strategy My custom domain portfolio brand

@trelgor @stub

Check this example:

https://hilltopads.com/page/adverti...K2nrgUlob1v4eA174vXoATXizFzVlLDwaAo4vEALw_wcB

How is buying traffic safe from the game over google stomp-out?

If it is organic traffic they do not have to penalize you, another thing is that you buy bots or do black seo strategies, but buying organic traffic is the same as paying facebook to advertise your profile.

Guys:

This is an excellent article about:

https://www.ezoic.com/buying-website-traffic/

edited

nameflipping said:

@trelgor @stub

Check this example:

https://hilltopads.com/page/adverti...K2nrgUlob1v4eA174vXoATXizFzVlLDwaAo4vEALw_wcB

Click to expand...

I don't want to monetize my domains with parking revenue. So this has no interest for me. Although I would not object to the Auction model. But my main focus is to Sell domain names with Buy Now and Make Offer Prices.

@nameflipping - I'm still waiting to here your keyword strategy for putting SEO keywords on domain for sale landing pages.

Hey!

When I have my website ready, I will create a full post and let you know.

Regards

@nameflipping - I hope so. Because you've said it is important but so far haven't said why or given any examples. And I can't see that statement changing just because your website becomes ready.

BTW. How soon will your website be ready?

I can see they could be important for parking pages and generating parking revenue. But for me? I question that assertion for the on-page SEO for a domain for sale landing page. But I'm ready to be persuaded by argument, and start using them.

I am working hard on this and publishing our first publication of a cloud solution for domainers, be happy to let you know when you are ready

Have any of you heard of Domain Market Pro? @TCK is the developer, and for me it is the best out there now.

Do you have the website address?

nameflipping said:

Do you have the website address?

Click to expand...

Sure, DomainMarketPro.com

PS: I am not affliated with them and I bought one of the packages before a month or so but for me it is the best and ahead of scripts like Efty.

@TCK Tom can provide you with more information

Thank you for your information!!

DomainMarketPro.com

I see @Abdullah Abdullah beat me with the URL by 2 minutes

stub said:

I see he beat me with the URL by 2 minutes

Click to expand...

Yup, as quick as a bot. So far I am yet to see something that can beat this. I tried many like dndork, efty and others.

stub said:

Firstly. I'm shocked that 80% of web browsing is mobile. I really never realized that. I guess primarily because I never use mobile for searching the web. It's so impractical.

Click to expand...

..and apart from being impractical that's not exactly true too.
at least for US traffic:


percentage of visits sites get from mobile vs. desktop


total time on site:


total page views


Source: https://www.stonetemple.com/mobile-vs-desktop-usage-study/

@nameflipping, I know that this is your thread and I had no intention of posting here. But since I have been mentioned here, I thought I would chime in. I hope you don't mind.

Abdullah Abdullah said:

Sure, DomainMarketPro.com

PS: I am not affliated with them and I bought one of the packages before a month or so but for me it is the best and ahead of scripts like Efty.

@TCK Tom can provide you with more information

Click to expand...

Thanks, Abdullah. Also really appreciate your feedback.

We are heavily invested in Domain Market Pro. It is the culmination of experience from over 10 years of developing domain marketplaces. Over the years, including presently, we have the privilege of working with talented and experienced domain investors and brokers whose feedback forms the building blocks for the features.

Today we just sent out a newsletter letting people know of new features:

https://blog.domainmarketpro.com

I agree with @nameflipping that there is a lack of quality tools for investors. Not to say there are none, but the choices are very limited.

There is still a lot of work to do and we're not taking the foot off the gas. I am thrilled about where we're heading. If anyone needs any info I'd be happy to provide it. You can DM me or post on any of the these threads:

https://www.namepros.com/threads/do...oftware-reviews-feature-requests-etc.1136534/

https://www.namepros.com/threads/domain-market-pro-review-feedback.1034681/

https://www.namepros.com/threads/is-domain-market-pro-any-good.1075861/

I don't want to hijack this thread.

Best Regards,
Tom

HugeWeb.com is a great domain for your portfolio, even better and more meaningful than HugeDomains.com

Congrats

My server recently got compromised due to foliotrader script using outdated Laravel framework. Lucky enough the foliotrader script was installed in a virtual server. The hacker only got the root permission in that virtual server.

The author Crivion at first denied that his script is vulnerable to attack and he insisted that everything he build is stable, fully functional and hacking proof.

I told him it's due to the outdated framework version he used and the hacker use a known loophole Published in 2017 (CVE-2017-9841) to get root permission on my server. I also asked Crivion to update the Laravel framework version because outdated version framework are likely vulnerable to such attack and I don't want the same things happened again. Sadly, Crivion flagged my comment and get it deleted.

Anyway, Crivion has released a new version and just delete the file utilized by CVE-2017-9841 loophole, but he didn't update the whole outdated Laravel framework.

I’m working very hard in a SAAS solution.

kam said:

My server recently got compromised due to foliotrader script using outdated Laravel framework. Lucky enough the foliotrader script was installed in a virtual server. The hacker only got the root permission in that virtual server.

Click to expand...

This is why we don't use 3rd party frameworks. They can speed up the development process, but also can be exploited by hackers as was in your case. This is like developing on WordPress, which is a framework in of itself. All our development is 100% proprietary and in-house.

Secure code is very important, especially prevention of code injection. But also as important is secure hosting environment. Blocking bad bots, and hackers fishing for vulnerabilities.

TCK said:

This is why we don't use 3rd party frameworks. They can speed up the development process, but also can be exploited by hackers as was in your case. This is like developing on WordPress, which is a framework in of itself. All our development is 100% proprietary and in-house.

Secure code is very important, especially prevention of code injection. But also as important is secure hosting environment. Blocking bad bots, and hackers fishing for vulnerabilities.

Click to expand...

One of the reason developers use frameworks are because they are not security experts and they want better security backed by frameworks. So, they just need to focus on coding only.

It's okay to use frameworks if the developer keep them up to date for security fix or the developer is a white hat security expert and have the knowledge of all vulnerable loophole and willing to fix all the critical loopholes on his own effort without updating the frameworks.

kam said:

One of the reason developers use frameworks are because they are not security experts and they want better security backed by frameworks. So, they just need to focus on coding only.

It's okay to use frameworks if the developer keep them up to date for security fix or the developer is a white hat security expert and have the knowledge of all vulnerable loophole and willing to fix all the critical loopholes on his own effort without updating the frameworks.

Click to expand...

I agree with everything you wrote.

I think that today developers should aim to become security experts, or at least become competent in writing secure code.

Using a popular framework results in the same issues as developing with WordPress. You are putting a target on your back and you have to constantly update the framework with security patches. Which in turn can cause your custom code to break. Trusting that the developer of a framework has security covered, among other things, can cause the developer using that framework to write lazy code which can expose vulnerability.