IT.COM

The LLL.com sales report & discussion thread

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch
We need this one too guys :)

This guide will also help LLLL.com holders to understand more the value of their 4 letters .com based on how expensive the similar 3 letters .com are.

From:

http://3character.com/priceguide.html

Pricing Guide for 3-Letter (Composed Of Letters Only) Domains:

Current Observed Minimum Wholesale Price (regardless of letter combo) as of February 1, 2008:

3-Letter .com - $6700 (+ $300 since January 1, 2008 report)

But I consider their guide a bit old since they are not taking in consideration the emergenging countries that appreciate other letters and as we have run a poll here several times lately, the majority of people consider the letters U
and W to be Premium letters.

Let`s have a look at some recent LLL.com sales as reported from NameBio.com :


nak.com $27,135 2007-12-22 SEDO.com
nyz.com $10,605 2007-12-19 tdnam
utw.com $10,100 2007-12-10 SEDO.com
via.com $157,500 2007-12-06 SEDO.com
cgf.com $14,500 2007-12-06 SEDO.com
vkx.com $6,200 2007-12-06 SEDO.com
mje.com $10,734 2007-12-06 SEDO.com
okf.com $8,500 2007-12-06 SEDO.com
our.com $60,000 2007-12-06 SEDO.com
kxr.com $7,101 2007-12-06 SEDO.com
lhg.com $13,613 2007-12-06 SEDO.com
wae.com $10,099 2007-12-06 SEDO.com
hya.com $7,499 2007-12-06 SEDO.com
yrd.com $9,100 2007-12-05 SEDO.com
vfk.com $15,750 2007-11-29 AfterNic.com
qee.com $10,882 2007-11-27 SEDO.com
 
7
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
1
•••
Pretty much any LLL is easy to make a brand of. UXV = United eXchange (eXtreme etc.) Ventures

Yea, I stand corrected, erased the post, thanks as "UX" is also this relatively new User Experience thing too in tech. Good price for someone.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
JBO.com closed at $16,630 upload_2017-11-28_21-2-26.png
Featured Auction: 1eeq2wcr | http://www.namejet.com/Pages/Auctions/StandardDetails.aspx?auctionid=4003779
 
Last edited:
2
•••
Last edited:
1
•••
ixa.com will end at NameJet today. Very brandable, I think, so will be interesting to follow.

IXA.com has sold at least three times in the last 2.5 years.
upload_2017-11-29_1-25-25.png


I don't know which NJ alias won it for for $42,000 in December/2015, but an assumption is bidder first based on the WHOIS updating to Hu Weisheng in December 2015. http://www.namejet.com/Pages/Auctions/StandardDetails.aspx?auctionid=3742622

upload_2017-11-29_1-11-33.png upload_2017-11-29_1-19-33.png http://www.namejet.com/featuredauctions/ab1205th

The reserve is between $25k and $50k. So anything that hits reserve appears to be profit if the seller is the one who bought it from @BoothDomains
 
3
•••
IXA.com sales on NameJet:

upload_2017-11-29_17-34-24.png


first auction sold to "first". last one didn't met reserve
 
Last edited:
3
•••
Well, ixa.com ended at $18,000 and did not meet reserve. It does indeed seem like the trend is downwards.

Although this one is not a Chinese premium, it should command more than this as witnessed by the previous times it has sold.
 
2
•••
IXA.com sales on NameJet:

91361_d99415c7dbb43576f36696c084ef913a.png


first auction sold to "first". last one didn't met reserve

There were several $69 bids placed years before your $69 bid in this past auction. The earliest being a $69 bid by yiming October 5th, 2009.
Well, ixa.com ended at $18,000 and did not meet reserve. It does indeed seem like the trend is downwards.

Although this one is not a Chinese premium, it should command more than this as witnessed by the previous times it has sold.

The previous auction NameJet auction winners for this domain were First and TwoTwo. I did not see either of them in this last IXA.com auction. Is it common for them to miss a LLL.com auction at NJ?

upload_2017-11-29_20-15-54.pnghttp://www.namejet.com/Pages/Auctions/StandardDetails.aspx?auctionid=4003286
 
Last edited:
1
•••
it is not usual but happens, maybe because they become tired of repeated auctions of the same domains...
 
2
•••
CUH.com will end in less than 18 hours at NameJet | Current High Bid: $11,211 by finlead. First and TwoTwo have yet to bid above $69.

The earliest $69 bid was placed on October 4th, 2009 by alias Yiming
http://www.namejet.com/pages/auctions/standarddetails.aspx?auctionid=4003779 | Featured Auction 1eeq2wcr On April 25th, 2017 it looks like it was parked using as-drid-2959215220667262
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-11-29_21-4-7.png
    upload_2017-11-29_21-4-7.png
    109.1 KB · Views: 43
Last edited:
1
•••
someone is trying to sell a 29 domain portfolio of LLL.com's for $700K, maybe see weakening in pricing, as the reseller market was really holding up the price, and people are taking a step back, and letting it fall a bit, looking to get better deals which is the right move.

