IT.COM

news BTC Immutable...NO

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch

MSN-Domains

Top Member
Impact
845
Most of the people here on the forum have obviously gone radio silent since the fall of 2017 and are chasing their next new high whatever that may be. To those still with positions in bitcoin, i expect you to defend it like a religion that's fine. But you can't dismiss what has been said. Most important of all BTC is not immutable so all the buzzwords banded around, turn out not to be true after all. To those with BTC do you turn a blind eye and say we'll he's not capable of pulling that off, despite jihan wu supporting the rollback

https://twitter.com/SilentWhstlBlwr/status/1126023549993541632


Munger sharp as a razor blade aged 93 called what CZ suggested. unbelievable in every-sense. Key part being if their is enough incentive i.e. the hack was larger $100m+ likely would of roll-backed

Make of it what you will - Blockchain is going nowhere IPFS is great we'll continue to see how this plays out. #nocapitalatrisk
 
Last edited:
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
btc gonna be 100k cause I own 0.3 of it.

(hey... its as good an argument as any out there lol)
 
0
•••
btc gonna be 100k cause I own 0.3 of it.

(hey... its as good an argument as any out there lol)

I appreciate your optimism - I take it if they rolled back or not it wouldn't bother you or change decisions to hold the virtual currency
 
0
•••
correct. I do not really care or will be affected either way.

however, I would prefer for btc to reach 100k so I can cashout with 33k
versus btc finishing at $10... and I get 3$

based on this, I have decided to not cash out now. at around 2k! :)
 
0
•••
Last edited:
0
•••
0
•••
Being Anti-BTC despite all the evidence is also a form of religion, or, as in the case of Charles Munger, plain ignorance.

Bitcoin is now 10 years old and worth $6k. It's about the time to give it some credit.
 
3
•••
The fact that all of us are talking about BTC shows its widespread notoriety/popularity which in itself has value.

Let's not forget that fiat currency is a great vehicle for germs and viruses which will likely spur the move away from it as the risk of pandemics spread around the world. U.S. notes have even been found to contain traces of cocaine, tied to the lucrative drug trade. Not to mention the illicit effort to counterfeit paper money.

Also, governments facing austerity would save millions from not having to print and mint. Bitcoin is the logical next step in the evolution of finance and money.

Prominent business news network like Bloomberg have entire segments devoted to digital currency. This is when you know the scale is starting to tip in BTC's favour as far as clout and adoption.

With institutional money pouring in and an array of startups cropping up around it, not to mention municipal governments accepting the currency to pay tax bills....it seems Bitcoin is very much on track to become a mainstream store of value--like gold.

Remember, gold has practical uses but is essentially a mineral we mine out of the ground...Bitcoin is mined, too, and has practical privacy, security, and expediency uses. The U.S. prints millions of dollars a day despite being trillions in debt...but, hey, it's backed by the worlds biggest economy so no one bats an eye. Only because the dollar is officiated as a means of exchange.


The digital currency market itself is worth billions...not indicative of a 'fad' but rather the beginning of a revolution. Universities offering blockchain degrees for a fad? I don't think so.

Yes, we all lost money chasing the next 'big thing'....but how many car companies before Tesla went belly up before Elon was able to punch his way through all the barriers? Lots. Why would an electric car with 100% torque on demand at 0 rpm not become a national objective? Politics. People stand to lose from the other side of the aisle--always.

So a guy named 'Charlie' from Berkshire Hathaway says blockchain is going nowhere? Well, with all due respect to his accomplishments and service, he represents the old guard that is uncertain of unregulated new technology...those types pour money into blue chips stocks and sit on it for 30 years and wait for a handsome return. These guys operate on what's tested and true. Wealthy people don't like to bet on something that's not a sure thing. People who do not understand what blockchain tech is will understandably be wary of it. Out of the box thinking is not a strongpoint in these circles.

Innovations does not occur by sitting on our laurels and pontificating on the merits of this or that. Why did we go to the moon? Not because we had to but because we wanted to. Bitcoin will go to the moon, too, simply because the will is there. Market sentiment and optimism will push it further.

As far as investing into Bitcoin, I wouldn't touch it with a ten foot pole, even if I could...too many sharks in the pond and my stomach isn't suited for it. However, the practical use cases are simply too profound to ignore.

Really, after the $700 billion dollar bailout of the banks in 2008...who really trusts these ravenous institutions? I certainly do not. I trust the common man...and Bitcoin is for the common man (and woman).

-end spiel
 
Last edited:
1
•••
The argument here seems to be that the internet will die, and will never allow people to talk to each other.
 
0
•••
BTC is old tech, new and better coins will replace it
 
1
•••
Fascinating story following this technically. What's clear is the protocol has a worthwhile Bounty on it's head and some point in time will be put under another serious test. To all those who hold Godspeed & Good-luck

tech.JPG
 
0
•••
The fact that all of us are talking about BTC shows its widespread notoriety/popularity which in itself has value.

