IT.COM
Spaceship Spaceship
Watch
Impact
3,414
Just wondering what the general thoughts are about whether the recent trend to legalize marijuana will boost the prices of pot-related domains?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
19
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Yes. Why are you asking ?
Uuuuuuhhhhmmmmmm... O_o

Mmmmm beeeeeeecause I was trying to point out the link in my post to those that might have some?!?!? :xf.confused:

Yep, that's my story and I'm sticking to it!
 
1
•••
Uuuuuuhhhhmmmmmm... O_o

Mmmmm beeeeeeecause I was trying to point out the link in my post to those that might have some?!?!? :xf.confused:

Yep, that's my story and I'm sticking to it!

got meself a HEMPLuxuries . com if that counts ? sorry ... i also have other luxuries ..

CannaLuxuries
LeafLuxuries
HempLuxuries in .coms

I would add my othernames but i think i see differently on whats considered Luxury...
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Never noticed updates or changes after the auction is finalized. For example, HappyHemp closed at $7400, but then buyer never paid so it dropped down to an alternate bidder and finalized at $1801. It still reads 7400 on NB.

None of that makes any sense. How does it go from a closed $7400, winner not paying. Then the “alternate bidder” gets it at $1801. Where were the bidders or bidder directly below the $7400 ? Unless my math is truly that bad, there’s a bIg gap in there??🤷🏻‍♂️ How does that work ?
newb asking
 
0
•••
None of that makes any sense. How does it go from a closed $7400, winner not paying. Then the “alternate bidder” gets it at $1801. Where were the bidders or bidder directly below the $7400 ? Unless my math is truly that bad, there’s a bIg gap in there??🤷🏻‍♂️ How does that work ? newb asking

When a bidder fails to pay all of their bids become void and are removed, thus decreasing auction bid amounts to the point just prior to the non-payer entering the auction.
 
4
•••
7
•••
HempCultivation com

maybe little bit long but still really nice generic..
 
6
•••
HempCultivation com

maybe little bit long but still really nice generic..
The CULTIVATION word is to complicated, it is more on the farmer level, and not so much on the processor, or end user who would actually process the final product, not simply the growing stage which is more of a commodity sale to producers.
 
0
•••
vape(...)rs

serves as a nice "vapers" hack
 
2
•••
I’m having fits posting screenshots. Here’s the deal...

Cannasticks ended at GoDaddy and the high bidder didn’t pay. GoDaddy offered it to me as second high bid at $2069 but I didn’t bid that amount. Then they say the auction ended at $1059 which was my bid and they sold to another bidder.

They have become a disgraceful and dishonest service in my eyes.
When I lose out on an expired auction, I now copy the entire bid thread when the auction ends. I do this when I think there's a chance the high bidder might not pay (really just a gut feeling and on the higher ticket items). This gives me the exact history of the bidding so I know what I should pay if the winner disappears...

But I should not have to do this. GoDaddy should make the entire bid history available to the 2nd highest bidder (or to everyone for that matter)
 
3
•••
Can we move the GD Auction issues some of you are experiencing to another Namepros Discussion ..... as this Discussion is for "Showcase and Discuss Marijuana/Pot/Hemp/Cannabis domains"... and not GD Auction concerns!
 
1
•••
Can we move the GD Auction issues some of you are experiencing to another Namepros Discussion ..... as this Discussion is for "Showcase and Discuss Marijuana/Pot/Hemp/Cannabis domains"... and not GD Auction concerns!
The reason we’re discussing it here is because most of these auction shenanigans have been happening with pot domains.
 
1
•••
The reason we’re discussing it here is because most of these auction shenanigans have been happening with pot domains.

Exactly why it's likely to be the same person, or group of people, screwing with the auctions without any actual intent on purchasing if they win. Shouldn't be difficult to find out who it is and put a stop to it, imo.
 
0
•••
The reason we’re discussing it here is because most of these auction shenanigans have been happening with pot domains.

I wouldn't worry about it. The guy has been here for a year and has 4 posts. Not entirely sure why he cares what you post here.
 
1
•••
When I lose out on an expired auction, I now copy the entire bid thread when the auction ends. I do this when I think there's a chance the high bidder might not pay (really just a gut feeling and on the higher ticket items). This gives me the exact history of the bidding so I know what I should pay if the winner disappears...

But I should not have to do this. GoDaddy should make the entire bid history available to the 2nd highest bidder (or to everyone for that matter)
My rep cleared up what happened with cannasticks. He’s not sure why the end price was one of my bids though.

At any rate I suggested that they implement bidding handles to keep people somewhat honest. He immediately passed that idea up the chain. Would be nice if they actually go that route!
 
Last edited:
4
•••
My rep cleared up what happened with cannasticks. He’s not sure why the end price was one of my bids though.

