IT.COM

showcase Metaverse ~ Showcase your names and Discussion Thread~

NameSilo
Watch

DomainBarracksRob

Top Member
Impact
8,466
Hey all figured with the recent .io 6 figure sale and the nice .xyz sale by a follow NP member. We should open a showcase and discussion thread here.

Metaverse is a fast growing keyword, term and niche! Let's share and discuss our name and news.

I've only got One to start with but its a GOOD one my favorite ending keyword on most names.


MetaverseHub.com



Welcome! :)
 
49
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
I'm going for MV.......it makes perfect sense, short and direct!

Good luck!
 
1
•••
Good thing it's short since it's hyphenated, figured why not.

T/h//e - MV (.)C0M
 
1
•••
I personally think anyone who argues that MV doesn't have legs then it's clear they have heavily invested in Meterverse+keyword, Meta+keyword and keyword+verse and will use this thread to pump to end-users! Just my 2 cents 👍
 
2
•••
I actually heard about it here a few months back. https://www.namepros.com/threads/y-at-emoji-sub-domains-go-viral-with-425-000-sale-more.1234034/
With all my respect, if by saying that you have not heard about Yat names before, implies that none has well...
In any case what I was refering to is that the combo of word+verse or meta+word is something that a brand may use as the way to be part of this hype of the metaverse while keeping there brand name.

no of course I didnt use me as.gold.standard.. when I said most never heard it it was.a guess.

at this point both our guesses stand unverified. but u of course with respect are welcome to guess opposite..that most have heard it.

like Elad said keep eyes on prize and experiments to min ;)
 
1
•••
Some keywords have clout and in my opinion should not be abbreviated because then they might lose that clout visually.

Metaverse is one such keyword.

IMO
 
5
•••
I personally think anyone who argues that MV doesn't have legs then it's clear they have heavily invested in Meterverse+keyword, Meta+keyword and keyword+verse and will use this thread to pump to end-users! Just my 2 cents 👍

Pump to end-users lol.

Such a shame.
 
3
•••
Purchased - MetaVerseStreaming.com
 
3
•••
When talking about new and experimental regs I believe a veteran investor should clarify that's it's a big bet and any new domainer should know most likely it's a waste of money (highly speculative)

Remember that!

Of course. I couldn't agree more, but I already gave out the warnings about MV in my first post about it saying "don't hold your breath". That includes most speculative domains in future tech as well, including 99% of Metaverse domains... MV is even more speculative and risky because it's a sub-niche.

Anyone who goes into niche domaining that still doesn't understand that regging multiple domains in any niche (especially future tech) comes with great risk needs to find a new hobby.

All niches are risky. MV is even riskier because barely anyone is using it. Not sure what you're worried about. It's not like you are going to prevent people from wasting their money and do you *really* care?
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Here we go!

... Don't go on a MV regging spree. There aren't any companies doing any *marketing* currently with MV. There is no sign that anyone will either. I don't endorse regging a bunch of MV names so don't blame me if you waste your money. It's a super risky bet, like regging a bunch of BC domains to represent Blockchain (as I've already said). There is a SUPER HIGH chance that you are wasting your money if you're regging "Metaverse" domains and there is a NEAR CERTAIN risk that you are wasting money regging "MV" domains. ALL of niches are risky but when you deal with experimental abbreviations that's quadruply risky! (and no I'm not sure quadruply is even a word 😆)

Boom! ... I'm done warning you guys...
 
Last edited:
3
•••
Of course. I couldn't agree more, but I already gave out the warnings about MV in my first post about it saying "don't hold your breath". That includes most speculative domains in future tech as well, including 99% of Metaverse domains... MV is even more speculative and risky because it's a sub-niche.

Anyone who goes into niche domaining that still doesn't understand that regging multiple domains in any niche (especially future tech) comes with great risk needs to find a new hobby.

All niches are risky. MV is even riskier because barely anyone is using it. Not sure what you're worried about. It's not like you are going to prevent people from wasting their money and do you *really* care?

Yes I do care, seen it happened before.

Some of us care.
 
2
•••
Here we go!

... Don't go on a MV regging spree. There aren't any companies doing any *marketing* currently with MV. There is no sign that anyone will either. I don't endorse regging a bunch of MV names so don't blame me if you waste your money. It's a super risky bet, like regging a bunch of BC domains to represent Blockchain (as I've already said). There is a SUPER HIGH chance that you are wasting your money if you're regging "Metaverse" domains and there is a NEAR CERTAIN risk that you are wasting money regging "MV" domains. ALL of niches are risky but when you deal with experimental abbreviations that's quadruply risky! (and no I'm not sure quadruply is even a word 😆)

Boom! ... I'm done warning you guys...

agree for mv

metaverse regging is just fine..but few yrs ago. so timing is issue here..not keyword
 
0
•••
Good thing it's short since it's hyphenated, figured why not.

T/h//e - MV (.)C0M


This ^ and M/V+ oasis are the only 2 I have just because it's short and could be used. don't except to make a killing on it either.

I agree with @oldtimer

Metaverse is just to cool a word to cut short and walk around saying " in to the MV we go". I think it's great for typing out commination.

