=== The principle of discussion class is, a topic or an argument can be debated, criticized and even proven wrong. ===
Here is my topic, based on my own experience.
The auction rules of my thread tittled: CannabisMonger.com (https://www.namepros.com/threads/the-cannabis-monger-cannabismonger-com.1107252/), is coppied from a thread of member name: dnlucky.com tittled “Analgesics.com and Additional Domains” (https://www.namepros.com/threads/analgesics-com-and-additional-domains.1105734/).
But the treatment on my thread is, given a warning and immediately closes the thread. Whereas the treatment of dnlucky’s is, given a warning and the thread remains opened.
The warning to dnlucky is the same as the warning on my thread. That is: "Your end time stating "whenever I decide to halt the auction and declare the current high bidder the winner." does not meet the criteria posted above and needs to be edited to follow the rule."
Then what happens is, dnlucky gives an argument to the moderator's warning, that he is not wrong in posting the thread rule like that. (See: the dnlucky argument on the thread).
In my opinion, NP Moderator is correct, because the method of auction like that is not in the rules set by NamePros.
On the contrary, dnlucky believed that the attraction of words does not violate NP rules because they have the same meaning.
What do you think about this?
Let's go to discussion room by using our smart minds and common sense, for NamePros Progress, as the Largest Domain Forum in the World.
Thank You...
Viva NamePros !!!
BabayS
Here is my topic, based on my own experience.
The auction rules of my thread tittled: CannabisMonger.com (https://www.namepros.com/threads/the-cannabis-monger-cannabismonger-com.1107252/), is coppied from a thread of member name: dnlucky.com tittled “Analgesics.com and Additional Domains” (https://www.namepros.com/threads/analgesics-com-and-additional-domains.1105734/).
But the treatment on my thread is, given a warning and immediately closes the thread. Whereas the treatment of dnlucky’s is, given a warning and the thread remains opened.
The warning to dnlucky is the same as the warning on my thread. That is: "Your end time stating "whenever I decide to halt the auction and declare the current high bidder the winner." does not meet the criteria posted above and needs to be edited to follow the rule."
Then what happens is, dnlucky gives an argument to the moderator's warning, that he is not wrong in posting the thread rule like that. (See: the dnlucky argument on the thread).
In my opinion, NP Moderator is correct, because the method of auction like that is not in the rules set by NamePros.
On the contrary, dnlucky believed that the attraction of words does not violate NP rules because they have the same meaning.
What do you think about this?
Let's go to discussion room by using our smart minds and common sense, for NamePros Progress, as the Largest Domain Forum in the World.
Thank You...
Viva NamePros !!!
BabayS