Dynadot

discuss 5G IS NOT LIKE 4G!

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch

artstar

Top Member
Impact
1,640
Ok you 5G naysayers u have to research the topic b4 u tear down a niche like 5G!

I see alot of domainers on here saying 5G will never take off.

Well let me say that 5G is THE BIGGEST leap in technology to come in 25 years and it will be in EVERY facet of our lives in time.

It is going to be used in almost every industry on the planet from automakers to hotels, so stop the bad mouthing and get on board!

Mind u I dont really mind the negativity as it means more domains for those who see the potential.
 
1
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
0
•••
btw if 5g is not that special why is Nokia, Qualcomm, Ubiquiti, Huawei vying for the contracts?

This will be a TRILLION dollar industry in 10 years + not my words.

so there u go.
 
0
•••
I think more people will be searching for 5G service as it becomes available. There is a name for someone..... :xf.grin: I put 5GWIFI (dot) com in my collection awhile ago. Could be used to sell company services. Its for sale like all my names.

Keep in mind that Wi-Fi and 5G don't go together--in many spaces, they're competing technologies. The phrase "5G Wi-Fi" is comparable to "Android iPhone".

There is something called 5 GHz Wi-Fi, though. When people need to differentiate between 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, they're occasionally shortened to 2G and 5G. More often they're just shortened to 2 and 5, though.
 
2
•••
btw if 5g is not that special why is Nokia, Qualcomm, Ubiquiti, Huawei vying for the contracts?

Has Ubiquiti actually attempted to get any contracts? I haven't heard of them entering the 5G space yet, but I expect it to happen eventually, since 5G competes heavily with Ubiquiti's tech.
 
0
•••
1
•••
Has Ubiquiti actually attempted to get any contracts? I haven't heard of them entering the 5G space yet, but I expect it to happen eventually, since 5G competes heavily with Ubiquiti's tech.
not sure on that but nokia just beat out qualcomm on getting more contracts
 
0
•••
0
•••
not sure on that but nokia just beat out qualcomm on getting more contracts

Did some quick checks. As far as I can tell, Ubiquiti hasn't made any statements on 5G and isn't currently fighting for any contracts. I don't usually see them fighting for contracts anyway; they're really good at finding niches and out-pricing their competition. I do expect them to enter the 5G market eventually, but not until later in the game.
 
1
•••
yes the 5g industry is gigantic and the spinoffs will be huge someday. i dont know why people say its not an issue but who cares .

5g is the future weather they like it or not and most dont read anything just bad mouth people. theres alot of mutant humans who hate to see smart and switched on people succeed . in my life ive come across way too many and i laugh at them all as i know whats up when corps with mega billions lay it down

people say what good is 5g domains ? well what good is pot domains or cbd domains or insurance domains on and on?

anyhow like i said in prior posts its all bogus info on 5g right? who needs it? alrighty then
 
0
•••
people say what good is 5g domains ? well what good is pot domains or cbd domains or insurance domains on and on?
Tell us, what good are they? :cigar:
 
0
•••
0
•••
man u r relentless buddy. go hassle some other thread now cause im near done with your tripe
That's awkward. Thought you might know something on this that I don't
 
0
•••
That's awkward. Thought you might know something on this that I don't
bore bore bore blah blah blah u never have anything constructive to say bud its all about nothing. u have no clue what u r on about so go start a new thread called lovedomains is a dork or something along that line . or maybe i will and c how many posters think u r. im sure it will be a top watched thread.
 
0
•••
I got an announcement. Great news! Purchased 5Gpenis.com for $15 and flipped immediately for 200 percent gain...$$$$$$
 
0
•••
Keep in mind that Wi-Fi and 5G don't go together--in many spaces, they're competing technologies. The phrase "5G Wi-Fi" is comparable to "Android iPhone".

There is something called 5 GHz Wi-Fi, though. When people need to differentiate between 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, they're occasionally shortened to 2G and 5G. More often they're just shortened to 2 and 5, though.

I agree they are not the same but you are not clear on the technology obviously. Taken from a tech blog:
[While 5G is an exciting new standard, it has nothing to do with Wi-Fi. 5G is used for cellular connections. Future smartphones may support 5G and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, but current smartphones support 4G LTE and 5 GHz Wi-Fi.]
 
0
•••
5g is alot more than for just phones obviously. its a massive tech that encompasses lots of niches
 
0
•••
with online games being such a huge growth niche with 5G high speed and low latency how about:

5GOnlineGames.Com
 
0
•••
Why putting it here and on the other thread?
Practically the same
 
0
•••
0
•••
alrighty then, the same but different:

5GOnlineGaming.Com
 
0
•••
alrighty then, the same but different:

