Dynadot
Spaceship Spaceship
Watch

Who is to Blame for the Troubled US Economy?

  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.
  • Both Parties

    268 
    votes
    44.7%
  • Neither Party

    57 
    votes
    9.5%
  • Democrats

    133 
    votes
    22.2%
  • Republicans

    141 
    votes
    23.5%
  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.

Impact
8,557
Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun :)

:wave:
 
8
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Abortion ends the life of a human regardless how he or she was conceived. You're analogy is still an evil rationalization.

So you're against abortion even in cases of rape/incest? What if that happened to somebody close to you, wife, daughter, mother, niece etc. And they didn't want the baby. You still would be against that, forcing them to carry to term?
 
1
•••
Prez Trump just proposed a new immigration policy that favours skilled immigrants’ passage to residency and citizenship.

Correct me if I’m wrong, if more skilled and educated immigrants are given preference, won’t this take away well paying jobs and business opportunities from US citizens?

Because of the great employment numbers, isn’t there a shortage in filling low skilled positions because US citizens don’t want them? Why wouldn’t you want to have legal immigrants take those jobs?
 
Last edited:
0
•••
They don't actually give a shit about the rapist's offspring. It's all to try and appear virtuous when they aren't hahah


If men were the ones who carried babies and if they discovered a weird thing happening, like how so many think Jesus was conceived..
A phenomenon where some percentage of men randomly get pregnant without having sex, and nobody understands where the female DNA came from
They would just go "wow, that's a really weird thing! you guys can abort it if you want, since you didn't consent to start a pregnancy. but if for some odd reason you want to, you can of course keep it, disrupt your life for it, go through the issues of pregnancy for it." Nobody would force them.

Yet when it's a freakin rapist and a woman, they're pretending it's the end of the world, you're a murderer
 
1
•••
0
•••
This is asinine babel. Try living in the real world


They don't actually give a sh*t about the rapist's offspring. It's all to try and appear virtuous when they aren't hahah


If men were the ones who carried babies and if they discovered a weird thing happening, like how so many think Jesus was conceived..
A phenomenon where some percentage of men randomly get pregnant without having sex, and nobody understands where the female DNA came from
They would just go "wow, that's a really weird thing! you guys can abort it if you want, since you didn't consent to start a pregnancy. but if for some odd reason you want to, you can of course keep it, disrupt your life for it, go through the issues of pregnancy for it." Nobody would force them.

Yet when it's a freakin rapist and a woman, they're pretending it's the end of the world, you're a murderer
 
1
•••
It's as realistic as Jesus being born of a virgin
 
0
•••
If I was advising them, there were no medical problems, my council would be to bring the baby to full term. If you felt alienated at that time, put the baby up for adoption.

Of course, regressive are using outliers in an attempt to make others look extreme. Planned Parenthood has been caught multiple times helping rapist and pimps cover up their crimes. Abortions for rape / incest are a fraction of a %. Most abortions are used like birth-control and destroy healthy babies.

My wife was put up for adoption by her unmarried mother.

So you're against abortion even in cases of rape/incest? What if that happened to somebody close to you, wife, daughter, mother, niece etc. And they didn't want the baby. You still would be against that, forcing them to carry to term?
 
1
•••
It's no wonder the Christian right has policies that treat women nas lesser beings
Their holy book does the same

  • 1 Timothy 2:11-15 A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent
  • 1 Corinthians 11:3-16 Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man
 
0
•••
1
•••
If I was advising them, there were no medical problems, my council would be to bring the baby to full term. If you felt alienated at that time, put the baby up for adoption.

Of course, regressive are using outliers in an attempt to make others look extreme.

No, you make yourself look extreme. So if you wife was raped and didn't want to carry the baby, you would advise her to carry it to full term. Alienated at the time of birth? What if she felt that way being pregnant for 9 months.

For historic purposes. Somebody saying Virgin birth more realistic than evolution.
More realistic than evolution.
 
1
•••
Last edited:
1
•••
1 Corinthians 3:19

For the wisdom of this world is foolishness to God. As the Scriptures say, “He traps the wise in the snare of
their own cleverness.
 
0
•••
1
•••
1
•••
0
•••
Alabama-
The bill’s sponsor, Sen. Clyde Chambliss (R), acknowledged in his opening statement that he was not a doctor, nor was he entirely clear on when a woman can know she is pregnant.

“I’m not trained medically so I don’t know the proper medical terminology and timelines,” Chambliss said. “But from what I’ve read, what I’ve been told, there’s some period of time before you can know a woman is pregnant.”

The senator then used that claim to argue that under the bill, a woman could end her pregnancy as long as she did not know she was pregnant. The claim, which Chambliss repeated several times during the debate, left many viewers feeling confused.

