Dynadot

information GPT and Similar Artificial Intelligence Technologies: Implications for the Domain Name Industry

Spaceship Spaceship
Since OpenAI introduced ChatGPT-3 in late November 2022, it seems everyone is talking about ChatGPT.

Earlier in the NamePros Blog, I ‘interviewed’ ChatGPT on domain topics. I think most will agree that ChatGPT did an impressive job on most answers.

Many investors are registering domain names in this sector, and a few have already sold. It is important to understand how GPT fits within the wider AI field, including limitations and possible applications, to help evaluate which names have most potential.

In this article, I take a deeper look at what GPT-3 is, and is not, and what it may mean for the domain name world.

ChatGPT and OpenAI

ChatGPT is one product from OpenAI. With interest in ChatGPT, OpenAI has rocketed to the 98th top website globally according to SimilarWeb.

OpenAI started as a capped-profit initiative, but has transformed into two parts, the non-profit OpenAI Incorporated, and for-profit, OpenAI Limited Partnership.

OpenAI was founded in 2015 by a number of investors who pledged $1 billion in startup funds. You can read more about OpenAI history here, and their charter at OpenAI Charter.

Sam Altman is the CEO of OpenAI. He had earlier served as President at Y Combinator.

On January 23, 2023 Microsoft and OpenAI announced an extension of their partnership. That includes a number of AI initiatives, and is expected to integrate ChatGPT into Microsoft products Bing, Word and PowerPoint.

ChatGPT was introduced as a free and open offering, although you do need to sign up for an OpenAI account. They have now introduced a ChatGPT Plus at $20 per month, with a restricted free version still available.

What Is GPT-3?

GPT is an example of Natural Language Processing, NLP, an active field since the 1950’s. The key idea of natural language processing is the system learns to interpret conversational prompts, and to reply in a way that mimics how a human would respond.

Over the last decade, most developments in NLP have used neural networks for machine learning.

The plan for the OpenAI GPT-3 implementation was outlined in a preprint document in 2020. You can freely download Language Models Are Few-Shot Learners, 75 pages long, by 31 authors from, or associated with, OpenAI.

GPT-3 was not well known to the general public until the November 30, 2022 release of ChatGPT by OpenAI, but it was in beta testing as early as July 2020.

GPT stands for Generative Pre-Trained Transformer. We explore below the meaning of each of the three terms.

Since many who use the term don’t relate it to the meaning of the acronym, GTP is a common typo of GPT.

What Was GPT-3 Trained On?

GPT-3 was pre-trained on a huge set of material. When you ask it a question, it is not searching for an answer, nor is it coded in the traditional sense. Rather, it mimics how someone might respond who had read almost everything, learned and internalized the information, and had developed the ability to generate text output.

So what was GPT-3 pre-trained on? That included essentially all of Wikipedia, but that only accounts for 3% of its training. About 6% is from the two huge sets of digitized book content. The biggest part, though, is from a filtered crawl of the online web, Common Crawl, represented 60% of the GPT-3 training material.

Read more in GPT-3 All You Need to Know About the AI Language Model.

How Does GPT-3 Work?

While the field of machine learning continues to evolve, the software is very good at knowing what terms come in what order, because it has learned from ‘reading’ so much what, statistically, are the most common sequences for words, and the implications of different placements.

That is why it writes so fluently - effective writers usually read a lot, and it has ‘read’ almost all of the digitized world. In a simplified fashion, generative means it does a great job at generating text, after prompts.

It has learned to key on prompts, to process the language more than just knowing what each word means out of context. It has learned language and response in much the way that infants and children do, or you learn a second language. It notices patterns, and through trial and error, during training, gets better at responding in the ‘correct’ manner.

What Is A Transformer?

The term transformer is not what you might associate with the term in toys, media, or electrical devices, but rather is a specific neural network term. Dale Markowitz wrote a good article: Transformers Explained: Understand the Model Behind GPT-3, BERT and T5.

An excellent technical, but still readable, introduction to the neural network transformer is What Is A Transformer Model?, written by Rick Merritt. That includes the origin of the term.

