Dynadot
NameSilo
Watch

Who is to Blame for the Troubled US Economy?

  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.
  • Both Parties

    268 
    votes
    44.7%
  • Neither Party

    57 
    votes
    9.5%
  • Democrats

    134 
    votes
    22.3%
  • Republicans

    141 
    votes
    23.5%
  • This poll is still running and the standings may change.

Impact
8,557
Here you can spout your USA political views.

Rules:
1. Keep it clean
2. No fighting
3. Respect the views of others.
4. US Political views, No Religious views
5. Have fun :)

:wave:
 
8
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
....
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Woman assumes Sikh politician is Muslim, angrily attacks him for supporting sharia. He responds with grace and love.

I am usually neutral on religious and political debates. But this is quite interesting.

She went to a Sikh person to shut down the Sharia Law? :xf.grin:

Crazy. Quick glance at his FB or twitter account, he as left as you can get.

I always wonder if stuff like this is staged for publicity.


this-guy-has-asikhsense-of-humor-this-guy-has-a-8401052.png
 
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
Actually it is no big surprise that people think like that or say those sort of things. Look at what many famous celebrities have wished upon Trump. So just imagine how many thousands and thousands of normal people that would like to see Trump dead, as well as his followers.
20170616_left.jpg
You missed the point. The post was fake. Some troll posted that to promote negative sentiment towards non red voters and those without a religious affiliation.

Celebrities are a rule unto themselves, especially D list has-beens. Projecting that what these attention hos say and do represents "thousands of people" is a logical fallacy.

The hatred by the left towards those that don't agree with them is quite staggering.

Some pretty hateful things come out of you in this thread towards those who don't agree with you. Just sayin'.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Was about to have a field day on Eric Bolling and another Fox News fall from (dis)grace...then I read the news about his son, extremely unfortunate, not to be wished on anyone...

BTW, I would say the same about anyone on the left (corporate news stations) pushing propaganda, and most of them do, just in more subtle ways and one could easily argue that that is more insidious.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
A Texas attorney has protected, then fully deleted his Twitter account after tweeting he would “be OK” if U.S. Education Secretary Betsy DeVos “was sexually assaulted.”

Robert Ranco, a partner of the Carlson Law Firm who specializes in civil rights law, apparently disagrees with DeVos’s decision to scrap the Obama administration’s heavy-handed Title IX policy that forced colleges and universities to conduct “kangaroo courts” in dealing with accusations of sexual assault.

The Washington Times reports on Ranco’s tweets before the attorney protected his Twitter account:

DJQdjLmUMAAmPLj.jpg
 
0
•••
Outrage Grows After Stephen Colbert Gives Trump Nazi Salute
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-09-08/outrage-after-stephen-colbert-gives-trump-nazi-salute
20170909_colbert_0.jpg

Comedian Stephen Colbert, host of the Late Show on CBS, twice flashed a Nazi salute on live television during a rant about US President Donald Trump earlier this week.

While not the first celebrity to accuse Trump of being Hitler-lite, Colbert was the first to give a Nazi salute on national television. More importantly, it prompted conservative observers to wonder if CBS will apply the same standard as CNN did when it fired pro-Trump commentator Jeffrey Lord in early August.
 
0
•••
Antifa scum vs Spanish riot police. The no BS way of dealing with them...
 
1
•••
I don't have anything against any religion..But I do believe that journalism nowadays has done more damage than they have done any good.

When you say Terror doesn't have any religion, then walk the talk. Why do you say it as a "Buddhist Terror"? When you see one of the most peaceful religions reacting against you, the problem is you.

Pic 1: TIME when Muslims "attacked"
Pic 2: TIME when Muslims "got attacked".
pic1.png
pic2.png
 
Last edited:
1
•••
I don't have anything against any religion..But I do believe that journalism nowadays has done more damage than they have done any good.

When you say Terror doesn't have any religion, then walk the talk. Why do you say it as a "Buddhist Terror"? When you see one of the most peaceful religions reacting against you, the problem is you.

Pic 1: TIME when Muslims "attacked"
Pic 2: TIME when Muslims "got attacked".
Show attachment 68540 Show attachment 68541
Yeah tell me about it... Main Stream Media have become the enemy of the people and the biggest propaganda tool around.

Like lately they are so worried about the Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar, to the point that most of the MSM are advocating that the Nobel Peace prize that Aung San Suu Kyi won, should be taken away from her.

