Dynadot

3D is DEAD! Get on the 4D train now!

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch
Just look at these awesome hand regs I grabbed:

4dviideocam.com (Typo!)

finda4Ddateintahoma.net (Geotargeted! And everybody knows dating is a hot niche!)

onetwothreefourdee.com (Brandable! Memorable!)

4Dcabbages.com (generic product -- "cabbages" get huge search volume, just imagine what it will be in 4D a few years from now!)

No, seriously -- why is everyone going crazy over 3D domains? A couple of 3D movies are out, just like in the 90s, the 80s, the 70s, the 60s, and the 50s. There's lots of talk about 3D becoming standard for certain venues and types of films, but 1) that talk resurfaces once per decade since before my mom was born, and 2) if something becomes standard it is no longer a buzzword -- so the modifier becomes redundant or at best passé.

Seriously ... if it isn't related to stereographics or other visual/audio media, what is the point to registering anything with "3D" in it?


Frank
 
2
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
3d movies from 90s, the 80s, the 70s have a very bad quality (Red Green glasses)

The new 3d Movies in 3d Movie theaters are digital. Have a look RealD 3D Experience | Regal Theaters

And the 3d TVs are HD.

That is the difference.

Best Regards
 
0
•••
3D might be here to stay, but low quality 3D domains are not.

Brad
 
0
•••
Your living in a dream world, filled with hype and void of logic.
 
0
•••
0
•••
posted by Spade:
Your living in a dream world, filled with hype and void of logic

You're living in a world devoid of satire -- who's worse off?


Frank
 
1
•••
posted by Spade:


You're living in a world devoid of satire -- who's worse off?


Frank

So very glad you were being satirical. I almost went into convulsions thinking you actually were regging those names D-:
 
0
•••
:lol: I was thinkin', here we go again. You got me. repped!
 
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
samsung and toshiba coming out with 3d sets for sale this week

2 huge companies, along with the movie industry pushing this trend...lots of money put in by them to market your good 3d names and the 3d future

I agree good 3d names are in, 3dtoothpaste is not..
 
0
•••
LMAO.

Very Funny Thread.
Repped!
 
0
•••
Just look at these awesome hand regs I grabbed:

4dviideocam.com (Typo!)

finda4Ddateintahoma.net (Geotargeted! And everybody knows dating is a hot niche!)

onetwothreefourdee.com (Brandable! Memorable!)

4Dcabbages.com (generic product -- "cabbages" get huge search volume, just imagine what it will be in 4D a few years from now!)

Frank

GraceDelete4D.com
 
0
•••
J
Seriously ... if it isn't related to stereographics or other visual/audio media, what is the point to registering anything with "3D" in it?
/QUOTE]

Well, 3Dhooters.com popped into mind...(just checked - it's taken)

I agree that often either the technology doesn't take off, or it does and the name becomes redundant. At best, most tech names are at high risk of being made obsolete and worthless by newer technologies. That's why I prefer the low tech stuff, like furniture names. Rockingchair.com never has to worry about rocketchair.com coming along.
 
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
5D will be all mine.
Mine, mine, all mine, ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
 
0
•••
samsung and toshiba coming out with 3d sets for sale this week

2 huge companies, along with the movie industry pushing this trend...lots of money put in by them to market your good 3d names and the 3d future

I agree good 3d names are in, 3dtoothpaste is not..

One thing is for sure, Samsung wont purchase those names, they already have the names they want. :)
 
0
•••
Stay in school kids.

There is plenty of potential with hand-registrations of existing products that have search volume.

It's a lot harder than arbitrarily inventing keywords and sticking "3D" in it.
 
0
•••
some say the 4th dimension is time , if you move something it takes time , so should i be looking for domains that can move ???
 
0
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back