The neural net transformer idea was developed at University of Toronto and Google Labs primarily to do language translation, but now they can apply the same principles to interpret language. Their preprint is available free, and has the simple title Attention Is All You Need.

The idea of transformers in neural network implementations is that they come, through learning and attention, to understand the patterns of language. It turns out, compared to other ways to process language, the transformer method is both simpler and very well suited to parallel processing.

Just to show how important the transformer idea is, one estimate is that 70% of all AI preprint literature in the last few years has involved transformer ideas.

What Does GPT-3 Do Well That Could Help Domain Sellers?

I think most would agree that GPT-3 does a good job of ‘understanding’ most prompts, and writes fluent and grammatically correct output. Because it was trained on a huge amount of content, it can create a detailed answer on most topics.

It is not surprising that it is already very good at writing domain name descriptions. You can use SquadHelp, standard or premium listings, to see how effective AI-generated descriptions can be. I commented a couple of weeks ago that I have written a lot of domain name descriptions over the past five years, and, in most cases the SquadHelp AI implementation does a better job than I would in this task.

GPT-3 would also be well suited to writing other types of promotional material, such as website content, press releases, outbound emails, or social media posts. I have not tried it personally, but SquadHelp have a social media creation tool currently operational.

While one would need to human check prior to sending, GPT-3 implementations could possibly be as effective, or more effective, in replying to email inquiries on a domain name.

The whole point of a ChatBot is to mimic human speech interaction, and in many, not all, circumstances it does this pretty well. As such, it could, if trained on all documents at the marketplace, be very effective in answering questions, replacing FAQs of a registrar or domain marketplace with a more engaging style.

If trained on the specific inventory, not possible directly with ChatGPT which has been pre-trained, I think it could be a far superior system for searching the millions of domain names at a marketplace, and quickly leading potential buyers to the ones of greatest interest. SquadHelp have introduced this already, although still in a pretty simplistic fashion.

I think whichever company optimizes AI for inventory search and domain selection will have a significant competitive advantage.

Since GPT-3 is trained to know what sequence of words are natural together, it should be ideal at creating multi-word domain names. Because it is pre-trained, ChatGPT has no way of knowing which of those names are available, however.

It can generate results in what would be considered creative applications, such as writing poetry, lyrics or short stories. Expert views vary on the quality of these. Creative works might be effective in promoting certain types of names.

The Chat implementation of GPT-3 is generally fast at responding, and can give improved answers from additional clarification prompts.

What Can’t It Do Well?

The fact that it is pre-trained, and not actively connected to the Internet, means that, at least the current OpenAI ChatGPT formulation, fails at anything requiring near real-time information.

It makes mistakes, and should never be used without human supervision in any error-critical task. When asked to write research papers with references, it not only got some things wrong, but worse seemed to at times simply make up paper references. What it probably did was report references that somewhere in online world had been incorrectly reported. Similarly, when asked for top domain sales in a certain category, it gives some results not in NameBio and not clearly valid.

But to understand the most critical limitation of Chat GPT-3, it is important to stress again that it learned by looking at a huge collection of text. Along the way, it developed ability to key in on patterns within that text, and applied it to generate fluent response text. Young children learn language that way too.

But then, as youth and then adults, we also develop a second system, one built not just on recognizing patterns but developing abstract abilities, such as complex mathematical operations. If you ask math questions of ChatGPT it will get simple arithmetic right, since it has seen the question before, but will soon fail. Similarly, people have tricked it with logical deductions that most humans would get right.

GPT alone systems will fail at many tasks involving sophisticated logical and mathematical operations.

Will There Be GPT-4?

Yes, GPT-4 is already well in development, and plans are in place for GPT-5. While a specific release date has not been announced, a fair amount already seems clear about GPT-4 – see What We Know About GPT-4.

By the way, strictly speaking the ChatGPT was based on GPT-3.5, although it is simplified to GPT-3.

So What About Domain Names?