Take away Aung San Suu Kyi’s Nobel peace prize. She no longer deserves it
https://www.theguardian.com/comment...an-suu-kyi-nobel-peace-prize-rohingya-myanmar

A Nobel Peace Prize Winner's Shame - The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/09/09/opinion/kristof-nobel-prize-aung-san-suu-kyi-shame.html?rref=collection/sectioncollection/opinion-columnists&mcubz=0

Even the Prime Minister of Bangladesh, a predominantly Muslim country doesn't want to take in the Muslim Rohingya.

Islam is the only Religion in the world that can't get along with all the other major Religions. They don't even get along among themselves (Shias and Sunnis)

They detest Jews, Christians, Hindus and even the very peaceful Budists...

Afghanistan Taliban Muslims destroyed Bamiyan Buddha Statues
 
Last edited:
1
•••
1
•••
Alex Jones "sources" are those little voices in his head ...
 
1
•••
1
•••
A member of Russian parliament (Duma) outright admitted their meddling in our election - crazy that some will still refuse to believe it.
http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecu...ce-missed-it-while-russian-intelligence-stole

The Cruz "like" on the porn tweet - first thing I saw this AM on twitter was that Ted Cruz trending. I was curious so I looked to see why... D-: Eww - things we'd rather not imagine...especially before coffee. lol

I'm waiting for him to claim his account was hacked...

Comments were pretty funny though. Stuff like that brings out the best in the Twitterverse.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
President BHO not only interfered in RU but, Israel and Egypt too.

This high horse hand wringing about RU interfering in our election, confirmed by 17 intelligence agencies, including the coast guard is bullshit.

Hillary lost b/c she was a terrible person, a horrible candidate who dodged the press, ignored real scandals and didn't bother to campaign in THREE states. She called HALF of America deplorable.

Drama created to attack the current President, no matter how bad you hate him, is meaningless politics.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Ted Cruz: "Perhaps we should have done something like this during the Indiana primary."

Cruz: "There are a number of people on the team that have access to the account & it appears that someone inadvertently hit the like button"

As anyone with a media team knows, it's easy to find out which team member made the mistake.
 
0
•••
Alex Jones "sources" are those little voices in his head ...
45 also said he had been wiretapped but unable to present evidence and even his own administration can only contradict him. Faker.

World leaders too are aware that 45 is a faker. That's the sad truth, the Potus is a joker whose word cannot be trusted, it has the same value as that of a drunkard out of a bar.
Of course this will have consequences for your country, because a clown feeding on fake news and conspiracy theories cannot represent you adequately on the world stage.
 
1
•••
RU interfering in our election, confirmed by 17 intelligence agencies, including the coast guard is bullsh*t.

And you come to that that conclusion because ...you're an expert CI, PSYops, etc? And you don't believe the guy who outright said thats what they did...because why?

Hillary wasn't a likeable candidate and the deplorable comment was a bad mistake but she was a hella lot more qualified than what we got.

One other factor why she lost was adopting that "when they go low we go high" - great line for a convention, bad practice for a campaign as dirty as this one was. You don't win a mud wrestling match with a badminton racquet.

Instead someone who called some of her opponents followers deplorables, we got a guy who calls them "losers." We got a clown who mocks the disabled, brags about groping women, calls anyone who contradicts him a liar, is a compulsive liar himself, has no government experience or law background, never applied for or held a real job in his life, avoided military service on a dodgy excuse, ran a scam university, was notorious for shirking his debts to small businesses he hired to do work for him (obviously not a Lannister), was probably involved with various mob connections and money laundering (tbd), won't speak out against white supremacist organizations OR Putin, and likely knew damned well RU was helping his campaign in return for paving the way for the Rosneft deal (sanctions.)

But OMG - emails.

