- Impact
- 8,399
Just saw this.
https://domainnamewire.com/2018/11/01/breaking-u-s-gov-grants-verisign-com-price-hikes/
“Content Neutral Operations. The parties agree that Verisign will operate the .com registry in a content neutral manner and that Verisign will participate in ICANN processes that promote the development of content neutral policies for the operation of the DNS.”
Removal of the Maximum Price restriction under Section 7.3(d)(i) (Maximum Price) of the .com Registry Agreement, which by way of clarification will continue to be subject to Section 3(a) of Amendment 32 setting forth the standard and process for removal;
https://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/amendment_35.pdf
I haven’t studied this document, but it seems that “premium domains” like one word .com’s, couldn’t Verisign figure a way to invent some new pricing tiers to be introduced like the new gtlds?
https://domainnamewire.com/2018/11/01/breaking-u-s-gov-grants-verisign-com-price-hikes/
“Content Neutral Operations. The parties agree that Verisign will operate the .com registry in a content neutral manner and that Verisign will participate in ICANN processes that promote the development of content neutral policies for the operation of the DNS.”
Removal of the Maximum Price restriction under Section 7.3(d)(i) (Maximum Price) of the .com Registry Agreement, which by way of clarification will continue to be subject to Section 3(a) of Amendment 32 setting forth the standard and process for removal;
https://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/amendment_35.pdf
I haven’t studied this document, but it seems that “premium domains” like one word .com’s, couldn’t Verisign figure a way to invent some new pricing tiers to be introduced like the new gtlds?
Last edited:
