NoBS
Established Member
- Impact
- 156
We allow this to benefit sellers (And buyers). It helps bump/pull the most interesting and sought after Request threads to the top for sellers to check out. It also helps the sellers nudge the buyer to respond to their DM. It even helps the buyer by getting their request thread more exposure. Overall, it's a positive thing.I have a feeling NoBS may not have been asking about what the terms mean, and instead was making a commentary about this habit of forum threads getting flooded by duplicates of "pm/dm sent" (when the OP gets a notification either way)?
I don't think buyers would want to do this: it would be more work for them and it would publicize their purchases and the ballpark price of those purchases, which reseller typically don't want when trying to resell domains for multiples more. There wouldn't be enough benefit to this for us to justify enforcing it.Buyer needs to mention what domain he bought and from whom, in his request thread.
Sellers can decide this on their own, for instance, if they want to ignore threads from new members. We can look into an easier way to filter the results based on criteria if there's enough interest in that.Buyer should have certain qualified parameters before putting on a request thread. (x amount of trade reviews / registered for minimum xx months etc..)
There have been a lot of threads on this. There are passionate advocates on both sides of the argument. There isn't enough of a consensus one way or another for us to create a rule about it.Buyers should reply to PMs/DMs. If a seller is trying to give you options for the domains you want, it's your obligation to at least reply to their messages.