There has been a flood to register domain names containing the term GPT, often with chat as well. These numbers will already be dated when you read this, but the exact phrase GPT was, according to DotDB, registered in 164 extensions, not nearly as many as NFT or meta, but almost all are recent registrations. Also, it is part of more than 21,000 longer domain names, mainly in .com or .ai.

Here is a list of NameBio-recorded sales from the last two years that include the term ‘GPT’. Note that at least one sale on list includes GPT but is not a GPT domain sale. A few other sales have been reported on social media, and at time of article UnreportedSales showed 5 sales with ‘GPT’, 3 in 4-figures and one at $10,000.

Dofo Advanced Search indicated 670 domain names for sale including ‘GPT’, fewer than I would have thought. The number will probably be higher as you read this. Of those, 460 were .com.

@Centaur has started a NamePros Discussion Thread for GPT domain names.

Possible Domain Name Market for GPT

Let’s first start with who might be the market for domain names related to GPT, or AI more broadly. This is certainly not an exclusive list, but a few ideas:
  1. Better prompts mean better results with ChatGPT. That means that the immediate market might be to solopreneurs who hope to cash in on the sudden interest by offering prompt services tailored to a specific sector.
  2. We will probably quickly see consultants and small agencies that will help clients get up and running using AI tools, including, but not restricted to, ChatGPT.
  3. What about monetized reference and information sites? There may be some market, probably over a short time horizon building on the current momentum.
  4. As Microsoft implement OpenAI products into Word and PowerPoint, there may be a mass-market opportunity for education and training.
  5. Are there new services only feasible with AI? That is, not simply applying AI to an existing service, but something entirely novel. If so, what are they? This is a harder segment of the market to predict, but potentially selling names as brands for higher amounts than the applications mentioned earlier.
  6. Will AI Chatbot become good enough, and trustworthy enough, to use in support, training and therapy roles? If so, the number of possible end use cases is very large.
  7. Educational institutions are already scrambling to prevent academic dishonesty from students misuse of tools like ChatGPT. There is probably a market there for a few businesses. OpenAI has introduced a way to detect AI-written text, and announced that more is on the way.
  8. GPT was first developed for language and translation, and it is natural that we will see many applications in sectors related to language: translation, editing, content generation, etc.
  9. There are a host of legal, equity, copyright and other issues associated with AI technology. Will there be opportunities for domain names related to those sectors?
  10. Clearly some great AI names, not necessarily with AI specifically in them, and definitely not with GPT, might sell for a lot. The most obvious extensions seem .com or .ai.
There seems little doubt that AI will be the major trend of 2023, the technology now at a maturity where the many applications are feasible and obvious. It is also almost certainly true, as with other trends, that the vast majority of recently registered names will never find a buyer.

Keep In Mind

Here are a few points to keep in mind.
  • We know that GPT-4 is in development, so names involving GPT-3 may have a short shelf-life.
  • In all sectors, most businesses do not brand on the specific, generic term, but rather something that is more unique and more easily trademarked and defended.
  • OpenAI has made noise about renaming ChatGPT. If that were to happen, domain names with GPT are suddenly less relevant.
  • OpenAI filed a trademark application for the term ChatGPT on Dec 27, 2022. An apparently unrelated party also has a trademark application, dated Dec 15, 2022.
  • Making a great chatbot interface in a free product has captured public attention. But longer term, most uses will probably not be operating through a chat interface.
  • Some of the most exciting developments in AI are related to images, so while everyone is talking language AI now, that is just one part. You can read about OpenAI DALL-E 2 project here.
  • As I was completing this article, Microsoft announced AI integration into Bing search. This will further increase public awareness and appreciation of AI, but at same time, as Microsoft implements features into Bing and Office components, some of the market for stand-alone applications will dry up.
  • Those investing in this area should delve at some depth into the topic, so created names are relevant. Invest in what you know, and know what you invest in, is usually good advice.
And Now There Is Bard

On Feb 6, 2023 Sundar Pichai, Google CEO, announced AI integration with Google search, called Bard.

