IT.COM

Neeley v 5 Federal Communications Commissioners, et al

NameSilo
Watch
Impact
15
Neeley v 5 Federal Communications Commissioners, et al, (5:14-cv-05135)

This 23-page complaint is filed as a paid case in the United States Court for the Western District of Arkansas.
The elderly prior judge and all Article III judges who on in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals or are on the Supreme Court and exceed the age of 7o are listed along with Commissioner Tom Wheeler of the FCC.
The complaint also names "Honorable Denny Chin" from the Southern District of New York for his fair-use Google Inc books mistake as well as the U.S. Attorney General along with Google Inc and Microsoft Corporation for maliciously violating communications privacy laws exempted from 47 U.S.C. §230.

Docket mirror: http://master-of-photography.us/theendofpornbywire/ or via http://TheEndofPornbyWire.org
The attached exhibits were mutilated by the United States Court for the Western District of Arkansas but are available online as follows.

Complaint and exhibits in color (with naked images):
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment_search/execute?proceeding=14-28
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment_search/execute?proceeding=13-86
http://www.scribd.com/collections/4506920/5-14-cv-05135

Complaint only:
http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2434364
http://www.lulu.com/shop/curtis-neeley/514-cv-05135-complaint/paperback/product-21620438.html
http://www.scribd.com/doc/223673331...ation-of-Rights-of-a-Parent-and-Visual-Artist
https://www.namepros.com/attachments/complaint-pdf.5853/

This completely NEW lawsuit does not seek any copy[rite] violation and does not involve Namemedia Inc.
The prior offer to settle for 5-million by Google Inc that was rejected is mentioned in this complaint. on page 8.
http://master-of-photography.us/theendofpornbywire/index.html#8

5. Google Inc admitted this human right violation as wrong and ceased this violation and offered 5 million in a phone call, now denied, after the District Court bias was certified by calling (5:12-cv-5208) Dkt#53-3 and (5:13-cv-5293) Dkt. #1 identical in almost every respect”. This claim is a judicial FRAUD and an injustice now plead.

From the bottom of page 12 the following fact is reported.

5. When potentially “indecent, obscene, or profane” communications are broadcast by wire, these broadcasts may also be received via Wi-Fi radio making ALL “indecent, obscene, or profane” [sic] “Internet” communications illegal for return to ANY anonymous public making Google Inc and Microsoft Corporation hundreds of BILLIONS of dollars in organized criminal proceeds.

The FCC released a NPRM last week on 5-15-2014 that apparently plans continuing to not regulate [sic] "internet" as a common carrier and plans to continue to allow some (e.g. Google Inc and Netflix) to purchase priority access to searchers as is described as wrong in my lawsuit on Page 17 as follows.

4. The interconnected wires now used for [sic] “internet” wire communications are exactly the same type wire communications used when US President James Buchanan and Queen Victoria exchanged telegraph wire messages on August 16, 1858. Had there been interconnected networks of wires in 1858; Every interconnected telegraph apparatus would have received the same wire communication via the interconnected common carrier medium of wire. [sic]“Internet” communications should have always been subject to Title II regulation by the FCC even when called a “[holy] new medium”.

The sky is falling!

Well; The sky is not falling but has always been on the ground all around us. People (e.g. Defendants) are now being asked to realize unregulated [sic]"internet" wire communications have been illegal since long before Al Gore invented [sic]"internet" wire communications" and before these were disguised as [sic]"internet" in 1997 by a senile oligarch addicted to pornography. See Reno v ACLU, (96-511)
 

Attachments

  • Complaint.pdf
    284 KB · Views: 159
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
This story looks almost like the anti-Larry Flint :)
 
0
•••
This lawsuit does not include any naked images done by me but those naked images that STILL return from searches for my name though my name is not on these pages. I printed these photos out for exhibits and offended the District Court who refused to scan these into the record and called them obscene and indecent in Doc. #18. This litigation should resolve such that well done adult websites like michelle7-erotica.com and magazines like Playboy should become profitable again. Pornography "online" will require authentication but will become consistently profitable.

Millions of morally inclined artists who publish naked material "online" so this material is not visible to the anonymous horny teen could make this into a class action. This litigation seeks to require the FCC regulate "online" as communications using common wire carriers defined in 1948 in 47 U.S.C. §153¶(59). This will REQUIRE logging in to view nakedness and require ratings of all JPGs used in interstate communications. I included links to the searches that were printed out for exhibits in the appearance you see "online" above and these links are still live links the judges can click on or ignore. Judges are not likely to ignore these live links.

THERE IS ONLY ONE RESULT NOW!

Reading page eight makes it clear. Judges can see, click, and might even start to understand and can at least read the CLEAR laws being ignored without ANY exhibits! http://theendofpornbywire.org/Complaint.html#8

I do not particularly care how this case ends now because I am getting older and want to begin enjoying my family more in light of my disabilities.
http://TheEndofPornbyWire.org/
means ONLY the END of FREE porn.
 
0
•••
0
•••
OK. It is simple and most here would have as well.

My mother was very ill and progressively becoming more more paralyzed. I asked her if I should settle for five-million and drop everyone including the FCC. She told me there are things in life more important than money and she felt this was one of those cases. She said not to stop fighting GOOG et al until the "right thing" was done.

It turned out that my mother was dying of ALS and this was one of her last request to me before she died.

I think NOBODY else here would disappoint a DYING MOTHER?

http://theendofpornbywire.org/14-3447/

I quit after my next is thrown out...
http://theendofpornbywire.org/Complaint.html#8
Complaint is linked from page 11 and 22 of my Motion but will be attached as well.
..
Motion_p.#11 .. Motion_p.#22

I do not particularly care how this case ends now because I am getting older and want to begin enjoying my family more in light of my disabilities.

