Dynadot

Unimarket or Undev

NameSilo
Watch

Which is better for landing?

  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.
  • Uniregisrty market

    vote
    6.7%
  • Undevelopoed

    14 
    votes
    93.3%
  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.

address

Established Member
Impact
245
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Undeveloped.com for me. Not a huge fan of Uni's brokers being super aggressive and pissing people off with the relentless emails :punch: amongst other things.
 
3
•••
yeah I agree.. there isn't really anything uniregistry is better at than something else... unless you compare it to something thats like super not good.
 
0
•••
I'd prefer (unlisted) option - "own lander" :) Which will be more unique and can have links to any (or almost any) processing platform if needed.
Within the limits of this poll, I voted for "undeveloped" though.
 
1
•••
Undev
upload_2018-10-11_0-36-55.png


Uni
upload_2018-10-11_0-34-26.png


Uni looks more friendly. Undev - better design and usability ..
 
1
•••
Not a huge fan of Uni's brokers being super aggressive and pissing people off with the relentless emails :punch: amongst other things.
You can disable brokerage. It's turned off by default
upload_2018-10-11_0-43-8.png
 
0
•••
not sure about the Uniregistry market fees without brokerge
 
0
•••
Which is better for landing?
Your poll is incomplete, there are more options to consider. Why not include Epik or Namesilo? Why not include "Other"?

Undeveloped is registrar independent. Not sure, does Uniregistry allow using their marketplace/landers for domains registered with other registrars?
 
0
•••
0
•••
yes it's allowed
Good to know, thanks!
Namesilo looks outdated for me
Are you referring to their website/CP or their landers?
Rob Monster (Epik's CEO) had taken steps to rectify that. They communicate much better now. And Rob's hands on approach beats the heck out of any other registrar... he's one guy I really don't mind having the occasional misunderstanding or disagreement with :xf.wink:

As opposed to Uniregistry reps/brokers, basically like talking to chatbots... heck, maybe they are :sneaky:
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Which is better for landing?
I think if you want the visitor to feel secure, then Uniregistry is better. Sedo is also nice.
Like someone who is like wtf domain for sale? when he lands on Sedo, sees services, sees the professional environment, visits homepage and sees all those expensive featured domains and all that activity around domain names, its good.
Makes you look legit.
Godaddy landers are ghetto. 0 info. all confusion as for whats happening. ''Maybe someone trying to rip me off 5000$''
Its only good if you have fair valuation for good $xxx domains or if you've already negotiated with the buyer and youre giving him the link to make the purchase in a trusted place.
For landers on $xxxx domains, f*ck it.
 
0
•••
Giving them the power to browse sedo marketplace is not a problem if you've done a good job at targeting your buyer and pricing right. Different landers for different purposes.
 
0
•••
1
•••
Different landers for different purposes.
If you send a very very short and extremely targeted email to let someone know that there is a relevant $xxxx domain for sale, Id use sedo as a lander. When I see people opening the email again and again over the weeks without saying anything, it makes me think that they are confused/hesitant/not trusting you. Its nice to have sedo brokers around and a platform/ecosystem that educates them. Thats why I dont like godaddy landers, they are blank and any crook could be hiding behind it.

If you have already negotiated then Undev is good for low commission and instant payment. Godaddy is nice to let them have the domain right away, but at a 20% commission rate. The same applies to Uniregistry if your domains are registered with them.

I dont mess with sedo or afternic parking pages, i think they are worse than blank godaddy landers.
I use redirect to sedo listing.
 
0
•••
Back