NameSilo

analysis What Is The Path For Most Domain Name Sales? 
Data and Insights from Nikul at Hypernames

Spaceship
A key question is: what are the critical steps for a domain name to be discovered and ultimately purchased?

Last week Nikul Sanghvi of Hypernames posted data from his own portfolio that helps to answer questions such as the percentage of sales at Afternic, and, of those, how many are fast transfer network sales at different partners. With his permission I am sharing his content below.

The Name Discovery Flowchart

Before we get to the data, here is a flowchart that Nikul recently produced.
Image-FlowChartHypernames.jpeg

Chart by Nikul Sanghvi of Hypernames. This is a simplified look at some possible ways a domain name may be discovered and purchased.

Nikul divides searches into intentional, buyers know the name they want, and what he calls discovery, buyers need a name, but don’t have a specific one in mind.

The buyer that knows the name they want, usually does one of two things:
  • They may search that name at their registrar, or at a domain name marketplace, entering the complete domain name with extension Example.com.
  • Alternatively, they might type the name into a browser, and ideally go to an operational lander.
As the diagram shows, if they do not find the name, or find it at a landing page they don’t trust, they might try a different approach.

If the potential buyer does find the name, purchase will largely depend on whether the name is within their price range, or could be within their range with a lease-to-own option, and their trust in the selling process.

Those who do not have a specific domain name in mind, have several options, two of which are covered in the flowchart;
  • The potential purchaser might go to a curated marketplace, like BrandBucket, Atom or BrandPa, among others, and those marketplaces guide purchasers to names via categories and more powerful search capability. In essence the marketplace or staff guide the buyer to a set of possible names.
  • Alternatively, the potential buyer might search, without an extension, for a few terms that describe what they are looking for. That search might be at a general domain name marketplace, such as Sedo, or at a registrar, such as GoDaddy or Namecheap.
If search was powerful and efficient, the registrars or marketplace would provide a meaningful number of possibilities that matched the criteria. That would include similar terms, or these terms in other strong extensions, etc.

The NamePros Blog covered the topic of intentional and discovery search, although we did not use those terms, this summer in Does Anyone Know They Want This Domain Name?.

Where Do Domain Sales Happen?

Nikul has been a successful seller for a number of years, and keeps careful records. He described the background for the data this way:
Over the last few years, I've used DAN for 99% of my landers but also listed on Afternic for reg-path/network sales. This has given me a fairly clean view of data - albeit with a small sample size (~150 sales – mostly alternate TLDs)
In other words, by having landers with Dan, but the names also listed on Afternic, and with Fast Transfer enabled where possible, the name has the possibility of selling in various ways. Where did the sales actually happen?
Image-HyperNames-WhereSaleFrom.jpeg

Data and chart by Nikul Sanghvi of Hypernames. This is a summary for about 150 sales from last few years where the name had nameservers pointed to Dan, but the names were also listed on Afternic and many through that the Fast Transfer network.

The results:
  • 46% of sales via the Afternic network.
  • 48% of sales at Dan, where landing pages were.
  • 6% from a variety of other sources such as inbound emails, Efty, private negotiations, brokers and at Sedo
.A big picture summary is that roughly half of the sales come via the lander, and the other half via the registrar distribution network.

One can often deduce where a network sale happened according to where the name ended up, and/or via information from a service representative. This is what Nikul found,
I also tracked Afternic sales as they happened – to see where domains went after transfer. It's pretty safe to say that Afternic is the GoDaddy reg-path - and only Namecheap stood out as a significant source of network sales outside of GoDaddy.
Of the 46% that are network, 30% are via GoDaddy, 7% are Namecheap, and 9% everything else combined. While much is made of the number of partners in the fast transfer networks, in fact most sales just happen at GoDaddy itself and NameCheap to a lesser degree. You can read more about fast transfer networks in A Deeper Look at Domain Name Fast Transfer Sales Networks.

Now there are a few caveats, in addition to the fact that this is a fairly small number of sales for a statistical analysis. One is that it is possible that the alternative extensions that are a major focus by Nikul, like .co, .io, .xyz and .ai, might produce a different result compared to a portfolio of mainly two-word .com names, for example. Someone asked about pricing, and Nikul responded that, after taking out a few large outlier sales, the typical sales price was about $6000 for these names.

