NameSilo

analysis What Is The Path For Most Domain Name Sales? 
Data and Insights from Nikul at Hypernames

Spaceship
A key question is: what are the critical steps for a domain name to be discovered and ultimately purchased?

Last week Nikul Sanghvi of Hypernames posted data from his own portfolio that helps to answer questions such as the percentage of sales at Afternic, and, of those, how many are fast transfer network sales at different partners. With his permission I am sharing his content below.

The Name Discovery Flowchart

Before we get to the data, here is a flowchart that Nikul recently produced.
Image-FlowChartHypernames.jpeg

Chart by Nikul Sanghvi of Hypernames. This is a simplified look at some possible ways a domain name may be discovered and purchased.

Nikul divides searches into intentional, buyers know the name they want, and what he calls discovery, buyers need a name, but don’t have a specific one in mind.

The buyer that knows the name they want, usually does one of two things:
  • They may search that name at their registrar, or at a domain name marketplace, entering the complete domain name with extension Example.com.
  • Alternatively, they might type the name into a browser, and ideally go to an operational lander.
As the diagram shows, if they do not find the name, or find it at a landing page they don’t trust, they might try a different approach.

If the potential buyer does find the name, purchase will largely depend on whether the name is within their price range, or could be within their range with a lease-to-own option, and their trust in the selling process.

Those who do not have a specific domain name in mind, have several options, two of which are covered in the flowchart;
  • The potential purchaser might go to a curated marketplace, like BrandBucket, Atom or BrandPa, among others, and those marketplaces guide purchasers to names via categories and more powerful search capability. In essence the marketplace or staff guide the buyer to a set of possible names.
  • Alternatively, the potential buyer might search, without an extension, for a few terms that describe what they are looking for. That search might be at a general domain name marketplace, such as Sedo, or at a registrar, such as GoDaddy or Namecheap.
If search was powerful and efficient, the registrars or marketplace would provide a meaningful number of possibilities that matched the criteria. That would include similar terms, or these terms in other strong extensions, etc.

The NamePros Blog covered the topic of intentional and discovery search, although we did not use those terms, this summer in Does Anyone Know They Want This Domain Name?.

Where Do Domain Sales Happen?

Nikul has been a successful seller for a number of years, and keeps careful records. He described the background for the data this way:
Over the last few years, I've used DAN for 99% of my landers but also listed on Afternic for reg-path/network sales. This has given me a fairly clean view of data - albeit with a small sample size (~150 sales – mostly alternate TLDs)
In other words, by having landers with Dan, but the names also listed on Afternic, and with Fast Transfer enabled where possible, the name has the possibility of selling in various ways. Where did the sales actually happen?
Image-HyperNames-WhereSaleFrom.jpeg

Data and chart by Nikul Sanghvi of Hypernames. This is a summary for about 150 sales from last few years where the name had nameservers pointed to Dan, but the names were also listed on Afternic and many through that the Fast Transfer network.

The results:
  • 46% of sales via the Afternic network.
  • 48% of sales at Dan, where landing pages were.
  • 6% from a variety of other sources such as inbound emails, Efty, private negotiations, brokers and at Sedo
.A big picture summary is that roughly half of the sales come via the lander, and the other half via the registrar distribution network.

One can often deduce where a network sale happened according to where the name ended up, and/or via information from a service representative. This is what Nikul found,
I also tracked Afternic sales as they happened – to see where domains went after transfer. It's pretty safe to say that Afternic is the GoDaddy reg-path - and only Namecheap stood out as a significant source of network sales outside of GoDaddy.
Of the 46% that are network, 30% are via GoDaddy, 7% are Namecheap, and 9% everything else combined. While much is made of the number of partners in the fast transfer networks, in fact most sales just happen at GoDaddy itself and NameCheap to a lesser degree. You can read more about fast transfer networks in A Deeper Look at Domain Name Fast Transfer Sales Networks.

Now there are a few caveats, in addition to the fact that this is a fairly small number of sales for a statistical analysis. One is that it is possible that the alternative extensions that are a major focus by Nikul, like .co, .io, .xyz and .ai, might produce a different result compared to a portfolio of mainly two-word .com names, for example. Someone asked about pricing, and Nikul responded that, after taking out a few large outlier sales, the typical sales price was about $6000 for these names.

