I know that the liars on the left can't argue science with a Nobel Prize winning scientist,
so all you can do is try to smear him, so let Ted Koppel of ABC News—Nightline answer you.
"Take all the MPV's from professional baseball, basketball,
and football. Throw in your dozen favorite movie stars and
a half dozen rock stars for good measure, add all the television
anchorpeople now on the air, and collectively, we have not
affected the current good or the future welfare of mankind
as much as Kary Mullis."
Ted Koppel? He's not a scientist. We're pushing 2020, for people to still deny climate change is crazy. Other scientists have taken him apart. I gave you a few links already. Scientists who weren't f*cked up on alcohol and hallucinogens or believed in astrology.
Obviously Ted Koppel is not a scientist. He is a highly respected anchorman for the news
Your sources included no scientists and really said nothing to "debunk" Kari Mullis.
In fact, scientists who once championed the ozone hole danger now say that the ozone
hole is not threat. But, they are saying this years after we have wasted billions of dollars
to remove harmless CFC.
Ozone is created when oxygen molecules in the stratosphere absorb energy from the
sun's ultraviolet rays. In other words, it takes sunshine to create ozone.
Antarctica gets no sunshine for 6 months a year and very little sunshine for
the other 6 months. And even during the summer, the sun never rises very much
above the horizon. So no sunlight is going through the stratosphere directly above
Antarctica—ever. It is this lack of sunshine that creates the ozone hole.
This is why the ozone hole never spreads beyond Antarctica.
CFCs have nothin to do with it.
Some in the media is saying that the CFC ban repaired the ozone hole problem and
that is the reason that the ozone hole is no longer a threat. But this is such an obvious lie.
The ozone hole is still floating above Antarctica, as it has been for millions of years.
And climate scientists are mostly silent on this now, obviously wanting this
issue to go silently away. But Kari Mullis called out this fraud many years ago.
And he also said this:
"Politicians don't know anything about scientific things.
They just want to look like they do.
Somebody has to advise them.
Who are those advisors?
It's an important question because those people—who are
always having to come up with eminent disasters
that can be prevented by governmental projects—are
manipulating you.
They are parasites with degrees..."
"Beyond the lack of scientific evidence,
it makes no sense anyhow that we could destroy ozone
in the upper atmosphere. If a hole in the ozone layer
appeared somehow, here's what would happen: The UV rays
from the sun would come through the hole and strike
the Earth's atmosphere, where they would be absorbed
by the miles-thick layer of oxygen surrounding the Earth.
Then it would make more ozone. When the UV rays from
the sun combine with oxygen, they form ozone."
The ozone thus formed absorbs UV light, which continues
to come from the sun, and prevents it from penetrating any
farther into the oxygen below that has not been converted
to ozone. That is why we have oxygen to breathe down here
and ozone in the upper atmosphere. If all the nations
of the world agreed to spend all of their money to
eliminate the ozone layer—they couldn't do it.
It can't go away unless all the
oxygen in the atmosphere were to go away, and then,
guess what—we couldn't breathe, untill the green plants
made some more.
The ozone in the upper atmosphere regulates itself.
If you measure a drop in some variable like ozone,
it doesn't mean it is going to be gone.
Put a stick on the beach marking the edge of the last wave
while the tide is coming in, then come back in an hour
with another stick. You'll notice that the tide has come in
ten feet in an hour, but if you predict that in a year
the tide would have come in 87,000 feet, you'd be dead wrong."
