WingMan
Established Member
- Impact
- 273
Recently, I posted on chat whether members thought $7K was a good price for a particular domain name (see attachment). This is NOT my domain name. I wasn't trying to sell a domain name to anybody. I was just commenting on a domain name that had already SOLD. You may check up namebio.com for more details.
However, yesterday, a WHOLE SEVEN days after my post, I get a message from @Amanda saying I have been restricted from chat, saying "Domain are not allowed in the chat room outside of the allowed days". I just checked the chat rules again, and I don't see this particular bit mentioned anywhere. Or at least, not from the way I understand what the rules are saying.
Other than domain names, what are members supposed to chat about on a domain website? I believe rules are there to stop abuse and protect other members, but I honestly don't know what banning me for this comment achieves here. If I had asked whether members thought insurance.com was worth $35M or whether they thought Fund.com was worth $10M in the chat section, will this also get me a ban? Seriously? What for? What does this achieve?
If this is indeed the rule, then it's too severe in my opinion and doesn't really serve any practical purpose. I have been banned for good reason in the past, but this time around, it just looks harsh and unfair, especially coming so long after the supposed infraction. Happy to hear from @Amanda for more clarification though.
However, yesterday, a WHOLE SEVEN days after my post, I get a message from @Amanda saying I have been restricted from chat, saying "Domain are not allowed in the chat room outside of the allowed days". I just checked the chat rules again, and I don't see this particular bit mentioned anywhere. Or at least, not from the way I understand what the rules are saying.
Other than domain names, what are members supposed to chat about on a domain website? I believe rules are there to stop abuse and protect other members, but I honestly don't know what banning me for this comment achieves here. If I had asked whether members thought insurance.com was worth $35M or whether they thought Fund.com was worth $10M in the chat section, will this also get me a ban? Seriously? What for? What does this achieve?
If this is indeed the rule, then it's too severe in my opinion and doesn't really serve any practical purpose. I have been banned for good reason in the past, but this time around, it just looks harsh and unfair, especially coming so long after the supposed infraction. Happy to hear from @Amanda for more clarification though.