Also, keep in mind that GoDaddy search changed this year, and that Afternic search was terminated, and instead searchers sent to GoDaddy search. The impact of the AI search, by GoDaddy and other providers, is also difficult to assess. And, of course we now have the search changes that are part of Boost.

How Do People Search At Registrars

I always wondered how many people search for a specific name, with extension, versus searching a term alone, at a registrar. Nikul tagged a number of registrar representatives, asking about that, and now we know the situation at two registrars.

Todd Han of Dynadot reported that about 60% of searches include the extension. That data does not include the bulk searches. Someone then asked what percentage were searching with the .com extension, and that is about 30% of the overall searches, or in other words only about half of the searches with an extension given are in .com. It turns out that Dynadot has that data constantly, refreshed when there is a system update. At the time Todd posted, there had been 80,495 searches since the last update, of which 49,828 included the extension, and of those 23,402 were searches with .com as the extension.

The Porkbun official account also responded, with a higher percentage search with extension there, about 80%, and for about 55% of those searches the extension is .com.

Where Name Sells Is Not Necessarily Where Decision To Buy Made

While we track where the name was purchased, we should not assume that other steps were not important in producing that sale. The size and advertising of GoDaddy, coupled to the familiarity through other services they offer businesses, make it likely that many buyers prefer to buy the name through them.

In other words, a sale might look like it is via the network, since the buyer did not purchase at the Dan lander, but really they were convinced to buy the name at that lander, and may have first found it through search there.

The same is true for sales of brandable names that close at GoDaddy or another registrar, or at Sedo or Afternic. The name was discovered on the brandable marketplace and the presentation there was essential for the sale.

Would They Still Find The Name Another Way?

The official NamePros account asked Nikul this:
How many reg-path sales do you think would have still happened directly if your domains weren’t in the reg path? After the buyer doesn’t see it there, do you think they’d give up or visit the domain directly to try to buy it?
Asked another way, do you really need to be in the fast transfer networks to get the roughly half of sales from that avenue.

This is how Nikul responded:
Those are the big questions - wish I had more data to answer. But on a hunch, I'd say 30%-40% of the reg path sales would shift to a lander. But there's two things that would impact that.
Just before we look at those two things, I wanted to stress that would mean that you would still have 80% plus of the sales, given the roughly 50% that already take place at the lander.

But what were the uncertain factors Nikul mentioned?
The reg-path sales are split into two: discovery (broad search - only SLD/keyword) and intentional (exact search - SLD+TLD). A small chunk of the discovery path subsequently visits the lander too, and a proportion of the intentional searches will have originated from the lander.

But there's also a cohort of buyers that will never visit the lander as they don't know what they're looking for. These buyers are pure discovery and many types of 'inventory' quality names or brandable style names will need to be discovered through broad search. And if they're priced in a certain range ($1500-$3000), there's the opportunity for impulse buys.
The situation may be slightly different at the high end of the market, as he commented:
But for higher quality names, the path maybe leans towards more intentional. The buyer knows that they want a specific SLD and potentially searches for availability in specific TLDs. The exception here is the premium end of Atom/Squadhelp buyers, who have a larger budget and a set of requirements, but not a specific name in mind. So they want help with a curated discovery.
We should not overlook trust as a factor.
If the page doesn't look reputable and trustworthy, there'll be a reduction in conversion and an increased flow from the lander to the search path. For the majority of buyers, GoDaddy is the most well-known and trusted brand in relation to domain names.
Price is also a factor in sales conversion.

He summarized the situation this way:
Without the registration path, you'd probably be losing around 30% of total sales, but you could make up for some of it with lower commissions on a high quality lander.

New Entry in Domain Name Search

I think there is general agreement that right now the search avenues for those seeking domain names are far from optimum. While it is still early for details, Josh Reason has announced a fourth quarter 2024 start for a new service to address that: GTDN.com (Get That Domain Name). I reached out to Josh and he responded:
GTDN aims to solve the issue of finding a domain that suits your business and your budget by helping you easily sort through millions of domains listed for sale.
If GTDN becomes an common way for businesses to find domain names, it will be important that sellers make sure they are listing in ways that GTDN accesses.