I will seek to appeal “I.F.P.” and seek summary judgment by law at the same time.

The Corts of the United States are not capable of justice compared to European Courts. This has been true for centuries but is becoming PAINFULLY obvious today after the C-131/12* personal data control ruling. A portion of this "right to be forgotten" ruling is in p5* of the Supt Brief.

I do not believe Magistrate Honorable Erin L Setser should be a judge having never ever been a private attorney. I do not accept the ruling of ANY judge over (68-70) as fair or reasonably considered including most of the aging SCOTUS oligarchy. I would leave the U.S. for Europe if I were a young man in search of a nation with fair rule of law and democracy. I am not so I will now try to fix the United States.
 
0
•••
I was once offered 5 million by GOOG

I call BS on this, I cant see how this was their fault at all
 
0
•••
Keep going down this road of frivolous pro se suits, you'll eventually have your assets attached to pay attorneys costs.
 
0
•••
I call BS on this, I cant see how this was their fault at all
GOOG, MSFT, and almost EVERYONE else on Earth ignored the fact that JPG image files could be rated in order to automatically prevent display of "obscene, indecent, or profane" pics in 1992 when most creators of GOOG were in high school. I was in the USMC in Okinawa doing Multi-Channel Microwave Troposcatter Telecommunication that could send ? Hz of digital wireless along with a top-secret number of telephone calls at the same time on the same ONE Analog FM signal. Wireless broadband is ALWAYS communications by Title II common carrier wire communications as defined around 1934 and overlooked by a culturally senile SCOTUS in 1997. (John Paul Stevens was 77)

(59 )Wire Communications*
The term “wire communication” or “communication by wire” means the transmission of writing, signs, signals, pictures, and sounds of all kinds by aid of wire, cable, or other like connection between the points of origin and reception of such transmission, including all instrumentalities, facilities, apparatus, and services (among other things, the receipt, forwarding, and delivery of communications) incidental to such transmission.

1.) From a wireless iPad, smartphone, or Wi-Fi by radio; 2.) to a cell-tower/transmitter then passed through 3.) WIRES then to 4.) more WIRES and then passed by 5.) WIRES into another cell-tower/transmitter and then 6.) by radio into another wireless iPad, smartphone or Wi-Fi.

I hope the Eighth Circuit judges can see "Wire to instrumentalities, facilities, apparatus, and services" simply means signals coming from "something" to a wire to something else. This means that wireless communications are actually "communications by wire" except for satellite or two-way radios. This will be typed very slowly and have links to Webster's dictionary.

Most citizens of the United States agree that whether "online" is recognized as the Title II common carrier telecommunications IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN or something else more mysterious should NOT be determined by people who were (60)-years-old when Wi-Fi was trademarked in 2000.

Keep going down this road of frivolous pro se suits, you'll eventually have your assets attached to pay attorneys costs.
I have no assets that could be "attached" because I am a "pauper". Nothing I have done is frivolous although called frivolous because of a clear "lack of legal experience" and intellect or "senility". It was bad to call a former Chief District Court Judge mentally disabled and beginning to suffer from "senility" but this was true and is still true and will be FOREVER.

I do not expect justice in the legally dishonorable United States. Most of the "moral" public will back me up and do ALREADY. Yes, this means if you do not already, I consider you immoral.

Morality has NOTHING to do with religion to me. 2 + 2 is always 4 unless you ask judges in the United States Corts for the Western District of Arkansas in Fayetteville. Then it will depend on how timidly you ask and if you make sure to seem properly concerned about the honorable answer given by "the most noble, honorable judge" on the bench and whether these most honorable rulers are addicted to pornography or just like "artisan n_des" a lot.
 
0
•••
GOOG, MSFT, and almost EVERYONE else on Earth ignored the fact that JPG image files could be rated in order to automatically prevent display of "obscene, indecent, or profane" pics in 1992 when most creators of GOOG were in high school. I was in the USMC in Okinawa doing Multi-Channel Microwave Troposcatter Telecommunication that could send ? Hz of digital wireless along with a top-secret number of telephone calls at the same time on the same ONE Analog FM signal. Wireless broadband is ALWAYScommunications by Title II common carrier wire communications as defined around 1934 and overlooked by a culturally senile SCOTUS in 1997. (John Paul Stevens was 77)

This is just babbling Curtis, Just explain it in basic english mate
 
0
•••
IV. Reckless “Indexing” of JPGs
1. Microsoft Corporation and Google Inc are organized criminal conspirators recklessly indexing and displaying harmful unrated JPG image files. Halting this one wrong would make electronic communications safe for everyone and would almost immediately end ALL continuing “online” child pornography.

2. Google Inc Counselor Michael Henry Page deceived the Western District of Arkansas via Honorable Magistrate Erin L. Setser in open court in Neeley v Namemedia Inc., et al, (5:09-cv-05151) Dkt #216* p71, as follows, by utterly false information given in open court.
[Honorable Erin L. Setser]: Well, just out of curiosity, is it possible for Google to prevent these pictures from coming up when you type in his name?
[Michael Henry Page Esq]: No. Well, not, not without an insane amount of effort. For one thing, search is completely automated. It goes out, it crawls the web, it sees what's there, and it reports it back. The machine has no way of knowing whether a picture is nude, whether the person searching for it is Muslim. All it knows is that there are some bits out there that say Curtis Neeley and there are other bits on the same page and there are pictures.

3.
This deceptive response to a judicial query could be attributed to lack of familiarity with search algorithms or lack of familiarity with “online” in general. This fraudulent statement was not objected to during the hearing because this severely brain injured Plaintiff/Appellant did not wish to appear more improper like seen discussed on p64 of Dkt #216*.

