb stuff that has nothing to do with the post.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
The tactic here is tried and true.

"Respected legal scholars all agree that Trump committed impeachable offenses."

"92% of scientists agree that climate change is real."

"Members of America's national intelligence agencies are unassailable.

Why do you waste your time, continually making yourself look silly with stuff like that? Legal scholars. Again, you associate scholars with being liberal, you're giving liberals a compliment. You come back with some tweet from somebody. You don't know their political leaning at all, didn't take apart the arguments they made. Why don't you do that with your next post, actually go thru the article and take it apart.

"legal scholars".
 
1
•••
Legal scholar who testified in congress had to "cross the street" to avoid walking in front of a building with Trump's name on it. The other thought Trump should be impeached for mean tweets.

Get out of here.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Too bad the left has no sense of humor. America is the funniest place in the world these days. But you'll be accused of a hate crime if you laugh about it.
 
3
•••
Why do you waste your time, continually making yourself look silly with stuff like that? Legal scholars. Again, you associate scholars with being liberal, you're giving liberals a compliment. You come back with some tweet from somebody. You don't know their political leaning at all, didn't take apart the arguments they made. Why don't you do that with your next post, actually go thru the article and take it apart.



Folded. Dodged it.



Continually posting stupid stuff. Mentions 1 scholar crossing the street, when the article is about 500 legal scholars. Dumb Trumpers. Still not taking the article apart. Everybody can see you're dodging it. Quote something in the article, take it apart. Some running from it.

JB hides his replies in previous post when he's loosing but can't stand not having the last word.

upload_2019-12-7_18-22-14.png



If you're a liberal preaching climate change will end the world but haven't sterilized yourself, you're just another hypocrite tool of the system.

If you're think 500 "legal scholars" who think trump should be impeached aren't liberals, you're just stupid.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
JB hides his replies in previous post when he's loosing but can't stand not having the last word.

I've explained it to you before. It's because you have this habit of going on and on about something, just to fill up pages because you're bored.

First, doing dumb screenshots when the post is already there for anybody to read.

Then, you mentioning 1 scholar crossing the street, isn't an argument against the article and 500 legal scholars. It's just you running away again posting up dumb stuff that has nothing to do with the post.

Now, tell me, why don't you take the legal arguments in the article apart? Quote something in the article and then tell me why you disagree. Actual discussion.
 
Last edited:
0
•••


“If I may have your attention please. Will a Mr. Clinton KilldEpstein meet your party at the grocery entrance. Mr. Clinton KilldEpstein, please go to grocery entrance to meet with your party. Thank you.”
 
1
•••
Nobody cares. You dummies have been calling for impeachment since 2017.

I've explained it to you before. It's because you have this habit of going on and on about something, just to fill up pages because you're bored.

First, doing dumb screenshots when the post is already there for anybody to read.

Then, you mentioning 1 scholar crossing the street, isn't an argument against the article and 500 legal scholars. It's just you running away again posting up dumb stuff that has nothing to do with the post.

Now, tell me, why don't you take the legal arguments in the article apart? Quote something in the article and then tell me why you disagree. Actual discussion.

Just more liberal bullshit, green new deal, impeach trump, yada, yada, yada.
 
1
•••
Nobody cares. You dummies have been calling for impeachment since 2017.



Just more liberal bullsh*t, green new deal, impeach trump, yada, yada, yada.

See, you're always proving me right. Dodged it yet again, talking about other stuff, green new deal? Just grabbed that out of the air. What does that have to do with impeachment, 500 legal scholars? Nothing. It's just you can't cope, can't come up with an adult response.
 
0
•••
Report: 6 Saudis Detained After Pensacola Shooting, Including 3 Who Filmed Attack
The SITE Intelligence Group, which monitors jihadist media, identified the gunman as Mohammed al-Shamrani, saying he had posted a short manifesto on Twitter that read: “I’m against evil, and America as a whole has turned into a nation of evil.”

“I’m not against you for just being American, I don’t hate you because your freedoms, I hate you because every day you supporting, funding and committing crimes not only against Muslims but also humanity,” he wrote.

Seems like America didn't quite learn the lesson of 9/11...

"The Saudi student who fatally shot three people at a U.S. naval base in Florida hosted a dinner party earlier in the week where he and three others watched videos of mass shootings."
"Dinner party."
 
Last edited:
0
•••
It's that time of the year again. Enjoy it while you can, 'cause someday Islam will take over. Merry Christmas France...
ELBQAFcW4Ach5gb.jpg
 
1
•••
Paul Joseph Watson‏ Verified account @PrisonPlanet Dec 6
Pelosi: "Civilization as we know it today is at stake in the next election."

They've gone from screaming in the streets to seriously claiming that humanity as we know it will cease to exist if Trump wins.

Trump Derangement Syndrome knows no bounds.
 
1
•••
0
•••
If you're a liberal preaching climate change will end the world but haven't sterilized yourself, you're just another hypocrite tool of the system.

Said the king of hyperbole and tinfoil hats...

Seems like America didn't quite learn the lesson of 9/11...

Correct. And if you remember way back when, I was asking why Saudi Arabia wasn’t on that ban list. It was supposed to prevent terrorism, yet it didn’t include a country of origin for most of the perpetrators of the worst terror incident on US soil. But Kush and MBS are BFFs - wouldn’t want to offend.

