Dynadot
NameSilo
Watch

Who is to Blame for the Troubled US Economy?

  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.
  • Both Parties

    268 
    votes
    44.7%
  • Neither Party

    57 
    votes
    9.5%
  • Democrats

    134 
    votes
    22.3%
  • Republicans

    141 
    votes
    23.5%
  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.

Impact
8,557
Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun :)

:wave:
 
8
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
If you want to protest in elegance...
DtqN3NUVsAALhaZ
 
1
•••
Salvini & Le Pen... Vive la résistance!!!
Dtw6p7lWwAA9n7v
 
0
•••
MACRON you SOB... another weekend like this and you will be forced to resign!

I watched an couple of hours on youtube. Some regular people, some violent scum and police entrapping them in “kettles”. I have no crowd control experience, but I don’t get why the police don’t encircle in a “C” with a voluntary escape route to break up the crowd. It seems to me in the US, with riots they don’t surround a crowd 360 degrees in these situations. By trapping all of them, they are encouraging and nearly forcing violence into all people practically to be enraged and protect themselves in self defense. Maybe they were warned but I didnt hear french or see anyone leaving, even the camera guy was stuck.

I would like to see the entire video on this one as that police guy with his smirking sickly look as he sprays that guy, appears as though they enjoy doing that. What is bothering me are the police shooting rubber bullets. I get the tear gas and water cannons, but the bullets unless its deadly force... ugh.

Destructing private property, looting, etc those clods deserve to be arrested.

Macron disappears, how embarrassing what a putz.

Btw: Did you see the UKIP Brexit Betrayal thing today? Peaceful. TR’s speech was pretty uneventful and surprised that it wasn’t very strong.
 
1
•••
China strongly urges the Canadian side to immediately release the detained person, and earnestly protect their lawful, legitimate rights,

This is a mess. What civil action (if any) happened after that 2012 report? If not, why not? If the US really wanted her, and she is a criminal they should have flown in the CIA’s private jets ahead of time and escorted her like they do drug dealers, etc. in rather than put Canada in the middle of some extradition action. Maybe she will be taking refuge in an embassy like Julian Assage? Lol. This seems like it could cause a much larger problem than necessary. Like indicting Russian hackers, sure it supposed to make good press- for dumb people, but the result is zero and its kinda dumb, unenforceable and only justifies the huge govt tax dollars wasted in investigative billable hours chasing down something you can’t do anything about. Muellers $500 lunch expenses and side kicks will get buried in those expense reports.

Maybe as punishment to the US, next trip over to China, Tim Cook will get arrested? Then they can do a prisoner swap. Actually, they should demand that Tim should give them trade secrets to be their Chief Information protector and Censor. Lol.
 
1
•••
good press- for dumb people
Pretty much describes the US media.

I think it is quite likely China will arrest some US executive. But the retaliation will go further than that.

Of course the real problem is that the US, and the dumb people who cheer this stuff on, think that US law applies to all people everywhere in the world. Because they are patriots and good people on God's (or Obama's) side.

Imagine if China did have Tim cook arrested. And had Pakistan do it for them. For violating Chinese law in his US company.

Imagine if China wanted to arrest one of America's most prominent journalists for something he published that exposed some of their secrets, and forced him to hide out in a small room in a small embassy in a third country in a tiny room. For years.

I could go on and on with things that people would find almost declarations of war if China or Russia did them. But they somehow see it as just when the US does it.
 
1
•••
1
•••
Imagine if Tim Cook was installing telecommunications equipment with secret capability to spy on the Chinese Gov, business and it's citizens.

Chinese military would shot him, then send the bill for the bullet to his boy friend.

Pretty much describes the US media.

I think it is quite likely China will arrest some US executive. But the retaliation will go further than that.

Of course the real problem is that the US, and the dumb people who cheer this stuff on, think that US law applies to all people everywhere in the world. Because they are patriots and good people on God's (or Obama's) side.

Imagine if China did have Tim cook arrested. And had Pakistan do it for them. For violating Chinese law in his US company.

Imagine if China wanted to arrest one of America's most prominent journalists for something he published that exposed some of their secrets, and forced him to hide out in a small room in a small embassy in a third country in a tiny room. For years.

I could go on and on with things that people would find almost declarations of war if China or Russia did them. But they somehow see it as just when the US does it.

Top: USA F-35 Stealth Fighter.
56fc256a52bcd044008b9beb-640-436[1].png


Bottom: Chinese Copy.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
1
•••
Xi Jinping is probably as evil as you imagine President Trump is.

