Dynadot
NameSilo
Watch

Who is to Blame for the Troubled US Economy?

  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.
  • Both Parties

    267 
    votes
    44.6%
  • Neither Party

    57 
    votes
    9.5%
  • Democrats

    133 
    votes
    22.2%
  • Republicans

    141 
    votes
    23.6%
  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.

Impact
8,557
Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun :)

:wave:
 
8
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Do you really want to talk being Dumb?
You follow the Dumbest President in American history.

You're more moral, smarter and history started yesterday ( only for leftist though ). Thank-you.
 
1
•••
Thanks for letting everybody know you lie by pretending to have me on block. I know you've been reading my posts.

This may be difficult for you, but when people are on block, there is still a link to click "view ignored content." I rarely read your posts because you rarely have anything intelligent to say, but often have something hateful or untruthful to say. So you are on block.

Again thanks for revealing how you misquote by taking "Chinese are freer in some ways" and just using the first 3 words. This is typical of your dishonesty.

I never read the post you linked to because, like I said you are on block. Flatter yourself that I secretly read all your messages if you wish. But now I have read it, and it makes as much sense as the rest of your posts. You call me a liar for saying you made a radiation joke, then quoted your own radiation joke.

You seem to equate America-loving with being silent while the country declines into a high-tech military banana republic. So Solzhenitsyn was a Russia hater and German opponents to Hitler were German haters. (Here is where you go off on a tangent and say I am comparing the left to Nazis).

I have some thoughts as to why you and Enlytend don't care that much about the future, as long as it holds together long enough for you to live comfortably, but that's just speculation and I'll leave it there rather than spew out personal conjecture as you so often do.

I am sorry, but the bubble you live in will pop someday, and it won't be pretty for anyone. I am rather concerned that, rather than reflecting how they got it wrong, Americans will lash out at some perceived enemy or neighbor.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
democrat clown car

.@JoeBiden:
"Why in God's should someone who's clipping coupons in the stock market... pay a lower tax rate than someone who is a school teacher and a firefighter.

Crazy Uncle Joe.
 
2
•••
This may be difficult for you, but when people are on block, there is still a link to click "view ignored content." I rarely read your posts because you rarely have anything intelligent to say, but often have something hateful or untruthful to say. So you are on block.

Again thanks for revealing how you misquote by taking "Chinese are freer in some ways" and just using the first 3 words. This is typical of your dishonesty.

I never read the post you linked to because, like I said you are on block. Flatter yourself that I secretly read all your messages if you wish. But now I have read it, and it makes as much sense as the rest of your posts. You call me a liar for saying you made a radiation joke, then quoted your own radiation joke.

You seem to equate America-loving with being silent while the country declines into a high-tech military banana republic. So Solzhenitsyn was a Russia hater and German opponents to Hitler were German haters. (Here is where you go off on a tangent and say I am comparing the left to Nazis).

I have some thoughts as to why you and Enlytend don't care that much about the future, as long as it holds together long enough for you to live comfortably, but that's just speculation and I'll leave it there rather than spew out personal conjecture as you so often do.

I am sorry, but the bubble you live in will pop someday, and it won't be pretty for anyone. I am rather concerned that, rather than reflecting how they got it wrong, Americans will lash out at some perceived enemy or neighbor.

This is yet another dishonest post from you. You very well know it isn't the first time you've said this stuff.

"I never read the post you linked to because," Of course you didn't, because it was me exposing you lying, but other people can read it, even if you're too lazy too, same effort you used with tonight's debate, but it won't stop you talking about it.

Then more of your Anti-American stuff I expect from you, usual drivel. Some bubble is going to pop, America is going down like Rome, stuff you've posted before. "I have some thoughts as to why you and Enlytend don't care that much about the future" I'm sure you do, you nutters are pretty amusing.
---------------------
Kamala screwing up again.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
trumpthanks.png
 
0
•••
This is yet another dishonest post from you. You very well know it isn't the first time you've said this stuff.

"I never read the post you linked to because," Of course you didn't, because it was me exposing you lying, but other people can read it, even if you're too lazy too, same effort you used with tonight's debate, but it won't stop you talking about it.

Then more of your Anti-American stuff I expect from you, usual drivel. Some bubble is going to pop, America is going down like Rome, stuff you've posted before. You nutters are pretty amusing.

I defer to your expertise in drivel and dishonesty.

You exposed no lies, but that doesn't stop you from calling me a liar. You call me a nutter because... I don't know, because you can't wrap your head around some rather obvious points, I guess. Why do you call people names on the internet? People you know nothing about? It's sad. I can respect someone who makes an effort to rebut with logic, but personal attacks are pretty much a sign that you have nothing substantial to say in defense of your position.