15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi - why are we giving them pilot training? At least without some serious vetting, which might have raised red flags about this guy.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Said the king of hyperbole and tinfoil hats...



Correct. And if you remember way back when, I was asking why Saudi Arabia wasn’t on that ban list. It was supposed to prevent terrorism, yet it didn’t include a country of origin for most of the perpetrators of the worst terror incident on US soil. But Kush and MBS are BFFs - wouldn’t want to offend.

15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi - why are we giving them pilot training? At least without some serious vetting, which might have raised red flags about this guy.

Just think, if the Saudis hadn't allowed us to use Riyadh to house our soldiers and use the air strips in Riyadh Saudi Arabia, we wouldn't have been able to carry out "Desert Storm" . which led to the war in Iraq = worse than the Vietnam war IMO. which has been going on for 20 years and cost the living hell out our government.

Don't worry, all our homeless and suffering seniors and elderly can make it without any assistance.

sorry at @enlytend , I was just venting
 
Last edited:
1
•••
f you remember way back when, I was asking why Saudi Arabia wasn’t on that ban list. It was supposed to prevent terrorism, yet it didn’t include a country of origin for most of the perpetrators of the worst terror incident on US soil. But Kush and MBS are BFFs - wouldn’t want to offend.

It was Obama who made that list. I don't recall any complaints until Trump adopted it. Lest people think Saint Obama was hard on the Saudis, a reminder....


Screen Shot.jpg
 
2
•••
Correct. And if you remember way back when, I was asking why Saudi Arabia wasn’t on that ban list. It was supposed to prevent terrorism, yet it didn’t include a country of origin for most of the perpetrators of the worst terror incident on US soil. But Kush and MBS are BFFs - wouldn’t want to offend.
And just in case you don't remember, Trump wanted to expand quite considerably on Obama's list of banned Muslim country immigrants, but the Lefties, the Liberal Media, the Dems, Hollywood, the Courts and even many Republicans went apeshit with his very wise idea.

And just in case you don't remember... Obama treated the Fort Hood terrorist massacre as a "workplace violence"

15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi - why are we giving them pilot training? At least without some serious vetting, which might have raised red flags about this guy.
Couldn't agree more. IMO, since the Saudis buy so many American military aircraft, they should pay for the training of their pilots to be done in Saudi Arabia... the same with other Arab countries.

Everyone around here already knows my feelings about the followers of the Religion of Peace. I have absolutely no problems with them... in their own countries, but when they invade Europe with the blessings of our Liberal leaders and their dumb followers, then "we have a problem"
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Said the king of hyperbole and tinfoil hats...

Democrats are saying we only have 12 years ( at best ) to prevent a climate catastrophe. We need to rewrite our Government, stop using fossil fuels, stop eating meat, control the population, end capitalism, embrace communism.

I"m being sarcastic not hyperbolic.

Correct. And if you remember way back when, I was asking why Saudi Arabia wasn’t on that ban list. It was supposed to prevent terrorism, yet it didn’t include a country of origin for most of the perpetrators of the worst terror incident on US soil. But Kush and MBS are BFFs - wouldn’t want to offend.

15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi - why are we giving them pilot training? At least without some serious vetting, which might have raised red flags about this guy.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
See, you're always proving me right. Dodged it yet again, talking about other stuff, green new deal? Just grabbed that out of the air. What does that have to do with impeachment, 500 legal scholars? Nothing. It's just you can't cope, can't come up with an adult response.

You post about hundreds of "legal scholars" agreeing Trump should be impeached. I point out they are liberals, most are probably idiots like the "constitutional experts" that testified in the House Judiciary.

You get angry, call me stupid for disagreeing with you, bury your response at the bottom of an old post because your ego demands the last insult.

Large groups of people agreeing on something they actually know little about, is a tool the left uses to "confirm" bias and form the opinions of their readers. That you think this type of propaganda is important says alot about your critical thinking.

Here's something to make you feel better.
--
Trump’s mental state is deteriorating dangerously due to impeachment with potentially ‘catastrophic outcomes’, psychiatrists urgently warn Congress
Exclusive: Statement to be accompanied by petition with at least 350 signatures from mental health professionals endorsing conclusions
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...-psychiatrist-petition-congress-a9232386.html
--

Here's another one that will make your week:
Trump's salt and pepper shakers tower over everyone else's. Obama, Bush, and Clinton used the same size shakers as their guests.
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-salt-and-pepper-shakers-are-massive-photos-2019-12
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Last edited:
1
•••
Rogan O’Handley @DC_Draino· 22h

Want to know the worst thing about Common Core?

Obama got a $65 million check after leaving office from the publisher he awarded the contract to during his term This is what we call a “bribe” and they’re supposed to be illegal...

*paging AG Barr*
--

“Obama gave Pearson Publishing $350 million to create Commoncore text and Pearson gave Obama a $65 million dollar book deal in return. Quid Pro Quo. Media silent…”

https://iotwreport.com/lets-talk-quid-pro-quo/
--
When word broke early last week that former president and first lady Barack and Michelle Obama had landed a joint deal at Penguin Random House worth a reported $65 million, many in the industry were stunned. The advance is, if not the largest on record for two standalone works, certainly the largest in recent memory.
https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw...amas-book-deals-spark-65-million-mystery.html
--

I wonder what 500 legal scholars think about that? But the real story is the size of Trump's salt shakers and his request for Ukraine to investigate corruption.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
Back