Dynadot

question Is It Legal to Buy Domain Names to Harass Your Enemies?

NameSilo
Watch

deez007

The More I Learn The Less I "Know"Top Member
Impact
12,971
Interesting Reading...

Tuesday, Business Insider reported that Martin Shkreli has spent the last several months buying up domain names associated with at least eight journalists who have criticized him. The pharmaceutical entrepreneur, who was convicted earlier this month of securities fraud, has now begun to customize the sites with the goal of mocking the reporters.

On a site associated with CNBC reporter Caroline Moss for example, Shkreli wrote "Everything you need to know about this CNBC safe spacer." A similar site bearing Vanity Fair writer Maya Kosoff's name sarcastically reads "Here we honor one of the most vibrant Social Justice advocates today." A WHOIS lookup confirms that both websites were registered with domain provider GoDaddy by Martin Shkreli earlier this year.

Shkreli offered to sell a domain connected to NY Post reporter Emily Saul to her for $12,000, according to Business Insider. On a phone call, Shkreli told me the proposal was a joke. "I'm a very rich guy. I don't need $12,000," he said. "I would never sell any of these domains for any price." Saul declined to comment, citing company policy.

Shkreli is clearly trying to agitate, but is what he's doing illegal? According to Shkreli, the answer is no. "This is not illegal," he told me. "There's nothing illegal about buying a domain name that's the same name as someone's name." He mentioned he had consulted lawyers before purchasing the websites, which he told me were bought to test software on the backend that his new company is developing.

According to a legal expert I spoke to, Shkreli could be wrong. Several federal cyberlaws protect individuals like the journalists Shkreli targeted from domain disputes like this one. "There are certainly a fair number of options that these individuals would have," David J. Steele, a lawyer specializing in trademark and internet law and a professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, told me on a phone call.

What's working against Shkreli, according to Steele, is that he has purchased numerous domains. "You can show a pattern of abusive registrations," he said.

Steele outlined for me three main ways domain disputes like the one Shkreli started can be legally resolved:

Read Full Story Here:
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/...al-to-buy-domain-names-to-harass-your-enemies
 
Last edited:
1
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
This probably falls into the "freedom of speech" so anyone can say anything, but a renown publisher and journalist is more reputable and has more authority when he publishes something - even on internet.
 
1
•••
Question - Is It Legal to Buy Domain Names to Harass Your Enemies?

Answer -
Only in America

Cheers
Corey
 
4
•••
Shkreli won't be doing much on the internet from his jail cell
 
1
•••
Ask any celebrity what they think of journos?

There is a phrase - treat others how you want to be treated yourself

If you want to hound pester anooy and become a general nuisance to others etc expect them to return the favour at some point

Mind you social media returned the favour

All the media ad $`'s are flowing in to Google's pockets at lightning speed

No one bothers with traditional media any more that why paper sales are falling and no one bothers to buy papers online

Modern media eg viral videos etc is one bod uploads content and the world adds their own opinion the balance of which is about right

Viral videos can be less than 5 mins long no need for full length documentaries as people get bored after 5 mins

Traditional ads on traditional media are forced upon the listener and or viewer

Google's ads just sit quietly amongst other content on a page requested by the person using Google search on an appealing Google homepage not high speed rattling of terms and conditions and desperately trying to get the viewers or listeners attention before they change channel but channel hopping us so yestercentury because the ads all come on at the same time so no need to channelhop as the off button is a much better option

We no longer live in an era where they know everything and we know nothing

We live in an era where we don't need to know the news every half an hour on the radio we only need to know the news when we need to know the news whenever that may be and only once not all day long lol
 
1
•••
Carly Fiorina did this to journalist when they mocked her campaign for not owning her own name.
 
1
•••
Interesting Reading...

Tuesday, Business Insider reported that Martin Shkreli has spent the last several months buying up domain names associated with at least eight journalists who have criticized him. The pharmaceutical entrepreneur, who was convicted earlier this month of securities fraud, has now begun to customize the sites with the goal of mocking the reporters.

On a site associated with CNBC reporter Caroline Moss for example, Shkreli wrote "Everything you need to know about this CNBC safe spacer." A similar site bearing Vanity Fair writer Maya Kosoff's name sarcastically reads "Here we honor one of the most vibrant Social Justice advocates today." A WHOIS lookup confirms that both websites were registered with domain provider GoDaddy by Martin Shkreli earlier this year.

Shkreli offered to sell a domain connected to NY Post reporter Emily Saul to her for $12,000, according to Business Insider. On a phone call, Shkreli told me the proposal was a joke. "I'm a very rich guy. I don't need $12,000," he said. "I would never sell any of these domains for any price." Saul declined to comment, citing company policy.

Shkreli is clearly trying to agitate, but is what he's doing illegal? According to Shkreli, the answer is no. "This is not illegal," he told me. "There's nothing illegal about buying a domain name that's the same name as someone's name." He mentioned he had consulted lawyers before purchasing the websites, which he told me were bought to test software on the backend that his new company is developing.

According to a legal expert I spoke to, Shkreli could be wrong. Several federal cyberlaws protect individuals like the journalists Shkreli targeted from domain disputes like this one. "There are certainly a fair number of options that these individuals would have," David J. Steele, a lawyer specializing in trademark and internet law and a professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, told me on a phone call.

What's working against Shkreli, according to Steele, is that he has purchased numerous domains. "You can show a pattern of abusive registrations," he said.

Steele outlined for me three main ways domain disputes like the one Shkreli started can be legally resolved:

Read Full Story Here:
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/...al-to-buy-domain-names-to-harass-your-enemies

Dang I'm in the right business then. Democrats and Republicans can lease my Domain Name from time to time.

QualifiedMonkey.com.jpg
 
2
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back