Final Thoughts

First of all, a sincere thank you to Nikul Sanghvi of Hypernames for the excellent data, insights and commentary, and for generously agreeing to me to include it in this article. Also thanks to both Porkbun and Dynadot for sharing the registrar search data.

While keeping in mind the cautions about sample size and possible bias due to different types of portfolio, these are the conclusions that I take:
  • Roughly half of sales come via the lander.
  • A lander with strong trust factor can increase conversion.
  • Network sales are primarily via GoDaddy and Namecheap, that is probably related to trust in the seller.
  • Intentional buyers searching for a specific name will probably check multiple ways, if necessary. For example at a marketplace, at a network registrar, or via a landing page.
  • A significant number of people search without the extension. At least some of them are probably willing to consider multiple extensions, although others expect the system to automatically include the .com.
  • I was somewhat surprised that only about half of people searching for a specific name are looking for the .com, at least at the registrars reporting search data.
  • Overall, within the domain markets, current search leaves much to be desired.
  • If it is unlikely that someone will guess a specific name and search for it, then it is essential to use another mechanism such as a brandable marketplace, social promotion, outbound, or services of a broker to make the availability of the name known to likely end users.
 
74
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Good article! Did the sales analysis differentiate between lander types? Curious if one stood out for better conversions.
 
4
•••
So, according to these stats, what will be the way for 45% of sales after Dan.com will be closed in next month?
 
2
•••
Thanks for this great article. From the Landers-only part of the graph, now that Dan is disappearing, which platform do you think could play the function of that Lander part? Dynadot? Atom?
 
2
•••
Thanks for the great questions. Clearly @Nikul Sanghvi is the expert, but below are my thoughts.
Good article! Did the sales analysis differentiate between lander types?
A good question. Given the total number of sales, then split half selling with landers, then with different extensions, sectors, etc. I suspect difficult to have enough data to prove anything re lander type, even if he did try each of the main Dan lander types. If they type in this specific name, I suspect the nature of the lander, standard or minimal or brandable, would have only a tiny impact. Adding 'A GoDaddy Brand' helped on the trust side, I would suspect.
what will be the way for 45% of sales after Dan.com will be closed in next month
which platform do you think could play the function of that Lander part? Dynadot? Atom?
I read what he commented as mainly saying that the key element of the lander (in addition to there being an operating lander) is to build trust in the process, that the seller will not be giving financial details to a business they do not know and trust.

Some landers make it obvious that you are buying from a seller through the marketplace, while some leave the impression that you are buying from the business. I suspect the GoDaddy landers perform well partly because they leave that impression, and trust is a bit higher when they feel they are buying via a big business. In that sense the Boost business of verified badges might actually be negative. If GoDaddy was the seller what would verified even mean? The presence of the badge on some names might flag to potential buyers that they are really buying from independent sellers, which they are of course. I am sure they thought about this, just something I recently wondered about.

Actually how the transaction is processed varies with some marketplaces essentially buying the name from you and selling it to the buyer, while others make it clear it is a sale from the seller to buyer with them acting as an agent taking a commission.

I am not sure they were always this way, but the Dynadot landers don't make it clear that the name is being sold by an individual, and therefore may convert well, like the GoDaddy ones. I am trying out some additional names with their landers.

But I think the bottom line is as long as the lander is smoothly operational and builds trust that percentage that buy via the lander will not change much. The specifics of other aspects of the lander are probably secondary.

-Bob
 
4
•••
I understood his comment to suggest that a key aspect of the landing page—beyond just having an operational one—is fostering trust in the process. Sellers are unlikely to share financial details with businesses they don't know or trust.

Some landing pages clearly indicate that you are purchasing from a seller via the marketplace, while others give the impression that you are buying directly from the business. I suspect that GoDaddy's landing pages perform well partly because they create that impression, which boosts trust as buyers feel they're dealing with a reputable company. In this context, the Boost feature with verified badges might actually be counterproductive. If GoDaddy were the seller, what would a verified badge even signify? The presence of such badges might alert potential buyers that they are, in fact, purchasing from independent sellers. I’m sure this has been considered, but it’s something I’ve been pondering recently.