Also, keep in mind that GoDaddy search changed this year, and that Afternic search was terminated, and instead searchers sent to GoDaddy search. The impact of the AI search, by GoDaddy and other providers, is also difficult to assess. And, of course we now have the search changes that are part of Boost.

How Do People Search At Registrars

I always wondered how many people search for a specific name, with extension, versus searching a term alone, at a registrar. Nikul tagged a number of registrar representatives, asking about that, and now we know the situation at two registrars.

Todd Han of Dynadot reported that about 60% of searches include the extension. That data does not include the bulk searches. Someone then asked what percentage were searching with the .com extension, and that is about 30% of the overall searches, or in other words only about half of the searches with an extension given are in .com. It turns out that Dynadot has that data constantly, refreshed when there is a system update. At the time Todd posted, there had been 80,495 searches since the last update, of which 49,828 included the extension, and of those 23,402 were searches with .com as the extension.

The Porkbun official account also responded, with a higher percentage search with extension there, about 80%, and for about 55% of those searches the extension is .com.

Where Name Sells Is Not Necessarily Where Decision To Buy Made

While we track where the name was purchased, we should not assume that other steps were not important in producing that sale. The size and advertising of GoDaddy, coupled to the familiarity through other services they offer businesses, make it likely that many buyers prefer to buy the name through them.

In other words, a sale might look like it is via the network, since the buyer did not purchase at the Dan lander, but really they were convinced to buy the name at that lander, and may have first found it through search there.

The same is true for sales of brandable names that close at GoDaddy or another registrar, or at Sedo or Afternic. The name was discovered on the brandable marketplace and the presentation there was essential for the sale.

Would They Still Find The Name Another Way?

The official NamePros account asked Nikul this:
How many reg-path sales do you think would have still happened directly if your domains weren’t in the reg path? After the buyer doesn’t see it there, do you think they’d give up or visit the domain directly to try to buy it?
Asked another way, do you really need to be in the fast transfer networks to get the roughly half of sales from that avenue.

This is how Nikul responded:
Those are the big questions - wish I had more data to answer. But on a hunch, I'd say 30%-40% of the reg path sales would shift to a lander. But there's two things that would impact that.
Just before we look at those two things, I wanted to stress that would mean that you would still have 80% plus of the sales, given the roughly 50% that already take place at the lander.

But what were the uncertain factors Nikul mentioned?
The reg-path sales are split into two: discovery (broad search - only SLD/keyword) and intentional (exact search - SLD+TLD). A small chunk of the discovery path subsequently visits the lander too, and a proportion of the intentional searches will have originated from the lander.

But there's also a cohort of buyers that will never visit the lander as they don't know what they're looking for. These buyers are pure discovery and many types of 'inventory' quality names or brandable style names will need to be discovered through broad search. And if they're priced in a certain range ($1500-$3000), there's the opportunity for impulse buys.
The situation may be slightly different at the high end of the market, as he commented:
But for higher quality names, the path maybe leans towards more intentional. The buyer knows that they want a specific SLD and potentially searches for availability in specific TLDs. The exception here is the premium end of Atom/Squadhelp buyers, who have a larger budget and a set of requirements, but not a specific name in mind. So they want help with a curated discovery.
We should not overlook trust as a factor.
If the page doesn't look reputable and trustworthy, there'll be a reduction in conversion and an increased flow from the lander to the search path. For the majority of buyers, GoDaddy is the most well-known and trusted brand in relation to domain names.
Price is also a factor in sales conversion.

He summarized the situation this way:
Without the registration path, you'd probably be losing around 30% of total sales, but you could make up for some of it with lower commissions on a high quality lander.

New Entry in Domain Name Search

I think there is general agreement that right now the search avenues for those seeking domain names are far from optimum. While it is still early for details, Josh Reason has announced a fourth quarter 2024 start for a new service to address that: GTDN.com (Get That Domain Name). I reached out to Josh and he responded:
GTDN aims to solve the issue of finding a domain that suits your business and your budget by helping you easily sort through millions of domains listed for sale.
If GTDN becomes an common way for businesses to find domain names, it will be important that sellers make sure they are listing in ways that GTDN accesses.

Final Thoughts

First of all, a sincere thank you to Nikul Sanghvi of Hypernames for the excellent data, insights and commentary, and for generously agreeing to me to include it in this article. Also thanks to both Porkbun and Dynadot for sharing the registrar search data.