Let's not forget that fiat currency is a great vehicle for germs and viruses which will likely spur the move away from it as the risk of pandemics spread around the world. U.S. notes have even been found to contain traces of cocaine, tied to the lucrative drug trade. Not to mention the illicit effort to counterfeit paper money.

Also, governments facing austerity would save millions from not having to print and mint. Bitcoin is the logical next step in the evolution of finance and money.

Prominent business news network like Bloomberg have entire segments devoted to digital currency. This is when you know the scale is starting to tip in BTC's favour as far as clout and adoption.

With institutional money pouring in and an array of startups cropping up around it, not to mention municipal governments accepting the currency to pay tax bills....it seems Bitcoin is very much on track to become a mainstream store of value--like gold.

Remember, gold has practical uses but is essentially a mineral we mine out of the ground...Bitcoin is mined, too, and has practical privacy, security, and expediency uses. The U.S. prints millions of dollars a day despite being trillions in debt...but, hey, it's backed by the worlds biggest economy so no one bats an eye. Only because the dollar is officiated as a means of exchange.


The digital currency market itself is worth billions...not indicative of a 'fad' but rather the beginning of a revolution. Universities offering blockchain degrees for a fad? I don't think so.

Yes, we all lost money chasing the next 'big thing'....but how many car companies before Tesla went belly up before Elon was able to punch his way through all the barriers? Lots. Why would an electric car with 100% torque on demand at 0 rpm not become a national objective? Politics. People stand to lose from the other side of the aisle--always.

So a guy named 'Charlie' from Berkshire Hathaway says blockchain is going nowhere? Well, with all due respect to his accomplishments and service, he represents the old guard that is uncertain of unregulated new technology...those types pour money into blue chips stocks and sit on it for 30 years and wait for a handsome return. These guys operate on what's tested and true. Wealthy people don't like to bet on something that's not a sure thing. People who do not understand what blockchain tech is will understandably be wary of it. Out of the box thinking is not a strongpoint in these circles.

Innovations does not occur by sitting on our laurels and pontificating on the merits of this or that. Why did we go to the moon? Not because we had to but because we wanted to. Bitcoin will go to the moon, too, simply because the will is there. Market sentiment and optimism will push it further.

As far as investing into Bitcoin, I wouldn't touch it with a ten foot pole, even if I could...too many sharks in the pond and my stomach isn't suited for it. However, the practical use cases are simply too profound to ignore.

Really, after the $700 billion dollar bailout of the banks in 2008...who really trusts these ravenous institutions? I certainly do not. I trust the common man...and Bitcoin is for the common man (and woman).

-end spiel
Your post is too long to read. Learn to condense your thoughts into a shorter narrative. What looks like gibberish usually is
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Being Anti-BTC despite all the evidence is also a form of religion, or, as in the case of Charles Munger, plain ignorance.

Bitcoin is now 10 years old and worth $6k. It's about the time to give it some credit.
There is no ANTI-BTC there is accepting reality in the face of reality or there is turning a blind-eye i noted in the opening post i knew you would do the latter so you don't need to get defensive i expected that at the very least.

Would be better to state technically/emotionally it doesn't matter what happens you will defend bitcoin as a religion thus - "nothing to see here"

reorg.JPG
 
0
•••
I laughed when the price of hot air went above gold. If anyone bought and sold at the $20,000 peak, they are retired hopefully. Buffet called it a new name: Seashell- it just sits there.

"Outspoken crypto critic and Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffett has again derided bitcoin (BTC) for its purported lack of real use value, likening the coin to a seashell that “just sits there.”

Buffett used this latest cryptocurrency metaphor during a press meeting ahead of the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholders’ meeting in Omaha, Nebraska, CNBC reported on May 4.

The CEO — who also serves as chairman of the ~$248 billion revenue multinational holding conglomerate Berkshire Hathaway — is well-known for his scathing stance toward cryptocurrencies, memorably characterizing bitcoin as "probably rat poison squared" during last year’s shareholders’ meeting. In his latest remarks, Buffett claimed:

“It doesn’t do anything. It just sits there. It’s like a seashell or something, and that is not an investment to me.”

https://cointelegraph.com/news/berk...fers-fresh-metaphor-for-bitcoin-as-a-seashell
 
0
•••
it does not matter what one moron has to say about one thing, it matters a hell of a lot more what the MARKET says about it.
 
0
•••
it does not matter what one moron has to say about one thing, it matters a hell of a lot more what the MARKET says about it.

what matters more and most is that none can predict future
 
0
•••
Of course, I am not suggesting that anyone can, but the quote
Blockchain is going nowhere
is also trying to predict the future. And its like I said above, its as if this poster was trying to say that the internet will never work.
 
0
•••
thank you for letting me know about bitcoins dead

so I could buy it 5K


At $8000 the market is grossly underpricing the significance of the Microsoft news. For a tech giant of this magnitude to announce they are using BITCOIN is a probably the most significant announcements in this space to date. They have just endorsed BTC as a platform they trust.
 
0
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back