Additionally, the way transactions are processed varies among marketplaces; some essentially buy the domain from you and sell it to the buyer, while others clearly state that it’s a sale from the seller to the buyer, acting as an agent for a commission.

I'm not certain if this has always been the case, but Dynadot’s landing pages don’t clearly indicate that the name is being sold by an individual, which may contribute to their conversion rates, similar to GoDaddy's. I'm experimenting with additional names on their landing pages.

Ultimately, I think the key takeaway is that as long as the landing page operates smoothly and builds trust, the percentage of buyers converting through it is unlikely to change significantly. The specifics of other elements on the landing page are likely secondary.
 
0
•••
There is one more opportunity with landers - Aftermarket.com
They got Domain.io and are opening their marketplace this fall.
 
4
•••
There is one more opportunity with landers - Aftermarket.com
They got Domain.io and are opening their marketplace this fall.
Coming soon...
 
2
•••
I am not sure they were always this way, but the Dynadot landers don't make it clear that the name is being sold by an individual, and therefore may

I'm not certain if this has always been the case, but Dynadot’s landing pages don’t clearly indicate that the name is being sold by an individual, which may contribute
Welcome to NamePros. Not identical, but you write surprisingly similar to my post just before. Glad we agree! :xf.smile:

We both are saying that landers that give impression it is the company, not an individual seller, probably convert better due to higher trust.

-Bob
 
Last edited:
7
•••
Thanks for the article. I search without the .com and every site that I search on gives me the .com first in the search results. If this wasn't the case, I would include .com in the results. So I don't think that the lack of .com in the search is too telling. Inexperienced users also assume that they will get .com results, I think.
 
2
•••
Always great articles Bob. Thanks for sharing it with us
 
1
•••
  • Roughly half of sales come via the lander.
  • A lander with strong trust factor can increase conversion.
  • Network sales are primarily via GoDaddy and Namecheap, that is probably related to trust in the seller.
  • Intentional buyers searching for a specific name will probably check multiple ways, if necessary. For example at a marketplace, at a network registrar, or via a landing page.
  • A significant number of people search without the extension. At least some of them are probably willing to consider multiple extensions, although others expect the system to automatically include the .com.
  • I was somewhat surprised that only about half of people searching for a specific name are looking for the .com, at least at the registrars reporting search data.
  • Overall, within the domain markets, current search leaves much to be desired.
  • If it is unlikely that someone will guess a specific name and search for it, then it is essential to use another mechanism such as a brandable marketplace, social promotion, outbound, or services of a broker to make the availability of the name known to likely end users.

Hi Bob, thank you very much for your work. I read your posts, they are very useful for a beginner like me.
Your conclusions are the North Star in the jungle of numbers, so I focus on those.
Those points describe the behavior that each of us would have if we were looking for a domain, or at least that I would have.
As a user, yes, I first would search via GoDaddy or Namecheap, and others to compare prices. I wouldn't trust landing pages unless they are from trusted and established registrars. I would also search for the name without specifying the extension. And I'd looking for a ccTLD, or other ngTLD to be different and better identifiable in the sea of (dot)com. For ex., I really like identify.digital. How many investors would bet on (dot)digital? Instead yes, that website is great.
I totally agree with your last point, we have to use other mechanisms to reach potential buyers.
Could you explain to me better what you mean with your second-last point, "Overall, within the domain markets, current search leaves much to be desired"?

Thanks again.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
Yeah, so roughly 50% from network, and 50% from landers.

So why do some domainers use platforms like Atom, Brandpa etc ? Don't they still give you the same sales you'll get from your own landers?

If namecheap gets you only 7%, how much additional traffic can these platforms drive ?
 
1
•••
Yeah, so roughly 50% from network, and 50% from landers.

So why do some domainers use platforms like Atom, Brandpa etc ? Don't they still give you the same sales you'll get from your own landers?
It is important to keep in mind that the 50% from landers is of those that sold, and based on the kind of portfolio Nikul holds, mainly high-value single-word domains many in alternative extensions. If on the other hand you own a creative made-up word or two-word combination the odds of someone who is buying thinking of that exact combination and entering it to get to a lander is low.