I apologize. It is hard not to sound like babbling. I am WAY open to suggestions.
 
1
•••
This litigation is over and was presented tactfully to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals and is now also presented to EVERYONE on EARTH at the same time with PDF and HTML versions. This request is the same query as asking United States Courts to Affirm that two plus two equals four. The confused, angry, culturally irrelevant, pornography addicted District Court already ruled immorally in this action when asked the same thing.



This litigation does not need to once again include physical display of the indecent and obscene searches because these were ALL included as active links in each PDF and are all already publicly accessible from the Federal Communications Commission 14-28 proceeding with live links and from
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=60000986250
http://TheEndofPornbyWire.org/Appeal/
 
0
•••
This thread looks so "grandiose"...
 
0
•••
This thread looks so "grandiose"...
Yes sir I agree; This thread is unfortunately very grandiose. The word and this thread are like the saying torn from the Shakespeare's play "Much ado about Nothing". My grandiose appeal will soon result in absolutely nothing.

The similarity in the way "noting" and "nothing" were pronounced in England in 1599 is ironic. This appeal may only be one noting of the fact that clear U.S. communications laws are being ignored with absolutely nothing expected to now be done.

Communications laws specifically exempted from 47 U.S.C. §230 by 47 U.S.C. §230(e)
 
0
•••
1
•••
I will do neither. I do not like most movies and the ending of this one is not yet complete. "It is Finished" - was re-use of the last words of the Great Counselor. I did this and imply I have filed for the last time and advised the Eighth Circuit this is my last filing in "American Corts".

These legal disputations should have as much impact on humanity as Rev. Martin Luther's "95 Thesis" from 1517. Clear laws being violated by GOOG and MSFT are ignored by the FCC and ignored by “American Corts” after "America" overthrew the United States during the last century.

http://theendofpornbywire.org/14-3447/BrfSptRenewalofMotiontoAppealasPauper.html#18
41. The action's attached but not scanned exhibits* and Doc. #17 leave guilt a matter of unquestionable law with damages the only issue remaining for a jury to consider. Wire communications disguised as [sic] “internet” today will become wholly safe for anonymous children to use without filtration or supervision anywhere on Earth kids might carry mobile phones including public schools and libraries after commercial radio stations become ISP capable making “online” as pervasive and as free as commercial FM radio is today.

=============================================================

http://theendofpornbywire.org/14-3447/BrfSptRenewalofMotiontoAppealasPauper.html#20
4. This plead disputation will be published continually and promoted continually until individual creator responsibility for potentially indecent artwork is recognized by the United States like Europe did first in May 2014 in C-131/12.*​

5. This human right to control original speech was ignored by the Western District Court of Arkansas. This personal “free speech control” matter will be another Earth impacting decision made in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals like the (14-1891) abortion ruling now pending. All media, law professors, and church personnel contacted could be shown in exhibits but would require around fifty pages and violate the privacy assured to many who perhaps did not wish to help protest “online” indulgences in tagged indecency due to addictions to “online” indulgences in indecency.​

6. Legal contact with ABC, CBS, FOX, and NBC was a (15)* page joint reply to their FCC GN #13-18 comment. A (5)* page reply was submitted for the Electronic Freedom Foundation(EFF). Legal contact with the National Association of Broadcasters(NAB) due their comment was a (28)* page reply. PBS received a (9)* page reply and the ACLU received a (3)* page reply.​

7. “Professor of Law” Leli Levi from University of Miami School of Law was given a (12)* page reply. 100,000+ brief commentators on the “New Indecency Policy” of the FCC or GN #13-86 proceeding can access the (17)* page response to general comments by each submitted to the Federal Communications Commission. The general public can access these and are likely to ignore these comments like the FCC does to accentuate the damages to this Plaintiff/Appellant's unprotected human rights. “Professor” Christopher M Fairman from the Ohio State Moritz College of Law was left a (27)* page reply to the “Professor's” outrageous comment on the FCC indecency policy.​

I honestly do not expect justice and do not expect these two laws to be enforced.

http://theendofpornbywire.org/
 
0
•••
5. This human right to control original speech was ignored by the Western District Court of Arkansas. This personal “free speech control” matter will be another Earth impacting decision made in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals like the (14-1891) abortion ruling now pending. All media, law professors, and church personnel contacted could be shown in exhibits but would require around fifty pages and violate the privacy assured to many who perhaps did not wish to help protest “online” indulgences in tagged indecency due to addictions to “online” indulgences in indecency.

6. Legal contact with ABC, CBS, FOX, and NBC was a (15)* page joint reply to their FCC GN #13-18 comment. A (5)* page reply was submitted for the Electronic Freedom Foundation(EFF). Legal contact with the National Association of Broadcasters(NAB) due their comment was a (28)* page reply. PBS received a (9)* page reply and the ACLU received a (3)* page reply.

7. “Professor of Law” Leli Levi from University of Miami School of Law was given a (12)* page reply. 100,000+ brief commentators on the “New Indecency Policy” of the FCC or GN #13-86 proceeding can access the (17)* page response to general comments by each submitted to the Federal Communications Commission. The general public can access these and are likely to ignore these comments like the FCC does to accentuate the damages to this Plaintiff/Appellant's unprotected human rights. “Professor” Christopher M Fairman from the Ohio State Moritz College of Law was left a (27)* page reply to the “Professor's” outrageous comment on the FCC indecency policy.

