Dynadot

domains LittleBean.com is forced to rebrand after a TM battle

NameSilo
Watch

Lox

____Top Member
Impact
12,376
A Portland Vegan Ice Cream Company LittleBean(.com) Is Forced to Rebrand After a Trademark Battle With Gerber Baby Foods and changed its name to LittleChickpea(.com)

Camden came up with the name Little Bean a little over a year ago before the Northwest storefront opened. He says that when he applied for a trademark he was initially told "everything looked good," but then the trademark office informed him that he might "run into an issue with Gerber."

"Our lawyers reached out to theirs and they said they had discontinued the line and had no intention of doing anything with it," Camden says. So he opened his store and decided to re-apply for the trademark in a year. But Gerber still wouldn't budge.

"They said they had no intention of using the trademark but they will keep it until it expires," Camden says. "We don't have three to four years to wait."

read more ( wweek )

 
6
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
I feel for them, but at the end of the day it's up to Gerber to decide whether they want to keep the name or not. Maybe the lawyers concerned didn't have the word from the top that they could scrap the brand.

Also, just cause they didn't want to do anything with it doesn't mean that it's not valuable intellectual property to Gerber. They have the right to keep the trademark for as long as they want as they have traded under the name.

Gerber are owned by NestlΓ©: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerber_Products_Company
I'm going to guess that this relates to the LIL' BEANIES Trademark: https://www.tmdn.org/tmview/get-detail?st13=US500000086707972
 
Last edited:
2
•••
it indeed an unpleasant experience for them. They should have avoided the name entirely since someone owns it before even if not really active.
 
5
•••
The crazy part is the Gerber product is discontinued.
 
0
•••
1
•••
The crazy part is the Gerber product is discontinued.

Until it expires, the trademark for the discontinued product still remains a company asset until they 'dispose' of it by sale, writing off, or any other means.
 
2
•••
Why is that crazy? :nailbiting:
Until it expires, the trademark for the discontinued product still remains a company asset until they 'dispose' of it by sale, writing off, or any other means.

Well obviously.... they still own the TM but the fact to pay all those fees and time to file for the case, for a product they're no longer going to sell, and for name that that doesnt even match the name of the product. Lil Beanies.

That's the crazy part!
 
1
•••
Well obviously.... they still own the TM but the fact to pay all those fees and time to file for the case, for a product they're no longer going to sell, and for name that that doesnt even match the name of the product. Lil Beanies.

That's the crazy part!
You should see some of the claims that Facebook make when people try to register anything with the word Face or Book in them.

Here's one for objection of the mark BOOKOOROO
http://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/v?pno=88483788&pty=EXT

:woot::woot::woot:
 
1
•••
1
•••
0
•••
1
•••
0
•••
1
•••
0
•••
1
•••
1
•••
2
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back