Certainly not all names need a brandable marketplace and their commissions are high, but some names do or they would never be found. The following article covers that in more detail.

Article 'Does Anyone Know That They Want This Domain Name?'
https://www.namepros.com/blog/does-anyone-know-that-they-want-this-domain-name.1330677/

-Bob
 
7
•••
Could you explain to me better what you mean with your second-last point, "Overall, within the domain markets, current search leaves much to be desired"?
It is a big topic but here are a few thoughts.

Afternic now send all search to GoDaddy search. While the more trusted and known brand is a plus, the problem is that search is serving many masters, registry promoted names, the GD hand registration business, names in GD expiration stream, and the Afternic names like the ones you and I hold. It presents 40 search results, but it is a mix of all of those. This has two problems. With 24 million roughly names, a two-word name in any popular sector has little chance of appearing unless someone searches precisely for that combination. Also, most of those 40 places will be registry and hand reg. This leads to the second problem that your fine name with $10,0000 price is presented right beside to the same term in a promoted extension like .sucks and a misspelled name available to hand registrer. Boost is meant to give your names a better shot at making the 40, along with other features like the Verified badge.

Sedo advanced search do promotion of some names that are registry held, but most of the names will be aftermarket. It will work well for people searching an exact term, less so for intentional search, although it varies with term. It does allow search filtering in a fairly sophisticated way.

At Atom the problem is their algorithm seems to me at least to sometimes miss more obvious names. Also standard listings are presented after premium, which is reasonable, but for popular terms your standards are so far down unlikely to be found. And if nameservers not pointed there, they don’t appear at all. The brandable places do include all names in featured categories, that can help.

The key test is to search for some of your own names at each marketplace. Of course searching for the exact name hopefully works everywhere, but that is not search. Rather, search different terms with similar meanings.

I wrote an article about a year ago on how search could be better, and also rated a number of marketplaces for different types of search.

Article 'Making Domain Name Marketplace Search Better'
https://www.namepros.com/blog/making-domain-name-marketplace-search-better.1307715/

Bob
 
6
•••
It is important to keep in mind that the 50% from landers is of those that sold, and based on the kind of portfolio Nikul holds, mainly high-value single-word domains many in alternative extensions. If on the other hand you own a creative made-up word or two-word combination the odds of someone who is buying thinking of that exact combination and entering it to get to a lander is low.

Certainly not all names need a brandable marketplace and their commissions are high, but some names do or they would never be found. The following article covers that in more detail.

Article 'Does Anyone Know That They Want This Domain Name?'
https://www.namepros.com/blog/does-anyone-know-that-they-want-this-domain-name.1330677/

-Bob
I get that. Even for such brandable names, buyers will start from one of the modes mentioned in the above chart. I'm just trying to say that users who would start from curated marketplaces would be negligible.

Eg. How many sales can Atom or Brandpa get if landers aren't used ?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240930-082306.png
    Screenshot_20240930-082306.png
    319.4 KB · Views: 13
1
•••
1
•••
Even for such brandable names, buyers will start from one of the modes mentioned in the above chart. I'm just trying to say that users who would start from curated marketplaces would be negligible.
It would be interesting to know the breakdown of how Atom sales start e.g. lander, marketplace search, naming contest, advertising, etc. As far as I know we don’t know, but they release so much data maybe they said sometime and I missed it.

BrandPa does show for each name views from external sources, supposedly mainly the lander, and BrandPa marketplace. For my names normally more traffic from marketplace but it varies a lot with name.

This article below is for overall traffic, and would include seller traffic, but earlier in 2024 I looked at traffic at different marketplaces.

Article 'Domain Name Marketplace Traffic Comparisons'
https://www.namepros.com/blog/domain-name-marketplace-traffic-comparisons.1322060/

I think a significant number of those seeking a distinctive new brand would start that at a search at a curated marketplace but agree we don’t know the numbers.

Bob
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Excellent article, as always, Bob!