8. Unfortunately these all have improper tenor because of an inviolate belief that “during good behavior” requires retiring from public service by seventy years of age. This belief is as firm as Plaintiff/Appellant's belief in God and is shared by most U.S. States and the vast majority of the nations from the European Union and requires only an Act of Congress to define “during good behavior” and no CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT like will never again occur in the corporate “American” regime.

9. Senescence affects human brains as certainly as rust affects exposed ferrous metal. The effects of time on the human body are factual and certain though the impact of time on the mind is not predictable except for the irrelevance of formative life experiences.

10. The critical need for hard-to-find legally educated judges was the foundation for Article III not requiring retirement by age seventy due to the lack of legally educated citizens and lack of publicly supported law schools.
 
0
•••
This story looks almost like the anti-Larry Flint :)
Playboy magazine, website, and Playboy stock will make people rich because the open sewers of unregulated integrated wire and radio communications "enter-net" will soon no longer exist as was described as coming here at NamePros first over FIVE years ago. The domain name "economy" will now crash HARD very soon. Publicly accessible browsers will soon ALL be REQUIRED to have AdblockPlus installed by default. Hide your "parked" domains quickly as Mini-content-Sites while there is a chance. Parked sites are a plain violation of an Arkansas Computer Fraud law and many other US States probably.

I call BS on this, I cant see how this was their fault at all
I mach your call and raise you by calling for regulation of the web like GOOG knew was coming. Google Inc has known since nothing but an experiment in a garage that JPG files could contain descriptive ASCII content assessable by machine and always should have done to protect against harmful/dangerous files. The MPAA rating type system will soon be required for all communications broadcast "onWIRE" or "online". Showing nakedness without wire-communicated authentication will become an enforced criminal communications law like is being ignored today as will contribute during contemplation of the coming damages award by a JURY! This is NOW plead at the Eighth Circuit.
http://theendofpornbywire.org/Complaint.html

Keep going down this road of frivolous pro se suits, you'll eventually have your assets attached to pay attorneys costs.
"You can't squeeze blood out of a turnip."

This thread looks so "grandiose"...
It was until last week when I "entered" short comments in 18+ open FCC proceeding and ALERTED the FCC, the public, and the overloaded Eighth Circuit Court of PDF links to pornographic searches created by careful manipulation of the FCC ECFS public EXPRESS submission processes despite FCC ECFS alleging to not support links and stripping links and also preventing selection of PDF text to discourage visiting existing PDF links by cut-and-paste.
HACK

Are you going to write the script and direct yourself in the movie?
NO, My TBI prevents my speaking well and I sound like a mentally disabled person. I am consulting in support of a Spring release in 2017. I have had "scripts" running from numerous devices that at one time automatically harvested all IPs and viewership times for various messages in this thread. It still runs continually using PHP but began as Perl 5 and no longer looks here. You may see one script I wrote trying to teach oligarch Most Honorable Magistrate judge Jennifer L. Setser, who has NEVER practiced law privately, how easy it was to prevent nakedness in searches for my name like described FRAUDULENTLY in violation of Rule #11 as "insanely difficult" by Google Inc attorney like seen above in open court.
http://go-oogle.net/ is NOT Google and will mitigate or accentuate the damages award the JURY will soon set.
  1. How the FCC Plans to Regulate Internet Lines - Amy Schatz ...
  2. FCC Approves Plan to Regulate Internet | Fox News
  3. How the FCC Plans to Regulate Internet Lines - Digits - WSJ
  4. FCC in move to regulate internet - FT.com
  5. FCC to Regulate Broadband Internet Providers
  6. Report: FCC to re-regulate Internet for neutrality
  7. FCC will seek to regulate Internet providers
  8. FCC to Overhaul Regulation of Internet Lines | Just Piper
  9. FCC Renews Push to Regulate Internet | Heartland Institute
  10. FCC to Overhaul Regulation of Internet Lines « Internet ...

This is the biggest news that will occur for western humanity since 1517.
The first place IT WAS EVER HEARD WAS NAMEPROS.com
Porn will still be accessible but NOT WITHOUT AUTHENTICATION.

http://theendofpornbywire.org/Complaint.html#11
2. Plaintiff/Appellant also prays for immediate injunctive relief such that all violations of 18 U.S.C. 2511* and all violations of Ark Code Ann. 5-41-103* are ordered ceased immediately for Plaintiff/Appellant's name and seeks orders for the Federal Communications Commission to regulate “online” wire communications as a Title II common carrier and require ratings of all “obscene, indecent, or profane” JPG files communicated in interstate or world-wide commerce before indexed as soon as possible because this is already required by clear wording of U.S. law in 47 U.S.C. §151*.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
This notice will be electronically communicated by wires to (25) addresses BCC including:
Ms. Bettina E. Brownstein Esq, Ms. Susan Talcott Camp Esq, Ms. Courtney M. Dankworth Esq,
Ms. Holly Elizabeth Dickson Esq, Mr. Colin Jorgensen Esq,Ms. Mary Elizabeth McAlister Esq,
Mr. Allan Edward Parker, Jr. Esq, Ms. Shannon R. Selden Esq,Ms. Anita Staver Esq,
Mr. Claude Gabriel Szyfer Esq, Ms. Stephanie Toti Esq, Time, The New Republic, Grace Church,

The two primary cultural arguments of ALL time are the human rituals of reproduction and the human rituals concerning individual speech.

The earlier human species[1] developed rituals to counter certain natural human drives and further separated the human species from "lower" animals. Humans have used rituals promoted by agreement to rules or laws protecting certain species-wide desires from natural human drives for pleasure that are as general as the natural human drives to eat, drink, reproduce, sleep, or comfortably continue to exist.

Four examples of “lower” animals having no human ritualized controls.