China is creating concentration camps in Xinjiang.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.87c276df960a

China is accused of locking up hundreds of thousands of Muslims without trial in its western region of Xinjiang.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/resources/idt-sh/China_hidden_camps

The game from tech giant Tencent lets players clap along to a speech from the communist nation's president Xi Jinping
https://www.wired.co.uk/article/china-app-clap-tencent

The Chinese government plans to launch its Social Credit System in 2020. The aim? To judge the trustworthiness – or otherwise – of its 1.3 billion residents

https://www.wired.co.uk/article/chinese-government-social-credit-score-privacy-invasion

What do you think will happen to people who don't agree with the Government then? President Donald Trump has done more to hold China and Russia accountable than the previous two administrations combined.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
1
•••
Last edited:
0
•••
Last edited:
1
•••
Donald Trump Tweets: No “Smocking” Gun Tying His Campaign To Russia

Smocking is actually a type of sewing or embroidery where you gather the fabric together with fancy stitches, like at the waistband of a skirt. I’m sure crafters would love to have a “smocking gun” if there was such a thing.

aaaaaaaaa.jpg

I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt that maybe his autocorrect is doing weird things. BUT he’s the effing president of the United States ... couldn’t he maybe READ the tweet before he hits “send?” Or pay somebody to proofread for him?

Somebody else in the running just turned down the COS position. Can’t blame them - “managing a dumpster fire” isn’t something that looks good on a resumé. So who’s it gonna be? Ivanka? Don Jr.? We’re running out of unqualified candidates.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
President Donald Trump has done more to hold China and Russia accountable than the previous two administrations combined.

Past 4 Presidents, include both Bushes as well.
 
2
•••
In addition to the huge worldwide trade deficits... IP theft which includes selling back into the US products created cheaper from stolen US born technology.

Pretty bad, when an independent body has to do a study like this and what the incompetent Govt should be doing with our tax dollars wasted on other pet projects, sending troops everywhere to protect other countries, endless wars, etc.

http://ipcommission.org/report/IP_Commission_Report_Update_2017.pdf

“The Commission on the Theft of American Intellectual Property is an independent and bipartisan initiative of leading Americans from the private sector, public service in national security and foreign affairs, academia, and politics. The members are listed in the section About the Commissioners.
The three purposes of the Commission are as follows:
1. Document and assess the causes, scale, and other major dimensions of international intellectual property (IP) theft as they affect the United States.
2. Document and assess the role of China and other infringers in international IP theft.
3. Propose appropriate U.S. policy responses that would mitigate ongoing and future damage and obtain greater enforcement of IP rights (IPR) by China and other infringers.
IP theft pervades international trade in goods and services due to lack of legal enforcement and national industrial policies that encourage IP theft by public, quasi-private, and private entities. While some indicators show that the problem may have improved marginally, the theft of IP remains a grave threat to the United States. Since 2013, at the release of the IP Commission Report, U.S. policy mechanisms have been markedly enhanced but gone largely unused.

We estimate that the annual cost to the U.S. economy continues to exceed $225 billion in counterfeit goods, pirated software, and theft of trade secrets and could be as high as $600 billion.

1 It is important to note that both the low- and high-end figures do not incorporate the full cost of patent infringement—an area sorely in need of greater research. We have found no evidence that casts doubt on the estimate provided by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence in November 2015 that economic espionage through hacking costs $400 billion per year.

2 At this rate, the United States has suffered over $1.2 trillion in economic damage since the publication of the original IP Commission Report more than three years ago.”


“IP theft by thousands of Chinese actors continues to be rampant, and the United States constantly buys its own and other states’ inventions from Chinese infringers. China (including Hong Kong) accounts for 87% of counterfeit goods seized coming into the United States.10
China continues to obtain American IP from U.S. companies operating inside China, from entities elsewhere in the world, and of course from the United States directly through conventional as well as cyber means. These include coercive activities by the state designed to force outright IP transfer or give Chinese entities a better position from which to acquire or steal American IP.”


 
2
•••
I heard Monica's smocking on that blue dress had a messy problem
 
0
•••
1
•••
1
•••
“Democrats can’t find a Smocking Gun tying the Trump campaign to Russia after James Comey’s testimony. No Smocking Gun...No Collusion.” @FoxNews That’s because there was NO COLLUSION. So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction, wrongly call it a campaign contribution,...

....which it was not (but even if it was, it is only a CIVIL CASE, like Obama’s - but it was done correctly by a lawyer and there would not even be a fine. Lawyer’s liability if he made a mistake, not me). Cohen just trying to get his sentence reduced. WITCH HUNT!
Donald J. Trump‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump 7h

I guess that's him finally admitting it.

Somebody got a landing page up quick, of course I checked if it was avaiable, knowing it wouldn't be - smockinggun.com
 
0
•••
Last edited:
1
•••
maybe he just can't spell

https://twitter.com/christinawilkie/status/1024685910720491520/photo/1

Trump's "smocking gun" tweet has been deleted. But here it is, for posterity.

DjhqXXdWwAAsbB8.jpg

8:58 AM - 1 Aug 2018


Domain:
smockinggun.com
Registrar:
GoDaddy.com, LLC
Registered On:
2018-08-01

It's still up, https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1072095127894667265

Oh, that's another one from August.

Can't blame it on auto-correct, don't think it would change smoking to smocking.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Last edited:
1
•••
most people don’t set up a shell company for a “simple private transaction.”

Then most people don't have their personal lawyer record it just to have it aired on TV later on, haha.

 
1
•••
3
•••
most people don’t set up a shell company for a “simple private transaction.”

Yes they do. Very common for the top wealthy to have multiple LLC’s, trusts, etc to spread out liabilities and across different jurisdictions.
 
2
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back