IT.COM
Spaceship Spaceship
Watch
hello

I am new to BrandBucket. Before getting my hands on this

I wish to experience about brandbucket from my fellow members


Thanks :)
 
3
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
what if i prefer Escrow?

Show attachment 54503

i cant add names to BB :xf.confused:
Any names that sale will pass through BB escrow... This is only referencing your payment information to receive money from BB after a sale.

An escrow service is not needed when BB themselves handle the domain transaction.

If you were to use Escrow (if they offered it) it would cost you an escrow.com fee to receive your money.
 
2
•••
I remember someone making a comment about bb founder using domain privacy. It looks like some are now dis-enabled.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
How to push Brandbucket Accepted Domains to other Brandbucket account? I don't see any push buttons in the interface.
 
0
•••
How to push Brandbucket Accepted Domains to other Brandbucket account? I don't see any push buttons in the interface.

It's where you edit the name, change its price etc. Click on "edit".
UPD: Accepted names are not pushed at all. The new owner resubmits them, e.g. by email.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
It's where you edit the name, change its price etc. Click on "edit".
UPD: Accepted names are not pushed at all. The new owner resubmits them, e.g. by email.
Ok, got it. Thanks.
 
0
•••
Anyone had much luck selling their 4 letter .com domains on Brand Bucket? Perhaps @michaeljkrell can shed some light on how many 4 letter .coms they have moved in the mid - high $x,xxx range
 
0
•••
Anyone had much luck selling their 4 letter .com domains on Brand Bucket? Perhaps @michaeljkrell can shed some light on how many 4 letter .coms they have moved in the mid - high $x,xxx range
15% of BB sales are 4L names.
 
2
•••
I think 4L's turn over significantly faster than other names on BB, but at a lower ROI.

I've found it quite complicated to really compare 4L's ROI to other names, because 4L's really have their own traits.
  • A 4L costs way more than your typical BB name
  • But therefore renewals and listing fee add a much smaller % to total investment relatively
  • 4L's sell at notably higher sell-through rates
  • But for much lower multiples of price paid for domain
  • 4L's are quite liquid, but actually so are non-4L BB names
  • However, if you hold a non-4L BB name and a 4L BB name for 3 years and then decide to sell them both off to another domainer, you very well may not even recover your whole investment in the non-4L while there's a good chance you will recover approximately 100% of your investment in the 4L (because renewals and listing fee will have eroded much less of your initial investment)
My sense is still that non-4L's offer a better ROI opportunity.
 
6
•••
non-4L 5 year timeline
  • Hand-reg for $8.47 and it gets accepted at $1,795
  • Pay $9.09 listing fee
  • 4.99 years later you've renewed it 4 more times
  • Total investment = ~$51
  • Assume a 2.5% sell-through rate
  • If it sells you get $1,155 in-pocket
  • There is a 12.5% chance it sold
  • 12.5% x $1,155 = $144
  • quick glance ROI = 182%
4L 5 year timeline
  • Buy for $550 and it gets accepted at $4,995
  • Pay $9.09 listing fee
  • 4.99 years later you've renewed 4 times
  • Total investment = ~$584
  • Assume a 5% sell-through rate
  • If it sells you get $3,395 in-pocket
  • There is a 25% chance it sold
  • 25% x $3,395 = $849
  • quick glance ROI = 45%
This is not the whole picture but it's better than nothing. You can plug in your own assumed sell-through rates.
 
6
•••
@Nat Hunt I am not understanding how you are computing the 12.5 % chance of sale and the 25 % chance of sale into the ROI.

ROI is and equation of profit to investment. The "chance" of selling doesn't come into that equation.

I also don't understand the term "quick glance ROI"

Can you help me understand what you are saying, please?
 
Last edited:
0
•••
@NamesMax I'll try :) it's not that easy to communicate even though it's technically not that complicated. Did anyone follow my calculations?

I am not understanding how you are computing the 12.5 % chance of sale and the 25 % chance of sale into the ROI.

OK I'm assuming that an average non-4L has a 2.5% chance of selling over the course of a year. This is just an assumption. Who knows how far off it is.

Now, since it has a 2.5% chance of selling over the course of one year, it will have a 12.5% chance of selling over 5 years. (Again I understand that this is not an exact science at all, but for the sake of assumption we will say that 2.5% chance remains constant over time.)

Just take the 2.5% chance of selling in 1 year and multiply it by 5 years in order to see the odds that it sells over a 5 year period. This equals 12.5%.

The math for the 4L assumptions works the same. Assume a 5% chance of selling in 1 year and multiply by 5 years. It equals a 25% chance that the 4L sells over a 5 year period.

ROI is and equation of profit to investment. The "chance" of selling doesn't come into that equation.

Well, we are talking about the future here, so we have to estimate chance in order to estimate ROI.

I also don't understand the term "quick glance ROI"

What I meant by that is basically that this is an imperfect calculation, because it does not take into account everything that a more complete model would account for, such as estimated liquidation value of each domain at the end of 5 years.
 
2
•••
ZICH will be allowed to expire?
 
1
•••
@NamesMax I'll try :) it's not that easy to communicate even though it's technically not that complicated. Did anyone follow my calculations?



OK I'm assuming that an average non-4L has a 2.5% chance of selling over the course of a year. This is just an assumption. Who knows how far off it is.

Now, since it has a 2.5% chance of selling over the course of one year, it will have a 12.5% chance of selling over 5 years. (Again I understand that this is not an exact science at all, but for the sake of assumption we will say that 2.5% chance remains constant over time.)