Their product is based on an alternative to GPT called Language Model for Dialogue Applications (LaMDA). LaMDA has been around for a few years, and you can read more about it in LaMDA: Our Breakthrough Conversation Technology.

Originally, the bard from Celtic culture, was a story teller, composer, oral historian, or musician, usually having a patron. It seems a flexible name, allowing for the integration of text dialogue, music and sound, images and video, all of which are about to be fundamentally changed through AI.

According to DotDB, the day I checked bard was registered in 176 TLDs, and in almost 60,000 longer names.

The bard.com name is used by Becton, Dickinson and Company, while the .ai and .xyz are both currently for sale.

The term bard is part of the name, or also known as name, for over 2200 companies and organizations, according to OpenCorporates. Since the name is so related to Shakespeare, a number are theatre related, although almost every sector finds some use.

With the reach of Google, there is no doubt we will hear a lot about Bard in the weeks ahead.

A Future Scenario

Imagine a scenario in which you tick a preference box, and your registrar lists your domain name for sale on marketplaces.
  • AI automatically generates categories and potential uses for each domain name. It also checks for trademark issues.
  • AI assesses various characteristics, and determines retail pricing.
  • AI automatically generates a logo for the domain listing, and writes an eloquent description.
  • Perhaps it will generate still images or a video presentation specific to that name. For example, call for an AI-generated image of a couple beside a vintage car in front of a sandy beach.
  • AI will interact with visitors to the marketplaces, and through conversational dialog quickly guide them to just what they are looking for.
  • If you have the box ticked for outbound, it will research potential buyers, generate an email outreach, and communicate with them.
  • AI will, following your directions, generate a list of potential acquisitions, determine their wholesale worth, and bid in auctions on your behalf.
How close are we to this scenario? I think very close. The domain companies that seize the moment will have a huge competitive advantage.

But what does that leave for us to do?

More Information

Here are some articles that I found helpful in researching this topic:
 
Last edited:
74
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Thanks for many good points, @twiki.

I agree that it is the picking/valuation of names, in particular, that current automated approaches are totally not even in ballpark of being useful. And of course pre-trained models like GPT without access to current web are useless for the task.

I also agree that having the data is key. The data is more than just filtered domain sales and names listed for sale, and domains developed though. A part of it is a deep understanding of language patterns and use, etc. I think if Google partnered with GoDaddy with their sales data, it really could come up with intelligence that could on average outdo a skilled domainer (not always and it would make some big mistakes).

Because of mistakes, human oversight always needed. Also always a role for human creativity.

Thanks again for your spot-on points, and sharing your views.

-Bob

Thanks as well for the post.

Google does not, and will not partner with GD anytime soon in my opinion, probably not big enough to partner. If it was, they'd buy GD out. Google most often does that; rather than making any partnerships. See Youtube, Analytics and about everything else functional they got later; all were companies bought out by Google. That's how they work.

Also, our field is still very tiny; how much in total, was estimated recently at $3B or so? And likely decreased in 2022.

Anyway. The data is big and requires a huge amount of power. Sources are scarce and unreliable, and uncooperative; see what Dofo said about them giving up on the project. Quite on-point if you ask me.

Namebio data, the only thing quite freely available, is nothing else but a drop in the ocean.

Marketplaces cooperating by offering their sales data out via API or any organized manner? Not going to happen.

Pre-trained models are just regurgitators of statistically-determined tokens. They are NOT true artificial inteligence as people think. They will have an impact; but the impact so far is rather going to hit home in other places. (edit: not domaining.)

Such as blogging for example, or SEO in general that is on a crash course to a big iceberg. Also domainers who build sites on content basis. Search engines will likely no longer drive traffic out; but rather keep it for themselves as they will output most stuff inside the search page directly.

This also presents a huge potential impact on freedom of speech, as sites and blogs might get dry of visitors.

AI is a scary thing, but in different ways than those explored in this post.
 
