Dynadot

opinion DropCatch king of the game ..

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch

Muhaysen

Established Member
Impact
21
To be honest i am not using DropCatch service and do not like them way, but it is the only one in the arena. Yesterday i was monitoring :

sydel.com
thewonder.com
topchef.com

All backorder platforms are trying to catch the domains and easily Dropcatch done that, can we say goodbye NameJet, SnapNames and Godaddy ?
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
To be honest i am not using DropCatch service and do not like them way, but it is the only one in the arena. Yesterday i was monitoring :

sydel.com
thewonder.com
topchef.com

All backorder platforms are trying to catch the domains and easily Dropcatch done that, can we say goodbye NameJet, SnapNames and Godaddy ?

No, there are plenty of certain types of backorders I monitor that get scooped up by others.
 
0
•••
can we say goodbye NameJet, SnapNames and Godaddy ?

as far as backorders go, I never said hello to godaddy :)

but I suspect that each of them may have reps, who backorder with competition, just to cover all bases.

as that would make the most cents, to me

:)


imo…..
 
0
•••
SnapNames/NameJet also get quality names.
 
0
•••
2
•••
Yes, dropcatch has the most registrars by far and thus is best at dropcatching, by far.
 
1
•••
I wish they would invest in a server that is faster than a potato so that Namebright.com was usable.
 
1
•••
Any backorder services have the chance to get certain domain.

DropCatch.com is one of the mighty ones.
 
0
•••
Yes, dropcatch has the most registrars by far and thus is best at dropcatching, by far.

If you check the list of accredited registrars at Verisign, Dropcatch.com has way less than they used to. The registry cracked down and deleted a bunch of registrars to put in new regulations for dropcatching. Dropcatch is still really good at what they do, but the playing field is being leveled.
 
1
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back