Just take the 2.5% chance of selling in 1 year and multiply it by 5 years in order to see the odds that it sells over a 5 year period. This equals 12.5%.

The math for the 4L assumptions works the same. Assume a 5% chance of selling in 1 year and multiply by 5 years. It equals a 25% chance that the 4L sells over a 5 year period.



Well, we are talking about the future here, so we have to estimate chance in order to estimate ROI.



What I meant by that is basically that this is an imperfect calculation, because it does not take into account everything that a more complete model would account for, such as estimated liquidation value of each domain at the end of 5 years.

Not a big difference, but 2.5% a year chance in 5 years adds up to 11.9%. The way it is calculated is via opposite: chance of not selling in year 1 = 97.5%. The same for 2, 3, 4... So you do 97.5%^5 to calculate the chance of not being sold and then deduct it from 100%.
 
5
•••
Thanks for that @Recons.Com. I suspected I was taking a shortcut but was pretty sure it didn't make a big difference in this case :)
 
1
•••
I moved away from brand bucket about a year ago but because I was in fact "then" getting the odd sale I returned and have recently published 35 names. Wish I had read about nobody getting any sales anymore before spending the $350 in listing fees. I'll leave my names I have published up there for 6 months. If I don't get any sales I'll eat my $350 loss and post for sale elsewhere. Urgh
 
3
•••
I moved away from brand bucket about a year ago but because I was in fact "then" getting the odd sale I returned and have recently published 35 names. Wish I had read about nobody getting any sales anymore before spending the $350 in listing fees. I'll leave my names I have published up there for 6 months. If I don't get any sales I'll eat my $350 loss and post for sale elsewhere. Urgh
Who is not getting any sales anymore?

I guess you are listening to the wrong crowd
 
1
•••
Who is not getting any sales anymore?

I guess you are listening to the wrong crowd
Just read back through the discussion on the last few pages
 
0
•••
I moved away from brand bucket about a year ago but because I was in fact "then" getting the odd sale I returned and have recently published 35 names. Wish I had read about nobody getting any sales anymore before spending the $350 in listing fees. I'll leave my names I have published up there for 6 months. If I don't get any sales I'll eat my $350 loss and post for sale elsewhere. Urgh

I just wanted to let you know many people are doing well at BB. This thread has been mostly abandoned lately because the tone of the thread went negative a while back. Everyone got tired of trying to have a constructive conversation with people who did not want to improve BB - but just wanted to spread rumors and unsubstantiated claims. There is always room for criticism and improvement - but it is tiring to try to have an intelligent conversation with people who have an agenda. And don't get me wrong - this also goes the other way with blind BB supporters who provide no useful insights or comments.

Back to your post - IMO 6 months would not be enough time to judge results on a 35 name profile. At an industry standard of 1-2% you are unlikely to sell a domain in a year - though many at BB get well over 2% which would put you in line for 1 sale in a year. (If you can pull a 3% or above STR). To sell a domain in 6 months I believe you would need to be running at at least 6% STR - which would be great and is doable if you have a good portfolio.

But, BB is not for everyone - People need to make their own decisions that they feel with benefit them.

Best of luck!
 
6
•••
Not a big difference, but 2.5% a year chance in 5 years adds up to 11.9%. The way it is calculated is via opposite: chance of not selling in year 1 = 97.5%. The same for 2, 3, 4... So you do 97.5%^5 to calculate the chance of not being sold and then deduct it from 100%.
Thank you very much for supplying this info. I had never thought that deep into it.

Would you, @Recons.Com , or anyone else has the time to break down why these two different methods come up with two different values - when they both seem to be a reasonable approach?
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Thank you very much for supplying this info. I had never thought that deep into it.

Would you, @Recons.Com , or anyone else has the time to break down why these two different methods come up with two different values - when they both seem to be a reasonable approach?

Addition in this case is an approximation. You need to multiply to get the correct result. And you need to do the counterintuitive thing: to get the number for chance to sell, you need to multiply chances of sale not happening and deduct the number from 1.
 
1
•••
@Michael M I'll take a stab at it and @Recons.Com can correct me if I'm wrong...

What my original math didn't account for was the fact that there's only a 97.5% chance that the name even exists on BB to be sold (or not) once year 2 rolls around, since there was a 2.5% chance it already sold.

Therefore, the chance that it does not sell in year 2 is actually 97.5% of 97.5%.

Likewise, the chance that it still has not sold after Year 3 is 97.5% of 97.5% of 97.5%.

So now you can see why @Recons.Com did 97.5% to the 5th power in order to figure out the exact probability that after 5 full years, it still has not sold.

But then you need to obviously subtract that from 100% (or 1, as Recons said) in order to reverse engineer that chance that it did sell.
 
4
•••
That makes perfect sense. I was missing the fact of the reduction of potential sales through rate each year as this was looked at as a single domain name and not a "fixed profile size" over a set time.

Much more accurate!

That's for the explanations @Recons.Com and @Nat Hunt
 
Last edited:
2
•••
How do I deactivate my BB account?
 
2
•••
1
•••
Now if instead of assuming a 2.5% STR on the non-4L, and a 5% STR on the 4L...

You estimate a 6% STR for the 4L

And a 1% STR for the non-4L

Then the non-4L has a ROI of 11%

And the 4L has a ROI of 55%

Again, these do not take into account liquidation values

But you can see you need a very wide amount of out-performance by the 4L in order to make up the gap caused by its way, way higher cost.
 
0
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back