Last edited:
6
•••
presents a huge potential impact on freedom of speech, as sites and blogs might get dry of visitors.
Indeed. As Bing and Google search move deeper into presenting summaries, rather than simply linking to content, there are many serious issues, among them freedom of speech, but also intellectual property and simply the rights of content makers to have their sites monetized. I am not sure that the integration of AI with search will not be rather bad for site owners, and therefore domains as well. But any bias in those summaries mean issues of freedom of speech, as you not.

Bob
 
2
•••
They say 80% of what folks read online is so poorly written its a waste of time.
I think its safe to say your articles are not in that club, Bob.

Its also safe to say AI will be to domaining what the automotive assembly line was to the horse & buggy biz.

Because AI is a generative digital asset factory and a domain name is a generative digital asset address, the hypertext horse is no longer just pulling a name, it now can add the content horsepower in its namespace.

In other words, not only can AI select the domain... it can build sites, produce content (print to video -with the same virtual tools Hollywood uses), do marketing, communicate with users, identify prospects, and so on.

In time, this will change virtually everything... but the horse & buggy web will likely always be an option.
 
3
•••
AI is moving fast in what I'd call the "nice to have" arenas - creators, social media, assistants, chatbots, personalized everything with subsequent recommendations

but a long way to go...i worked with 3 ot the pioneers in deep learning, and I've declined offers to work for conglomerates and govt in ai as i no longer work 80 hr weeks.

ai is still dumb
lots of overfitting
need for better unbiased data sets
too many false positives in ai medical

deep learning neural networks can solve problems, but the outputs often are blackboxes

i briefly worked w/DARPA on explainable AI...and some progress has been made

i can see where back prop can be thrown out, except for optimization and future ai technologies will come into the world as tabula rosas like babies, albeit with innate language like babies

by 2055, i predict we will see nascent AGI technologies, w/embedded consciousness w/in neural networks

so how can any of this help with ai-related domains? very little

get a bunch of single word .ai somains or one of the many related key words: deep, smart, bot, generative/gen, prompt/prompts, and hope well-funded startup or conglomerate shells out 6 figures to come up with new brand/domain, and voila, your domain pops up on vip list

but how will I know who the potential buyer is? you prob won't...unless for example you own ____search.com for example and a company called ___SEARCH has received 350 million in funding and they have inferior name or GET___search.com
 
7
•••
AI is moving fast in what I'd call the "nice to have" arenas - creators, social media, assistants, chatbots, personalized everything with subsequent recommendations

but a long way to go...i worked with 3 ot the pioneers in deep learning, and I've declined offers to work for conglomerates and govt in ai as i no longer work 80 hr weeks.

ai is still dumb
lots of overfitting
need for better unbiased data sets
too many false positives in ai medical

deep learning neural networks can solve problems, but the outputs often are blackboxes

i briefly worked w/DARPA on explainable AI...and some progress has been made

i can see where back prop can be thrown out, except for optimization and future ai technologies will come into the world as tabula rosas like babies, albeit with innate language like babies

by 2055, i predict we will see nascent AGI technologies, w/embedded consciousness w/in neural networks

so how can any of this help with ai-related domains? very little

get a bunch of single word .ai somains or one of the many related key words: deep, smart, bot, generative/gen, prompt/prompts, and hope well-funded startup or conglomerate shells out 6 figures to come up with new brand/domain, and voila, your domain pops up on vip list

but how will I know who the potential buyer is? you prob won't...unless for example you own ____search.com for example and a company called ___SEARCH has received 350 million in funding and they have inferior name or GET___search.com

The difference between belief and knowledge, is clearly shown here.
 
1
•••
Thanks Bob.

Much to ponder...

Personally, I think AI will cause a steady reduction in search traffic as more information becomes available directly from a single query.

The rammifications for site owners, developers, content creators, all the way down to domainers, could be huge.
 
3
•••
Thanks Bob.

Much to ponder...

Personally, I think AI will cause a steady reduction in search traffic as more information becomes available directly from a single query.

The rammifications for site owners, developers, content creators, all the way down to domainers, could be huge.