But just like BLOCKCHAIN...nose goes, or in this case name goes, metaverse is cool fun and descriptive. I believe Meta & verse & metaverse are the real bread winners here.( MV is broad enough that it could pull of sales on something that’s not even Metaverse related ex: MotorVechicleParts (mvParts)

Sure I think there will be a few nice MV brands pop for MetaVerse, just not the way xr, and vr Have, but MV needs explained, if you don't know what it's referring to .

Also one thing AR XR AND VR all have in common which helped it catch is the R for Reality, which helps people recognize and adopt it. MV just won’t have the same play and that’s just y my personal thought, non the less I picked up 2 just to have my feet in that pool too! Gl all!

Meta and Metaverse do not

Also unlike Virtual Reality (still great) plus keyword

It's 2 words

Metaverse and blockchain are ( Compound words, 1 word made up of 2)

Just my 2 cents
 
Last edited:
2
•••
The only reason I'm holding MV domains is in case the tides turn and a major co starts using MV in their major *marketing* campaigns, but it's a just gamble, not proper domain "investing". If you are not aware of the science, you should do more research on how this industry works before wasting your money.

All niche domaining is risky and Metaverse is EXTREMELY risky, especially because it's a longish word. It's not as certain as a niche like Real Estate for example. 98% of you (especially with 2 word Metaverse domains) are wasting your money. Even some "top tier", 2 word Metaverse domains will never sell for even close to what their owners are hoping for. This is the nature of ALL speculative niche domaining.

The biggest winner in domain speculation is the house - the registrars and registries.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
Speaking of which. Now would be a great time to own a ". meta" registry.
 
0
•••
Magicverse.io
MetaCafe.io
MetaIdentity.io
MetaFuture.io
MetaMoney.io
MetaLegends.io
MetaTwins.io
MetaCredits.io
MetaLive.io
MetaCash.io
 
Last edited:
3
•••
..
(dawtcoms)


MetaItems

MetaversalWorks

.
 
1
•••
1
•••
7
•••
https://tldinvestors.com/2021/07/on...me-the-top-reported-sale-in-an-extension.html


Igor Gabrielan says

July 28, 2021 at 1:50 am

Today I was offered $ 60,000 for metaverse.ai . I turned it down, I want $ 200,000, because this name is at the intersection of two hot topics, AI and

he might get it ..but imo he will have to wait a very longtime

I think its a mistake.not.to take the 60k

what he calls.intrtsection while in a way there..may only exist in his head as.additional.value

frankly what does that even imply to connect metaverse with ai.. at least cheese.pizza has.some.obvious link.

but most domainers do suffer.from the..my domain is worth one million syndrome
 
Last edited:
3
•••
he might get it ..but imo he will have to wait a very longtime


frankly what does that even imply to connect metaverse with ai.. at least cheese.pizza has.some.obvious link.

I agree, would of taking the $60k( unless was 1st offer )

But actually Metaverse and AI are and will be interconnected.

Quick google search you can see several links!

23FDBAEF-C87B-4975-A33B-49123CF305C4.png




It would makes sense for AI to “live” within metaverse!


Show on Netflix “Altered Carbon” the host of the Hotel..is and AI begin


Also I own 1 .ai name already and it’s metaverse related.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
yeah... 200k is a lot of money..just for linking mv to ai..and via an extension..
.. more than 175k for io

io wins hands down over ai imo.

anyway.. if he can afford to wait... 5 to 10 yrs of now maybe he will get 6fig
 
Last edited:
2
•••
Within in the *
being *

Sry for my typeos

Always happens when I busy and on mobile.

To late to edit above post(30mins)past
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Metaverse-vr.com

Metaverse-coin.com
 
0
•••
I'll be honest with you guys. A few months ago I conceived of the idea of "MV" as an acronym on my own before discovering it was already being used and registered by early bird domainers. I regged about 20 MV names 3 months ago, including Glasses, Avatar, P*rno, Earth, blockchain and others. I am probably the first domainer to dive into this sub-niche the way I did, but @xr reality regged an MV domain (MVS*x dot com) way back in 2017. There are also even older registrations going back to 2014, and there are conversations archived online referring to the Metaverse as "MV" going as far back as the mid 2000s. There are more individuals using the term MV than there are companies, like 18 out of 20 (very rough estimate based on my previous research some months ago) but I have seen a nano sized handful professionals and projects use the term MV.

I think the term could catch on, but how likely is uncertain. One thing is for sure, Metaverse is a long word, so it would make sense to use MV, but length never got in the way of the success of Blockchain as a branding and marketing term. There were maybe 4 or 5 companies referring to it as "BC", but that acronym never caught on. So don't hold your breath for MV to be a bread winner. It's very plausible that it will not. Until we find out, I'm holding on to a few....let's see how it goes...

To the future 🥂
Cheers mate yeah mv caught my attention tried to get po$n etc but were gone got s3x as the owner of metaverseSex dot com wanted to pair up mv with it good luck mate exciting things are coming
 
3
•••
Cheers mate yeah mv caught my attention tried to get po$n etc but were gone got s3x as the owner of metaverseSex dot com wanted to pair up mv with it good luck mate exciting things are coming
Good names.. any offers on metaverses3x?
 
0
•••
Back