1. If one male desires to mate, this male will attempt to mate regardless of the wishes of others. {war, rape}

2. If one animal wants to dispose of another, this animal will dispose of the other regardless of the wishes of others. {abortion, murder, war}

3. If an animal wants to speak, this animal will speak regardless of the wishes of others. {obscenities, treason, propaganda, war}

4. If any animal obstructs any natural drive of another animal, the obstructed animal may kill the obstructing animal.{rape, murder, abortion, war}

1. Consuming free-speech (looking) without anyone knowing or being able to check ages or otherwise "judge" for the consumption of speech once considered indecent by most pastors and younger Article III judges is the natural human desire to exclusively control the self. The human desire for exclusive control the self is the basis for desiring the ability to make unregulated speech or desiring the ability to consume unregulated speech secretly or desiring the ability to cease gestations. This natural human drive is the same as “lower” animals desiring as much food as possible when fed abundantly while in a group and hiding any extra food for speculative later consumption.

2. SCOTUS is most naturally addicted to only their human free-will regulating their anonymous choices regarding free-speech or abortion. One SCOTUS clerk advised Curtis J. Neeley Jr. of an existing plan to protect the anonymous distribution of speech during a telephone wire communication. This communication was unpleasant. Five other SCOTUS clerks addressed this human desire as well. These clerks were not anonymous but Curtis J. Neeley Jr. remembers only notation of one today due to his or her colloquial job title and marital status at the time of the call.

3. Curtis J. Neeley Jr. will never file a brief or pray for ANY type relief from SCOTUS; EVER. This makes the SCOTUS gatekeeper clerk's opinions useful and irrelevant at the same time. Please watch these opinions assisting herein while concurrently teaching these six SCOTUS clerks and nine SCOTUS oligarchs to take better control of these types of future communications.

4. Broadcast is a verb that describes the dispersal of something without any particular concern about the manner this something is received. Democrats and Republicans broadcast their particular political ideals from rooftops, newspapers, mail, and via unregulated interstate and world-wide wire communications. Farmers generally broadcast grass, wheat, or other grains with no concern about how these are received besides perhaps concentration.

18 USC §1462 – 6/25/1948 – 2/8/1996*

Whoever brings into the United States, or any place subject to the jurisdiction thereof, or knowingly uses any express company or other common carrier [or interactive computer service (as defined in section 230(e)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934)]*, for carriage in interstate or foreign commerce—

(a) any obscene, lewd, lascivious, or filthy book, pamphlet, picture, motion-picture film, paper, letter, writing, print, or other matter of indecent character; or

(b) any obscene, lewd, lascivious, or filthy phonograph recording, electrical transcription, or other article or thing capable of producing sound; or

(c) any drug, medicine, article, or thing designed, adapted, or intended for producing abortion, or for any indecent or immoral use; or any written or printed card, letter, circular, book, pamphlet, advertisement, or notice of any kind giving information, directly or indirectly, where, how, or of whom, or by what means any of such mentioned articles, matters, or things may be obtained or made; or

Whoever knowingly takes or receives, from such express company or other common carrier [or interactive computer service (as defined in section 230(e)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934)]* any matter or thing the carriage or importation of which is herein made unlawful—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both, for the first such offense and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both, for each such offense thereafter.

18 USC §1464 – 6/25/1948 – 9/13/1994*

Whoever utters any obscene, indecent, or profane language by means of radio communication shall be fined [under this title]* or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.

5. On 9/15/1999, long after the 6/26/1997 failure of SCOTUS to recognize the more than 33.8 million commercial users of seamless integration of wire and radio communications in 1995, Wi-Fi was trademarked by the Wi-Fi Alliance. This was more than ten years before the 77 year-old SCOTUS author of the obvious factual error alleging some imaginary, “[holy] new medium for human communications” retired. Honorable John Paul Stevens alleged to discover a “[holy]new medium” that did not exist when this judge was sixteen and the FCC was created to regulate wire and radio broadcasting and was therefore exempt from archaic FCC moral regulations protecting children who would eventually be entitled to absolute free speech. The disproportional impact of childhood teachings is usually forgotten by the elderly and apparently Honorable John Paul Stevens was not exempt.

6. This oligarch ruled till 6/29/2010 despite the immoral reintroduction of unregulated communications in 1997 or the immoral reintroduction of indulging in guilt-free speech. This clear immorality was first recognized and protested by Rev Martin Luther on 8/31/1517 with 95 Thesis in about 1800 Latin words that translate into roughly 2,741 of Americanized English or roughly as many more words in Americanized English than this “disputation” has to this point.

7. Anything uttered today “online” is concurrently uttered by radio communications. This clear fact was true for more than 33,800,000 commercial subscribers when Honorable John Paul Stevens alleged to find a “[holy] new medium” entitled to guilt-free free-speech.

8. This ruling was VOID on 6/26/1997 and has become more VOID every year since for the last eighteen years or long enough to jump-start the type living predicted in one ancient book,[2] as will follow. The new cultural immorality of today may now be irreversible but the ability to assert legal age and being granted permission to make or consume indecent speech has existed since before “online” was discovered in 1997. Asserting legal age and permission to access otherwise forbidden legal speech will not reduce the availability-of or access-to otherwise legal forbidden speech. Adults and judges would then be responsible for their own minor's speech or their own clerks' speech, like alleged already today, -by mistake. The profitability of otherwise forbidden legal speech will quickly return. Sure; Legal pornography will mostly still control the profitability of integrated wire and radio communications disguised as another imaginary medium since 1997.

9. Free pornography and profitable illegal pornography escaping prosecution will cease almost immediately when falsification of IP address becomes a crime the FCC pursues to promote safety like created to do when: 1) Honorable John Paul Stevens was a sixteen year old teenager; and 2)World War II had not yet begun; and 3) nuclear weapons did not yet exist; and 4) Israel was not yet a nation; and 5) humans had not yet visited space, much less the moon.