For dedicated learners who would like to read more:

Here's our opinion based on decades of experience:

A very small fraction of end-user sales happen from discovery. Domain discovery is mostly used by domainers for acquisitions, not by end-users. That's why it doesn't make sense to give marketplaces a large percentage of your sales. The only time paying 10-30% of your sale makes sense is if a full-service domain brokerage is assisting you.

In order to be a stable and successful domain investor for the foreseeable future, you cannot depend on other companies to sell your domains. You must purchase domains that sell themselves. Otherwise, a big company can flip a switch and put you out of business at any moment. That big company could be Verisign, GoDaddy, etc.

Our landers are designed to help you succeed.

 
3
•••
The key test is to search for some of your own names at each marketplace. Of course searching for the exact name hopefully works everywhere, but that is not search. Rather, search different terms with similar meanings.

Bob
I did, and I saw a crazy world.
If I check my DN archeryworld.shop bought from Godaddy and listed and parcked on Sedo, on GoDaddy Search bar I have to write archery world to don't see my DN (.shop) listed, there isn't!
If I search on Sedo bar it is second in the list. If I search on 101Domain it's listed and signed inquire. Afternic put me on GoDaddy.
If I check only archery is like if I'd check cook.

Searches in domain marketplaces are very absurd.
 
1
•••
Another article I have to read more than once...lots of great info. Thanks Bob!
 
2
•••
It would be interesting to know the breakdown of how Atom sales start e.g. lander, marketplace search, naming contest, advertising, etc. As far as I know we don’t know, but they release so much data maybe they said sometime and I missed it.

BrandPa does show for each name views from external sources, supposedly mainly the lander, and BrandPa marketplace. For my names normally more traffic from marketplace but it varies a lot with name.

This article below is for overall traffic, and would include seller traffic, but earlier in 2024 I looked at traffic at different marketplaces.

Article 'Domain Name Marketplace Traffic Comparisons'
https://www.namepros.com/blog/domain-name-marketplace-traffic-comparisons.1322060/

I think a significant number of those seeking a distinctive new brand would start that at a search at a curated marketplace but agree we don’t know the numbers.

Bob
I think the real success of these brand marketplaces is that they've made us believe that they add value.

In reality, they're only cannibalising the landing page traffic. If not, they wouldn't be forcing to use their landing pages.

Instead they'll adopt a Afternic-like structure - Lower commission if domain is pointed to LP, and higher commission if not.

If Sedo is struggling to get sales, despite being in the industry for years and having a tangible MLS network - I don't expect these marketplaces to be able to add much value.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
A simple test is to list a newly acquired name on a general purpose marketplace that shows views, or NamePros landers or similar. Wait at least 30 days. See if your name is viewed. If answer is many times, then odds are a good lander is all you need. Note that newly listed names often get a bit of bounce, so best if possible to omit first week views.

If name has 0 or only a couple of views, first ask if name is worth keeping long term. If so, in my way of thinking, it makes sense to consider alternatives like a brandable marketplace, or carefully targetted outbound, to bring eyes to your domain names.

While many views is no assurance a name will likely sell eventually, zero views of any type seems to make a sale unlikely.

-Bob
 
3
•••
Instead they'll adopt a Afternic-like structure - Lower commission if domain is pointed to LP, and higher commission if not.
I agree logic to a marketplace lowering commission when names pointed there, especially if buyer came via the lander.

Would point out that Atom only insist using their nameservers for premium names. If you use Atom standard listings once verified you don’t need nameservers pointed, but you will not be in their marketplace search. You still have landers with other features like modifiable AI descriptions, visual display, 24x7 sales team to respond, BIN, MO and LTO options. The commission for that is 7.5% currently.

That implies that in their thinking advertising including retargetting, plus their marketplace search and contest leads, together worth about 22% more commission. Domainers can disagree, and it is good that we have many listing options.

Bob
 
Last edited:
1
•••
If you use Atom standard listings once verified you don’t need nameservers pointed, but you will not be in their marketplace search.
I'd like to add that Atom does include Standard listings that don't have Atom NS, with the Marketing Exposure feature. These results are then visible after the last page of Premium names, as follows:

Screenshot_20240930_192602_Chrome.png
 
2
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back