When Chambliss struggled to define when exactly a woman should know she was pregnant, Sen. Linda Coleman-Madison informed him he had given a “typical male answer.”

“You men don’t know what you don’t know because you’ve never been pregnant,” she said. “You can’t get pregnant, you’ve never been pregnant, you don’t know what it’s like to be pregnant, you don’t know what a woman goes through when she’s pregnant.”

“Senator, I don’t know if I’m smart enough to be pregnant,” Chambliss said, “so I appreciate the wisdom of our heavenly father.”


The wisdom of the world is foolishness to our heavenly father.... Now let me do shit to women without knowing shit about women
 
1
•••
Trump administration stands for free speech and the #1A against NZ, FR, GD, UK, Amazon, Google, Facebook, etc.

https://www.redstate.com/streiff/20...fuses-sign-fascistic-christchurch-call-thank/
Good for Trump for NOT going along with those dhimmi idiots who are so worried that one white lunatic went on a killing spree in a Christchurch Mosque, but NOT too worried about about several hundred "Easter Worshipers" getting killed in Sri Lanka, a few weeks later!

HYPOCRITES!
 
1
•••
It's no wonder the Christian right has policies that treat women nas lesser beings
Their holy book does the same

  • 1 Timothy 2:11-15 A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent
  • 1 Corinthians 11:3-16 Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man
Because it was written by men. In the middle east. A couple thousand years ago.
(Not to mention, translated from the original archaic language hundreds or more times, sometimes for political reasons ...)
Some denominations are pragmatic about that. Fundamentalists are not.
 
0
•••
Rep. Rashida Tlaib faces backlash over remarks on Holocaust, Israel...
Daily Wire editor-in-chief Ben Shapiro reacts to Tlaib's controversial comments on 'The Story.'
 
0
•••
0
•••
Prez Trump just proposed a new immigration policy that favours skilled immigrants’ passage to residency and citizenship.

Correct me if I’m wrong, if more skilled and educated immigrants are given preference, won’t this take away well paying jobs and business opportunities from US citizens?

Because of the great employment numbers, isn’t there a shortage in filling low skilled positions because US citizens don’t want them? Why wouldn’t you want to have legal immigrants take those jobs?

Hard to say - and allowing them immigrate doesn't necessarily mean they'll get those jobs... or is that a condition of the new policy?

I haven't seen the details yet, but many other countries have similar policies. Or you need to have a job lined up to become a permanent resident or citizen.

We do need people for the lower skilled positions though - agriculture, domestics, construction - personally I would like to see those remain an opportunity for those who are not skilled or highly educated but are looking for a new start here.

Many of our grandparents, great grandparents and earlier fled to this country with essentially the clothes on their backs, took whatever work they could find, and built a life from there - it would be good to continue the tradition of being the land of opportunity, not just a haven for those who already "have."
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Very similar policy as Canada and Australia Everyone who gets a visa doesn't become a citizen.

Prez Trump just proposed a new immigration policy that favours skilled immigrants’ passage to residency and citizenship.

Correct me if I’m wrong, if more skilled and educated immigrants are given preference, won’t this take away well paying jobs and business opportunities from US citizens?

Because of the great employment numbers, isn’t there a shortage in filling low skilled positions because US citizens don’t want them? Why wouldn’t you want to have legal immigrants take those jobs?
 
0
•••
Many of our grandparents, great grandparents and earlier fled to this country with essentially the clothes on their backs, took whatever work they could find, and built a life from there - it would be good to continue the tradition of being the land of opportunity, not just a haven for those who already "have."

Those that are highly skilled and well educated don't have much of an incentive to immigrate, unless like you say, they have a well paying job lined up.

Those that are struggling because of oppression or other societal problems tend to have a fire under them that makes them thrive in free societies.

People from my country that immigrated to the US and Canada in the 70s and 80s from an oppressive communist regime were very hard working and that made them successful. I know that people from poor countries in Latin America are extremely hard working.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Very similar policy as Canada and Australia Everyone who gets a visa doesn't become a citizen.

I live in Canada. There is a lot of immigration from countries that are refugees due to war and other endangerment to life.
 
1
•••
Those that are highly skilled and well educated don't have much of an incentive to immigrate, unless like you say, they have a well paying job lined up.

Those that are struggling because of oppression or other societal problems tend to have a fire under them that makes them thrive in free societies.

People from my country the immigrated to the US and Canada in the 70s and 80s from an oppressive communist regime were very hard working and that made them successful. I know that people from poor countries in Latin America are extremely hard working.

This is just the start, a proposal from the WH. The House and Senate will both make changes. Chances of it passing are near 0.
 
0
•••
Back