Dynadot

budget: above $5000 WTB: Exact Match Legal Form DOTCOM names

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch
Status
Not open for further replies.

wurdd

Account Closed (Requested)
Impact
713
Hello Folks,

I'm interested in buying domains with the following requirements - please read closely to understand:

- TLD ------> DOT COM only

***I'm not interested in any other alternate extensions, I don't want any other TLD - I can handreg them too - I just want DOT COM please! Also, a few folks have mentioned that there are names that fit my request available to handreg. Trust me, if a name in my niche was worth anything more than reg fee it would've been registered years ago.


- Aged: Any, but I do prefer older names and the best will be older
- Length: Any length as long as it's an EXACT MATCH LEGAL FORM in DOTCOM
- I prefer singular over plural

- Examples of perfect exact match legal forms (I'm looking for forms like these below):

PowerOfAttorney /com
BillofSale /com
RevocableTrust /com
PrenuptialAgreement /com
QuitclaimDeed /com
EvictionNotice /com
NameChange /com
SmallEstateAffidavit /com
WarrantyDeed /com


-Examples of Long Tail exact match legal forms (I may buy something like these if it fits my niche):

QuitclaimDeedForm /com
NameChangeForm /com
NonDisclosureAgreement /com
DurablePowerofAttorney /com
PowerofAttorneyForm /com
AffidavitForm /com
SpecialWarrantyDeed /com
CodiciToWill /com


Looking for Quality over Quantity -
If it's a good name will pay accordingly
Total Budget $5000+ will go higher for premium


Payment with Escrow, DAN, Paypal, trades, we can work it out for premium names

PM your names with prices for discussion and post "PM Sent" in thread.

All offers are very appreciated, will reply if a name meets the criteria.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
0
•••
0
•••
PM Sent
 
Last edited:
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back