Ps, yes, the US has interfered in politics in other countries. Why is that? Not for sh*ts and giggles, but to exert control and to further US interests.
Russia interfering in our government would be done to further their interests, not ours.
It's a fact that there are troll "farms" (notably in St Petersburg) that flood social media with various types of propaganda and disinformation to antagonize both the right and the left in this country. You think they're doing that for fun?
If you don't believe that is true, investigate it yourself. Check out the accounts that are replying and amplifying incendiary posts. Are the profile names auto generated? (Example: first name followed by 8 digits) When do they post? Where? Are their following / follower counts suspicious? Do their followers look genuine? How long have they been posting? If they are even using a profile picture, is it a stock photo? Is their English grammar suspiciously Russian-like? If the profile mentions other interests, do they ever post about any of them? How often do they post? Do they have flurries of activity around various international events, like elections? (A lot of pro trump bots rebranded after November and took up non us political causes)
 
Last edited:
0
•••
And you come to that that conclusion because ...you're an expert CI, PSYops, etc? And you don't believe the guy who outright said thats what they did...because why?

Because I read the news. Not that crap they shovel on CNN, MSNBC or HUFFPost, or WAPO, OR NYT, OR....

1) IF you have ONE bit of ACTUAL proof a law was broken, lay it out.

2) If your proof is solid, why hasn't someone been charged?

3) Why are the Democrats dragging their feet in both the House and Senate Investigations?




Hillary wasn't a likeable candidate and the deplorable comment was a bad mistake but she was a hella lot more qualified than what we got.

Hillary is the worst candidate in the world. She is a slimy, dishonest horrible politician motivated by nothing but desire for power.

All I hear is Yada Yada Yada.

One other factor why she lost was adopting that "when they go low we go high" - great line for a convention, bad practice for a campaign as dirty as this one was. You don't win a mud wrestling match with a badminton racquet.

Instead someone who called some of her opponents followers deplorables, we got a guy who calls them "losers." We got a clown who mocks the disabled, brags about groping women, calls anyone who contradicts him a liar, is a compulsive liar himself, has no government experience or law background, never applied for or held a real job in his life, avoided military service on a dodgy excuse, ran a scam university, was notorious for shirking his debts to small businesses he hired to do work for him (obviously not a Lannister), was probably involved with various mob connections and money laundering (tbd), won't speak out against white supremacist organizations OR Putin, and likely knew damned well RU was helping his campaign in return for paving the way for the Rosneft deal (sanctions.)

But OMG - emails.

Ps, yes, the US has interfered in politics in other countries. Why is that? Not for sh*ts and giggles, but to exert control and to further US interests.
Russia interfering in our government would be done to further their interests, not ours.
It's a fact that there are troll "farms" (notably in St Petersburg) that flood social media with various types of propaganda and disinformation to antagonize both the right and the left in this country. You think they're doing that for fun?
If you don't believe that is true, investigate it yourself. Check out the accounts that are replying and amplifying incendiary posts. Are the profile names auto generated? (Example: first name followed by 8 digits) When do they post? Where? Are their following / follower counts suspicious? Do their followers look genuine? How long have they been posting? If they are even using a profile picture, is it a stock photo? Is their English grammar suspiciously Russian-like? If the profile mentions other interests, do they ever post about any of them? How often do they post? Do they have flurries of activity around various international events, like elections? (A lot of pro trump bots rebranded after November and took up non us political causes)
 
Last edited:
2
•••
45 also said he had been wiretapped but unable to present evidence and even his own administration can only contradict him. Faker.

Most people in the USA understand the common term "wire tapped" as meaning being recorded or electronic eavesdropping, which is exactly what happened.

The only questions are, why did the UN ambassador and O's speech writer so freely unmask the identity of US citizens and did they break the law.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
You see, Hillary's not worst person in the world.

Capture.JPG
 
1
•••
2
•••
Hillary lost b/c she was a terrible person, a horrible candidate who dodged the press, ignored real scandals and didn't bother to campaign in THREE states. She called HALF of America deplorable.
Agree, and there are even more reasons she lost but that is hardly proof that Russia didn't interfere in the election, nor does it nullify the findings of 17 intelligence agencies. Swing and a miss there Skippy.

Drama created to attack the current President, no matter how bad you hate him, is meaningless politics.
Fully agree with you on this too, hey this is fun. Hardly a need to create drama about him when you can easily have a field day with the drama he has created for himself.
 
0
•••
Agree, and there are even more reasons she lost but that is hardly proof that Russia didn't interfere in the election, nor does it nullify the findings of 17 intelligence agencies. Swing and a miss there Skippy.

1) The fact you believe "17" intelligence reviewed a report financed by the DNC, says alot about you.

Fully agree with you on this too, hey this is fun. Hardly a need to create drama about him when you can easily have a field day with the drama he has created for himself.

2) Re-read #1
 
1
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back