Dynadot
Spaceship Spaceship
Watch

Who is to Blame for the Troubled US Economy?

  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.
  • Both Parties

    268 
    votes
    44.7%
  • Neither Party

    57 
    votes
    9.5%
  • Democrats

    134 
    votes
    22.3%
  • Republicans

    141 
    votes
    23.5%
  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.

Impact
8,557
Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun :)

:wave:
 
8
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Do you guys believe in the conspiracy stories you are regurgitating, or just trolling ?
 
0
•••
Do you guys believe in the conspiracy stories you are regurgitating, or just trolling ?

You mean its only a rumor that liberals are surviving by eating Crayons? Food stamps go farther than eating McDonald’s.
 
3
•••
0
•••
2
•••
She's a fraud, not a good look if that's the future.

Avenatti is the fraud and media attention wh$re, great job he did to help Kavanaugh!
 
5
•••
Interesting but not surprising that when some here trash older members of our government and judiciary they always single out the women.
7A532E5B-8C3A-4D90-A0E8-1EA919B5FA65.jpeg


Meanwhile not saying a word about fossils like Hatch, Grassley, McConnel, who should have been put out to pasture years ago instead of trying to turn the entire country back to relive THEIR glory days of the 1940s.
9AD7D886-743F-4643-9043-90DB66B9230B.jpeg


Go ahead. Dislike this all you want. Apparently the truth hurts or you wouldn’t be all triggered...
 
Last edited:
0
•••
1
•••

Senator Bob Corker @SenBobCorker


Transferring the countless injustices that have happened to women for decades onto a person who had nothing to do with them is an injustice, just as seeking to elevate one’s own political stature by wrongly destroying someone else’s reputation is an injustice.
 
3
•••
Donald Trump lied to us. I'm not sick of winning. As a matter of fact, I like it.
 
4
•••
NEXT REPLACEMENT JUDGE.
You can thank this RBG person for being partially responsible for messing up American Culture.

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-CHRG-GINSBURG/pdf/GPO-CHRG-GINSBURG-2-4-3-12.pdf

The Court ruled that "it simply does not follow that a woman's freedom of choice [to have an abortion] carries with it a constitutional entitlement to the financial resources to avail herself of the full range of protected choices."

In a 1980 book entitled Constitutional Government in America. Judge Ginsburg wrote a chapter endorsing taxpayer funding of abortions as a constitutional right and condemning the
high Court's rulings.

Sex Bias in the U.S. Code is a handbook which shows how the
feminists want to change our laws, our institutions and our attitudes, and convert America into a "gender-free" society. It clearly shows that the feminists are not trying to redress any
520 legitimate grievances women might have, but want to change human nature, social mores, and relationships between men and women — and want to do that by changing our laws. Despite the noisy complaints of the feminists about the oppression of women, a combing of federal laws by Ruth Bader Ginsburg, then a Columbia University Law School professor, and her staff under a federal grant of tax dollars, unearthed no federal laws that harm women! The feminists' complaints about "discriminatory laws" are either ridiculous or offensive.

But years after that was published much has come true:

All-boys' and all-girls' organizations must be sex- integrated because separate-but-equal organizations
perpetuate stereotyped sex roles.

Fraternities and sororities must be sex-integrated.

The Boy Scouts, the Girl Scouts, and other Congressionallv-
chartered youth organizations, must change their names and their purposes and become sex-integrated.

Men and women should be required to salute the flag in the same wav. (I guess she never thought about Klapperdick's protest)

The Federal Government must provide comprehensive government child-care.

The right to determine the family residence must be taken awav from the husband.

Here are some of the extremist feminist concepts from the Ginsburg book, Sex Bias in the U.S. Code:

And of course, Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote her most famous statement and most disgusting:

"The age of consent for sexual acts must be lowered to 12 years old.
"Eliminate the phrase 'carnal knowledge of any female, not his wife, who has not attained the age of 16 years' and substitute a federal, sex-neutral definition of the offense. . .
A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person, . . . [and] the other person is, in fact, less than 12 years old." (p. 102)"
 
2
•••
NEXT REPLACEMENT JUDGE.
You can thank this RBG person for being partially responsible for messing up American Culture.

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-CHRG-GINSBURG/pdf/GPO-CHRG-GINSBURG-2-4-3-12.pdf

The Court ruled that "it simply does not follow that a woman's freedom of choice [to have an abortion] carries with it a constitutional entitlement to the financial resources to avail herself of the full range of protected choices."

In a 1980 book entitled Constitutional Government in America. Judge Ginsburg wrote a chapter endorsing taxpayer funding of abortions as a constitutional right and condemning the
high Court's rulings.