At any rate I suggested that they implement bidding handles to keep people somewhat honest. He immediately passed that idea io the chain. Would be nice if they actually go that route!
The bidder handle call has been going on for years, there have been plenty who have called for it. The reason stated has always been they monitor manually for shill bidders, and don’t consider it an issue that they need bidder handles.

I have never seen the downside to this scenario, only transparency, but to this day it remains the only exchange that doesn’t give some clue who the other bid is. Maybe they think investors will collude, I have no idea, but I can’t bid strong on many names anymore because I don’t want to be on the wrong side of a deadbeat who can walk away, or someone who is clueless that this is not monopoly money.

I just want to see who paid $7189 for hempextractor.com
 
1
•••
Can I get some thoughts on these two names please ....

CannabisSocialHouse /com

CannabisCola / co

Worth hanging on to? High or low value?

Cheers!
 
0
•••
Haven't bought domains in a while, but I couldn't help myself with all of the marijuana craze. I purchased Legalizo (Spanish for legalize) and Simple/Bud. Both in king.
 
8
•••
Haven't bought domains in a while, but I couldn't help myself with all of the marijuana craze. I purchased Legalizo (Spanish for legalize) and Simple/Bud. Both in king.
Good choices, never go wrong with a one word, that goes across various niches. Simple Bud is a nice brand also, good quality domains that have a high likelyhood of selling.
 
2
•••
Can I get some thoughts on these two names please ....

CannabisSocialHouse /com

CannabisCola / co

Worth hanging on to? High or low value?

Cheers!

def not feeling the 1st listing. deff drop imo
i dont reg anything other then .COMS so I have no clue about your Cola.co ? ? Be Great if it were a .COM
maybe others will tag in ? but i dont see anything there worth a reg
cheers
 
3
•••
Show attachment 109950
Meanwhile GoDaddy sent me an email saying I won at a price of $2069. I said no thanks but I’m wondering why they’re trying to collect $1010 more than the winning bid? @Joe Styler
We didn't. It's pretty simple really and the way we have been running auctions since before I started here 13 years ago. As you know the winner couldn't pay. He outbid you. I'm going to give out bid amounts since they were public on the site and you already indicated you were the 2nd highest bidder. So your top bid was a $2200 proxy bid. You lost and were out bid by the next highest increment, $25 in this case, so the winning bid would have been $2225. When he didn't pay we didn't ask you to pay $2200, we asked you to pay $2069 as you stated. This is because when someone does not pay we remove any bids they placed and thus remove their impact on the auction. So if the high bidder never existed you would not have to outbid him, you would only have to outbid the 3rd highest bidder. So their high bid must have been $25 less than the $2069 we asked you to pay, or $2044. So the lowest amount needed to outbid them would be $2044 plus $25 min bid increment at that level = $2069.
You also already made it clear on this thread you didn't want the domain anymore. So we offered it to the 3rd highest bidder. But to be fair and in keeping with our policy we ignore your bids completely once you decline to pay. Therefore the 3rd highest bidder only needs to pay the minimum amount to outbid the 4th highest bidder's max bid. Which would be in this case The $1059 the auction ended at in your picture above, less the $25 minimum bid increment or $1034.
This is how the auction has always worked. We do not count any bids by a bidder who is disqualified from that auction. We treat it as if they never existed in the auction.
 
4
•••
That did happen which is when they offered it to me for $2069. I decided to check the history just now and see that it ended at $1059 with my bid. Why would they try to collect $1010 more than my high bid?!
Because your bids no longer count once you decline to buy it. Yes you bid over $1059 but your bids no longer count in the final auction as you declined to pay. I explained it in full already in another answer. There was another bidder, the one you ended up buying it who also bid higher than that, but your bids no longer count in the auction once you do not pay.
 
1
•••
Because your bids no longer count once you decline to buy it. Yes you bid over $1059 but your bids no longer count in the final auction as you declined to pay. I explained it in full already in another answer. There was another bidder, the one you ended up buying it who also bid higher than that, but your bids no longer count in the auction once you do not pay.
My rep explained this exactly as you did, thanks. The confusion on my end is that looking at the sale price, it’s $1059 and shows as my bid. So the expectation for me is that I should only have to pay that amount. It actually states that my bid is a winner!

While the system is confusing, I get it now.
 
Last edited:
5
•••
not going to post them here, but just based on what i'm seeing in this thread i might have some gems on my hands (just gems, like a ruby or sapphire.... not diamonds unfortunately).
 
1
•••
I can see that. The way it works though is that's not really your bid anymore. All your bids are removed from the auction on the back end practically speaking for the purchase. But they are still there for audit's sake etc to show exactly what happened on the auction. So they are there but they don't count anymore.
 
2
•••
Creso Pharma granted a growing licence for its state-of the-art Canadian facility - Stockhead

Cheers
Corey
 
2
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back