2 Timothy 3:1-5

“This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.”

Matthew 24:37-39

“But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, and knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.”

10. No natural right to cease gestation without risk of physical consequences has ever existed and will never exist for “lower” animals. The natural right to kill undesired or inconvenient offspring after birth existed exclusively for “lower” animals since human rules, rites, or laws forbid this natural right for the human species and at the same time forbid the existing natural right to artificially cause gestation to cease by accepting the risks involved.

11. In 1973 the SCOTUS oligarchy honorably ruled that the natural right to protect and control the self outweighed the prospective natural right to exist when ONLY these two competing rights were addressed. This allowed female human the ability to cease gestation after this process began without facing the choice of starvation, coat-hanger mutilation, or other gestation cessation inducing risks. The human species had finally progressed in establishing honorable rules like were implied to one day become a human moral choice by the main character in one popular ancient book as this character considered eminent death while recalling prior choices to eliminate inhabitants of two cities and the elimination of all life in one region of the earth except for fish and one boatload of animals. The ability of human females to consciously elect to not become parents by moral choice and not face introduction of another life destined to end unfavorably was clearly implied by this distressed main character as follows from this famous book cited AGAIN as noted in footnote #2.

Luke 23:27-31 – (NASB)

27 And following Him was a large crowd of the people, and of women who were mourning and lamenting Him. 28 But Jesus turning to them said, “Daughters of Jerusalem, stop weeping for Me, but weep for yourselves and for your children. 29 For behold, the days are coming when they will say, ‘Blessed are the barren, and the wombs that never bore, and the breasts that never nursed.’ 30 Then they will begin to say to the mountains, ‘Fall on us,’ and to the hills, ‘Cover us.’ 31 For if they do these things when the tree is green, what will happen when it is dry?”

Exodus 20:13 – (KJV)

13 Thou shalt not kill.

12. Roe v Wade is treated by many as allowing violation of this book's command from earlier forbidding killing. This rule, rite, ritual, or law is also translated as, “you shall not murder” (ESV). This implication requires common sense and the associated moral human choices. Using the literal translation from 1605, -done about eighty-eight years after Rev. Martin Luther's 95 Thesis which lead to King Henry VIII commissioning a translation in 1535, requires only common sense for use. Most interpretations of this very exacting rule do not forbid consumption of meat. One interpretation of this very exacting rule does prohibit consumption of meat, capital punishment, abortion, or any human killing of any animal life. This could be treated as a more honorable or just interpretation until considering the consumption of even flour or corn requires killing the potential for new plant life in every grain of wheat or kernel of corn. Meat eaters encourage plant consumption(killing) by plant eaters so humans can then consume these plant eaters. The Latin translation of Exodus 20:13 is “non occides”. This language leaves a great deal implied and must be why Latin is the language of law.

13. Roe v Wade was honorable and addressed other important reasons for FUTURE modification of the regulation of gestation after science made continuation of gestation more hazardous to the self than cessation of gestation. AR Act 301 will be ruled a permissible modification of human laws addressing the desires of other impacted parties before the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals today better than was considered in Roe. This ruling will be more honorable than addressing speculative claims for preservation of potential human life requiring the morally impossible determination of when humanity begins, as will never be addressed. Every Arkansas voter is now before the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals including every person in Arkansas whether these people actually voted or could not yet vote due to being in the third day of gestation or only in an ovary or testicle. There are millions of live sperm cells swimming in a uterus before this court today though none of these live cells may continue growing long enough to be recognized as lives.

14. 5017937849CJNJr1986 This communication should impact the future of humanity and is sent by impermissibly unregulated wire to those listed above by name but will be broadcast by wire and be read or ignored by ANYONE on earth just as the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals may do with the following broadcasting of facts. Both the “Pro-Life” and “Pro-Death” interests should be able to clearly see the need for FCC regulation of wire broadcasts to protect the public and should recognize the exclusive fundamental human right to control the body honorably requires allowing painless voluntary cessation of gestation until this gestation might impact the exclusive rights of others including the child resting an ear on a uterus and hearing a heartbeat. The potential life, individual, baby, fetus, embryo, or cell group is wholly irrelevant and superseded by the rights of the father and the public teaching children to treat sex as a decision that includes addressing the potential for new life.

15. 5017937849CJNJr1986 Curtis J. Neeley Jr. has absolutely no respect for oligarchs who remain active during bad behavior or after age sixty-eight. Teenagers are subject to the draft but can't purchase alcohol until the age of twenty-one. A young eighteen year old female may “honorably” and legally star in the most outrageous of legal “online” pornography for three years as a married mother and still be unable to purchase alcohol. (Many already do.) Honor would remain unimpacted and she would never be recognized by anyone without an authenticated claim to wish to see this type behavior in a way that could be checked when the FCC begins enforcing the Communications Act as written in 1934. This will make this type female decision once again profitable and restore Playboy print magazine to profitability. Yes; SCOTUS, -age is just a number as are (3, 3.1415926535898, 18, 21, 68, 70). None of these numbers ever exactly describe a person with any detail though the first three numbers could not purchase alcohol. (68) could still be an honorable judge in many nations. The last number could not still be a judge in ANY honorable court worldwide.