While keeping in mind the cautions about sample size and possible bias due to different types of portfolio, these are the conclusions that I take:
  • Roughly half of sales come via the lander.
  • A lander with strong trust factor can increase conversion.
  • Network sales are primarily via GoDaddy and Namecheap, that is probably related to trust in the seller.
  • Intentional buyers searching for a specific name will probably check multiple ways, if necessary. For example at a marketplace, at a network registrar, or via a landing page.
  • A significant number of people search without the extension. At least some of them are probably willing to consider multiple extensions, although others expect the system to automatically include the .com.
  • I was somewhat surprised that only about half of people searching for a specific name are looking for the .com, at least at the registrars reporting search data.
  • Overall, within the domain markets, current search leaves much to be desired.
  • If it is unlikely that someone will guess a specific name and search for it, then it is essential to use another mechanism such as a brandable marketplace, social promotion, outbound, or services of a broker to make the availability of the name known to likely end users.
 
74
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
1
•••
I'd like to add that Atom does include Standard listings that don't have Atom NS, with the Marketing Exposure feature.
Thanks for addition. Yes personally I spent the $3 marketing exposure so I could suggest names in contests and get marketing. They also have $0 option but you pay 20% commission instead of 7.5%.

But are you sure that marketing exposure alone gets you in Atom search? My understanding is you need nameservers pointed to Atom to be searchable, but I could be wrong.

Bob
 
2
•••
3
•••
3
•••
2
•••
Great. Any idea what % of their sales are generated from landing pages vs their marketplace for standard listings ?
Don't know about that.
 
2
•••
Someone asked about pricing, and Nikul responded that, after taking out a few large outlier sales, the typical sales price was about $6000 for these names.

There might be a consensus to the $6000 average. I have a few domains at BrandBucket. After an 8 -10 week appraisal time frame, my domains were appraised $2.7 - 2.9K. I requested a re-appraisal based on well known online appraisal services giving a higher evaluation. I provided screen shots with the current date and time as evidence. BrandBucket agreed and only raised my appraisal by a few hundred dollars. Their direct response was the sales data shows the majority of sale occur under $3K, I could raise the price by 20% if I wanted.

My domains on DAN have an average $5 - 7K GoDaddy appraisal. On some domains I let the appraisal stand as the sale price, on others I price average the direct buy option.

If you look at this weeks .com supporting cast and gTLD sales on DNJounal you'll see the price range from $9 - 2K. The $150K Super.net is an outlier.

So is the sweet spot between $3 - 6K?

If I'm using my own data, the price point doesn't matter. I have many domains listed under $500. The real deciding factor is the domain name and
Nikul divides searches into intentional, buyers know the name they want, and what he calls discovery, buyers need a name, but don’t have a specific one in mind.

The key isn't cut throat pricing, the key is optimum advertising visibility.

Afternic and GoDaddy have millions of domains listed for sale. If a small percentage of users boost their domains you still wouldn't be able to benefit from visibility.

On Sedo the Top Domains hovers around 800 listings. I might scroll half the list and quit.

The best probability for a sale is outbounding an intentional buyer.

Question who are the intentional buyers?
 
1
•••
The key isn't cut throat pricing, the key is optimum advertising visibility.

Afternic and GoDaddy have millions of domains listed for sale. If a small percentage of users boost their domains you still wouldn't be able to benefit from visibility.

Said that I think selling domain names should be like SEO strategy, but in domaining we don't have all the criteria we have in traditional seo, unless you have a personal website where you promote your names, but in this case you need to be a stable, known and reliable reseller so that someone will buy a domain from you and not from GoDaddy or others of that kind.
 
3
•••
Question who are the intentional buyers?
These are buyers who know they want this particular name. For example, if there are 50+ companies using the same word in their name, one only can have the .com. If you have the .net, .io, etc. the odds are a buyer, either upgrading from a two word or a new business also wanting to use the term, will eventually come seeking the name.

There will also be intentional buyers seeking trending terms in many extensions, or product/service match terms in .com.

Bob
 
4
•••
As part of an AMA at X, the Atom CEO provided statistics for the breakdown between lander and search/discovery at a brandable marketplace.
IMG_1358.jpeg
 
8
•••
1
•••
1
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back