It is supply, and demand, and the names investors were hoping to cash in on, are actually costing them money say if they had put it into BTC, they maybe looking to make other moves, causing more supply, in a
 
Last edited:
1
•••
i see this as the unwinding of positions after the bubble pop at the end of 2015. however, the puzzling thing is that this is happening in counter-cycle with the economy. it has gone way to low to not mean that a substantial top has been put in place but the length of it without a major pullback it's really a rare thing.

i am justifying with with two things:
1) money been diverted to the sink hole of ngTLDs
2) money being diverted to crypto market that has become a huge bubble. we only need to look at so many domainers talking about investments in cryptos to make the connection.
 
5
•••
i see this as the unwinding of positions after the bubble pop at the end of 2015. however, the puzzling thing is that this is happening in counter-cycle with the economy. it has gone way to low to not mean that a substantial top has been put in place but the length of it without a major pullback it's really a rare thing.

i am justifying with with two things:
1) money been diverted to the sink hole of ngTLDs
2) money being diverted to crypto market that has become a huge bubble. we only need to look at so many domainers talking about investments in cryptos to make the connection.
The stock market is on fire also like Home Depot Tesla amazon Apple Microsoft like they just keep going higher and higher. The P/E ratios are getting a bit wacky, and have a lot of the new admins scenarios in play, it is going to be big Xmas bonuses on Wall Street this year, hopefully this December there is a lot of excess spending in play that needs to be done, and domainers get a bit of that capital in their direction.
 
5
•••
CUH.com will end in less than 18 hours at NameJet | Current High Bid: $11,211 by finlead. First and TwoTwo have yet to bid above $69.

The earliest $69 bid was placed on October 4th, 2009 by alias Yiming
http://www.namejet.com/pages/auctions/standarddetails.aspx?auctionid=4003779 | Featured Auction 1eeq2wcr On April 25th, 2017 it looks like it was parked using as-drid-2959215220667262

CUH.com finished at $14,133. Winner: Defendor01 upload_2017-12-1_0-7-26.png

This is the new lowest CVC.com sale since XUG.com in 2015.
 
1
•••
CUH.com will end in less than 18 hours at NameJet | Current High Bid: $11,211 by finlead. First and TwoTwo have yet to bid above $69.

First, TwoTwo and ThreeThreeThree have yet to bid ))))
 
2
•••
Last edited:
1
•••
RTK.com $24,101
QRF.com $21,211
IVM.com $18,375
TIQ.com $17,977
NTU.com $17,500
CUH.com $14,133
VQD.com $12,600
CIF.com $100,000


Apologies if any of these have been posted already
 
1
•••
RTK.com $24,101
QRF.com $21,211
IVM.com $18,375
TIQ.com $17,977
NTU.com $17,500
CUH.com $14,133
VQD.com $12,600
CIF.com $100,000


Apologies if any of these have been posted already

CIF makes sense at that price for some large corp etc. as it is really the only one that make sense in common usage. (For shipping/trade company)
 
0
•••
CIF makes sense at that price for some large corp etc. as it is really the only one that make sense in common usage. (For shipping/trade company)

CIF is also the acronym for Central Issue Facility.

I haven't seen this sale recorded in NameBio yet, though it was mentioned in today's DNJournal.com article.

upload_2017-12-13_17-2-21.png


Personally, I have a hard time believing all sales reported to DNJ, so I take it with a grain of salt.
 
0
•••
call me naive but DNJ is one of the few sources that I trust
 
2
•••
call me naive but DNJ is one of the few sources that I trust

Well, maybe I am the naive one. Because I trust your opinion.

Can you say why you trust DNJ? Would you say you trust them more than places like ShortNames.com or NameBio.com?

I haven't seen DNJournal.com provide any coverage to the bidding on your own names at NameJet debacle. Maybe I'm wrong? What I do see is DNJournal.com constantly publicizing sales from those who were directly implicated in that scandal. @Ron Jackson is not the only person doing this, but for some reason, I expected more from DNJournal.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
because he has been on the market for long, doing due diligence on his reports AFAIK. and he doesn't enter in the "intricacies" of this market. he is there to inspire and to spread the reported sales.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
doing due diligence on his reports AFAIK.
Maybe I'm misreading their verification of reported sales, but it appears there is a clause that doesn't require well known parties to send in sales documentation. I don't know if that means both buyer and seller, or...? I'm not sure if other sales reporting venues have similar clauses / standards.

https://www.dnjournal.com/sales-verification.htm

upload_2017-12-13_17-54-56.png
 
Last edited:
1
•••
no other venue does better than this. yes, it could have a flaw by the trust issue as we have seen several well know persons behave very dubiously.
 
1
•••
2
•••
Back