On that, you're definitely correct. (Content impact)
 
Last edited:
2
•••
Optimization is key with tech but some things are never to be compromised


 
0
•••
Thanks for the article. I forecast huge SEO headaches for brands who've invested big money on .coms leaving .net, .org , .info floating as errant mines in the cyberspace.
 
2
•••
Thanks for the article. I forecast huge SEO headaches for brands who've invested big money on .coms leaving .net, .org , .info floating as errant mines in the cyberspace.
 
3
•••
Thanks, nice article.
I liked it
"Invest in what you know, and know what you invest in"
main-qimg-e70d3df2ab62b76f0cb45f65eb89c62d
 
4
•••
One thing no one seems to be focusing on in all these glowing reviews is this is just the start of replacing/eradicating many jobs humans up to this point have done.

Trusted bloggers and all forms of writers willl be a thing of the past eventually. And this is just one small area AI will take over.

Not sure I view bots taking over the world as advancement for humanity but I suppose we have to adjust to the times we find ourselves in.
 
3
•••
As long as brands exist, there will be a domain industry. However, we don't know how long that will last. If you have ever done Google Ads (I have for 10 years) you will know their bots have figured out what the majority of the public will go for. They even write the ads for you! It's actually not fun anymore because you can't really write your own stuff. They have worked out what works for mass consumerism. It's not wrong, but your own creativity is being taken out of the picture. They are now just basically asking for your money and their bots will do the work. So essentially Google ads have been turned into a pure banking industry...you got the money, we will do it. And the more money you put in, the more you can squash competitors. Simply a money game. Reminds me of Highlander....there can only be ONE!

This all tells me the choosing of domains can also become robotized. That's still a long way off, but it has to be figured into things. In the present circumstance, I think it's best to buy domains that are really good. Google is making sure crappy domains and sites, with no substance, are being expelled, tout de suite.

I think the biggest threat to domains is that AI will TELL people the brand they should be buying and do that relentlessly. When brands are successful, please realize people, at least in the past, made those decisions on likability of the name and quality of product and service. Now it stands that you could be mathematically coerced into liking a certain brand. Think about it. Pretty Orwellian.

Old timer domainers like Rick Schwartz and the like are the ones who stand to lose the most by AI infiltration to domaining. They have been advertising their seminal .com domains for a long time as being "premium". But AI can figure out which domains are actually the best and this can potentially leave, heretofore, portfolios only worth a fraction of what it once was. This is a long way off, but it wouldn't surprise me to see a lot of early .com investors liquidate their portfolios for this reason, within the next few years.

I am very much still pro-domaining, but to all those beginners out there, please realize, before you spend your hard-earned money, that you should be focussing on quality and not lottery registrations.
 
Last edited:
13
•••
Trusted bloggers and all forms of writers will be a thing of the past eventually.
I must say, the thought has been in my mind in recent months....oh well, it was a fun gig while it lasted! B-)
 
4
•••
In case you have not heard, the domain name AI.com now redirects to the ChatGPT site. Undoubtedly one of the most valuable domain names.

As far as I know we have not had clear confirmation if OpenAI owns the domain name, or are possibly leasing it. We do know that Saw were brokers for the sale of the domain name in 2021. We don't know, as far as I can tell, the exact price, but the article by @EJS says that the asking price had been $11 million back then.

https://domaininvesting.com/ai-com-forwarding-chatgpt/

Saw confirmed through a Tweet today they were broker for the AI.com sale. Not absolutely clear if they meant the 2021 sale or another more recent sale.

-Bob
 
4
•••
Not a bad sign. If AI top dogs are still buying domains, means the industry still has legs for some time to come.
 
3
•••
It’s a terrible idea for humans to put their trust in the hands of something like AI. We’re already seeing pushback on the tech from several well known people.

My prediction is that AI will fizzle and whoever goes down the ai domain path will most likely lose money.
 
10
•••
It’s a terrible idea for humans to put their trust in the hands of something like AI. We’re already seeing pushback on the tech from several well known people.