16. 5017937849CJNJr1986 There are females who enjoy treatment by a subset of the general public in ways that appear exploitative. There are also females who would prefer suicide to motherhood. Thirteen weeks is enough time today, after Act 301 is affirmed as legal, for these females to painlessly cease gestation. There are millions of people with very firm beliefs “souls” are created by humans via intercourse. Curtis J. Neeley Jr. has a firm belief in God and Jesus Christ and the sacrificial death by Christ followed by resurrection. Repentance for evils done and accepting the gift of Jesus Christ is all that is required for existing forever in God's presence. This belief is speculative and irrelevant to both issues addressed herein.

17. 5017937849CJNJr1986 “Prayers” are the ONLY interstate or world-wide broadcast communications that should be exempt from regulation by the FCC according to current law. “Online” unregulated indecency like is occurs today has already destroyed the sexual morality of two generations. Abortions prior to 13-weeks of gestation is the future Christ encouraged for the masses He knew would reject His sacrificial gift on Calvary. Curtis J. Neeley Jr. has a firm belief the free-will God allowed Adam and Eve to retain includes permission to perform-in and enjoy performing-in or consuming even obscene pornography communicated by wire to individuals or groups but not for illegal broadcast to the anonymous public by GOOG after intercepting good Samaritan's authentication filtration. This is as clearly illegal as murder for anyone else apparently except GOOG.

18. This fundamental human right to produce (speak) or consume (hear or view) pornography includes a concurrent duty to jealously forbid performance-by and consumption-of pornographic depictions by children regardless of how artistic the nakedness might be. Curtis J. Neeley Jr. admits belief in God and Christ is logical only for the most intelligent of the human species by offsetting evidence of irrelevant history described precisely but summarily in Genesis alleging creation took only six days.

19. Curtis J. Neeley Jr. experienced things and has advanced knowledge of these no human besides Lazarus could ever have. One example includes technical details of how commercial FM radio stations can beginning offering Wi-Fi, country, or rock music TODAY on one data stream. This advanced knowledge shares too many details with Top-Secret multichannel microwave tropo-scatter military telecommunications technology (USMC 2831) to be described without a waiver by the U.S. Attorney General or release by the USMC Commandant. Few humans today could hope to understand this technology but thousands on earth will or already do in China. Curtis J. Neeley Jr. apologizes to the humans who were negatively impacted by dishonorable parts of his past that are not remembered fully. The severe TBI, severe physical disabilities, are perhaps punishment enough.

online” FREE SPEECH

Appearance at Eighth Circuit Court1. http://issuu.com/curtisneeley/docs/cjnjr8thcirappearance
2. http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=60000986250
3. http://theendofpornbywire.org/14-3447/PDF-mirror/CJNJr8thCirAppearance.pdf
4. https://ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov/docs1/00802545987

Motion to proceed IFP at Eighth Circuit on Appeal1. http://issuu.com/curtisneeley/docs/motion_to_proceed_ifp_4217507
2. http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=60000987100
3. http://theendofpornbywire.org/14-3447/PDF-mirror/Motion to Proceed IFP_4217507.pdf
4. https://ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov/docs1/00802554701

Brief Supporting Motion to proceed IFP at Eighth Circuit on Appeal
1. http://issuu.com/curtisneeley/docs/brief_supt_motion_to_proceed_ifp_42
2. http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=60000987101
3. http://theendofpornbywire.org/14-3447/PDF-mirror/Brief Supt Motion to Proceed IFP_4217507.pdf
4. https://ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov/docs1/00802554701

Exhibit “C” filed.
1. http://issuu.com/curtisneeley/docs/exhibit-c_4218868
2. http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=60000988155
3. http://theendofpornbywire.org/14-3447/PDF-mirror/Exhibit-C_4218868.pdf
4. https://ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov/docs1/00802554701

Exhibit “X” filed.
1. http://issuu.com/curtisneeley/docs/exhibit-x_4217507
2. http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=60000987104
3. http://theendofpornbywire.org/14-3447/PDF-mirror/Exhibit-X_4217507.pdf
4. https://ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov/docs1/00802554701

Exhibit “Y” filed.
1. http://issuu.com/curtisneeley/docs/exhibit-y_4217507
2. http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=60000987105
3. http://theendofpornbywire.org/14-3447/PDF-mirror/Exhibit-Y_4217507.pdf
4. https://ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov/docs1/00802554701

Exhibit “Z” filed.
1. http://issuu.com/curtisneeley/docs/exhibit-z_4217507
2. http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=60000987309
3. http://theendofpornbywire.org/14-3447/PDF-mirror/Exhibit-Z_4217507.pdf
4. https://ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov/docs1/00802554701

Complaint as filed that should have been labeled Exhibit “C”.1. http://issuu.com/curtisneeley/docs/complaint-filed_4217507
2. http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=60000987102
3. http://theendofpornbywire.org/14-3447/PDF-mirror/Complaint-filed_4217507.pdf
4. https://ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov/docs1/00802554701

Regulations re: Gestation” -ABORTION-

1. This extremely profitable argument will soon end and neither side will like or protest Act 301's affirmation as the gestation law for the whole earth it will soon become. This is abundantly clear whether fathers or parents are mentioned in the 15 minutes of oral arguments on 1/13/2015 or are not. Allowing Act 301 to be enforced and then fine tuned as suggest to address speculative claims is obvious to any ninth grade student in the United States after reading the briefs or just the amicus reply now before the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Curtis J Neeley Jr most sincerely apologizes for mistakenly stating Mike Huckabee vetoed Act 301. Realizing the AR governor vetoed Act 301, this severely brain injured but extremely interested party used Mr Mike Huckabee's name by mistake. This apology is included in the reply brief supporting the Eighth Circuit Court.

amicus curiae in Support of Appellant
05/16/2014
http://master-of-photography.us/transfers/2014/Roe-v-Wade_AR/Appeal/Dkt-Mirror/AMICUS_BRIEF.pdf