I sometimes hope to encourage people like you an Enlytend to think. But you just get angry and lash out. Ask yourselves why. What are you defending?
 
1
•••
I did expose your lie, I literally linked to the thread. Your reply is you never read it, how convenient. You can go read it now.

Then calling names on the internet? Are you unaware of your own posts? I mean, I can do a greatest hits if you like?

This has been pointed out to you:

"But the House parliamentarian told Gaetz he is not allowed to attend the hearing because he does not sit on either the Intelligence, Foreign Affairs, or Oversight panels, which are the official committees conducting the impeachment inquiry."

And you think it's some Deep State, conspiracy nonsense, and then pretend you're being logical. It's normal stuff, it's how these hearings go.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Funny, I just got a look at Lennco's post. Now I understand. Where does one start with dismantling all of this craziness? The Russians are coming! Maybe JB, Enly and Lennco see us that way. One side obviously is nutty, and no amount of reasoning will pull them out of it.

"It's normal"

Ok :xf.wink:
 
Last edited:
1
•••
2
•••
1
•••
Funny, I just got a look at Lennco's post. Now I understand. Where does one start with dismantling all of this craziness? The Russians are coming! Maybe JB, Enly and Lennco see us that way. One side obviously is nutty, and no amount of reasoning will pull them out of it.

"It's normal"

Ok :xf.wink:

It is, sorry to disrupt your tin-foil hat. You do know this is information you can find on your own? People have given you links to read, quotes like the one I gave but I guess that's just too reasonable for you. Doesn't fit your conspiracy mindset.
 
1
•••
2
•••
Kamala screwing up again.
Honestly I thought she was going to be on point and factual but it seems like she's reading off a check list of "things to mention"list.

Why is tulsi calling out Warren after every question she answers herself?
Is there something between those two?

Amy is eating everyone's lunch on that stage. lol
 
2
•••
Watching Kamala Harris beg Elizabeth Warren to agree with her that Twitter should close President Trumps Twitter account was comical. She came off as completely desperate, inauthentic and frankly, pretty nutty! #CensorshipKamala #DemsAreDesperate
 
2
•••
I sometimes hope to encourage people like you an Enlytend to think. But you just get angry and lash out. Ask yourselves why. What are you defending?
Only when chicken start growing teeth. Trying to talk to JB Lyings is just like...
tenor.gif
 
1
•••
Watching Kamala Harris beg Elizabeth Warren to agree with her that Twitter should close President Trumps Twitter account was comical. She came off as completely desperate, inauthentic and frankly, pretty nutty! #CensorshipKamala #DemsAreDesperate

That's why I said she was screwing up. No reaction from crowd. It's not considered a personal account, they're not going to zap it. It wouldn't be good for Dems if they did, I think it's actually better for them. Lots to use.

Honestly I thought she was going to be on point and factual but it seems like she's reading off a check list of "things to mention"list.

Why is tulsi calling out Warren after every question she answers herself?
Is there something between those two?

Amy is eating everyone's lunch on that stage. lol

She is and I was checking some reaction - https://twitter.com/search?q=Klobuchar&src=trend_click&f=live

She's getting a lot of hate for some reason, as 1 person said "i don't think i've ever read one tweet in favor of klobuchar"

That's what it feels like to me. Are these Dems and she's just too moderate? Fake accounts? Don't know.

Don't think anything is really changing from this debate or any future ones. Biden or Warren. If it's Biden, then who is his running mate. As I said I like Knobluchar, more on the same page. Warren wouldn't work. I think it will be a female. But I don't know if Dems are feeling her/Amy. Could be somebody not on the stage, who knows. If it's Biden and another moderate, are all those to the left just going to stay home? I think a lot of Sanders fans did that last election.

------------
If it's Biden and right now he's at the top. Who would make a good VP. Should it be another moderate, I think it would help in a lot of states they lost, Midwest etc. Or should he pick somebody on the left, get that group motivated. Biden/Buttigieg? Buttigieg more moderate, served in military, appeals to left as well. Kinda young, not a lot of experience. Tough choice coming up.

---------
Spartanburg, South Carolina (CNN)Former Vice President Joe Biden said Tuesday that when picking a running mate, he would prefer someone who was "of color and/or a different gender."

Black, Female, check both boxes...........Michelle Obama, haha. Have the same 4 back in the White House, just different roles.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
It is, sorry to disrupt your tin-foil hat. You do know this is information you can find on your own? People have given you links to read, quotes like the one I gave but I guess that's just too reasonable for you. Doesn't fit your conspiracy mindset.

This is a good example of how disparate facts with no context can be used to influence people with atrophied reasoning skills. You read all those captions, many of them of dubious quality, plus one out-of-context quote to wrap it up, and conclude "the evil Russians are controlling our president... and the world!"