My prediction is that AI will fizzle and whoever goes down the ai domain path will most likely lose money.
AI won't fizzle. You can see already so many sectors of life caving to AI. The closing down of Classics and English Departments in Universities comes to mind. They just will not be able to track the plagiarized essays so they are ending. No use to departments based on original, critical thinking if AI is going to write all the students' papers without the professors being able to check for plagiarism.

And BEFORE AI, there were roughly 35% of papers based on plagiarism. So what now?
 
Last edited:
4
•••
As long as there is populism, there will be AI, and unless you know something I don't, this is a mainstay for the future.
 
3
•••
AI won't fizzle. You can see already so many sectors of life caving to AI. The closing down of Classics and English Departments in Universities comes to mind. They just will not be able to track the plagiarized essays so they are ending. No use to departments based on original, critical thinking if AI is going to write all the students' papers without the professors being able to check for plagiarism.

And BEFORE AI, there were roughly 35% of papers based on plagiarism. So what now?
You just made the case for why ai is shit.
 
5
•••
You just made the case for why ai is shit.
Well, I didn't say it wasn't shit. I said you can expect it to stay, outside of my own personal feelings.
 
4
•••
sergey brin and larry page, founders of google, hadn't been operational since 2018. Both have been mostly residing on islands in the Pacific and Caribbean. They hadn't stepped onto the Googleplex since 2018.

Google's CEO issued a "code red" as he's publicly stated Google will be first and foremost an Ai company. Sergey and Larry got off their hammocks and are back at the Googleplex.

Susan W, director of You Tube for the last 9 yrs, has been super, but Youtube is revamping the platform to be even more Ai-driven than its current algo/rec platform. Susan resigned today, as the Ai team is taking over.

Ai is in its 4th nascent stage...before, it lacked the billions of data sets to get to the next level. Labeling the data by humans also was challenging. But with unsupervised and reinforcement learning algos, Ai can do all the labeling.

Apple's medical division is poised to be first Ai-driven, w/Ar components.

Amazon will become the largest ecommerce Ai-driven company with multiple spinoffs in healthcare, Rx, hospitality, etc

The Ai stallion galloped out of the barn, and he's not headed back to the barn or out to pasture.

But I confess to being Ai-biased...I have degrees in Ai & Deep Learning and have worked for Ai incubators.

I also concur there has been way too much hype about Ai capabilities.
 
Last edited:
4
•••
1
•••
3
•••
Thanks for many good points, @twiki.

I agree that it is the picking/valuation of names, in particular, that current automated approaches are totally not even in ballpark of being useful. And of course pre-trained models like GPT without access to current web are useless for the task.

I also agree that having the data is key. The data is more than just filtered domain sales and names listed for sale, and domains developed though. A part of it is a deep understanding of language patterns and use, etc. I think if Google partnered with GoDaddy with their sales data, it really could come up with intelligence that could on average outdo a skilled domainer (not always and it would make some big mistakes).

Because of mistakes, human oversight always needed. Also always a role for human creativity.

Thanks again for your spot-on points, and sharing your views.

-Bob

One thing is be trained in the language and another is the enormous amount of data/process (which should also be understandable) that is needed to register a domain.

No, the data is not the key.

To obtain data it is only required to connect to the network, very easy, -but understand that data it is really complicated.

-Who can have the recipe for a good domain?

Registering a domain is even more difficult than launching a rocket to the moon since launching a rocket to the moon has clear objectives, _ A+B=C While A-B= -C, but... who has the formula to register a good domain? - how can you model the training of something no one knows about, and that without counting the evolution of the market itsel;

1990 - 4 letters domains worth nothing

2000 - 4 letters domains worth increase

2010 - All 4 letters domains are gold

2020 - No all 4 letters domains worth are gold


I don't think you'll see such a thing or anything like it for the next 10 years, probably longer. What we are seeing is the same effect of NFTs, companies release some things looking to obtain funds, like the metaverse fiber last year.

I am still waiting for the metaverse, same as investors.

However, no GPT will ever replace anything
 
Last edited:
1
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back