Appellant's Brief 05/27/2014
http://master-of-photography.us/transfers/2014/Roe-v-Wade_AR/Appeal/Dkt-Mirror/Appelants-Brief.pdf

amicus curiae in Support of Appellant 06/03/2014
http://master-of-photography.us/tra...ppeal/Dkt-Mirror/abortion-survivor-amicus.pdf

amicus curiae in Support of Appellant 06/18/2014
http://master-of-photography.us/tra...Dkt-Mirror/AMICUS_BRIEF_Concepts-of-Truth.pdf

Apellee's Brief 07/10/2014
http://master-of-photography.us/tra...t-Mirror/APPELLEES%92%20ANSWERING%20BRIEF.pdf

amicus curiae in Support of Appellee 07/18/2014
http://master-of-photography.us/transfers/2014/Roe-v-Wade_AR/Appeal/Dkt-Mirror/National-Abortion-Federation Amicus Brief .pdf

amicus curiae in Support of Appellee 07/18/2014
http://master-of-photography.us/transfers/2014/Roe-v-Wade_AR/Appeal/Dkt-Mirror/National-Abortion-Federation Amicus Brief .pdf

amicus curiae in Support of Appellee 07/18/2014
http://master-of-photography.us/transfers/2014/Roe-v-Wade_AR/Appeal/Dkt-Mirror/Public Health Assoc-Amicus Brief.pdf

Reply Brief in Support of Eighth Circuit Court 07/22/2014
http://master-of-photography.us/tra...kt-Mirror/Replacement-Reply-Brief_4175428.pdf

Appellant's Reply Brief 07/23/2014
http://master-of-photography.us/transfers/2014/Roe-v-Wade_AR/Appeal/Dkt-Mirror/Appellant Reply Brief.pdf

FREE DOCKET MIRROR OF EVERY FILING ONLINE
http://master-of-photography.us/transfers/2014/Roe-v-Wade_AR/Appeal/

20. Refusal to stop the free-online-speech litigation completely for five-million dollars offered casually by GOOG would be a dishonorable alternative to seeing the “abortion” and “free-speech” issues resolve amicably for humanity. Curtis will not further elaborate about the six-plus weeks on a respirator and unresponsive in a coma for the same reason Lazarus does not describe the four days he was dead in the book. Who knows; Perhaps this is all the result of coping with a TBI and a persistent delusion?

21. Both of these issues will resolve as suggested here but perhaps not at this time. Individual pornographic free-speech will be consumed by most while minor children will still have the innocence of youth protected from the new “free” drug of pornography. Sexual intercourse will become wholly a pleasurable recreational act that includes no real risks for procreation unless chosen. The “Pro-Life” interests may keep spending money trying to ban abortion otherwise but will quickly learn this is futile and costly

22. The coming affirmation of legality of Act 301 is the way laws remain and coming FCC regulation of ALL wire communication broadcasting to the anonymous will end the need for protection against indecent broadcasts. China and Iran will soon throw open their porn protections allowing all of humanity to finally share knowledge and collaborate instantly like was once the professed goal of wholly evil Defendant organized criminal enterprise Google Inc. Voting by authenticated wire communications will then be possible

--

Sincerely,
Curtis Neeley Jr
14792634795 t-sms
15014217083 f

5017937849CJNJr1986

http://curtisneeley.blogspot.com/2014/12/017937849cjnjr1986-12-26-2014-notice.html


https://curtisneeley.wordpress.com/2014/12/27/5017937849cjnjr1986-12-26-2014-notice/

.

.

.

.

.

,

1. Egyptians, Chinese, Mayan, Native American, Aboriginal, and too many ancient peoples to list

2. Let every reader engage this notice with absolutely no presumptions or speculative assertions from these ancient texts and address this notice as regarding only clear fact.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Rainman sure likes to talk doesn't he...
 
1
•••
Rainman sure likes to talk doesn't he...

Yes; but I have resolved to accept the U.S. Courts' inability to properly address the early U.S. error (in 1790) of ignoring the human need to protect the moral reputation of the author or of the self. This was because an American wrote the 1790 Copy[rite] Act and used a word coined in "Rights of Things" (1766) on page 406 of an extremely noted law book series before entered in any authoritative dictionary. This intentional misspelling was so Noah Webster could establish Webster's dictionary as authoritative by 1828. Webster's first dictionary printing was in 1806. Before this; Webster published nearly all early English elementary school textbooks because the Copy[rite] Act of 1790 prevented wealthy colonists from reprinting books they had imported. Noah Webster wished English "colour and honour" to be spelled "color and honor" in America. Mr. Webster intentionally misspelled these and other words in 1790, 1806, and then in 1828 to make American English a new tongue, although Noah Webster's 1828 tung was rejected.

Yes; I have a severe traumatic brain injury and "savant syndrome". Yes; Very much like Rainman. My IQ is not accurately testable and is far beyond most readers of this post and of this entire forum, -assuming readers here have randomly distributed intellectual quotients like the general population.

I will NOT seek certiorari before the Supreme Court although the the Supreme Court recently almost resolved gay mariage and Obama-care honorably but for the wrong reason. The protection of personal honor would have been more proper and would not have forced speech by redefining mariage, like no government entity can do without violating the First Amendment.

I challenge ANYONE here to find my name on a webpage with a naked image done by me? I doubt anyone can find one and my six-year pursuit of personal honor is close enough to complete for me. I will now write book(s) & movie script(s).

I was recently married and will be teaching HS this fall.
 
0
•••
...I was recently married and will be teaching HS this fall.

Congratulations Curtis!

I - and I'm sure everyone else who have watched your story unfold - wish you the best!
 
1
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back