5GOnlineGaming.Com

Interesting idea, but, at least on release, 5G won't work great for gaming. (That might change as hardware is refined over time, much like with Wi-Fi.) To determine why, it's important to note that "online gaming" will likely be a bit ambiguous by the time 5G is widely available. There are two main types of gaming that could be categorized as online gaming:
  1. Multiplayer gaming, where the multiplayer aspect is achieved via interconnection across the internet.
  2. Cloud gaming, where the game actually runs on a computer in a datacenter somewhere, and the hardware is essentially rented by the players. This isn't too common at the moment, and critics are skeptical of its long-term viability (will it just be a fad?), but a bunch of big-name companies are investing heavily in it, with the most recent announcement coming from Google in the form of Stadia.
5G should be usable for the first category under optimal conditions, but it won't be ideal. The main advantage of 5G is that it's cheaper to deploy to any given home than a traditional wired connection. It's a little more unstable than a proper wired connection; for example, it's theoretically susceptible to changes in weather. This can result in high packet loss and jitter, and that's exactly what you want to avoid while gaming online, especially competitively. In a proper installation, it should work fairly well, and the problems should be minimal, but most people won't be deliberately searching for 5G for the purpose of online gaming. Gamers who are choosing their internet service based on their gaming interests generally have strong prejudices toward certain tech; even if 5G would be suitable for their purposes, it's not something they're going to be deliberately seeking, so they won't be googling "5G online gaming".

5G isn't really usable for the second category. Although 5G speeds can theoretically be fast enough, even the slightest instability (packet loss, jitter) will be extremely noticeable and annoying. For this reason, wireless networking of any kind is avoided like the plague for cloud gaming. (That's actually one of the main factors keeping cloud gaming from going mainstream: to get it to work well, you need a fast, stable, and usually fairly expensive internet connection, and all the networking in your house has to be perfect, down to the crimping on each wire. Since the main attraction of cloud gaming is its price, the need for expensive hardware and a decent amount of networking knowledge kind of defeats the purpose.)
 
0
•••
Interesting idea, but, at least on release, 5G won't work great for gaming. (That might change as hardware is refined over time, much like with Wi-Fi.) To determine why, it's important to note that "online gaming" will likely be a bit ambiguous by the time 5G is widely available. There are two main types of gaming that could be categorized as online gaming:
  1. Multiplayer gaming, where the multiplayer aspect is achieved via interconnection across the internet.
  2. Cloud gaming, where the game actually runs on a computer in a datacenter somewhere, and the hardware is essentially rented by the players. This isn't too common at the moment, and critics are skeptical of its long-term viability (will it just be a fad?), but a bunch of big-name companies are investing heavily in it, with the most recent announcement coming from Google in the form of Stadia.
5G should be usable for the first category under optimal conditions, but it won't be ideal. The main advantage of 5G is that it's cheaper to deploy to any given home than a traditional wired connection. It's a little more unstable than a proper wired connection; for example, it's theoretically susceptible to changes in weather. This can result in high packet loss and jitter, and that's exactly what you want to avoid while gaming online, especially competitively. In a proper installation, it should work fairly well, and the problems should be minimal, but most people won't be deliberately searching for 5G for the purpose of online gaming. Gamers who are choosing their internet service based on their gaming interests generally have strong prejudices toward certain tech; even if 5G would be suitable for their purposes, it's not something they're going to be deliberately seeking, so they won't be googling "5G online gaming".

5G isn't really usable for the second category. Although 5G speeds can theoretically be fast enough, even the slightest instability (packet loss, jitter) will be extremely noticeable and annoying. For this reason, wireless networking of any kind is avoided like the plague for cloud gaming. (That's actually one of the main factors keeping cloud gaming from going mainstream: to get it to work well, you need a fast, stable, and usually fairly expensive internet connection, and all the networking in your house has to be perfect, down to the crimping on each wire. Since the main attraction of cloud gaming is its price, the need for expensive hardware and a decent amount of networking knowledge kind of defeats the purpose.)

ummm u better read some more as 5G is in THE NEAR FUTURE of online gaming in a HUGE way

i dont reg domains without research btw

go to google news simply type in "5g gaming" theres alot of info on the tech

https://www.techradar.com/news/this-is-how-5g-will-take-mobile-gaming-to-the-next-level

https://www.gamesradar.com/what-does-5g-mean-for-gaming/

i can keep going on 5G online gaming links but hey u check it out and c for yourselves.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
for online gaming 5G is the bomb because its 100x faster than 4G in spec

4g = 100mbps
5g= 1gbps

in reality today with 4g u get between 15-30mbps and that is super slow compared to what 5g will bring. If 5g is even double that speed, say 30-60mb, well then say no more as the gamers will be besides themselves with the 5G gaming when it hits the scene as it will be console like quality with mobile

of course in either gen u r not going to get the max speeds but its the latency thats key too with 5g.

the big dogs are spending billions on online gaming alone for the 5G runup so anyone that denies this reality is either delusional or cannot read. I dont make this stuff up btw!

in the short term gamers will be the first group out there to enjoy the benefits of 5G by streaming games through the cloud with no downloads!
 
Last edited:
0
•••
0
•••
factoids'

4g can stream 1 netflix movie at a time say in 10-20mbps

with 5g its like streaming 400 movies in 8k at the same time thats how fast it is!!

as far as latency 4g is about 100-200 milliseconds

5g in almost real time latency is 1 millisecond, now thats unheard of till now and is super fast downloads

so to u 5g naysayers, whats the big deal with 5g then?? lol

btw the facts r not my words
 
Last edited:
0
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back