Sex Bias in the U.S. Code is a handbook which shows how the
feminists want to change our laws, our institutions and our attitudes, and convert America into a "gender-free" society. It clearly shows that the feminists are not trying to redress any
520 legitimate grievances women might have, but want to change human nature, social mores, and relationships between men and women — and want to do that by changing our laws. Despite the noisy complaints of the feminists about the oppression of women, a combing of federal laws by Ruth Bader Ginsburg, then a Columbia University Law School professor, and her staff under a federal grant of tax dollars, unearthed no federal laws that harm women! The feminists' complaints about "discriminatory laws" are either ridiculous or offensive.

But years after that was published much has come true:

All-boys' and all-girls' organizations must be sex- integrated because separate-but-equal organizations
perpetuate stereotyped sex roles.

Fraternities and sororities must be sex-integrated.

The Boy Scouts, the Girl Scouts, and other Congressionallv-
chartered youth organizations, must change their names and their purposes and become sex-integrated.

Men and women should be required to salute the flag in the same wav. (I guess she never thought about Klapperdick's protest)

The Federal Government must provide comprehensive government child-care.

The right to determine the family residence must be taken awav from the husband.

Here are some of the extremist feminist concepts from the Ginsburg book, Sex Bias in the U.S. Code:

And of course, Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote her most famous statement and most disgusting:

"The age of consent for sexual acts must be lowered to 12 years old.
"Eliminate the phrase 'carnal knowledge of any female, not his wife, who has not attained the age of 16 years' and substitute a federal, sex-neutral definition of the offense. . .
A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person, . . . [and] the other person is, in fact, less than 12 years old." (p. 102)"

This is what happens when you get your news from Hannity.

"HANNITY: I guess where I am on this, if you look at Ruth Bader Ginsburg, I mean, she — the Ginsburg rule, she doesn’t have to answer specific questions, clearly pro-choice going in, thinks there may even be a constitutional right to polygamy, has a controversial view we should lower the age of consent to 12, supports legalized prostitution, very left-wing."

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/did-ruth-bader-ginsburg-say-that-pedophilia-was-good-for-children/
--------
Donald Trump lied to us. I'm not sick of winning. As a matter of fact, I like it.

Saved for next month.

House - Dems

I was just looking at the Senate Map, right now 48-44 Republicans. Took a look at the 8 toss ups. If you went by polls, it would be 51-49 Republicans.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2018/senate/2018_elections_senate_map.html

That would be something if Dems took both, it'll be close. But the House alone will be good enough. I think the boost Dems get from this Kavanaugh decision will make things even closer.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
3
•••
This is what happens when you get your news from Hannity.

Read the PDF, Look at the URL. It's from a .GOV website.

Here is the actual text from a library:
https://www2.law.umaryland.edu/marshall/usccr/documents/cr12se9.pdf

READ IT. Page 102

18 U.S.C. §2032 — Eliminate the phrase "carnal knowledge of
any female, not his wife who has not
attained the age of sixteen years" and
substitute a Federal, sex-neutral
definition of the offense patterned
after S. 1400 §1633: A person is guilty
of an offense if he engages in a sexual
act with another person, not his spouse,
and (1) compels the other person to
participate: (A) by force or (B) by
threatening or placing the other person
in fear that any person will imminently
be subjected to death, serious bodily
injury, or kidnapping; (2) has
substantially impaired the other
person's power to appraise or control
the conduct by administering or
employing a drug or intoxicant without
the knowledge or against the will of
such other person, or by other means; or
(3) the other person is, in fact, less
than 12 years

As some members of Congress are probably aware, the initial
research and draft of this report was developed by
contractors, Ruth Bader Ginsberg and Brenda Feigen Fasteau,
assisted by a group of Columbia Law School students. That
original product, utilized by several committees of the
International Womens Year (IWY) project, led to strong
recommendations that a comprehensive study of our
laws—statutory and regulatory—be completed and a strategy
developed to end sex bias in ourlaws.
 
4
•••
4
•••
0
•••
4
•••
Looks like those Republicans at least should start filing UDRP’s just to tie up those domains.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/feat...ve-built-a-new-anti-republican-attack-machine

Burton has snapped up 203 domains of incumbent Republicans

that will soon bear the fruit of his researchers’ efforts. Voters searching for information on Representatives Mike Bost of Illinois and Dave Schweikert of Arizona will discover their fondness for staying at Ritz-Carltons and the Waldorf Astoria, a perilous habit in light of Trump’s attacks on the Washington “Swamp.”
 
2
•••
Search of Rohrabacher. Sure, No Google Bias! None whatsoever. 2nd article in search has nothing to do with Dan Rohrabacher other than a smear. And Bloomberg is giving link juice to those smear websites.

democrat-fake-news-google.jpg
 
Last edited:
2
•••
Read the PDF, Look at the URL. It's from a .GOV website.

