I've spent a lot of time trying to sell new gtlds for little profit..
Yes... quantity matters as well.If you have 6,000 names like Kerala doss your bound to make some sales. Once you get over a few thousand names it just becomes a numbers game if the quality is decent. Would love to know how his/her numbers break down at the end of every year.
If you want to get involved with new gtlds your mantra needs to be:
"only the best"
"only the best"
"only the best"
"don't settle"
"don't settle"
"don't settle"
Just this week I have received a few inbound inquiries on nTLDs...
And they are NOT "only the best".
More important: their average budget on such domains...
And from my experience: $1K+ nTLD buyers are rare.
Some Californian CEO (his company can afford 5F purchase easily) even said like that:
This is not .com, so my Best Offer is $1,250.
p.s. The same keyword in .com costs $500K minimum.
What was the extension?Some Californian CEO (his company can afford 5F purchase easily) even said like that:
This is not .com, so my Best Offer is $1,250.
p.s. The same keyword in .com costs $500K minimum.
im curious tooWhat was the extension?
.lifeWhat was the extension?
Nothing to do with quality, all are 1word or LLL/LLLL.
Remember that the stated purpose of nTLDs is to increase the supply of available keywords, so that end users have more options and don't have to buy on the aftermarket. That's the theory of course, but a nTLD is never going to be their first choice, they will always go for .com if it's available (of course a few exceptions may exist).
So if you have a nTLD domain they like, they expect to be able to buy it for cheap precisely because it's not .com. If they have to pay a lot, then they could as well go for a second tier .com.
Anyway, the pool of motivated buyers is limited since the majority of end users don't want nTLDs at all.
I am going to be even more provocative: I think it's wishful thinking to price them at 5 or 6 figures because even in .com there are not many names selling in that range on a yearly basis.
Of course, if you don't ask, you don't receive. But there is a huge gap between domainer expectations and what end users are actually willing to pay.
I don't set any asking or fixed prices...
Just Contact Form and then negotiations...
This year is definitely better than previous... Significantly more inquiries... but mostly in 3F range.
I've spent a lot of time trying to sell new gtlds for little profit..
If we are looking to gain headway into placing proper value on names, I think going too cheap to a nicely matched name to a buyers needs should not be expected, especially given the time and effort most sellers put into investing in them.So if you have a nTLD domain they like, they expect to be able to buy it for cheap precisely because it's not .com. If they have to pay a lot, then they could as well go for a second tier .com.
This is the most important advice when it comes to new gTLDs...still many "investors" are not getting it, it seems that any nonsense word1.word2 will do for them..If you want to get involved with new gtlds your mantra needs to be:
"only the best"
"only the best"
"only the best"
"don't settle"
"don't settle"
"don't settle"