Dynadot

discuss End your buy now pricing with 95, 99, 88 or 00?

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch
Which have you found to be the most successful ending for pricing your domains?

$2,495
$2,499
$2,488
$2,500

Buy Domains ends most of their pricing with 88 and so does Mike Mann (Domain Market). Mike Berkens (sold his portfolio to Godaddy for 35 million) also ends his pricing in 88.

Huge Domains ends most of their names with 95. On the top two brandable marketplaces most of the pricing ends in 95.


Which have you found to be the most successful ending for your prices based on actual sales data?

Many articles have been written about this subject and here are a few links below.

https://www.fastcompany.com/1826172/psychology-behind-sweet-spots-pricing

https://www.allbusiness.com/why-99-is-the-magic-number-for-product-pricing-16745938-1.html

https://blog.kissmetrics.com/5-psychological-studies/
 
5
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Must say that I totally get the idea of pricing X00, i.e. making the number less complex and thus erasing a layer of thought process that goes into impulse buyer's head. Not gonna reprice a lot but will apply that kind of pricing for the next couple of hundred domains.
 
3
•••
Interesting insight Michael, thanks.

I read an interesting study at some point, can't find the link ATM. It said round numbers are better for impulse purchases, and specific numbers are better for researched purchases because they make the buyer stop and think why the number is so precise.

Based on that, I would think round numbers are better for low-end domains ($1,500 vs. $1,488) because you want them pulling the trigger quickly not agonizing over it. And high-end domains should be priced specifically ($32,488 vs. $32,500) because you probably need them to dig deeper to justify the price, and sales at this level are not impulse-buys.

But I'm not speaking from experience, I don't have a large enough portfolio of priced domains to test that. BuyDomains may have lots of names with very specific pricing, but if you look at their actual sales most have round numbers. Same goes for DomainMarket. This reply was already getting kind of long, so I decided to put it in a blog post instead with the actual data:

https://namebio.com/blog/pricing-strategies-domain-names/

TLDR; ending in 00 was the most likely sale price for both BuyDomains and DomainMarket by a wide margin. I even tried isolating sub $5k sales compared to $5k+ sales and the results were pretty much the same, so maybe it doesn't even make sense to price high-end domains with specific numbers.
 
0
•••
I've always just done even numbers $7000.00, last few years though I've kinda switched to 49 or 99 ending in dollars and left change out so usually like $6499 or $6999. Like to leave the change at .00 so I can eliminate 3 characters in the pricing field on the sales lander as $6999 looks cleaner than $6999.00 or $6999.99 plus I hate change. :ROFL: It's not 7k anymore it's only $6999 super bargain buy it now. :ROFL:

Personally think 99 works. If all my domains appealed to Chinese buyers then maybe I'd go 88 instead.

Walmart is a big 97 pricer but think charm pricing might have more psychological variations in lower end pricing but think when were talking thousands of dollars doubt it matters much. If someone is willing to pay a few thousand for a domain don't think a $6999 price ruins a sale where the $6998, $6997, $6995 price makes it happen.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Switched all my domains to even numbers. Example - $500, instead of $499.

Already had 2 sales yesterday. :)

I know @Bram C. says charm pricing works better. I guess you have to A/B test with your domains.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back