Here is the actual text from a library:
https://www2.law.umaryland.edu/marshall/usccr/documents/cr12se9.pdf

READ IT. Page 102

18 U.S.C. §2032 — Eliminate the phrase "carnal knowledge of
any female, not his wife who has not
attained the age of sixteen years" and
substitute a Federal, sex-neutral
definition of the offense patterned
after S. 1400 §1633: A person is guilty
of an offense if he engages in a sexual
act with another person, not his spouse,
and (1) compels the other person to
participate: (A) by force or (B) by
threatening or placing the other person
in fear that any person will imminently
be subjected to death, serious bodily
injury, or kidnapping; (2) has
substantially impaired the other
person's power to appraise or control
the conduct by administering or
employing a drug or intoxicant without
the knowledge or against the will of
such other person, or by other means; or
(3) the other person is, in fact, less
than 12 years

As some members of Congress are probably aware, the initial
research and draft of this report was developed by
contractors, Ruth Bader Ginsberg and Brenda Feigen Fasteau,
assisted by a group of Columbia Law School students. That
original product, utilized by several committees of the
International Womens Year (IWY) project, led to strong
recommendations that a comprehensive study of our
laws—statutory and regulatory—be completed and a strategy
developed to end sex bias in ourlaws.

I did read it. Now read what comes before and after, aka context. I linked to an article explaining it, read that
 
0
•••
5
•••
The candidate has : https://davidschweikert.com/

Yet, the resistance has a fake website to confuse and smear. Fake news 100%

Hello friends, I’m “Congressman Dave Schweikert”*
You may know me from “Friends of David Schweikert” or from my personal PAC “Team Dave.”

Friends, I’ve been under quite a bit-o-stress lately and I’m using this blog to work through some of the things my consultants and / or lawyers probably don’t want me to talk about in public. Even though, obviously it’s all I can think about right now.

Lots of famous and wonderful Congressmen have been investigated by the House Ethics Committee - not just me. For example, everybody’s favorite Republican: Abraham Lincoln. Oh wait, that’s not true. Ok, how about Frederick Douglass? He’s doing a lot these days, maybe he’s being investigated by — no, he’s not?

https: // www. daveschweikert. com/
capture-democrat-smear.jpg
 
2
•••
3
•••
Hey Liberals, let that sink into your thick skulls...
Do2bO1BWwAUBRFt
 
3
•••
This is beyond sickening. This ancient fossil needs to retire. She too is 85. Unbelievable.

https://politics.theonion.com/senator-feinstein-wondering-if-now-a-good-time-to-discl-1829555909

WASHINGTON—Weighing the importance of the information against the potential political fallout, Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) debated Friday whether or not now might be a prudent time to introduce into discussion the seven highly credible murder accusations against Brett Kavanaugh that were given to her in August. “Roughly five weeks ago, the family members of five slain women and two men presented me with dozens of file boxes full of concrete, corroborated evidence that Kavanaugh was personally and solely responsible for the deaths, and I’m now experiencing a strong feeling that maybe the other Senators, the media, and the American public should know,” said Feinstein, who also disclosed that dozens of people had come forward with information further connecting Kavanaugh to a string of brutal stranglings committed from 1986 to 2011, but had been turned away over concerns that it wasn’t relevant to the confirmation process. “His fingerprints are all over the crime scenes, there is DNA evidence from blood he left, and there are three dozen eyewitnesses. But information like that could really energize the Republican base, so you can see my dilemma here.” At press time, Feinstein had decided to sit on the evidence until a more politically expedient time.
 
2
•••
This is beyond sickening. This ancient fossil needs to retire. She too is 85. Unbelievable.

https://politics.theonion.com/senator-feinstein-wondering-if-now-a-good-time-to-discl-1829555909

WASHINGTON—Weighing the importance of the information against the potential political fallout, Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) debated Friday whether or not now might be a prudent time to introduce into discussion the seven highly credible murder accusations against Brett Kavanaugh that were given to her in August. “Roughly five weeks ago, the family members of five slain women and two men presented me with dozens of file boxes full of concrete, corroborated evidence that Kavanaugh was personally and solely responsible for the deaths, and I’m now experiencing a strong feeling that maybe the other Senators, the media, and the American public should know,” said Feinstein, who also disclosed that dozens of people had come forward with information further connecting Kavanaugh to a string of brutal stranglings committed from 1986 to 2011, but had been turned away over concerns that it wasn’t relevant to the confirmation process. “His fingerprints are all over the crime scenes, there is DNA evidence from blood he left, and there are three dozen eyewitnesses. But information like that could really energize the Republican base, so you can see my dilemma here.” At press time, Feinstein had decided to sit on the evidence until a more politically expedient time.

Oh boy. I'll give you a chance to figure it out.
 
0
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back