Information means nothing if you are unable to process it. You believe the president of the world's most powerful nation is controlled by the leader of a mostly dying agrarian region populated by babushkas and old men, and I have the tin-foil hat?

Explain what Russia and Iran "win " exactly? Something you need to shed more American blood over? Why don't you volunteer?

You really have no concept of history and the manipulation of the masses to create death and destruction. It's a recurring theme. Google it.
 
1
•••
This is a good example of how disparate facts with no context can be used to influence people with atrophied reasoning skills. You read all those captions, many of them of dubious quality, plus one out-of-context quote to wrap it up, and conclude "the evil Russians are controlling our president... and the world!"

Information means nothing if you are unable to process it. You believe the president of the world's most powerful nation is controlled by the leader of a mostly dying agrarian region populated by babushkas and old men, and I have the tin-foil hat?

Explain what Russia and Iran "win " exactly? Something you need to shed more American blood over? Why don't you volunteer?

You really have no concept of history and the manipulation of the masses to create death and destruction. It's a recurring theme. Google it.

What are you talking about? I was talking about this:

"But the House parliamentarian told Gaetz he is not allowed to attend the hearing because he does not sit on either the Intelligence, Foreign Affairs, or Oversight panels, which are the official committees conducting the impeachment inquiry."

Then you respond talking about Russian and Iran. Where am I talking about that? Actually, quote me, so I know what you're responding to.

HE DOES NOT SIT ON THOSE PANELS

Also, while you're here, you are aware of who you support? - https://www.namepros.com/threads/the-nps-official-usa-political-thread.764342/page-1593#post-7440388


--------
Oh, the it's normal stuff was referencing Gaetz not being able to sit in those panels. He's not on those panels, he's not supposed to be there. It's not the crazy reasons he was giving. Normal stuff. You read my post above wrong, that's all. Actually, read the full sentence from me:

"It's normal stuff, it's how these hearings go."

You took the first 2 words, "it's normal" and attributed it to something else, as if the rest of the sentence doesn't explain what I'm talking about.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
I did actually quote you. I was clearly discussing Lennco's meme post. Seems you confused yourself and reacted angrily towards me in your confusion. Like some elderly person...

Your link to your previous post doesn't really add anything to the discussion. What are you trying to say? Eating McDonald's is a political statement? What do pictures of Trump eating fast-food do with who I support? Offer me someone better than Trump to support. There are loads of such people, but most Americans don't like them. They make too much sense.

It's hard to keep up with you - you are all over the place here. Pick one thought and stick with that - then maybe we can have a discussion.
 
1
•••
I did actually quote you.

haha

"It's normal stuff, it's how these hearings go."

That's the full quote. Not, "it's normal" I was talking about the hearings, duh, it's literally right in the sentence. Matt got kicked out because he wasn't supposed to be there. That's it. Not sure why this goes over your head.

It's hard to follow this, let me quote myself, my quote in italics:

This has been pointed out to you:

"But the House parliamentarian told Gaetz he is not allowed to attend the :spiderman::spiderman:hearing:spiderman::spiderman: because he does not sit on either the Intelligence, Foreign Affairs, or Oversight panels, which are the official committees conducting the impeachment inquiry."

And you think it's some Deep State, conspiracy nonsense, and then pretend you're being logical. It's normal stuff, it's how these :spiderman::spiderman:hearings:spiderman::spiderman: go.


----------
I put it in big bold text for you, not sure if you have reading or eyesight problems. You take 2 words, it's normal, and say I'm talking about something else. Read the part in italics a few times until you get it. It's a short read. It's pretty clear I'm talking about the hearings. I put Spiderman emojis around the word to bring attention to it, to help you out. You notice it comes before and after the "it's normal" part?
 
Last edited:
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
Then more of your Anti-American stuff I expect from you, usual drivel.

Not to mention the lies, false assumptions and copious use of projection..... which are unfounded, and occasionally bordering on libel...

As soon as he doesn’t have a counter argument, the condescending ad hominems* come out.

*(I would say “mansplaining”, but he seems to be an equal opportunity annoyer.)
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Not to mention the lies.

Still waiting for you to show one. But just keep repeating the charge without evidence and it will stick. The traditional technique of the left.

false assumptions

Assumptions are assumptions. Again....evidence? You may have some here, as it's hard to avoid assumptions based on your posts here. But I am quite certain I assume less about you than you about me.

copious use of projection

That would mean I assume you are reasonable and reasonably intelligent...

occasionally bordering on libel...
Oh? Do explain, counselor.

As soon as he doesn’t have a counter argument, the condescending ad hominems* come out.

I do apologize. All this time I thought you were talking about me, not JB.

I would say “mansplaining”

Oh, come on. You know I love it when you talk to me that way...
 
Last edited:
1
•••
0
•••
Back